Fruit Tree Negligence. Mr. Mattingly, a farmer, has a legal right to apply pesticides to his fruit trees. One year, he decided to hire a crop-dusting airplane to spread a pesticide on his orchard. An unexpected gust of wind blew the chemical onto a neighbor's beehives, killing all the bees, The neighbor sued Mattingly for the value of the 60 beehives. Mattingly argued that a good fruit farmer has to apply pesticides and that the crop duster had exercised extreme caution in applying the chemical.

1. Was Mr. Mattingly negligent? Should strict liability apply to this case?
2. How should Mr. Mattingly defend this case? Explain.
3. How would you decide this case? Explain your answer.​

Yes, Mr. Mattingly was negligent. Although he had a legal right to apply pesticides to his fruit trees, he also had a duty to do so in a manner that did not cause harm to his neighbors.

Mr. Mattingly could defend this case by arguing that he acted with reasonable care in hiring a crop-dusting airplane to apply the pesticide and that the unexpected gust of wind was an unforeseeable event that he could not have prevented.

In deciding this case, the court would need to consider whether Mr. Mattingly breached his duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to his neighbor's property.

Negligence is a legal concept that refers to the failure of an individual or entity to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person or property. To establish negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements:

In other words, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others, and that failure results in harm or injury. Negligence is a common legal concept in many areas of law, including personal injury, medical malpractice, and product liability.

Learn more about negligence here: https://brainly.com/question/30867929

#SPJ1

Please provide an example of each stage of Lawrence Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory in either a single event or separate events for each stage in your scenario (which may be factual or fictional);

1.) Pre-conventional

2.) Conventional

3.) Post-conventional