HELP ME PLEASEEEEE!!!!​

As the text notes, there is a lot of tension towards the conclusion of the story since Anna repeatedly knocks the glass, and then her leg goes through it, opening up a variety of possible outcomes.

The reader can assume that the author fainted, received a concussion, or perhaps died because the author just says that everything turned dark.

Because it is focused on the 1991 shooting death of Rodney King by police in Los Angeles, California, and the ensuing riots in the city, Anna Deavere Smith's monologue "Brother" is given that name. Smith explores the relationship between the black community and law enforcement in the monologue, as well as how structural and historical racism have influenced this relationship.

Racism is an ideology that some racial groups are superior to others and is a system of prejudice, discrimination, and oppression. Racism can manifest itself in a variety of ways, including overt acts of violence and discrimination as well as more covert bigotry and microaggressions.

To learn more about  Anna's leg , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15616288

#SPJ4

The historical relationship between blackness and freedom of mobility or movement is that of struggle and resistance

The connection between blackness and freedom of mobility has been a constant struggle for African Americans throughout history. During the times of slavery, they were not allowed to move independently and viewed as property.

Even after slavery was abolished, discriminative laws such as Jim Crow segregation and redlining continued limiting their opportunities for housing, employment, and free movement.

The Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s diligently fought this long-standing oppression by demanding equal rights and access to public spaces.

Read more about freedom here:

https://brainly.com/question/13273450

#SPJ1

Central argument of the passage is best described by the fact that women used seemingly conservative genres to engage in social reform.

The statement that best sums up the central argument of the passage is that women used seemingly conservative genres to engage in social reform. Additionally, the passage discusses how feminine genres allowed women to express themselves and assert their influence, and how diary and letter writing provided them with a foothold in the publishing world. The passage also mentions how women modified traditional genres in the nineteenth century to express a unique point of view and how their correspondence provides insightful commentaries on nineteenth-century culture at large. However, the main focus is on how women utilized conservative genres for social reform.

Learn more about responses genres at https://brainly.com/question/31017838

#SPJ11

"The Passionate Shepherd to His Love" by Christopher Marlowe and "The Nymph's Reply to His Love" by Sir Walter Raleigh are two poems that are often compared and contrasted.

The former is a pastoral poem, expressing the shepherd's desire for a simple life with his love, while the latter is a response to the former, rejecting the shepherd's invitation and focusing on the harsh realities of love.

Both poems share a common theme of love, but while Marlowe portrays it as idyllic and perfect, Raleigh presents a more realistic and pragmatic view of love. The contrast between the two poems highlights the complexities of love and the conflicting desires that often come with it.

Learn more about  Nymphs Reply to His Love, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29983872

#SPJ1

All of the factors mentioned above should be considered when evaluating sources to ensure that the information presented is credible, reliable, and accurate. Here option D is the correct answer.

When evaluating sources, several factors should be considered to ensure their credibility and reliability. These factors include the author's credibility or authority, the timeliness of the information or publishing dates, and the accuracy of evidence used to support information.

Evaluating an author's credibility or authority is essential because it helps to determine their expertise and the reliability of the information presented. It involves checking the author's credentials, affiliations, and other publications to assess their knowledge and authority on the topic.

The timeliness of the information or publishing dates is also crucial because it indicates the currency and relevance of the information. It's essential to check when the information was published or last updated to ensure that it's still accurate and reliable.

The accuracy of evidence used to support information is also important because it helps to verify the claims made in the source. It involves checking the source's references, citations, and other supporting materials to ensure that they are factual, valid, and reliable.

To learn more about evaluating sources

https://brainly.com/question/11974991

#SPJ4

Complete question:

Which of these are considered when evaluating sources?

A - an author's credibility or authority

B - the timeliness of the information or publishing dates

C - the accuracy of evidence used to support information

D - all of the above

The correct answer is B. "I can see through your lies!

The phrase "see through" means to perceive or understand the true nature of something, especially when it is hidden or deceptive. In this context, the speaker is accusing the other person of lying, and they are expressing their ability to see beyond the deceptive words and recognize the truth.

Option A, "I can see in your lies," does not make sense in this context. It suggests that the speaker is able to find some hidden meaning within the lies, which is not what they are trying to convey.

Option C is also nonsensical. There is no clear meaning to "see out" someone's lies.

Option D is grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition to use with "see" in this context is "through."

In conclusion, option B is the correct answer because it accurately conveys the speaker's ability to see beyond the lies and perceives the truth.

To learn more about see, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/2631714

#SPJ11

In the novel "Death on the Nile" by Agatha Christie, Poirot suggests that Linnet feels guilty for stealing away her best friend's fiancé, Simon Doyle, and then marrying him herself.

Poirot agrees to help Linnet by protecting her from any harm or danger that may arise during their trip down the Nile River. Poirot determines that Linnet feels guilty due to a sense of responsibility for a negative outcome or action. To help Linnet, Poirot agrees to investigate the situation further and uncover the truth behind the events causing her guilt.

To know more about guilt please visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28023964

#SPJ11

Answer:

The correct option is:

"Left-handedness has largely vanished."

This sentence is in the present perfect tense and the passive voice. The subject of the sentence is "left-handedness," and the verb is "has vanished." The word "largely" is an adverb modifying the verb "vanished."

Explanation:

"stop" could be a suitable verb to complete the sentence, such as "The construction workers had to all stop work when one of the crew accidentally broke through a water main."

A verb is a word that indicates a physical action (e.g., “drive”), a mental action (e.g., “think”), or a state of being (e.g., “exist”). Every sentence contains a verb. Verbs are almost always used along with a noun or pronoun to describe what the noun or pronoun is doing.

to know more about verb click this link -

brainly.com/question/30515563

#SPJ11

To this day i have no idea who ate my last piece of pizza the mathematical operation known as multiplication is used to calculate the sum of two or more numbers. If an event can take place in m different ways and a second different ways after it.

We are informed that Dave consumed 15 slices of pizza, while Frank consumed 12 pieces. "| ate 1/4 more," remarked Dave. I ate a fifth less, stated Frank.Therefore, we must divide the numerator by the number of pizzas if Dave consumed 4 more than Frank did.

He consumed three more pizzas than Frank, so 12 + 4 = 3. Eight pieces make up a single pizza the portion of one pizza that Eric consumed out of a total of eight. = 2 items. The family consumed a total of 8 minus 2 pieces, or 6 pieces. In addition, there were 2 pizzas brought. Eric ate two more slices of the second pizza. Again, the family consumed a total of 6 pieces.Eric consumed a total of 4 pieces (2 + 2 = 4). And Eric's family consumed a total of 6 + 6 = 12 pieces. Eric's share to the family's share is therefore 4 to 12.

Complete question:

To this day i have no idea who ate my last piece of pizza “I ate 1/4 more,” said Dave. “I ate 1/5 less,” said Frank. Who was right?

To know more about Multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25570105

#SPJ4

Synonyms, antonyms, and multiple meaning words lend themselves to C) Selecting cognitive vocabulary activity.

Anaesthesia, linguistics, musicology, neurology, psychiatry, psychology, education, philosophy, anthropology, biology, systemics, logic, and computer science are a few of the disciplines that study cognitive processes from various angles and in various circumstances.

In the burgeoning subject of cognitive science, an academic discipline that is becoming more autonomous, these and other methods of cognition analysis (such as embodied cognition) are synthesised. "The mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses" is what cognition is defined as.

Words with numerous meanings, synonyms, and antonyms are particularly useful for C) Choosing cognitive vocabulary activities.

To know more about cognitive click here:

https://brainly.com/question/6581327

#SPJ11

The central theme of Ernest Shackleton’s South is the importance of leadership in overcoming danger. Thus the correct option is D.

The value of determination and endurance in the face of challenge is one of the main themes in Ernest Shackleton's book South. Throughout the book, Shackleton describes the obstacles and hardships his team encountered while attempting to walk across the Antarctic continent.

The novel is a landmark in the persistence of the human spirit and the value of holding onto hope even in the most hopeless situations. Therefore, option D is appropriate.

Learn more about  Ernest Shackleton’s South, here:

https://brainly.com/question/872714?

#SPJ1

The complete question is probably

What is one central theme of Ernest Shackleton’s South!?

A.

how difficult the struggle against nature can be

B.

the complexity of the fight against social norms

C.

the depth of the human need for friendship

D.

the importance of leadership in overcoming danger

The nurse's words at the end of paragraph 7, "Besides, I cannot think ...all around it." serve as -  C. advice on how to prevent Penelope's son's death

How to explain the paragraph

Within the seventh paragraph, the nurse provides critical counsel stating, "Besides, I cannot think...all around it," recommending a methodology to deter Penelope's son from an untimely death.

The nurse proposes persuading him to vacate the palace and secure assistance from his father's allies due to the potential threat of suitors attempting to claim Penelope as their own. This recommendation intends to preserve the youth's life rather than providing any implications for Odysseus or Penelope's husband's fate.

Learn more about Penelope on

https://brainly.com/question/27956811

#SPJ1

Answer:

D. "not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more"

Explanation:

got it right on the test

The sentence "not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" best explains how Brutus' speech helps to develop the theme of loyalty in the play, which is the last option.

This sentence highlights the conflict that Brutus feels between his loyalty to his friend Caesar and his loyalty to the Roman Republic. By explaining that he did not act out of a lack of love for Caesar but out of a greater love for Rome, Brutus is highlighting the theme of loyalty to a higher cause or principle. This theme is further developed throughout the play as characters grapple with conflicting loyalties and priorities.

Learn more about Brutus here.

https://brainly.com/question/31445550

#SPJ1

The word "mocked" can have different interpretations depending on the context in which it is used. In general, it means to ridicule, taunt, or make fun of someone or something. It is often associated with a sense of disrespect, contempt, or sarcasm towards the subject being mocked.

Mocking can occur in various settings, such as in social situations, online, in politics, and in religious contexts. It can be done for different reasons, including to show superiority, to gain attention, or to express dissatisfaction.

One interpretation of the word "mocked" is that it involves an act of aggression towards another person or group. It can cause emotional distress and harm, especially if the person being mocked is vulnerable or marginalized. Therefore, it is important to be mindful of our words and actions and to avoid mocking others, especially when it comes to sensitive topics or personal characteristics.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT  interpretarion of the word ''mocked" CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/2631832

#SPJ11

The best rebuttal of the claim is that advertising brings down prices by enabling goods to be mass-produced.

A rebuttal is a counterclaim to an idea touted by another person. In the passage, the argument is that advertising increases the prices of goods but a good rebuttal must show that advertising does the opposite which is reducing the prices of goods.

In the following sentence, we learn that advertising allows for mass production and a  decrease in prices of products.

Learn more about rebuttal here:

https://brainly.com/question/24690335

#SPJ1

The summary from Tom Sawyer that accurately relates the dialect into standard english " Darn! Okay, you can go. I was sure you’d skipped school and gone swimming."

The above summary most successfully converts the given dialect as per the norms of standard English. The employment of words like "Bother," "well," "made sure," "been," etc. exemplifies the community or tribe's particular language i.e. 'dialect' and hence, required to be changed.

Therefore, they would be substituted with 'Darn,' 'okay,' 'was sure,' 'gone,' etc. This translation takes the informal language used in the original passage and translates it into more standard, formal English.

To know more about Tom Sawyer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31396080

#SPJ1

The sentence "If I wouldn't marry, I would go out more" is grammatically correct by using the auxiliary verb. However, it is more common to use "didn't" instead of "wouldn't" in this context.

So, the sentence could also be written as "If I didn't marry, I would go out more." The sentence uses the second conditional, which refers to an unreal or imaginary situation in the present or future. In this case, the sentence implies that the speaker is currently married and cannot go out as much as they would like. However, if they were not married, they would have more freedom to go out.

The correct sentence uses the past simple tense in the if-clause ("If I didn't get married"), and the modal auxiliary verb "would" in the main clause ("I would go out more"). This structure is commonly used to express hypothetical situations and their potential outcomes.

To learn more about auxiliary verb, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/28503672

#SPJ4

In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Helmer advises Mrs. Linde to embroider rather than knit for a few reasons. Helmer, a traditionalist, perceives embroidery as a more feminine and elegant activity compared to knitting. He believes that embroidery is a more suitable pastime for women, as it reflects grace and delicacy.

Furthermore, Helmer's comment reflects the societal norms and gender roles of the 19th-century setting. By suggesting that Mrs. Linde should embroider, he implicitly reinforces the notion that women are meant to engage in activities that are decorative and pleasing to the eye, rather than practical. In contrast, knitting is seen as utilitarian, which goes against Helmer's view of the ideal woman.

Helmer's remark is not only about embroidery versus knitting, but it also serves as a critique of the society and the limitations placed on women at the time. Through this exchange, Ibsen highlights the rigid expectations and constraints women faced in a male-dominated society.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT  Mrs. Linde CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/15113786

#SPJ11

I wakened was with thund'ring noise, And piteous shrieks of dreadful voice are the lines of  “Here Follow Some Verses Upon the Burning of Our House.” The meaning of the lines is Bradstreet feels bad because she hurts because she lost her material possessions.

It is against her conviction that she ought to feel as such; showing she is a heathen.  Bradstreet accept that the loss of material possessions was a spiritually necessary event thanks to her firm Puritan beliefs. This poem's main point is books are destroyed if they are false or ignorant.

Learn more about Bradstreet, here:

https://brainly.com/question/2216672

#SPJ1

In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Torvald's second proposal for Nora's role can be understood as a shift in the dynamics of their relationship.

Initially, Torvald treats Nora as his submissive "doll" and expects her to comply with his demands. However, after the revelation of Nora's secret and her decision to leave, Torvald is confronted with the reality of their unequal partnership.
Torvald's second proposal for Nora's role involves a transformation in his perception of her. Instead of seeing her as a submissive and dependent wife, he recognizes Nora as an individual with her own desires and needs. He proposes a new dynamic where Nora is treated as an equal partner, with the freedom to express herself and make her own decisions.
This proposal signifies a crucial turning point in the play, as it demonstrates Torvald's willingness to change and adapt to Nora's needs. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of open communication and mutual respect in relationships, which are essential for a healthy and supportive partnership.
In conclusion, Torvald's second proposal for Nora's role is an attempt to redefine their relationship by acknowledging her autonomy and individuality. Through this proposal, he aims to establish a more balanced and respectful partnership, where both parties have an equal say in their lives and decisions.

To know more about the autonomy:

https://brainly.com/question/17174025

#SPJ11

From the details of text 2, we can understand better about text 1 what Jaylen's presentations are like. Option D is correct.

Based on the complete text, we can see that there is the inclusion of two articles as they are both interconnected based on the facts and details about bullying and the efforts to combat it.

With this in mind, we can see that the best thing which would help a reader make a text connection between the two texts is to understand that earlier Jaylen partnered with the Polk County, Florida, school board and local law-enforcement officials to launch a weeklong, countywide anti-bullying initiative and after a week he planned with Mihok to go into 10 local schools, doing their part to put a stop to bullying.

Thus, option D is correct.

To know more about bullying here

https://brainly.com/question/20989113

#SPJ1

In Antony's funeral speech from Act III of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,  he repeats the lines "But Brutus says he was ambitious;/And Brutus is an honorable man to show his uncertainty about whose side he should be on. Thus the correct option is A.

Act III of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Antony is attempting to convince the people that Julius Caesar was not the evil character he was portrayed to be and that his death was an unfortunate accident.

Antony suggests that Brutus may have had additional reasons for killing Caesar and may not be as fair as he seems by emphasizing his own desire and honor. People start to mistrust and feel uncertain as a result of this.

Therefore, option A is appropriate.

Learn more about the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, here:

https://brainly.com/question/11415623

#SPJ1

In the beginning of the story "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen, Nora asks Helene, the maid, to move the Christmas tree from its original place in the drawing-room to the living-room. The reason for this move is that Nora wants to decorate the tree with candles without her husband, Torvald, knowing about it. She wants to surprise him with a beautiful Christmas tree as she hopes to win his affection and respect.

Nora's request to Helene to move the Christmas tree is an indication of her desire to please Torvald and to maintain the illusion of a perfect household. It also highlights the fact that Nora feels the need to keep secrets from her husband and to manipulate him in order to get what she wants. This sets the tone for the rest of the play, which explores the themes of deception, power dynamics, and gender roles.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Christmas tree to in the beginning CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/14012976

#SPJ11

To write a reflective essay on this topic, you can say that the event happened when you joined a new school after migrating to a new land.

This essay should be based on your experience as it is reflective in nature. However, an experience that can fit in will be a young student that just migrated from the land of their birth to a new environment.

They may talk about the fear they felt upon arriving and the difficulty experienced in fitting in. Finally, the writer can state how he or she finally overcame their fear.

Learn more about essays here:

https://brainly.com/question/879918

#SPJ1

Both "analysis" and "priority" can be changed into verbs when the suffix -ize is used with them. The verbs would be "analyze" and "prioritize", respectively.

a detailed examination of anything complex in order to understand its nature or to determine its essential features : a thorough study. doing a careful analysis of the problem. : a statement of such an examination.

the quality or state of coming before another in time or importance. : a condition of being given attention before others. this project has top priority.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT suffix -ize  CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/24260333

#SPJ11

Electric cars can take between 30 minutes to 12 hours to charge, depending on the capacity of the battery and the speed of the charging point.

The charging time for electric cars is a critical factor that can impact their usability and convenience. Electric cars can be charged at different rates depending on the charging point's speed, the battery capacity, and the car's make and model. Fast charging points can charge an electric car's battery to 80% capacity in 30-60 minutes, while a slow charging point may take up to 12 hours to fully charge the battery. Many electric car manufacturers offer different battery capacities, ranging from around 40 kWh to over 100 kWh, which can impact the charging time and the car's overall range.

In addition to battery capacity and charging point speed, other factors can impact an electric car's charging time, such as temperature and the battery's state of charge. For example, charging an electric car's battery in cold weather can take longer, while charging it when the battery is almost empty can be faster than when it is almost full.

To learn more about Electric cars, visit here

https://brainly.com/question/29973828

#SPJ4

Sentence "Teenagers show less impulse control than other age groups when faced with a threat due to their brain development." best describes the central idea of the text. So the option D is correct.

The central idea of the text is that teenagers exhibit less impulse control than other age groups when faced with a threat. This is mainly due to the fact that the brain of a teenager is still developing, which can lead to a lack of impulse control.

This lack of impulse control means that teenagers may act without thinking and may be more prone to risk-taking behaviors when faced with a threat. This could lead to more extreme reactions and more dangerous outcomes.

As such, it is important for parents, educators, and other adults to be aware of this and to provide guidance and support to help teenagers make better decisions and manage their impulses. So the option D is correct.

To learn more about stressful situations link is here

brainly.com/question/30076735

#SPJ1

In imagining Nora's earlier life based on her characterization in Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," we can infer that Nora lived a sheltered and protected existence. She was likely raised in a traditional household where women were expected to be submissive and fulfill the roles of dutiful wives and mothers. Nora's father played a dominant role in her upbringing, shaping her values and views.

Upon marrying Torvald, Nora continued to inhabit a world where she was treated as a delicate and fragile object, rather than a fully independent and capable individual. In her marriage, she faced patronizing behavior from her husband and was often referred to by diminutive nicknames. Nora's primary responsibilities centered around taking care of her children and maintaining the household, with limited exposure to the outside world.

This environment stifled Nora's personal growth and led her to engage in secretive activities, such as taking out a loan to save her husband's life, demonstrating her innate resourcefulness and intelligence. Despite her circumstances, Nora's earlier life shows her desire to break free from societal expectations and gain her independence.

TO KNOW MORE ABOUT "A Doll's House CLICK THIS LINK -

brainly.com/question/24867668

#SPJ11

Answer:

Enders game three to five sentences long explain how the diction and characterization indicate the author's purpose for writing about a human rights issue. provide specific examples from the novel. use proper spelling and grammar.

Explanation: