It is the intention of the legislature that asset forfeiture is remedial in nature and ___ a form of punishment.

Answer:

asset Forfeiture  is the answer

Explanation:

In a criminal case, the prosecutor must prove the defendant’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt,” and in a civil case, the plaintiff must prove his case by a “preponderance of evidence.”

True or False

The President can make a short term agreement with another country that lasts for the duration of his presidency without any approval. This type of agreement is called a(n)

treaty

amnesty

executive agreeement

bill​

Reflections provide an occasion for insight and integration of the materials to which you have been exposed. They are also an opportunity to raise questions about course material. Your reflection should illustrate comprehensive understanding of the assigned material.

The stuff i learned Law deputy police , criminal cases, Criminology , Laws of the united States, issues with poverty and crime, and the world of corruption , k9's and police

can students get Married To school Teachers

what do you think of the concept of leadership of Filipinos in general?​

What should a judge's sentencing decision be based on?
The current charged conduct of the defendant
Prior bad acts
his or her testimony in court
The victim's testimony

Jeronimo é empregado na sociedade empresaria Produtos baianos Ltda., exercendo a função de entregador. No ano em que completou 18 anos . Jeronimo se alistou e foi convocado para prestar serviço militar, permanecendo no quartel por um ano. Findo esse periodo deu a respectiva baixa e retornou ao serviço junto ao empregador.

hey everyone . sorry . I always answered your all questions from Google which was a cheating . sorry if u think that I am a cheater. but now I will try to answer by my self​

which two statements about retaliation are true ?

I need an annotated bibliography about crime

Don Long is convicted of second-degree murder for killing a woman he had been seeing over the last few months. The court sentenced
him to 30 years in jail. One year after his trial, Don admits that he withheld evidence that
would have cleared him. He states he did so to protect his twin brother, who actually
committed the crime, but who was dying of cancer at the time. He further states that he
did not want his brother to spend the last years of his life behind bars. His brother has
since died. The evidence is conclusive as to Don's innocence. Should the court set aside his conviction due to the new evidence?
What policies would support the court in not
doing so?

Do you think issues like: Marriage rights and Abortion ought to be decided by: (1)Supreme Court (and therefore apply to ALL Americans the same), (2) have State Legislators vote and decide, or (3) have the voters in each state decide these issues? (There are three options here. Pick one and defend it against the other two.)

Please help

How does having three branches of government make our lawmaking process fairer? Make sure to use the phrase “checks and balances” in your answer.

PLEASE HELP ME ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS I ONLY HAVE LIKE 5 MINUTES PLEASE!!!!!!