There is a common theme of violence in many ancient myths. This may be because myths reflect the violent nature of the worlds and societies from which the myths originate. In ancient times, myths were often used to make sense of violence and explain why it happened.
What are the responses to other questions?2. Preserving our past and present history is important because it allows us to understand where we came from, how we got to where we are today and what the future holds. These stories provide valuable insight into the beliefs, values and traditions of our ancestors and can even inspire and guide our lives.
3. Depicting gods and goddesses as human was important because it made them more recognizable to those who worshiped them. People were able to better understand and empathize with them. It reinforced the idea that gods and gods are closely related to death and have a direct impact on the world and society.
learn more about myth: https://brainly.com/question/25098680
#SPJ1
The delegates to the First Continental Convention who gathered in September 1774 shared the following views EXCEPT
The delegates to the First Continental Convention who gathered in September 1774 particularly concerned about the British government's attempts to tax the colonies without their consent, and the restrictions on colonial trade and commerce. They also shared a strong commitment to protecting colonial rights and liberties, and a desire to assert greater autonomy for the colonies.
However, it is important to note that there were some differences of opinion among the delegates, particularly with regards to the appropriate response to these British policies. Some favored more conciliatory measures, while others advocated for more aggressive forms of resistance. Nonetheless, overall the delegates were united in their determination to defend colonial rights and liberties and to resist British encroachments on colonial autonomy.
In terms of the specific question of what views the delegates did not share, it is difficult to identify any clear examples. While there were certainly differences of opinion among the delegates, all were committed to the cause of colonial resistance and shared a fundamental belief in the importance of defending colonial rights and liberties. Thus, it is perhaps more accurate to say that the delegates shared a range of views and concerns, rather than that they held any views in common that were exceptions to the general consensus.
Learn more about First Continental Convention here:
https://brainly.com/question/30288806
#SPJ11
Which of the following best supports the argument that colonialism was responsible for the lack of economic development in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East in the late twentieth century?Corruption within the governments of former coloniesThe tendency of former colonies to export raw materialsThe presence of impoverished groups within industrialized statesThe prosperity of some newly independent states
The tendency of former colonies to export raw materials best supports the argument that colonialism was responsible for the lack of economic development in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.
It occured in the late twentieth century. Colonial powers and colonialism often developed their colonies as sources of raw materials, rather than as self-sufficient economies. This left many former colonies heavily reliant on exporting raw materials and vulnerable to fluctuations in commodity prices. As a result, they were unable to develop diversified and sustainable economies. This ongoing dependence on raw materials exports has contributed to their limited economic development and vulnerability to economic crises.
Learn more about commodity here:
https://brainly.com/question/15483550
#SPJ11
briefly explain the federal government's response to anxieties about communism within the us from 1945 to 1955
The federal government's response to anxieties about communism within the US from 1945 to 19551 was characterized by a series of policies and actions collectively known as the Red Scare. They are House Un-American Activities Committee(HUAC), McCarran Internal Security Act.
In response to fears that communist agents were operating within the US, the government established a range of programs designed to root out suspected subversives and prevent the spread of communism.
One of the key measures taken during this period was the establishment of the House Un-American Activities Committee (HAUC), which was tasked with investigating alleged communist activities within the US.
Another significant response to anxieties about communism was the passage of the McCarran Internal Security Act in 1950, which authorized the federal government to detain and deport suspected subversives.
Overall, the government's response to anxieties about communism during this period was marked by a significant expansion of federal power and the establishment of programs and policies that were often criticized for violating civil liberties and infringing on individual rights.
To learn more about the federal government visit:
brainly.com/question/860014
The federal government responded to anxieties about communism in the United States from 1945 to 1955 by passing legislation and implementing measures to combat the spread of communism.
The most prominent piece of legislation was the McCarran-Walter Act of 1952, which tightened immigration laws and allowed federal authorities to deport immigrants considered to be communist sympathizers.
Additionally, the House Un-American Activities Committee was established in 1945 to investigate subversives, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was given greater powers to spy on suspected communists.
The Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan were implemented to counter Soviet influence in Europe, and the National Security Council was created to coordinate the federal response to international threats. Finally, the United States conducted a series of nuclear tests to show its willingness to use atomic weapons against its enemies.
Know more about federal government here
https://brainly.com/question/371257#
#SPJ11
Should the Supreme Court have had the authority to end the national right to abortion that had existed for nearly 50 years? Explain why or why not.
Answer:
In explanation :)
Explanation:
The question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the authority to end the national right to abortion is a complex one. On one hand, the Supreme Court is tasked with interpreting the Constitution, and determining what rights it protects. Some argue that the Constitution does not explicitly protect the right to an abortion, and that this is a matter that should be left up to the states to decide.
On the other hand, others argue that the right to an abortion is a fundamental right, and that the Supreme Court has a responsibility to protect it. They argue that ending the national right to abortion would have serious consequences for women's health and autonomy, and would undermine the principle of reproductive freedom.
Ultimately, the question of whether or not the Supreme Court should have the authority to end the national right to abortion is a matter of legal interpretation and political opinion. It is a highly charged and contentious issue, and different people will have different views on it.
below is a list of names of some significant individuals in united states history. match each person's name to the description that best identifies the individual.
am Rayburn = Texas legislator, congressman, and longtime speaker of the US House of Representatives
Francis Scott Key = wrote the Star Spangled Banner
Clara Barton = founder of the American Red Cross
Adina Emilia DeZavala = teacher, historian, and preservationist of Texas history
Sam Houston = served as both the president of the Republic of Texas and the governor of the State of Texas
Which of the following responsibilities is necessary to ensure that an individual right in the Bill of Rights is upheld?
serving on a jury
It is important for individuals to take their civic duty seriously and participate in the jury system to uphold the individual rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.
Serving on a jury is necessary to ensure that an individual right in the Bill of Rights is upheld. The Sixth Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury. This means that individuals have the right to a fair trial by a group of their peers who will evaluate the evidence presented and make a decision based on the law. Serving on a jury is not only a civic duty but also a way to ensure that the rights of individuals are protected. By serving on a jury, citizens play an active role in the justice system and help to maintain the integrity of the Constitution. Without a fair trial by a jury, individuals may be denied their right to due process and the protection of the law.
Learn more about civic duty here:-
https://www.brainly.com/question/2377157
#SPJ11
What are the difference of national government to the powers of the states
Answer:
The federal government makes policies and implements laws on a national level while state governments do the same for their region of the country.
Describe ways in which you have felt "colonized," or that people in a position of power or authority were not looking out for your best interests. (3-5) sentence
Many members of historically marginalised communities have been the victims of colonisation and oppression on the part of people in positions of authority.
This can show up in a number of ways, including exploitation, forced assimilation, and cultural erasure. Indigenous peoples, for instance, have endured forceful eviction from their homes, the erasure of traditional practises, and the encroachment of alien ideas and ways of life.
Similar to this, institutional racism, a lack of resources, and constrained possibilities may be experienced by people of colour as a result of past and present prejudice. LGBTQ+ people have also been colonised by heteronormative ideals being imposed on them and by being shut out of mainstream society. For instance, Spain colonised America, England colonised the eastern shore of North America, and Russia colonised Siberia. All of them are instances of colonialism.
Learn more about colonisation visit: brainly.com/question/30236272
#SPJ4
the jazz singer (1927) is historically significant because it featured several scenes with .question 3 options: slow motion montage synchronous dialogue a musical score color
The Jazz Singer, a Warner Bros. production, was released in 1927 and starred Al Jolson as Jakie Rabinowitz, a young Jewish man who defies his father's wishes to become a cantor and instead pursues a career in jazz music.
The film was a sensation and is often cited as the first feature-length motion picture with synchronized dialogue sequences. While other films had previously experimented with sound, The Jazz Singer was the first to use sound as an integral part of the story and to include extended dialogue scenes with synchronized sound.
The use of synchronized sound was a game-changer for the film industry, as it allowed for greater realism and emotional impact in movies. The success of The Jazz Singer paved the way for the development of sound in movies and ultimately led to the decline of the silent film era. The film was also notable for its depiction of Jewish culture and identity, which was still relatively rare in Hollywood at the time. Despite some criticisms of its portrayal of Jewish characters, The Jazz Singer remains a landmark film in the history of cinema.
Learn more about Hollywood here:
https://brainly.com/question/28727450
#SPJ11
Interpretive anthropology can be contrasted with more __________ approaches.
Interpretive anthropology can be contrasted with more positivist or scientific approaches.
Positivist or scientific approaches aim to study human behavior through quantifiable data and objective observation, while interpretive anthropology focuses on subjective interpretation of the meanings behind human actions and culture. Interpretive anthropology seeks to understand the symbolic and cultural significance of human behavior, whereas positivist approaches aim to explain human behavior through cause-and-effect relationships.
Learn more about relationshipshere:
https://brainly.com/question/31248849
#SPJ11
What can you learn from a newspaper about laws, regulations or public policy?
A newspaper about laws, regulations or public policy and find out about laws, rules, or public policy in a newspaper by learning the names of the laws and/or the organisation in charge of enforcing them.
Governments create and carry out a corpus of laws, regulations, and decisions with the intention of assisting the general public. Public policy can affect which topics are of general public interest.
Which laws are established, and where financing is allocated. Governments, institutions, and even the general public work together to make public policy, making it a crucial and effective way to be heard. As politicians and parties change, so do the attitudes and views held by the majority or by those in authority.Politicians can, of course, be voted out of office and out of power, but changing the public policies they support is more difficult.
To know more about public policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20276608
#SPJ4
Which of these best describes a mixed economy?
A. Businesses are regulated by the government to protect the public's interest.
B. The government's only role in the economy is to ensure competition.
C. Natural resources are owned and controlled by the government.
D. The government decides who will produce goods and services.
Answer: d
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Text me
"What is important is the claim of the Communists themselves that for every party member there are 10 others ready, willing, and able to do the party's work. Herein lies the greatest menace of communism. . . .
". . . It might be of interest to observe that in 1917 when the Communists overthrew the Russian Government there was one Communist for every 2,277 persons in Russia. In the United States today there is one Communist for every 1,814 persons in the country.
"One who accepts the aims, principles, and program of the party, who attends meetings, who reads the party press and literature, who pays dues, and who is active on behalf of the party 'shall be considered a member.' The open, avowed Communist who carries a card and pays dues is no different from a security standpoint than the person who does the party's work but pays no dues, carries no card, and is not on the party rolls. In fact, the latter is a greater menace because of his opportunity to work in stealth."
J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), testimony before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), 1947
Which of the following best explains how the Red Scare following the Second World War reflected the larger historical context?
The ideas reveal strategies by the United States to gain support of other nations against Soviet expansion.
A
The ideas demonstrate efforts by the federal government to ensure domestic security.
B
The ideas represent a consensus among policy makers in favor of expanding the social welfare state.
C
The ideas show how conservatives mobilized to promote isolationism from international affairs.
D
The claim made by the Communists highlights the perceived influence and reach of their ideology, suggesting that for every party member, there are 10 additional supporters ready to further the cause.
This posed a significant concern for conservatives, who saw communism as a major threat to their values and the stability of their societies.
In response to the perceived menace of communism, conservatives mobilized to promote isolationism, a policy of remaining separate from international affairs, especially those related to the spread of communism. By advocating for isolationism, conservatives aimed to minimize the influence of communism on their own nation and to protect their values and way of life.
Isolationism also served as a means for conservatives to focus on domestic issues and strengthen their country's internal affairs. By withdrawing from international engagements, they hoped to prevent any potential ideological contamination from communism and maintain the integrity of their society.
In summary, the claim made by the Communists regarding their influence served as a catalyst for conservative mobilization. The promotion of isolationism by conservatives was an attempt to mitigate the perceived threat of communism and protect their values by minimizing their involvement in international affairs.
To learn more about communist refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/23716206
#SPJ11
Anthropologists take a comprehensive approach to understanding human beings. They accomplish this task by
a.conducting participant observation.
b.exploring the past.
c.using the four-field approach.
d.focusing mainly on biology.
Anthropologists take a comprehensive approach to understanding human beings by using the four-field approach, which includes cultural anthropology, linguistic anthropology, archaeology, and physical anthropology.
Through participant observation and exploring the past, they gain a holistic understanding of human beings, including their physical, cultural, and social dimensions.
Anthropologists take a comprehensive approach to understanding human beings by using the four-field approach. This approach includes cultural anthropology, linguistic anthropology, archaeology, and physical anthropology.
Cultural anthropology involves the study of human cultures, customs, and behaviors. Linguistic anthropology focuses on language and communication. Archaeology explores the human past through the examination of artifacts and remains. Physical anthropology is concerned with the biological and physiological aspects of human beings.
Anthropologists use all of these fields together to gain a comprehensive understanding of human beings. They conduct participant observation to gain first-hand knowledge of a particular culture or society. They also explore the past through the examination of artifacts and other evidence. By using all of these approaches, anthropologists can develop a holistic view of human beings, understanding their physical, cultural, and social dimensions.
Learn more about archaeology here:-
https://brainly.com/question/14327029
#SPJ11
Are legislative leaders in Texas too powerful? Why or why not?
The power of legislative leaders in Texas has been a topic of debate and discussion for many years. Some argue that legislative leaders in Texas are too powerful, while others believe that their power is necessary for effective governance.
On one hand, legislative leaders in Texas have significant power to shape the legislative agenda and control the flow of legislation through the process. The Speaker of the House and the Lieutenant Governor, for example, have the ability to appoint committee members and chairs, set the legislative calendar, and determine which bills come up for debate and vote. This concentration of power can lead to a lack of transparency and accountability, and can result in certain interests or groups having undue influence over the legislative process.
On the other hand, supporters of strong legislative leadership argue that it is necessary for efficient and effective governance. By centralizing power in the hands of a few key leaders, they are better able to set priorities, negotiate deals, and move legislation through the process in a timely manner. Additionally, legislative leaders are often elected by their colleagues and have experience and expertise in navigating the complexities of the legislative process.
In recent years, there have been efforts to reform the legislative process in Texas and redistribute power more evenly among lawmakers. For example, some have proposed changes to the rules governing committee assignments and the legislative calendar, or increasing the role of rank-and-file members in shaping the agenda. However, these efforts have met with mixed success and there remains a great deal of debate over the appropriate balance of power between legislative leaders and individual lawmakers.
In conclusion, whether legislative leaders in Texas are too powerful or not is a matter of perspective and there are valid arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the balance of power in the legislative process will continue to evolve and change over time as lawmakers and citizens grapple with the complexities of governance in a rapidly changing world.
How is the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment best described?
.
It prevents the government from creating a nationally recognized religion.
It allows each individual the freedom to practice a religion of choice.
It restricts a church's ability to collect money from its followers.
It keeps the federal government from placing property taxes on churches
Answer: B
Explanation: The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion as they please, so long as the practice does not run afoul of a "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest.
Which of the following did Nikita Khrushchev do in 1961 in response to John F. Kennedy's decision to send members of the Army Reserve and National Guard to protect West BerlinHe erected the Berlin Wall to separate East and West BerlinHe declared as preference for nonviolent civil disobedienceHe was refreshingly candid but his call for the wholesale bombing of north Vietnam worried voters
Answer: B
Explanation:
Nikita Khrushchev erected the Berlin Wall to separate East and West Berlin in response to John F. Kennedy's decision to send members of the Army Reserve and National Guard to protect West Berlin in 1961. He did not declare a preference for nonviolent civil disobedience, and his call for the wholesale bombing of north Vietnam did not occur until later in the 1960s.
What are Army Reserve and National Guard?
The Army Reserve and the National Guard are both reserve components of the United States Army. They are composed of part-time soldiers who serve in the military while also pursuing civilian careers or attending school.
The Army Reserve is made up of soldiers who are trained to provide support and logistics functions for the active-duty Army, such as transportation, supply, and maintenance. They are typically called upon to serve during times of war or national emergencies, but can also be activated for other types of missions, such as disaster relief efforts.
The National Guard is a dual-status organization that serves both state and federal governments. National Guard soldiers are trained to provide both domestic support and military operations. They can be called upon by the governor of their state to assist with natural disasters or other emergencies, and they can also be called upon by the President of the United States to support federal military operations.
To know more about Army Reserve and National Guard:
https://brainly.com/question/6156922
#SPJ11
During World War I, the U.S. Army screened recruits using the _______________to determine if the recruits were cognitively capable of serving in the military and what job classification would be appropriate.
Answer: Army Alpha and Army Beta tests
From where do we derive most anthropological data?
Answer: I believe It's fieldwork
Compare the 1870 Red River Resistance and the 1885 Northwest Resistance. How does Riel's attempt at another resistance show progress or decline for the Métis?
The 1870 Red River Resistance and the 1885 Northwest Resistance were both uprisings that happened in Canada's western districts, essentially including Métis individuals who felt that their rights and work were being undermined by the Canadian government.
What is the Resistance?The Resistance was driven by Louis Riel, who was able to arrange with the Canadian government and accomplish a few concessions for the Métis individuals.
Therefore, the 1885 Northwest Resistance, driven by Riel once more, was less effective. The Métis were confronting comparable issues as in 1870, counting arrive debate and social concealment, and Riel believed that the as it were way to realize alter was through another resistance.
Learn more about Resistance from
https://brainly.com/question/17563681
#SPJ1
Please help me. TIMED QUIZ!!
On September 11, 2001, why was Flight 93 the only hijacked plane not to reach its target?
A. Terrorists changed their minds about the attack.
B The crew and passengers landed the plane in a field.
C. Passengers fought terrorists for control of the plane.
D. US fighter jets were forced to shoot down the plane.
On September 11, 2001, Flight 93 was the only hijacked plane not to reach its target because C. passengers fought terrorists for control of the plane.
What happened on Flight 93?Following takeoff, the hijackers commandeered the plane with the intention of crashing it into a significant target--most likely the United States Capitol or White House.
But after communicating information regarding other similar incidents to their loved ones through phone calls, the passengers and crew pooled together and made an effort to reclaim control of the aircraft they were aboard. By violently storming the cockpit, fighting off the hijackers onboard, the plane ultimately went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania where there was an open field.
Find out more on Flight 93 at https://brainly.com/question/3602747
#SPJ1
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Why do you think that the junta began yo expand its Dirty War operations to citizens who weren’t guerillas?
( Get answer from text )
Junta expanded its Dirty War operations to citizens who weren't guerillas in order to maintain control and instill fear in the population.
Why was junta expanded beyond guerillas?They wanted to eliminate any perceived threats to their regime, including leftist activists, intellectuals, and anyone who spoke out against their rule. As guerilla groups became weaker, junta began to view other groups as sources of opposition and increased their targeting of them.
By expanding scope of War, the junta created climate of fear and uncertainty among the general population, making it easier for them to maintain control which led to campaign of terror that resulted in the disappearance and murder of thousands of people.
Read more about Junta
brainly.com/question/14308149
#SPJ1
1. How many people lived in Florida in 1837?
2. What type of government did the Florida Constitution provide?
3. What did the Florida Constitution say about slavery?
4. What did Congress want to do about slavery? How was this issue settled?
READ THE PARAGRAPHS I NEED IT ASAP!!!!!
In 1837 the census for the territory of Florida reported that 48,000 people lived there. Enslaved people made up about one-half of Florida's population. Officials organized a vote to determine if Floridians wanted to form a state. Only white men over 21 years of age voted in this election. These voters chose to seek statehood. Now Floridians had to draw up a state constitution and submit it to the U.S. Congress.
Florida voters chose 56 people to attend the constitutional convention in St. Joseph, a small port city on the Gulf Coast. The first constitution provided for a governor elected for four years and an elected General Assembly, or legislature. The Constitution also allowed slavery and called for a system of public schools. The delegates approved the constitution on January 11, 1839. Florida then sent the document to the U.S. Congress for final approval or ratification.
Florida's desire to enter the Union as a slave state caused some difficulty. Congress had long struggled to maintain an equal balance between slave and free states. As a result, it would take six years for Congress to act on Florida's wish. Congress had to wait until another territory was ready to become a free state.
Iowa finally emerged as a free state candidate. With the question of slavery removed, President John Tyler signed the Florida statehood bill. Florida became the twenty-seventh state in the United States on March 3, 1845. The next year, Iowa became a free state. Thus, the balance between the slave and free states in the nation remained the same in Congress.
Answer:
In 1837, 48,000 people lived in Florida.The Florida Constitution provided for a governor elected for four years and an elected General Assembly, or legislature.The Florida Constitution allowed slavery.Congress had long struggled to maintain an equal balance between slave and free states. It took six years for Congress to act on Florida's wish to enter the Union as a slave state. Congress had to wait until another territory was ready to become a free state. Iowa finally emerged as a free state candidate, and with the question of slavery removed, President John Tyler signed the Florida statehood bill. Florida became the twenty-seventh state in the United States on March 3, 1845. The next year, Iowa became a free state, thus maintaining the balance between the slave and free states in Congress._______________ is the pioneering American anthropologist who did work among the Zuni and founded the Women's Anthropological Society in 1885.
Answer:
Her name was Matilda Coxe Stevenson and she also conducted research on the Hopi and Pueblo peoples of the American Southwest.
Explanation:
According to John O'Sullivan, the "manifest destiny" of the United States to occupy North America could be traced to:
According to John O'Sullivan, the "manifest destiny" of the United States to occupy North America could be traced to the belief that it was the nation's divine mission to spread its values, institutions, and democracy across the continent.
According to John O'Sullivan, the "manifest destiny" of the United States to occupy North America could be traced to the belief that it was the divine mission of the United States to spread democracy and civilization throughout the continent. This idea was based on the belief that Americans were inherently superior and destined to expand their territory and influence. O'Sullivan argued that this expansion was not only inevitable, but also morally justifiable, and that it was the duty of the United States to take control of the land and resources of North America in order to fulfill this destiny.
Learn more about United States here
https://brainly.com/question/25899399
#SPJ11
which of the following best explains how this photograph from the second world war can be connected to the cold war that began shortly afterward? responses it provides evidence of underlying hostility between the soviet union and the united states even when they were allied during the second world war. it provides evidence of underlying hostility between the soviet union and the united states even when they were allied during the second world war. it shows the technological advances made by one of the victors of the second world war that solidified its position as a postwar superpower. it shows the technological advances made by one of the victors of the second world war that solidified its position as a postwar superpower. it demonstrates the numerical and material advantages enjoyed by the allied powers in their conflict with the axis powers of germany, italy, and japan. it demonstrates the numerical and material advantages enjoyed by the allied powers in their conflict with the axis powers of germany, italy, and japan. it illustrates the convergence of soviet and american military technology as both countries adopted the same methods of fighting.
The photograph from the second world war that can be connected to the cold war shows the technological advances made by one of the victors of the last world war that solidified its position as a postwar superpower. Therefore the correct option is B.
The photograph shows planes and armament manufacturing in the industrialized western countries that were among the victorious powers in the second world war, either the United States or the Soviet Union.
These countries used their technological and industrial advantages to demand and adapt to the modern postwar world, and became the two superpowers that dominated the cold war.
The photograph, therefore, shows a connection between the past technological and industrial might of the victors of the second world war and the postwar technological and industrial advancements that made them superpowers in the cold war.
Learn more about cold war: https://brainly.com/question/26831734
#SPJ11
What is the argument on the political cartoon "History Marches On: Nativism Marches In Place"? Be detailed and specific in your analysis and tie it to what we learned in this unit! Be sure to mention the beliefs of the "Nativists" or "Native Americans"?
The political cartoon "History Marches On: Nativism Marches In Place" depicts a group of people holding a banner that reads "Native Americans," standing in front of a large wall with the words "America for Americans" inscribed on it.
Behind the wall, there is a procession of people, including Native Americans, African Americans, and immigrants, who are marching towards a brighter future. However, the "Native Americans" in the foreground are holding the group back and preventing progress.
The cartoon is a commentary on the rise of nativism in the United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Nativists believed in protecting the rights and privileges of native-born white Americans and were opposed to immigration and the integration of other groups into American society. They saw immigrants and minorities as a threat to their way of life and sought to limit their influence through laws such as the Chinese Exclusion Act and the Immigration Act of 1924.
The cartoon is suggesting that the nativist attitudes of the "Native Americans" are hindering progress and preventing the United States from moving forward as a society. By holding onto their narrow views and resisting change, they are preventing the country from realizing its potential and achieving greater success.
The cartoon ties into what we learned in this unit about the rise of nativism and the tensions that emerged between different groups in American society during this time period. It highlights the need for greater understanding and cooperation between different groups in order to achieve a more prosperous and inclusive future for all.
Learn more about Immigration here:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ11
Why did President George H. W. Bush invade the nation of Panama in 1989?
President George H. W. Bush invaded Panama in 1989 primarily to capture Manuel Noriega, the Panamanian dictator who had been indicted in the United States .
President George H. W. Bush ordered the invasion of Panama in 1989 for several reasons. The main reason was to capture Manuel Noriega, the Panamanian dictator who had been indicted in the United States on drug trafficking charges. Noriega had been a longtime ally of the United States, but his drug trafficking activities and his increasingly authoritarian rule had caused tensions between the two countries to escalate. Additionally, the United States had strategic interests in Panama, including the protection of the Panama Canal and the safety of American citizens living there. Finally, the invasion was seen as a way for President Bush to demonstrate U.S. military power and assert American influence in the region.
Learn more about military here:
https://brainly.com/question/28357806
#SPJ11
Can anyone write a sold argumentative statement regarding Stalin's rise to power for me to use in an essay?
Answer:
Stalin's rise to power was a complex process that involved political maneuvering, propaganda, and the elimination of his rivals. A solid argumentative statement could be: "Stalin's ruthless tactics and manipulation of the Communist Party allowed him to consolidate power and become the leader of the Soviet Union, leading to significant political and social changes in the country.
Explanation:
In what way did the United States help the Hungarian refugees after the Soviets invaded in 1956?
The United States help the Hungarian refugees by creating a special immigration quota after the Soviets invaded in 1956.
The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 started from 23 October to 4 November 1956 it was also known as the Hungarian Uprising. It was a countrywide revolution against the government of the Hungarian People's Republic and the policies caused by the government's subordination to the Soviet Union (USSR).
Due to the Revolution, the United States created a special immigration quota in 1956 for refugees from the communist crackdown, and more than 30,000 Hungarians resettled in the United States by May 1957 through that program and two hundred thousand Hungarians crossed into Austria. The main events of the Hungarian Revolution are,
Hungarian Revolution 1956Battle of Dien Bien Phu.Brezhnev Doctrine.Brezhnev Era.Cold War Alliances.Cominform.Cominform and Comecon.Cuban Missile Crisis.To learn more about The Hungarian Revolution of 1956:
https://brainly.com/question/30694776
#SPJ4
Explain three ways in which the United States tried to “contain” Communism during the Cold War
Answer:
below
Explanation:
During the Cold War, the United States sought to contain the spread of communism around the world. Here are three ways in which they tried to do so:
1. Truman Doctrine: In 1947, President Harry S. Truman announced the Truman Doctrine, which was a policy of providing economic and military assistance to countries threatened by communism. This policy was put into effect to prevent the spread of communism into countries that were vulnerable to the communist ideology.
2. Marshall Plan: The Marshall Plan, officially known as the European Recovery Program, was a U.S.-sponsored program aimed at rebuilding the war-torn economies of Western Europe after World War II. The plan provided more than $13 billion in aid to European countries from 1948 to 1952. The goal was to rebuild these economies, stabilize them, and ultimately make them less vulnerable to the spread of communism.
3. Military alliances: The United States formed military alliances with countries around the world as a way of containing communism. One of the most significant of these alliances was the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which was established in 1949. NATO was a military alliance between the United States, Canada, and several European countries. It was created to provide a collective defense against the Soviet Union and other communist nations. By forming military alliances, the United States sought to deter Soviet expansionism and limit the spread of communism.
also here are quotes from my AMH1020 college textbook since I’m extra:
Here are some quotes from Eric Foner's "Give Me Liberty! An American History" Volume 2 Edition six that provide evidence for the ways in which the United States tried to contain communism during the Cold War:
1. Truman Doctrine: "The Truman Doctrine, announced in March 1947, pledged that the United States would provide military and economic aid to any nation threatened by communism. In justifying this dramatic departure from previous policy, Truman argued that the United States must support 'free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.'"
2. Marshall Plan: "The Marshall Plan, officially the European Recovery Program, provided massive American economic assistance to revive the economies of Western Europe and prevent the spread of communism on that continent...Over the next four years, the United States provided more than $13 billion in aid to Europe."
3. Military alliances: "The United States responded by forming a military alliance, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), with most of Western Europe...Established in 1949, NATO provided for a collective defense against Soviet aggression."These quotes from Eric Foner's book demonstrate how the United States sought to contain communism during the Cold War through policies such as the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and military alliances like NATO.
Hope this helps, peace