The water source that is salty from the list of options given is the oceans.
What are Salty Water Source?Oceans cover more than 70% of the Earth's surface and contain a significant amount of dissolved salts and minerals. The saltiness of the ocean is due to the accumulation of these dissolved salts over time, primarily sodium chloride.
Oceans play a crucial role in regulating the Earth's climate and weather patterns and support a diverse range of marine life. The high salt content of the oceans also makes them uninhabitable for most terrestrial plants and animals, except for a few species that have evolved to adapt to these extreme conditions.
Learn more about salty water source on:
https://brainly.com/question/1785701
#SPJ1
Which structure has the least effect on the ability of a virus to infect and replicate in a host cell?
envelope
O capsid
DNA
ribosome
Save and Exit
Next
Answer:
Therefore, the structure that has the least effect on the ability of a virus to infect and replicate in a host cell is the envelope.
Explanation:
Ribosomes are not part of the virus structure, but rather are present in host cells and are necessary for virus replication. Therefore, the answer would be between envelope and capsid.
While both envelope and capsid play important roles in virus attachment and entry into host cells, some viruses can infect and replicate in cells even if they lack an envelope. In contrast, capsid is an essential component of all viruses, as it protects the viral genetic material and facilitates its delivery into the host cell.
Therefore, the structure that has the least effect on the ability of a virus to infect and replicate in a host cell is the envelope.
the muluki ain and dubar high school started and established by junga bahadur contributed directly to transform the nepalese society . justify?
Answer: bild deffrent
Explanation:
now five points
critique of statistical validity must address two main points, (1) effect size and (2) statistical significance. Effect Size: Whether/How do they report how large their effect was or how much variability was there? For example was it an R-value? Was it a Beta in a regression table? Was it a difference between means? Was it a percentage? Using self-affirmation to increase intellectual humility in debate Regular healthy public debates signal a progressive and democratic society, but meaningful interactions and reciprocal attitude change can only occur if respective parties listen to each other in an open-minded, calm and tolerant way [1]. Unfortunately, this is not a common experience during debate, with many people experiencing stress and frustration from conversations with which © 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Commons Attribution License http://commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 03 February 2023 they disagree [2]. Debaters often insult the competence of others, engage in ad hominem attacks, show no willingness to even consider changing their perspectives when presented with alternatives and fail to accept their own limitations. These divisive characteristics pose a risk to democratic coherence in societies, potentially exacerbating violent conflict and putting individuals materially and psychologically at risk. An antidote to this situation, intellectual humility, is receiving increasing attention. Philosophers understand intellectual humility as the disposition to own or accept one's intellectual shortcomings out of a genuine desire for knowledge and truth [3,4]. This orientation is often contrasted with intellectually arrogant and intellectually servile behaviour, which obstruct the acquisition of knowledge and understanding [5,6]. Intellectual arrogance entails expressing an unquestioned superiority in one's attitudes, and intell
The passage above does not appear to address the critique of statistical validity, but rather discusses the concept of intellectual humility and its potential role in promoting productive and respectful debates.
What is the statistical validity about?The general overview of what a critique of statistical validity might entail is that:
When critiquing the statistical validity of a study, it is important to consider both effect size and statistical significance. Effect size refers to the magnitude or strength of the relationship between variables, while statistical significance refers to the likelihood that the relationship observed in the data is not due to chance.Effect size can be reported in a variety of ways, such as through correlation coefficients (such as an R-value), regression coefficients (such as a Beta), or differences between means (such as a Cohen's d). When critiquing a study's effect size, it is important to consider whether the effect size is large enough to be meaningful and relevant to the research question. This can be compared to effect sizes reported in similar studies or in the broader literature.
Therefore, a critique of statistical validity should evaluate both the strength of the observed effect and the likelihood that the effect is not due to chance, while also considering other factors that may influence the study's statistical analysis.
Learn more about statistical validity from
https://brainly.com/question/30019043
#SPJ1
See complete text below
critique of statistical validity must address two main points, (1) effect size and (2) statistical significance. Effect Size: Whether/How do they report how large their effect was or how much variability was there? For example was it an R-value? Was it a Beta in a regression table? Was it a difference between means? Was it a percentage? Using self-affirmation to increase intellectual humility in debate Regular healthy public debates signal a progressive and democratic society, but meaningful interactions and reciprocal attitude change can only occur if respective parties listen to each other in an open-minded, calm and tolerant way [1]. Unfortunately, this is not a common experience during debate, with many people experiencing stress and frustration from conversations with which © 2023 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Commons Attribution License http://commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. Downloaded from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ on 03 February 2023 they disagree [2]. Debaters often insult the competence of others, engage in ad hominem attacks, show no willingness to even consider changing their perspectives when presented with alternatives and fail to accept their own limitations. These divisive characteristics pose a risk to democratic coherence in societies, potentially exacerbating violent conflict and putting individuals materially and psychologically at risk. An antidote to this situation, intellectual humility, is receiving increasing attention. Philosophers understand intellectual humility as the disposition to own or accept one's intellectual shortcomings out of a genuine desire for knowledge and truth [3,4]. This orientation is often contrasted with intellectually arrogant and intellectually servile behaviour, which obstruct the acquisition of knowledge and understanding [5,6]. Intellectual arrogance entails expressing an unquestioned superiority in one's attitudes, and intellectual servility entails accepting uncritically the opinions of others without reflection or analysis [5,6].
Which statement is true?
Answer:
Government have unlimited money
what are ways of raising capital for a partnership business
Answer:
borrowing power of each partner may be pooled to raise debt capital, or additional partners may be admitted to increase
Explanation:
If the partnership does not need help with the ownership the limited partnership may be established to the captial's decision
Answer:
Demographic refers to:
Explanation:
CAN SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME THE AGE OF DISCOVERY AND EVERYTHING ABOUT IT
Answer: The Age of Discovery or the Age of Exploration, part of the early modern period and largely overlapping with the Age of Sail, was a period from approximately the 15th century to the 17th century in European history, during which seafaring Europeans explored, colonized, and conquered regions across the globe.
The extensive overseas exploration, with the Portuguese and Spanish at the forefront, later joined by the Dutch, English, and French, emerged as a powerful factor in European culture, most notably the European colonization of the Americas. It also marks an increased adoption of colonialism as a government policy in several European states. As such, it is sometimes synonymous with the first wave of European colonization.
European exploration outside the Mediterranean started with the maritime expeditions of Portugal to the Canary Islands in 1336,[1] and later with the Portuguese discoveries of the Atlantic archipelagos of Madeira and Azores, the coast of West Africa in 1434, and the establishment of the sea route to India in 1498 by Vasco da Gama, which initiated the Portuguese maritime and trade presence in Kerala and the Indian Ocean.
A main event in the Age of Discovery took place when Spain made the transatlantic voyages of Christopher Columbus between 1492 and 1504, which saw the beginning of the colonization of the Americas. Years later, the Spanish Magellan expedition made the first circumnavigation of the globe between 1519 and 1522, which was regarded as a major achievement in seamanship, and had a significant impact on the European understanding of the world.
(That's about all the info I could get on this)