Answer:
below
Explanation:
bet, for brainliest I'm a give you the best answer ever
I do actually hope this helps you fr though
even though it looks like a lot it is 6 sentences
Claim: Nationalism spread throughout the long 19th century through various political, economic, and social factors, which ultimately led to changes in how people perceived their national identity.
Evidence: One major factor that contributed to the spread of nationalism was the rise of industrialization and the growth of the middle class, which allowed for greater economic and social mobility. Additionally, the spread of print media and communication technologies made it easier for nationalist ideas and movements to spread across borders.
Reasoning: As a result of these factors, people began to identify more strongly with their national identity and saw themselves as part of a larger community. This led to the emergence of new nation-states and the formation of nationalist movements that aimed to create or strengthen national identities.
Overall, the spread of nationalism during the long 19th century was a complex and multifaceted process that was shaped by a variety of social, economic, and political factors.
THIRTY POINTS. PLEASE HELP.
Select all of the phrases Regan used to describe the Soviet Union and the Cold War:
A. The march of freedom and democracy … will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history.
B. The Soviet Union has a lot to offer to the people of the world.
C. The Soviet Union was nothing less than an "evil empire."
D. A battle between good and evil, freedom and tyranny, truth and lies.
E. Lenin and Marx were designers of the future of history.
Answer:
A. The march of freedom and democracy … will leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash heap of history.
C. The Soviet Union was nothing less than an "evil empire."
D. A battle between good and evil, freedom and tyranny, truth and lies.
Explanation:
imagine you are a patrician and you are writing a letter to a plebeian. you letter needs to show at least thread ways your political power has improved as a result of the conflict of the orders
Answer:
Dear Plebeian,
I hope this letter finds you well. I wanted to take a moment to address the recent conflict of the orders and how it has impacted my political power as a Patrician.
Firstly, as a result of the conflict of the orders, the Patricians were able to maintain their control over the government. The Plebeians demanded a greater role in the government and as a compromise, they were given their own representatives called Tribunes. However, these Tribunes did not have the power to make laws, only to veto them. This ensured that the Patricians would continue to have a strong say in the government.
Secondly, the conflict of the orders also allowed for greater political power within the Patrician class. The Plebeians were granted the right to marry Patricians, which allowed for greater social mobility. However, this did not mean that the Patricians lost their exclusive rights to hold high offices and participate in government affairs. In fact, many Plebeians who married into Patrician families often adopted the Patrician way of life and continued to support the Patrician class.
Lastly, the conflict of the orders led to the creation of the Law of the Twelve Tables, a set of laws that applied to all Roman citizens. This was a significant improvement in political power as it created a standardized legal system that was not subject to the whims of individual magistrates. This helped to ensure that Patricians were not unfairly targeted by biased judges.
In conclusion, the conflict of the orders may have seemed like a victory for the Plebeians, but it also had significant benefits for the Patrician class. It allowed us to maintain our control over the government, improve our social standing, and establish a fair and just legal system. I hope this letter has helped you to understand our position and the benefits that have come from the conflict of the orders.
Sincerely,
A Patrician
After reading chapter 23, in at least three paragraphs using examples from the textbook, please
explain why the United States did not support movements for colonial Independence around the
world?
Answer:
Chapter 23 of the textbook highlights the reasons why the United States did not support movements for colonial independence around the world. One of the primary reasons was the U.S. government's focus on expanding its own territorial influence and maintaining its global hegemony. The U.S. saw itself as a world power and believed it had a duty to shape global affairs according to its interests. For instance, when the Philippines sought independence from American colonial rule, the U.S. government saw it as a threat to its economic and strategic interests in the Asia-Pacific region and opposed the movement.
Another reason why the U.S. did not support movements for colonial independence was its anti-communist stance during the Cold War. The U.S. government saw any movement that had communist or socialist leanings as a threat to its national security interests. Therefore, it actively opposed such movements and supported authoritarian regimes that were aligned with its interests. For example, the U.S. supported the military dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet in Chile, which overthrew the democratically elected socialist government of Salvador Allende.
Furthermore, the U.S. government's support for European colonial powers was a significant factor in its opposition to movements for colonial independence. The U.S. government had strong economic and political ties with European colonial powers such as France and Britain, which it did not want to undermine. For instance, during the Algerian War of Independence, the U.S. government supported France because it saw Algeria as an important source of oil for the U.S. economy. Thus, the U.S. prioritized its economic interests over the desire for decolonization and self-determination of colonized peoples.
In conclusion, the U.S. did not support movements for colonial independence around the world due to its desire to maintain its global hegemony, anti-communist stance during the Cold War, and its economic and political ties with European colonial powers. These factors led the U.S. to prioritize its own interests over the aspirations of colonized peoples for self-determination and freedom.
Explanation:
Why did the United States provide military assistance to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan during the 1980s?
Explain the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan in the 1990s, and why the regime became an enemy of the United States. In light of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, do you think the United States could have adopted a different policy toward Afghanistan in the 1980s?
Answer:
At the end of 1979 the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in order to support the Communist-inspired Afghan government. This led to a decade-long conflict in which the anti-Soviet Islamic Mujahideen rebels were supported by the United States. Here, Daniel Boustead tells us about the conflict and some of the negative unintended consequences of American support for the rebels.
Explanation:
From 1979 to 1989 the Americans supported the Mujahideen Islamic rebels in their fight against the Soviet Union’s invasion. The Americans supported the rebels as a means of inflicting their own “Vietnam” on the Soviet Union. The decision in sending weapons to the anti-Communist rebels helped turn the tide of the war in the rebels favor and doomed the Soviet Union - and later the USA. American support for rebels in Afghanistan, was one of a number of Carter and Reagan’s foreign policy blunders that hurt America and Israel. The U.S. decision to support the rebels in Afghanistan was a strategic miscalculation and the wrong way to overcome our defeat in Vietnam. This was known as “Vietnam Syndrome”, which haunts America to this day.
U.S efforts to support the rebels appeared as far back as March 1979 in classified protocols at the Jimmy Carter White House ([1]). This was done because the U.S. was worried about increased Soviet involvement in propping up the weak pro-Communist puppet state in Afghanistan. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan in late December 1979 ([2]). In the very first hours after the Soviet Union invaded, President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski said “He hoped the Soviets could be punished for invading Afghanistan, that they could be tied down and bloodied the way the United States had been in Vietnam” ([3]). At the start of the conflict the American government started sending the rebels some captured Soviet weapons as a means of getting revenge for the Soviet’s (limited) involvement in the Vietnam War, while keeping their involvement minimal (6). This was a bad decision because the Islamic fundamentalism of the recent Iranian Revolution was also coming to Afghanistan.
What is Moral Relativism (or moral skepticism)? What are the arguments for and against it? Which side is more plausible?
Moral relativism, also known as moral skepticism, is the view that moral truths are relative to individuals or cultures, and that there are no objective moral standards that apply universally.
The arguments for moral relativism include the observation that moral beliefs and practices vary widely across cultures and history, suggesting that there are no universal moral standards.
Moral relativists also argue that individuals have the right to decide what is morally right or wrong for themselves, as long as it does not harm others.
Learn more about Moral relativism, here
https://brainly.com/question/14546755
#SPJ1
Which is not a responsibility of the judicial branch?
a.
Judge cases not solved by lower courts.
b.
Try officials in cases of impeachment.
c.
Judge cases not in a state's jurisdiction.
d.
Review cases and laws.
B, try officials in cases of impeachment
Explanation: The Senate actually has the sole power to try all impeachments, not the judicial branch. Hope this helps! :)
One way Reagan and Bush governed conservatively was...
The way in which Reagan and Bush governed conservatively was through a commitment to free market principles and deregulation.
How did their commitment to free market principles shape their conservative governance?They believed that free market was the best mechanism for economic growth and prosperity and so. implemented policies to reduce government regulations on businesses which they saw as a hindrance to innovation and competition.
All these included deregulating industries such as telecommunications and transportation which led to increased competition and lower prices for consumers. They also lowered taxes on individuals and corporations, which they believed would spur investment and economic growth.
Read more about Conservative government
brainly.com/question/743663
#SPJ1
the background essay on the berlin airlift Do you agree with Mr. Bingham? Why or Why not? USE A TS, CD, CM
The crisis began on June 24, 1948, when Soviet troops barred Allied-controlled portions of Berlin from being accessed by train, road, and water. In response, American and United Kingdom aircraft were sent to fly supplies from Allied airfields in western Germany to Berlin.
Over a period of several hundred years, the countries that made up the United Kingdom underwent a number of annexations, unions, and divisions. The Kingdom of Great Britain was created in 1707 as a result of the Treaty of Union, which united the Kingdoms of England Soviet troops (which included Wales) and Scotland.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland was created in 1801, following its union with the Kingdom of Ireland.
Learn more about United Kingdom, from :
brainly.com/question/27540598
#SPJ1
What groups of people and individuals committed the acts in the Darfur Genocide
Answer:
The Darfur Genocide was committed by the Janjaweed, ethnic Arab militia groups armed by the Sudanese government , and Sudanese government forces. The key targeted groups were the Fur , Zaghawa, and Masalit communities. This led to alleged genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity committed in Darfur, Sudan, since July 1, 2002. The violence intensified during 2003 when two groups -- the Sudan Liberation Movement (SLM) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) -- took up arms against the Sudanese government . The conflict has led to a large number of internally displaced persons in the region.
Explanation:
1. What was one of the main reasons America entered the Vietnam and Korean Wars?
a) So it could gain more territory in Asia
b) Because it wanted to pick a fight with the Soviets
c) Because of the Domino Theory that said if a nation fell to communism, others would
follow
d) So it could spread Christianity
The main reasons America entered the Vietnam and Korean Wars
c) Because of the Domino Theory that said if a nation fell to communism, others would follow
What was the Domino Theory?The premise of the Domino Theory was an integral part in the thinking process which drove the United States to become militarily involved not only during the Vietnam War, but also as a participant in the Korean War.
This Cold War-era way of thinking proposed that when a single nation fell to communism in any area, other neighboring countries would experience a knock-on effect - appearing quite like dominoes - and tumble into the same political mindset.
Learn more about Korean Wars at
https://brainly.com/question/22602863
#SPJ1
what is government and what is World War 2 explain
I need a friend can anyone be
Answer:
Government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, often a state or country. The government is responsible for making and enforcing laws, providing essential services, and protecting the rights and freedoms of its citizens.
World War 2, also known as the Second World War, was a global conflict that lasted from 1939 to 1945. It was the deadliest conflict in human history, involving the majority of the world's nations, including all the great powers. The war was primarily caused by the aggressive foreign policies of Nazi Germany under the leadership of Adolf Hitler, who sought to expand Germany's territory and establish a global hegemony. The war ended with the defeat of the Axis powers, including Germany, Italy, and Japan, and the establishment of the United Nations to promote peace and international cooperation. The war had a profound impact on the world, resulting in the deaths of millions of people, the displacement of millions more, and the reshaping of the global political order.
Explanation:
how were men treated in Vietnam
Answer:
Men in Vietnam were often subjected to harsh living conditions and faced the constant threat of enemy attacks. They also had to deal with the psychological toll of being away from their families and loved ones for extended periods of time.
Explanation:
... That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted
among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of
the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government
becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the
People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
Government, laying its foundation on such principles and
organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem
most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
In which document can this passage be found?
OA. The Magna Carta
OB. The Treaty of Paris
OC. The Bill of Rights
D. The Declaration of Independence
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The passage provided can be found in the Declaration of Independence, which is option D.
The Declaration of Independence was a document adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, in which the thirteen American colonies declared their independence from Great Britain. The passage in question is part of the second paragraph of the document, and it asserts that governments are created to secure the rights of the people, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so. The Declaration of Independence is one of the most important documents in American history, as it marks the birth of the United States as a nation and the beginning of the American Revolution.
The Immigration Act of 1924 reflected the anti-immigration views of the KKK and similar groups by severely limiting the number of people who could
immigrate to the United States from certain countries and completely banning immigration from Asia. What can you MOST reasonably infer about the
KKK's role in this legislation?
O A. Its leaders wrote the law.
Its leaders opposed the law and all immigration.
O C.
Its leaders and members helped pass the law.
O D. Its leaders and members enforced the law.
B.
Answer:
The answer choice that best reflects the role of the KKK in the Immigration Act of 1924 is: "Its leaders and members helped pass the law"
Using a case study provided by the readings, other than gas refrigerators, explain why an alternative technology/concept failed. Based on readings from Volti, Misa and Andrade, explain the intersection of technology and warfare and the creep in weapons innovation using a historical example.
One example of an alternative technology that failed is the Sinclair C5 electric vehicle. Introduced in 1985, it was a battery-powered tricycle designed for short-range commuting.
Despite initial enthusiasm, the C5 was widely criticized for being unsafe, impractical, and not fitting with the existing transportation infrastructure. Its low top speed, limited range, and poor weather protection made it unsuitable for most commuters, and the high price tag further limited its appeal.
In the end, the C5 failed to gain widespread adoption, and production was halted after just a few months.
Regarding the intersection of technology and warfare, Misa and Andrade both note that warfare has been a major driver of technological innovation throughout history.
However, this innovation has often been accompanied by a "creep" in the lethality of weapons. For example, the introduction of the longbow in medieval Europe led to a shift toward more open-field battles and a decline in knightly combat, but it also made warfare more deadly and created new challenges for armor and fortifications.
Similarly, the development of gunpowder and firearms in the Renaissance period led to significant changes in tactics and strategy, but it also made warfare more lethal and destructive.
Learn more about technology here:
https://brainly.com/question/13044551
#SPJ1
How did Rome’s growing republic affect small farmers
the rome republic crossword puzzle answer key
Some items in the Rome Republic crossword puzzle are as follows:
Gaul - Roman name for France conquered by Caesar.Tribunes - Spokesmen for the poor who could observe and advise.Cincinnatus - The Roman model of a dictator.How to fill a crossword puzzleTo fill out a crossword puzzle, you should be able to identify the words that are related to Roman history. The terms and their definitions for this set are found above.
Solving a crossword puzzle requires prior knowledge of the subject. So, if you know that Gaul is the name for Roman-conquered France, then it will be easier to identify the word.
Learn more about Rome here:
https://brainly.com/question/1892495
#SPJ1
Does anyone have the answer to this work sheet by chance?
Answer:
Explanation:
.
(8) How did the Industrial Revolution change America?
A. Workers took over the managment of the factories from the owners
B. A system of master craftsmen and apprentices was set up.
C. Machines were used to produce goods on a large scale.
D. There were changes in the way workers were hired and contracts were written.
THIS NEEDS TO BE AWNSERED ASAP PLEASE!!!!! IM GIVING 100 POINTS TO WHO AWNSERES THIS
The Industrial Revolution change America in the way that machines were used to produce goods on a large scale. The correct option is C.
The Industrial Revolution made it possible to produce goods in large amount than before. This led to the growth of factories and the mass production of goods, which in turn helped to fuel economic growth and development.
The use of machines and new technologies also led to increased efficiency and productivity in manufacturing, which made goods more affordable and accessible to a wider range of consumers.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/455063
#SPJ1
Which dynasty created a terracotta army and began work on the Great Wall of China?
Zhou dynasty
Han dynasty
Shang dynasty
Qin dynasty
Answer:
The Qin Dynasty
Explanation:
I've seen a question similar to this before, and i've done that module your doing before, so I know. If the answer is wrong , please let me know
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
According to the U.S. Constitution, all Supreme Court justices must have a background in law.
Select one:
True
False
Answer:
it's true
The requirement that all Supreme Court justices must have a background in law is derived from the U.S. Constitution itself. Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services a Compensation which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." This clause sets up the basic structure of the federal court system, and it is generally understood that the judges who sit on these courts must have a background in law in order to be able to properly interpret and apply the law. Additionally, the qualifications for Supreme Court justices are further detailed in Article II, Section 2, which states that the President "shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Judges of the Supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law."
DND question here, one of my players has spent the past 4 sessions trying to invent electricity like it was invented in real life! Should I let this happen? What would be the consequences?
Edit: lighting magic does exist in the campaign.
Answer:Can they roll a history check to see if they remember things from the previous session?
Explanation:Can they roll a history check to see if they remember things from the previous session?
In Hidden Figures
Al Harrison, Katherine's boss, saw Katherine's genius. Yet he didn't see discrimination against her in the Space Task Group -- his own department -- until she confronted him with it. Why not?
Al Harrison because he was privileged. It made him not to recognize the issues that the lady faced
Why Al Harrison did not recognize the issuesAl Harrison, Katherine's boss in Hidden Figures, possessed a lack of visibility when it came to both racial discrimination and systemic injustice due to his status as a white male with wealth and influence.
Consequently, he could not comprehend the everyday obstacles which Katherine and other African American women experienced in the Space Task Group due to the fact that they did not form part of his lived experience.
This enabled him to remain unaware of their struggles and inhibits him from understanding their plight.
Read more on Hidden figure here:https://brainly.com/question/22573624
#SPJ1
Information about the first European ships that
sailed the upper Atlantic coast would best fit in
which section of the article?
The information about the first European ships that sailed the upper Atlantic coast which would best fit the section of the article is "Swarms of Settlers Arrive”.
What were first European ships that sailed the upper Atlantic coast?The Swarms of Settlers Arrive would be the best fit for information about the first European ships that sailed the upper Atlantic coast. This section details the arrival of the Pilgrims in 1620 who were among the first Europeans to establish a permanent settlement in the region.
The section mentioned that the Pilgrims sailed on the Mayflower, a ship that had been hired by a group of London merchants. Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Atlantic coast
brainly.com/question/16621754
#SPJ1
which of the following answer choices best compares the pax romana with the final period of the roman republic
The Pax Romana and the final period of the Roman Republic were two distinct eras in Roman history.
In contrast, the final period of the Roman Republic was a time of political instability and civil unrest that lasted for several decades, from the late 2nd century BCE to the end of the Roman Republic in 27 BCE.
Political System: During the Pax Romana, Rome was ruled by emperors who held absolute power and were often regarded as god-like figures. In contrast, during the final period of the Roman Republic.
Learn more about Pax Romana, here
https://brainly.com/question/417329
#SPJ1
Which of these actions showed continuing discrimination against women during World War II?
Answer:
Letting them do jobs that men did and then taking their jobs away after the war ended
Explanation:
What was the role of government in Russia regarding technology and engineering before the Soviet Union and after its coming according to Graham? How does this contrast with Burke's portrayal of government regulation of technology in the United States?
According to Paul Graham's "Inequality and Risk," the Russian government before the Soviet Union had a hands-off approach to technology and engineering, allowing individuals to pursue their interests and innovations freely.
However, after the Soviet Union was established, the government took control of technology and engineering, emphasizing the need for central planning and state control.
This contrasts with James Burke's portrayal of government regulation of technology in the United States.
Burke argues that the US government has historically taken a more active role in supporting and regulating technology and engineering, with initiatives such as the National Science Foundation and the Department of Energy providing funding and oversight to drive innovation and development.
Learn more about innovations here:
brainly.com/question/1008019
#SPJ1
which had a higher influence on the Civil Rights Movement, Randolph's Walk on Washington Movement or
the Brown v. Board decision
Answer:Both the Walk on Washington Movement led by A. Philip Randolph and the Brown v. Board of Education decision were significant in the Civil Rights Movement and had a significant impact on the movement's progress.
The Walk on Washington Movement, which took place in 1941, was organized by Randolph to protest discrimination in employment and the armed forces. The movement was successful in pressuring President Franklin D. Roosevelt to sign Executive Order 8802, which prohibited racial discrimination in the defense industry and federal government.
On the other hand, the Brown v. Board of Education decision, delivered by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954, declared that segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. The decision marked a significant legal victory for the Civil Rights Movement and sparked a wave of activism and protest that continued throughout the 1950s and 1960s.
While both the Walk on Washington Movement and the Brown v. Board of Education decision were important milestones in the Civil Rights Movement, it is difficult to determine which had a greater influence. The Walk on Washington Movement was important in securing employment opportunities for African Americans, while the Brown v. Board of Education decision was a landmark legal victory that challenged the system of segregation in the United States. Both were critical in the fight for civil rights and played a significant role in advancing the movement.
Explanation:
Lines 1-11: What historical details in the first paragraph did Shakespeare probably draw on when developing the plot and characters in Macbeth?
Answer:
Please help me by marking me the brainliest
Explanation:
There are several historical details in the first paragraph of Macbeth that Shakespeare likely drew upon for inspiration:
1) King Duncan - Duncan was the name of actual Scottish kings, suggesting Shakespeare may have modeled Macbeth's king after a particular ruler. Duncan I was king when Macbeth ruled, allowing Shakespeare to base details on this time period.
2) Thane of Cawdor - The Thane of Cawdor was an actual nobleman's title in Scotland, demonstrating Shakespeare's knowledge of the political system and titles. Macbeth holding this title made him a key figure.
3) Macbeth - The name Macbeth itself originates from medieval Scotland. It likely came from a bellicose 12th century ruler, providing a historical precedent for the play's protagonist.
4) Malcolm III - There were several Malcolm kings in Scottish history, and Malcolm III reigned during Duncan I's time, as in the play. Shakespeare may have seen Malcolm as a counterpart to Macbeth.
5) Relation of the Murder of King Duncan - Shakespeare mentions the "relation of the murder of King Duncan" to frame the play as historical, rooted in real events (though fictionalized). This helped legitimize the Scottish setting and political intrigue.
6) Kingdom of Scotland - By anchoring the play in the "Kingdom of Scotland," Shakespeare gives it a sense of historical authenticity and helps audiences see parallels between past and present. Scottish history was of interest to the English at the time.
7) 10th-12th Centuries - While not specified, the power dynamics, titles, names and events suggest the 10th to 12th centuries in Scotland, a turbulent time that would inspire Shakespeare.
In summary, Shakespeare likely used actual Scottish kings, nobles, titles, places and time periods as the basis for characters, settings and events in Macbeth. Historically-grounded references would make the play's political intrigues and succession crisis feel authentic and palpable to audiences. Medieval Scotland was a rich source for Shakespeare to draw upon, even in crafting a fictional tragedy.
The paragraph's opening lines effectively immerse the reader in the play's historical backdrop before launching into the tragic tale of murder, political upheaval and guilt that follows. Shakespeare had historico-political details in mind from the very first words.
Does this help explain the historical inspirations Shakespeare probably drew upon in developing the plot and characters of Macbeth? Let me know if any part of the analysis is unclear or if you have additional questions. I can also discuss any other aspects of the play or its historical context in more depth.