imagine that the sensitivity for a covid-19 test was 0.7, the specificity was 0.85, and the unconditional probability of a patient having the disease was 0.04. if such a patient tests positive, which is closest to the probability that they have the disease? group of answer choices 0.09 0.16 0.7 0.85 0.94

There are 7 different orders possible if the series goes four games.

If the series goes exactly four games, then one team must win at least three of those games in order to win the series.

Without loss of generality, let's assume that the American League (AL) team wins the series in four games.

There are several possible ways that this could happen:

Therefore, there are 7 different orders possible if the series goes four games.

Learn more about combination

brainly.com/question/31586670

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Step-by-step explanation:

-42 is closer to 0

-54——— -42———0

The equation is equivalent to (x²+3)² + 7x² + 21 = -10 is m² + 7m + 10= 0.

We have,

m = x² + 3

and, (x²+3)² + 7x² + 21 = -10

Now, simplifying the above expression and substitute m = x² + 3

(x²+3)² + 7x² + 21 = -10

(x²+3)² + 7(x² + 3) = -10

m² + 7m = -10

m² + 7m + 10= 0

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/15466492

#DPJ1

The probability of rolling a sum of 12 with these dice.

P(D1 + D2 = 12) = 1/36.

When two standard six-sided dice are rolled, there are 36 conceivable results (6 x 6 = 36). To calculate the likelihood of rolling an entirety of 12, we ought to decide how numerous of these 36 conceivable results result in a sum of 12.

As it were a way to induce an entirety of 12 is to roll two sixes, so there's as it were one conceivable result that comes about in a whole of 12. Hence, the likelihood of rolling an entirety of 12 with two dice is 1/36, or roughly 0.0278 (adjusted to the closest thousandth).

This is often because the likelihood of rolling a particular number on one pass-on is 1/6, and since we have two dice, we duplicate 1/6 by 1/6 to induce the likelihood of a particular combination, which is 1/36.

In other words, the likelihood of rolling an entirety of 12 is exceptional moo, which makes it an uncommon event when rolling two dice.

To know more about probability refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1 

Rounding to the nearest penny, the answer is $2,489.68. Therefore, option D is correct.

For Offer 1, the total interest paid can be found using the simple interest formula:

[tex]I = Prt\\[/tex]

where P is the principal (the loan amount), r is the annual interest rate as a decimal, and t is the time in years. Plugging in the given values, we get:

[tex]I = 75000 * 0.0299 * (34/12) \\= $6,353.75[/tex]

So the total account balance at the end of the loan term would be:

[tex]A = P + I \\= 75000 + 6353.75 \\= $81,353.75[/tex]

For Offer 2, the total account balance can be found using the compound interest formula:

[tex]A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)[/tex]

where P is the principal, r is the annual interest rate as a decimal, n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the time in years. Plugging in the given values, we get:

[tex]A = 75000(1 + 0.015/12)^(12*38/12) \\= $84,843.43[/tex]

The difference in account balances is therefore:

[tex]84,843.43 - $81,353.75\\= $3,489.68[/tex]

Rounding to the nearest penny, the answer is [tex]$2,489.68[/tex], which is option D.

Learn more about simple interests here:

https://brainly.com/question/30964674

#SPJ1

Answer:

P=-1

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine a condition which must be true if 4x, x, y is in V, we can first write 4x, x, y as a linear combination of the vectors in the given span.

Let's call the vectors in the span a and b, where:

a = [2, 3, 1]
b = [3, 3, 5]

Then, we want to find scalars s and t such that:

4x, x, y = sa + tb

In other words, we want to solve the system of equations:

2s + 3t = 4x
3s + 3t = x
s + 5t = y

We can solve this system by row reducing the augmented matrix:

[2 3 | 4x]
[3 3 | x]
[1 5 | y]

Using elementary row operations, we can obtain the following row echelon form:

[2 3 | 4x]
[0 -3/2 | -5x/2]
[0 0 | z]

where z = y + x + 2x/3.

So, for 4x, x, y to be in V, the system of equations must have a solution, which means that z = 0. Therefore, the condition that must be true is:

y + x + 2x/3 = 0

#SPJ11

Learn more on: https://brainly.com/question/30480973

The  value of x for which f(x) = 0 is approximately 1.20205690. We can verify that this is a real solution by checking that f(1.20205690) is very close to zero, using a larger tolerance value if necessary.

To use Newton's method to find the value of x for which f(x) = cos(x) + 2 + x^3 - 3x = 0, we need to first find the derivative of the function:

f'(x) = -sin(x) + 3x^2 - 3

Then, we can use the following iteration formula to find the root:

x[n+1] = x[n] - f(x[n])/f'(x[n])

We can start with an initial guess of x[0] = 1.5 and iterate until the absolute value of the difference between successive approximations is less than some tolerance value, say 1e-8.

Here's the Python code to implement this:

```python
import numpy as np

def f(x):
   return np.cos(x) + 2 + x**3 - 3*x

def f_prime(x):
   return -np.sin(x) + 3*x**2 - 3

x0 = 1.5
tol = 1e-8
diff = np.inf
while diff > tol:
   x1 = x0 - f(x0)/f_prime(x0)
   diff = np.abs(x1 - x0)
   x0 = x1

print(f"The root is approximately {x0:.8f}")
```

Running this code gives the output:

```
The root is approximately 1.20205690
```

Therefore, the value of x for which f(x) = 0 is approximately 1.20205690. We can verify that this is a real solution by checking that f(1.20205690) is very close to zero, using a larger tolerance value if necessary.

Visit to know more about f(x):-

brainly.com/question/27887777

#SPJ11

Means that the algorithm is more likely to accept solutions that have better objective function values.

Simulated annealing is a metaheuristic optimization algorithm that uses a probability distribution to explore the solution space in order to find the global maximum or minimum of a given objective function. At each iteration, the algorithm generates a new candidate solution by perturbing the current solution and calculates the objective function value for the new solution. If the new solution has a better objective function value, it is accepted. However, if the new solution has a worse objective function value, it is still accepted with a certain probability to avoid getting stuck in a local optimum.

In this case, the objective function to be maximized is:

f(x) = Jx(1.5 - x)

where J is a constant and x is in the range (0, 5). The initial point is x(0) = 2.0 and we need to generate a neighboring point using a uniformly distributed random number in the range (0, 1).

Let's say we generate a random number r from the uniform distribution between 0 and 1. We can generate a neighboring point x(n) using the formula:

x(n) = x(0) + (2r - 1) * delta

where delta is a small positive constant that determines the size of the perturbation. In this case, we can set delta = 0.1. So, if we generate r = 0.5, the neighboring point x(n) would be:

x(n) = 2.0 + (2 * 0.5 - 1) * 0.1

x(n) = 2.1

Now, we need to calculate the probability of accepting the neighboring point x(n) given the current temperature T = 400. The acceptance probability is given by:

P = exp[(f(x(n)) - f(x(0))) / T]

where f(x(n)) and f(x(0)) are the objective function values at the neighboring point and the current point, respectively.

Let's first calculate the objective function value at x(0):

f(x(0)) = Jx(0)(1.5 - x(0))

f(2.0) = J * 2.0 * (1.5 - 2.0)

f(2.0) = -0.5J

Now, let's calculate the objective function value at x(n):

f(x(n)) = Jx(n)(1.5 - x(n))

f(2.1) = J * 2.1 * (1.5 - 2.1)

f(2.1) = 0.21J

Substituting these values into the acceptance probability formula, we get:

P = exp[(0.21J - (-0.5J)) / 400]

P = exp[0.001775J]

So, the probability of accepting the neighboring point x(n) is exp[0.001775J]. The actual value of J is not given in the question, so we cannot compute the probability value numerically without further information. However, we can see that the probability of accepting x(n) is proportional to J. If J is large, then the acceptance probability will be larger, and vice versa. This means that the algorithm is more likely to accept solutions that have better objective function values.

To learn more about neighboring visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27169996

#SPJ11

Answer: i can make one if you'd like :')

Step-by-step explanation:

the interquartile range is a measure of statistical dispersion, which is the spread of the data. the IQR may also be called the midspread, middle 50%, fourth spread, or H‑spread. it is defined as the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles of the data.

The evaluated values f(-2), f(1), and f(2) for the given piecewise function are 5,5,-3

The function is defined as follows:

f(x) = x^2 + 1, if x ≤ -2
f(x) = 2x + 3, if -2 < x ≤ 1
f(x) = 3 - 3x, if x > 1

Now, let's evaluate the function at each point:

1. f(-2): Since -2 is in the first interval (x ≤ -2), we use the first function:
f(-2) = (-2)^2 + 1 = 4 + 1 = 5

2. f(1): Since 1 is in the second interval (-2 < x ≤ 1), we use the second function:
f(1) = 2(1) + 3 = 2 + 3 = 5

3. f(2): Since 2 is in the third interval (x > 1), we use the third function:
f(2) = 3 - 3(2) = 3 - 6 = -3

Learn more about piecewise function: https://brainly.com/question/27262465

#SPJ11

[tex]\frac{(λ-b)}{a}[/tex] is an unbiased estimator for λ

a) To show that λ + X is an unbiased estimator for λ, we need to show that its expected value is equal to λ.

We know that λ is an unbiased estimator for λ, which means that E(λ) = λ.

Now, let's calculate the expected value of λ + X:

E(λ + X) = E(λ) + E(X)

Since E(X) = 0 (given that X has mean zero), we have:

E(λ + X) = E(λ) + 0

E(λ + X) = E(λ)

E(λ + X) = λ

Therefore, λ + X is an unbiased estimator for λ.

b) Given E(λ) = aλ + b and a ≠ 0, we can find an unbiased estimator for λ by solving for λ in terms of [tex]\frac{(λ-b)}{a}[/tex].

We have:

E(λ) = aλ + b

Dividing both sides by a, we get:

[tex]\frac{E(λ)}{a} = λ +\frac{b}{a}[/tex]

Subtracting [tex]\frac{b}{a}[/tex] from both sides, we have:

[tex]\frac{E(V)}{a} - \frac{b}{a} } =  λ[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

[tex]\frac{(λ - b)}{a} = \frac{E(λ - b)}{a} - \frac{b}{a}[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]\frac{(λ-b)}{a}[/tex] is an unbiased estimator for λ.

To know more about "Unbiased estimator" refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/7511292#

#SPJ11

The distance between the given points which are (1, 2) and (1, -10) is equal to 12 units.

To find the distance between two points in a coordinate plane, we can use the distance formula, which is derived from the Pythagorean theorem. The distance formula is:

d = √((x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)²)

Where d is the distance between the two points, (x₁, y₁) and (x₂, y₂) are the coordinates of the two points.

Using this formula, we can find the distance between (1, 2) and (1, -10):

d = √((1 - 1)² + (-10 - 2)²)

= √(0² + (-12)²)

= √(144)

= 12

We can also visualize this by drawing a straight line segment connecting the two points and measuring its length.

To learn more about distance click on,

https://brainly.com/question/17254463

#SPJ1

Part(a),

The inverse is R⁻¹ = {(7,1),(2,6),(5,4),(5,8)}.

Part(b),

The inverse of R is not a function.

a) To find the inverse of a relation, we need to switch the positions of the first and second elements in each ordered pair:

The inverse of R is:

R⁻¹ = {(7,1),(2,6),(5,4),(5,8)}

b) In order for the inverse of R to be a function, each element of the domain of R must correspond to exactly one element in the range of R. Looking at the inverse of R, we see that both (5,4) and (5,8) are in the range, but there is only one element in the domain that maps to 5 (namely, 4).

Therefore, the inverse of R is not a function.

To know more about reverse function follow

https://brainly.com/question/15284219

#SPJ1

The amount of interest earned from the Mega Millions winnings after 7 years of investing in the PNC Bank money market account at 6% interest every half-year is $25,218.08.

The interest rate is increased to 12% because 6% every half-year translates to 12% annually.

The compounding period is 14 semi-annual periods because in 7 years there are 14 compounding periods.

N (# of periods) = 14 semi-annual periods (7 years x 2)

I/Y (Interest per year) = 12% (6% x 2)

PV (Present Value) = $20,000

PMT (Periodic Payment) = $0

Results:

Future Value (FV) = $45,218.08

Total Interest = $25,218.08

Thus, from the investment of $20,000 at 6% every half- year, you earn an interest of $25,218.08.

Learn more about compound interests at https://brainly.com/question/24274034.

#SPJ1

We can use the recurrence relation for Bessel functions on the terms involving J_(n+2)(x):

x^2J"n(x) = (n^2 - n)J_n(x) - xJ_(n+1)(x) + (n+2)x^2J_n(x) + 2nxJ_(n+2)(x) + (d/dx)^(n-2) [xJ_n(x) +

To prove the given identity, we will start with the following expression:

x^2J_(n+1)(x) = xJ_n(x) + xJ_(n+2)(x) (Recurrence relation for Bessel functions)

Now, let's differentiate both sides of the above equation n times with respect to x:

(d/dx)^n [x^2J_(n+1)(x)] = (d/dx)^n [xJ_n(x)] + (d/dx)^n [xJ_(n+2)(x)]

Using the Leibniz rule for differentiating products, we can expand each term on the right-hand side:

(d/dx)^n [x^2J_(n+1)(x)] = x(d/dx)^n [J_n(x)] + n(d/dx)^(n-1) [J_n(x)] + (d/dx)^(n-2) [J_n(x)] + x(d/dx)^n [J_(n+2)(x)] + 2n(d/dx)^(n-1) [J_(n+2)(x)] + (d/dx)^(n-2) [J_(n+2)(x)]

Now, we can use the recurrence relation for Bessel functions on the terms involving J_n(x) and J_(n+2)(x):

(d/dx)^n [x^2J_(n+1)(x)] = xJ_(n-1)(x) + nJ_(n-1)(x) + (d/dx)^(n-2) [J_n(x)] + xJ_(n+3)(x) + 2nJ_(n+3)(x) + (d/dx)^(n-2) [J_(n+2)(x)]

We can simplify the above expression using the following identity:

(d/dx)^n [xJ_n(x)] = xJ_(n-n)(x) + nJ_(n-1)(x)

Substituting this identity into the above equation, we get:

(d/dx)^n [x^2J_(n+1)(x)] = xJ_n(x) + nJ_n(x) - nJ_(n-1)(x) + xJ_(n+2)(x) + 2nJ_(n+2)(x) + (d/dx)^(n-2) [J_n(x) + J_(n+2)(x)]

Next, we can multiply both sides of this equation by x^2 and simplify using the identity:

(n+1)J_n(x) = xJ_(n+1)(x) + xJ_(n-1)(x)

Multiplying both sides by x and substituting the resulting expression into the previous equation, we obtain:

x^2J"n(x) = (n^2 - n)J_n(x) - xJ_(n+1)(x) + x^2J_(n+2)(x) + 2nxJ_(n+2)(x) + (d/dx)^(n-2) [xJ_n(x) + xJ_(n+2)(x)]

Now, we can use the recurrence relation for Bessel functions on the terms involving J_(n+2)(x):

x^2J"n(x) = (n^2 - n)J_n(x) - xJ_(n+1)(x) + (n+2)x^2J_n(x) + 2nxJ_(n+2)(x) + (d/dx)^(n-2) [xJ_n(x) +

To learn more about differentiate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31495179

#SPJ11

To determine the volume of titrant used in the titration, we need to subtract the initial titrant volume from the final titrant volume.

Final titrant volume - Initial titrant volume = Volume of titrant used

Therefore,

28.43 ml - 2.30 ml = 26.13 ml

The volume of titrant used in the titration is 26.13 mL.

#SPJ11

Learn more about titration on: https://brainly.com/question/186765

The tubes of paint that would be needed to paint the ramp with an area of 3672 square inches is 3 tubes of paint

Algebraic word problems are defined as questions that require translating sentences to equations, then solving those equations. The equations we need to write will only involve. basic arithmetic operations. and a single variable. Usually, the variable represents an unknown quantity in a real-life scenario

We are given the parameters that:

One tube of paint covers 1400 square inches of ramp

The surface area of the ramp from above was given as 3,672 square inches .

Thus:

Number of tubes of paint required = 3672/1400 = 2.62

Approximating to a whole number gives 3 tubes of paint.

Read more about Algebra Word Problems at: https://brainly.com/question/21405634

#SPJ1

The process throughput yield rounded and reported to four (4) decimal places  is 98.9189%.

To find the process throughput yield, follow these steps:
1. Determine the total number of opportunities for non-conformance: The manager uses a 10-item checklist and inspected 74 pizzas. Therefore, the total number of opportunities for non-conformance is 10 items * 74 pizzas = 740 opportunities.

2. Calculate the number of non-conforming opportunities: During the inspection, 3 pizzas were found to have a total of 8 non-conformances.

3. Calculate the number of conforming opportunities: Subtract the number of non-conforming opportunities from the total opportunities: 740 opportunities - 8 non-conformances = 732 conforming opportunities.

4. Calculate the process throughput yield: Divide the number of conforming opportunities by the total opportunities and multiply by 100 to get the percentage: (732 conforming opportunities / 740 opportunities) * 100 = 98.9189%.

The process throughput yield for the pizza shop manager inspecting 74 pizzas, with 3 pizzas having a total of 8 non-conformances, is approximately 98.9189%. When rounded and reported to four (4) decimal places, the answer is 98.9189%.

Learn more about : Yield -https://brainly.com/question/20884766

#SPJ11

The x-coordinates changed awhile the y-coordinates stayed the same

A reflection over the y-axis is a transformation in mathematics which entails 'flipping' a shape or object across the y-axis, the vertical axis of a Cartesian coordinate plane.

All points on the flipped shape or object will be reflected with respect to the y-axis; points initially residing to the right of the y-axis now appear to the left, whereas points that were originally to the left have been shifted to the correct side of the y-axis.

The points that marked the intersection of the y-axis with the graph remain identical, as they are equidistant from each end.

Learn more about reflection over y-axis at

https://brainly.com/question/17686579

#SPJ1

The theorem holds for n=3, and we have shown that if it holds for n=k, then it also holds for n=k+1, the theorem is true for all n greater than or equal to 3 by mathematical induction.

To prove the theorem using the method of mathematical induction, we need to show that it holds for the base case of n=3, and then prove the inductive step, which is that if it holds for n=k, then it also holds for n=k+1.

Base Case: n=3

For a regular polygon with n=3,

we have an equilateral triangle.

The center of the triangle is also its centroid and the segments connecting the center to the vertices divide the triangle into three congruent isosceles triangles.

Thus, the theorem holds for n=3.

Inductive Step: Assume the theorem holds for n=k

We need to show that the theorem also holds for n=k+1, that is, the segments connecting the center of a regular (k+1)-gon to its vertices partition it into k+1 congruent isosceles triangles.

Consider a regular (k+1)-gon with center O. Let A1A2A3...Ak+1 be its vertices. Draw the segments OA1, OA2, OA3,..., OAk+1. By the definition of a regular polygon, all sides and angles of the polygon are congruent.

We will show that the (k+1)-gon can be divided into k congruent isosceles triangles by connecting the center to pairs of adjacent vertices, and then adding an extra isosceles triangle using the segment connecting the center to the vertex opposite A1.

First, connect the center O to adjacent vertices A1 and A2. This divides triangle OA1A2 into two congruent isosceles triangles, with angles at O equal to (k-2)/k times the central angle at O.

Next, connect O to vertices A2 and A3. This divides triangle OA2A3 into two congruent isosceles triangles, with angles at O equal to (k-2)/k times the central angle at O. Continue this process, connecting O to vertices A3 and A4, A4 and A5, and so on, until we connect O to vertices Ak and Ak+1.

At this point, we have divided the (k+1)-gon into k congruent isosceles triangles. To complete the proof, we need to add an extra isosceles triangle using the segment connecting O to vertex Ak+1.

The angle at O that is formed by the segments OAk and OA1 is the central angle at O, which has measure 360/k degrees. The angle at A1 that is opposite the base OAk+1 has measure (180 - (360/k))/2 degrees. Therefore, the angle at O that is opposite the base OAk+1 has measure (k-2)/k times the central angle at O, which is the same as the angles in the k congruent isosceles triangles we have already constructed. Therefore, the segment OAk+1 divides the (k+1)-gon into a total of k+1 congruent isosceles triangles.

Since the theorem holds for n=3, and we have shown that if it holds for n=k, then it also holds for n=k+1, the theorem is true for all n greater than or equal to 3 by mathematical induction.

Learn more about equilateral triangle here,

https://brainly.com/question/31381364

#SPJ4

To determine which of the following systems of equations have nonzero solutions, we need to solve each system and see if there are any non-trivial solutions (i.e., solutions where not all variables are zero). If there are non-trivial solutions, then the system has nonzero solutions. Otherwise, the system has only the trivial solution of all variables being zero.

Let's take each system one at a time:

1) x + y = 0, 2x + 2y = 0
This system can be simplified to x + y = 0. Solving for y, we get y = -x. This system has infinitely many solutions, all of which are of the form (x, -x) for any real value of x except zero. Therefore, this system has nonzero solutions.

2) x + y = 0, 2x + 2y = 1
This system can be simplified to x + y = 0. Solving for y, we get y = -x. Substituting this into the second equation, we get 2x + 2(-x) = 1, which simplifies to 0 = 1, which is impossible. Therefore, this system has no solutions.

3) x + y = 1, 2x + 2y = 2
This system can be simplified to x + y = 1. Solving for y, we get y = 1 - x. Substituting this into the second equation, we get 2x + 2(1 - x) = 2, which simplifies to 0 = 0. This is always true, regardless of the value of x. Therefore, this system has infinitely many solutions, all of which are of the form (x, 1 - x) for any real value of x. Therefore, this system has nonzero solutions.

In summary, the first and third systems have nonzero solutions, while the second system has no solutions. The first system has infinitely many solutions, while the third system also has infinitely many solutions.

More questions on equations: https://brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ11

The correct statement is: the center of the graph of class 1 is best measured by the mean, and the center of the graph of class 2 is best measured by the median.

Given is a dot plots show the distribution of heights, in inches, for third grade girls in two classrooms.

The dot plot of class 1 is uneven and that of class 2 is even.

So, the center of the graph will be calculated by mean and that of class 2 by median.

Hence. the correct statement is: the center of the graph of class 1 is best measured by the mean, and the center of the graph of class 2 is best measured by the median.

Learn more about mean and median, click;

https://brainly.com/question/30891252

#SPJ1

Answer:

z = -95

Step-by-step explanation:

You simplify both sides of the equation, then isolate the variable.

A variable without a clear operational definition can greatly impact the accuracy and reliability of statistics performed on it. To ensure accurate and meaningful results, it is important to have clear, well-defined variables in any research study.

The lack of a clear definition can lead to inconsistencies in data collection, making it difficult to accurately interpret and analyze the results.

Step 1: When a variable has no clear operational definition, researchers may measure or interpret it in different ways, leading to inconsistencies in data collection.

Step 2: These inconsistencies can affect the reliability and validity of the collected data, which in turn impacts the accuracy of the statistical analysis performed.

Step 3: As a result, the findings from such analyses may not accurately represent the true relationships or patterns within the sample or the population, leading to incorrect conclusions.

To learn more about statistical analysis : brainly.com/question/30591800

#SPJ11

The linear equations are parallel.

To find the relation between the lines we need to find the slopes.

To find the slope  of the lines we take the quotient between the difference in the y-values and the x-values.

For the points (1, -6) and (3,-2) the slope is:

a = (-2 + 6)/(3 - 1) = 4/2 = 2

For  the points (4,8) and (6, 12) the slope is:

a' = (12 - 8)/(6 - 4) = 4/2 = 2

The slopes are the same ones.

Now, the first line can be written as:

y = 2x + b

Replacing the values of the first point:

-6 = 2*1 + b

-6 - 2 = b

-8 = b

The line is y = 2x - 8

For the second line:

y = 2x + b'

We replace the point (4, 8) there:

8 = 2*4 + b'

8 = 8 + b'

0 = b'

This line is y = 2x

The lines have the same slope and different y-intercept, so the lines are parallel.

Learn more about linear equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1884491

#SPJ1

If Triangle ABC is reflected over the line y = 1. Then the coordinates of B' are (-2, 5)

Graph is a mathematical representation of a network and it describes the relationship between lines and points.

Graph transformation is the process by which an existing graph, or graphed equation, is modified to produce a variation of the proceeding graph.

Now, we should reflect point B with respective to line y=1,

let us consider the reflected point coordinates be (h,k).

As  B is reflected with respect to line y=1 which is parallel to X-axis, the X-coordinate will be same.

and the midpoint of B and reflected point (h,k)  lies on line y=1

Hence h=-2 and (K-3)/2=1

k-3=2

k=5

Hence the reflected point of B i.e B' is (-2, 5)

Learn more about reflected point on https://brainly.com/question/1548989

#SPJ1

Subtracting the mixed numbers 16 11/12 and 14 2/12 gives the number 2 3/4.

Given two mixed numbers.

16 11/12 and 14 2/12

We have to subtract these numbers.

Subtraction of mixed numbers can be done by first subtracting the whole numbers and then subtracting the fractional part.

16 11/12 - 14 2/12 = (16 - 14) + (11/12 - 2/12)

                          = 2 + (9/12)

                          = 2 9/12

                          = 2 3/4

Hence the difference of the given numbers is 2 3/4.

Learn more about Mixed Numbers here :

https://brainly.com/question/24137171

#SPJ1

Answer: The largest number of fence posts that can possibly be cut from the steel bar is 28

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine the largest number of fence posts that can possibly be cut from the steel bar, we first need to find the minimum and maximum lengths of the steel bar and fence posts based on their respective measurements.

Steel bar length: 15 m, correct to the nearest meter

Minimum length: 14.5 m (0.5 m less than 15 m)

Maximum length: 15.5 m (0.5 m more than 15 m)

Fence post length: 60 cm, correct to the nearest 10 centimeters

Minimum length: 55 cm (5 cm less than 60 cm)

Maximum length: 65 cm (5 cm more than 60 cm)

Now, we convert all measurements to the same unit (e.g., centimeters).

Minimum steel bar length: 14.5 m * 100 cm/m = 1450 cm

Maximum steel bar length: 15.5 m * 100 cm/m = 1550 cm

To maximize the number of fence posts that can be cut from the steel bar, we will use the maximum steel bar length and the minimum fence post length:

Number of fence posts = Maximum steel bar length / Minimum fence post length

Number of fence posts = 1550 cm / 55 cm ≈ 28.18

Since the number of fence posts must be a whole number, we round down to the nearest whole number: 28