Answer:
Legal culpability relates to whether the prosecutor can establish beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the crime. Whether you committed the crime or not, you are not legally guilty unless the prosecution has enough evidence to convict you beyond a reasonable doubt in front of a court or jury.
Explanation:
Brainliset Please!
Ikemba is a Marine judge advocate defending three enlisted Marines from the charge of having abused enemy
combatants captured in a recent raid on a terrorist camp. What area of law does Ikemba's case involve?
O
administrative
O
international
O
operations
O
criminal
Answer:
The answer to your question would be "criminal".
CAN YOU IDENTIFY ANY BIASES THIS AUTHOR MIGHT HAVE?
These 3 Common Arguments For Preserving the Electoral College Are Wrong from TIME Magazine
Why We Need the Electoral College from Real Clear Politics
This proposal calls for popular vote to determine the winner from PBS NewsHour
Answer:
cannot speculate on the personal biases of any author as it would require knowledge about their thoughts, beliefs, and values, which I do not possess. However, I can say that each of these articles presents a different perspective on the Electoral College and its role in American politics. It is up to the reader to critically evaluate the arguments presented and consider any potential biases or assumptions underlying them.
SCENARIO TWO FACTS: Potter is a professional jockey who has been riding in horse races for ten years. Just after he left the starting gate, Potter's horse veered away from another horse approaching on his right and stumbled on a clod of dirt in the racetrack. Potter fell and injured his back. Potter sued the racetrack owners for failure to use due care in maintaining the racetrack.
1. Explain what, if any, responsibility each party has regarding the injuries sustained from the attack. Plaintiff Defendant​
2. What, if any, claim does the plaintiff have? Explain
3. What, if any, affirmative defense does the defense have?Explain
The plaintiff is Potter, the professional jockey who was riding in the horse race and got injured. The defendant is the racetrack owners, who are responsible for maintaining the racetrack.
What is the responsibility each party has?1. In this scenario, the plaintiff is Potter, the professional jockey who was riding in the horse race and got injured. The defendant is the racetrack owners, who are responsible for maintaining the racetrack.
The plaintiff may argue that the defendant had a duty of care to ensure that the racetrack was safe for the horses and jockeys to ride on. The defendant, on the other hand, may argue that they took all reasonable measures to maintain the racetrack, and the plaintiff's injuries were caused by the horse's behavior.
2. The plaintiff may have a claim for negligence against the defendant. Negligence is a legal theory that holds individuals or organizations responsible for the harm they cause as a result of their failure to take reasonable care to prevent that harm.
In this case, the plaintiff may argue that the defendant failed to use due care in maintaining the racetrack, which led to the plaintiff's injuries. To succeed in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the breach caused the plaintiff's injuries.
3. The defendant may have an affirmative defense of assumption of risk. Assumption of risk is a legal theory that holds that if a person engages in a risky activity, they accept the risks associated with that activity. In this case, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff, as a professional jockey, assumed the risks associated with riding in a horse race, including the risk of injury.
The defendant may also argue that the plaintiff was aware of the dangers of horse racing and chose to participate anyway, thereby assuming the risk of injury. To succeed with an assumption of risk defense, the defendant must prove that the plaintiff knew of the risks and voluntarily chose to assume them.
Learn more about plaintiff here:https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
Even though he's only 19 years old, Bennie has witnessed more murders than he can
count in his St. Louis neighborhood. He's been involved in his neighborhood gang
since he was in elementary school and has committed many illegal acts he felt
pressured to do. However, he's come to the point where he's making some contacts
outside of his gang friends when he walks to another neighborhood where his friend
Donny has moved. Donny tells him about other activities he's involved in, such as a
community center basketball program. By the time he turns 21, Bennie has started
spending less time with his friends in the gang and more time connected with his
friend Donny and Donny's welcoming family. He began to reject the view that the
gang is central to his life or that killing is "necessary to survive" as he used to believe.
Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human without reason or legitimate argument, particularly the unlawful killing of another human with hatred in mind.
How is a homicide defined?Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human without reason or legitimate argument, particularly the unlawful killing of another human with hatred in mind.
Depending on the region, this state of thought may differentiate murder from other types of unlawful homicide, such as manslaughter. Manslaughter is defined as murdering done without malice[note 1] and caused by reasonable provocation or reduced ability. Where it is acknowledged, involuntary manslaughter is a shooting that lacks all but the most diluted guilty purpose and carelessness.
Learn more about unlawful killing
https://brainly.com/question/28460818
#SPJ1
State two risks and two benefits from the collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military. In a summary sentence, show a way for the U.S. government and its citizens to live with the risks.
Answer:
Two risks of collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military include a lack of accountability and potential conflicts of interest. Private military services may prioritize profits over the safety and well-being of U.S. military personnel and civilians, leading to unethical or even illegal actions.
Two benefits of collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military include access to specialized expertise and technology, as well as the ability to supplement and support the U.S. military in times of need.
To live with the risks, the U.S. government can implement regulations and oversight to ensure that private military services are held accountable for their actions and prioritize the safety and well-being of U.S. military personnel and civilians. Additionally, the government can work to increase transparency and limit conflicts of interest to prevent private military services from putting profits ahead of ethical considerations.
Please provide an example of each stage of Lawrence Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory in either a single event or separate events for each stage in your scenario (which may be factual or fictional);
1.) Pre-conventional
2.) Conventional
3.) Post-conventional
The estimated cost to America for traffic crashes caused by underage drinkers is more than ___________ billion dollars per year.
Answer:
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 2010, the estimated economic cost of crashes involving underage drinking was $24 billion per year in the United States. However, it is important to note that this figure may have changed in recent years due to various factors such as changes in traffic laws, population growth, and changes in alcohol consumption patterns.
I Hope This Helps!
In the context of strategies used in drug enforcement in the US, explain crop eradication and the problems associated with its implementation.
Answer:
Manual eradication or aerial spraying of a herbicide combination, the major element of which is glyphosate, is used to eliminate drug crops in the United States under the trade name Roundup®. Eradication can be carried out freely or involuntarily by growers.
Explanation:
Brainliest, please!
How do different governments influence one another?
Governments can influence each other in various ways, including through diplomacy, economic ties, military alliances, cultural exchange, and international organizations. Here are some examples:
Diplomacy: Governments can engage in diplomatic efforts to promote their interests and influence other countries. This can include negotiations, treaties, and agreements between governments to address issues of mutual concern, such as trade, security, or environmental protection.
Economic ties: Governments can influence each other through their economic relations, such as trade agreements and foreign investment. Economic sanctions or tariffs can also be used to pressure governments to change their policies.
Military alliances: Governments can form alliances with other countries for mutual defense and security. These alliances can influence each other's military strategies and policies, as well as their relationships with other countries.
Cultural exchange: Governments can promote cultural exchange and cooperation through programs such as student exchanges, cultural festivals, and language programs. This can help foster understanding and positive relationships between countries.
International organizations: Governments can influence each other through international organizations such as the United Nations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund. These organizations provide a forum for countries to cooperate on global issues, such as climate change, human rights, and economic development.
Overall, governments can influence each other in a range of ways, and the nature of these interactions depends on the specific goals and priorities of each government.