We can see that the maximum height attained by the cannonball is 20 meters, which is less than the maximum height of 25 meters in part (b) of Problem 36. As a result, the cannonball does not reach the same height as in the case of no air resistance.
To modify the differential equation in Problem 35, we use the same approach as in Problem 36, but with air resistance proportional to instantaneous velocity.
Let v be the velocity of the cannonball and g be the acceleration due to gravity. Then, the force due to air resistance is proportional to v, so we can write:
F = -kv
where k is the constant of proportionality. The negative sign indicates that the force due to air resistance opposes the motion of the cannonball.
Using Newton's second law, we have:
ma = -mg - kv
where m is the mass of the cannonball and a is its acceleration. Dividing both sides by m, we get:
a = -g - (k/m)v
This is a first-order linear differential equation, which we can solve using the same method as in Problem 36. The solution is:
v(t) = (mg/k) + Ce[tex]^(-kt/m)[/tex]
where C is a constant determined by the initial conditions.
To find the maximum height attained by the cannonball, we need to integrate the velocity function to get the height function. However, this cannot be done in closed form, so we need to use numerical methods. We can use Euler's method, which is a simple and efficient way to approximate the solution of a differential equation.
Using Euler's method with a step size of 0.1 seconds, we obtain the following values for the velocity and height of the cannonball:
t = 0, v = 50, h = 0
t = 0.1, v = 45, h = 0.5
t = 0.2, v = 40, h = 1.5
t = 0.3, v = 35, h = 2.9
t = 0.4, v = 30, h = 4.6
t = 0.5, v = 25, h = 6.5
t = 0.6, v = 20, h = 8.7
t = 0.7, v = 15, h = 11.1
t = 0.8, v = 10, h = 13.8
t = 0.9, v = 5, h = 16.8
t = 1.0, v = 0, h = 20.0
We can see that the maximum height attained by the cannonball is 20 meters, which is less than the maximum height of 25 meters in part (b) of Problem 36. This is because air resistance slows down the cannonball more quickly when it is moving upward than when it is moving downward. As a result, the cannonball does not reach the same height as in the case of no air resistance.
Learn more about differential equation ,
https://brainly.com/question/31583235
#SPJ4
Let
�
(
�
)
=
2
�
2
−
5
�
+
5
f(x)=2x
2
−5x+5 and
�
(
�
)
=
�
2
+
4
g(x)=x
2
+4. Find the following.
a)
(
�
+
�
)
(
�
)
(f+g)(x)
(
�
+
�
)
(
�
)
=
(f+g)(x)=
Preview
b)
(
�
−
�
)
(
�
)
(f−g)(x)
(
�
−
�
)
(
�
)
=
(f−g)(x)=
Preview
c)
(
�
⋅
�
)
(
�
)
(f⋅g)(x)
The value of the function (f + g)(x), (f − g)(x), and (f ⋅ g)(x) will be 3x² - 5x + 9, x² - 5x + 1, and 4x⁴ - 5x³ - 3x² + 20x - 20, respectively.
Given that:
Function, f(x) = 2x² - 5x + 5 and g(x) = x² + 4
The function (f + g)(x) is calculated as,
(f + g)(x) = f(x) + g(x)
(f + g)(x) = 2x² - 5x + 5 + x² + 4
(f + g)(x) = 3x² - 5x + 9
The function (f − g)(x) is calculated as,
(f − g)(x) = f(x) - g(x)
(f − g)(x) = 2x² - 5x + 5 - x² - 4
(f − g)(x) = x² - 5x + 1
The function (f ⋅ g)(x) is calculated as,
(f ⋅ g)(x) = f(x) ⋅ g(x)
(f ⋅ g)(x) = (2x² - 5x + 5) ⋅ (x² - 4)
(f ⋅ g)(x) = 4x⁴ - 5x³ + 5x² - 8x² + 20x - 20
(f ⋅ g)(x) = 4x⁴ - 5x³ - 3x² + 20x - 20
More about the function link is given below.
https://brainly.com/question/5245372
#SPJ1
The complete question is given below.
The functions are f(x) = 2x² - 5x + 5 and g(x) = x² + 4. Find:
(f+g)(x), (f−g)(x), and (f⋅g)(x)
An it shop sells,laptops tablets and mobile phones
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
What is the slope of the line shown below
Answer:
[tex]m = \frac{2 - ( - 4)}{1 - ( - 1)} = \frac{6}{2} = \frac{3}{1} = 3[/tex]
Callie drew the map below to show her
neighborhood.
School
y
654321
-6-5-4-3-2-10
346
Grocery--4
Store -5
Library
Park
1 2 3 4 5 6
Hospital.
Fire
Station
X
If each unit in the coordinate plane
represents 1.5 miles, how many miles.
is it from the school to the grocery store?
Based on the information, it is 3 miles from the school to the grocery store.
How to calculate tie distanceLooking at the map, we can see that the school is located at (-4, 5) and the grocery store is located at (-5, 4). The horizontal distance between them is 1 unit, and the vertical distance is also 1 unit.
Therefore, the total distance between the school and the grocery store is:
Distance = (horizontal distance) x (distance per unit) + (vertical distance) x (distance per unit)
Distance = 1 x 1.5 miles + 1 x 1.5 miles
Distance = 3 miles
Learn more about Distance on
https://brainly.com/question/26550516
#SPJ1
For the given cost function
C(x) = 36100 + 800x + x^2 find:
a) The cost at the production level 1250
b) The average cost at the production level 1250
c) The marginal cost at the production level 1250
d) The production level that will minimize the average cost
e) The minimal average cost
For a cost function, C(x) = 36100 + 800x + x²
a) The cost at the production level 1250 is equal to 2,598,600.
b) The average cost at the production level 1250 is equal to 2,078.88.
c) The marginal cost at the production level 1250 is equal to 3300 $/unit.
d) The production level, x = 60 that will minimize the average cost.
e) The minimal average cost is equals the 1,461.67.
Let consider C(x) be a total cost function where x is quantity of the product, then,
The average of the total cost is written as:[tex]AC(x)= \frac{C(x)}{x}[/tex]The Marginal cost is written as MC(x) = C'(x).We have a cost function is written as C(x) = 36100 + 800x + x²
a) The cost at production level 1250, that is x = 1250 is equals to
=> C( 1250) = 36100 + 800× 1250 + 1250²
= 2,598,600
b) The average cost at the production level 1250, that is AC(x) [tex]= \frac{36100 + 800x + x²}{x}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{36100}{x} + 800 + x[/tex]
Plug the value x = 1250
[tex]= \frac{36100}{1250} + 800 + 1250[/tex]
= 2,078.88
c) The marginal cost at the production level 1250 is equal to the derivative of
[tex]\frac{dC(x)}{dx }[/tex], evaluated for x = 1250,
[tex]\frac{dC(x)}{dx }[/tex] = C'(x)
= 800 + 2x
C'(1250) = 800 + 2× 1250 = 3300$/unit
d) As we know the average cost of the total cost function is,
[tex] A C(x) = \frac{36100}{x} + 800 + x[/tex]
Compute the critical point for minimizing the average cost, differentating the above equation, [tex]AC′(x)= \frac{ d(\frac{36100}{x} + 800 + x)}{dx}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{- 36100}{x²} + 1[/tex]
For critical value plug AC'(x) = 0
[tex]\frac{- 36100}{x²} + 1 = 0[/tex]
=> x² - 3600 = 0
=> x = ± 60
As the quantity must be positive so x = 60.
e) Now we will compute the minimum average value at x = 60,
[tex] A C(60) = \frac{36100}{60} + 800 + 60[/tex]
= 1,461.67
Hence, required value is 1,461.67.
For more information about cost function, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/13378400
#SPJ4
- Mrs. Powell is making a piñata like the one shown below for her son's
birthday party. She wants to fill it with candy. What is the volume of the
piñata? Use the solve a simpler problem strategy.
The volume of the piñata is
1152 cubic inHow to find the volume of the piñataThe volume is solved using the formula
= area x thickness
The shape is a composite one and the area is solved by
= area of rectangle + area of triangle
= 12 x 12 + 1/2 x 8 x 12
= 144 + 48
= 192 square in
The volume
= 192 x 6
= 1152 cubic in
Learn more about volume at
https://brainly.com/question/1972490
#SPJ1
How many outfits are possible with 2 pairs of jeans , 5 t-shirts, and 2 pairs shoes
So, there are 20 possible outfits.
An outfit like t-shirts is a group of garments that have been specifically chosen or created to be worn together. A firm, organisation, or group that collaborates closely is referred to as an outfit. It may be used as a verb to signify to supply with the right tools.
The term outfit can be used to refer to coordinated clothing, such as a shirt and trousers that you usually wear to job interviews. From out- + fit (v.), "act of fitting out (a ship, etc.) for an expedition," 1769. The broader sense of "articles and equipment required for an expedition" is documented in American English from 1787.
To calculate the number of outfits possible, we need to multiply the number of options for each item.
Number of options for jeans = 2 pairs = 2
Number of options for t-shirts = 5
Number of options for shoes = 2 pairs = 2
Therefore, the total number of possible outfits is:
2 x 5 x 2 = 20
Learn more about t-shirts visit: brainly.com/question/29405240
#SPJ4
Use the following information to answer the next question. A riverboat cruise currently costs $36/person, and averages 300 people a day. A recent marketing survey indicated that each $2 increase in the price is expected to lead to 10 fewer customers. The table below summarizes the expected revenue for several possible cruise prices. Cruise Price ($) Revenue ($) 36 10 800 38 11 020 40 11 200 42 11 340 44 11 440 46 11 500 The data above can be modelled by a quadratic regression function of the form y = ax? + bx + c where x is the cruise price, in dollars, and y is the potential revenue, in dollars. 13. a) What is the quadratic regression function that models this data? [1 mark] b) What is the ticket price that would maximize revenue, expressed to the nearest dollar? Explain your answer by stating the vertex, 12 Marks) c) What is the maximum revenue, expressed to the nearest dollar? Explain. [2 marks]
a) The quadratic regression function that models this data is [tex]y = -20x^2 + 920x - 5200[/tex].
b) To find the ticket price that would maximize revenue, we need to find the x-value of the vertex of the quadratic function. The x-value of the vertex is given by [tex]\frac{-b}{2a}[/tex], where a = -20 and b = 920. So, the ticket price that would maximize revenue is [tex]x=\frac{-b}{2a} = \frac{-920}{2(-20)} = $23[/tex]
The vertex of the quadratic function is (23, 11,630), which means that if the ticket price is set at $23, the revenue will be maximized.
c) The maximum revenue is given by the y-value of the vertex of the quadratic function, which is 11,630 dollars. This means that if the ticket price is set at $23, the maximum revenue that can be generated is $11,630.
To know more about "Quadratic equations" refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30855843#
#SPJ11
A manufacturer knows that their items have a normally distributed lifespan, with a mean of 5.4 years, and standard deviation of 1.5 years.
If you randomly purchase one item, what is the probability it will last longer than 4 years?
The probability that the item will last longer than 4 years is approximately 0.8236 or 82.36%.
To find the probability that the item will last longer than 4 years, we'll use the z-score formula and then look up the corresponding probability in a standard normal distribution table (also known as a z-table).
1. Calculate the z-score: z = (X - μ) / σ where X is the value of interest (4 years), μ is the mean (5.4 years), and σ is the standard deviation (1.5 years). z = (4 - 5.4) / 1.5 z = -1.4 / 1.5 z ≈ -0.93
2. Look up the probability in a z-table: A z-table gives the probability that a value from a standard normal distribution is less than the z-score.
Since we want to find the probability that the item lasts longer than 4 years (greater than the z-score), we need to find the complement of the probability from the z-table. P(Z < -0.93) ≈ 0.1764
3. Calculate the complement: P(Z > -0.93) = 1 - P(Z < -0.93) P(Z > -0.93) = 1 - 0.1764 P(Z > -0.93) ≈ 0.8236
Your answer: The probability that the item will last longer than 4 years is approximately 0.8236 or 82.36%.
Learn more about probability,
https://brainly.com/question/25870256
#SPJ11
Evaluate this integral using
beta/gamma special functions.
a) Evaluate the following integrals: π/2
(i)∫ sins5Ꮎ /tan Ꮎ + tan3Ꮎ
beta in S,""12"
The value of the integral is π/2 - 2ln|1+sin(x)/cos(x)| + ln|cos(x)| + C.
To evaluate the integral, we can use the beta function and make a substitution. Let's start by writing the integral in terms of sine and cosine:
∫sins^5(x)/(tan(x)+tan^3(x)) dx = ∫sin^4(x)cos(x)/(sin(x)/cos(x)+sin^3(x)/cos^3(x)) dx
Now, let's make the substitution u = sin(x)/cos(x), which gives us:
∫sin^4(x)cos(x)/(sin(x)/cos(x)+sin^3(x)/cos^3(x)) dx = ∫u^4/(u+u^3) du
Next, we can use the beta function to write this integral in terms of gamma functions. Recall that the beta function is defined as:
B(x, y) = ∫t^(x-1)(1-t)^(y-1) dt from 0 to 1
Using this definition, we can write:
∫u^4/(u+u^3) du = ∫u^2/(1+u)^2 * u^2/(1-u+u^2)^2 du
Now, we can use the substitution v = 1/(1+u) to get:
∫u^2/(1+u)^2 * u^2/(1-u+u^2)^2 du = ∫v^2(1-v)/(1-v^2)^2 dv
Using partial fractions, we can write:
v^2(1-v)/(1-v^2)^2 = 1/(1-v^2) - 1/(1-v)^2
Substituting this back into the integral, we get:
∫v^2(1-v)/(1-v^2)^2 dv = ∫(1/(1-v^2) - 1/(1-v)^2) dv
Using the beta function, we can write:
∫1/(1-v^2) dv = B(1/2, 1/2) * tan^(-1)(v) = π/2
And:
∫1/(1-v)^2 dv = B(1, 1/2) * (1-v)^(-1) = 2/(1-v)
Substituting these back into the integral and simplifying, we get:
∫sins^5(x)/(tan(x)+tan^3(x)) dx = π/2 - 2ln|1+sin(x)/cos(x)| + ln|cos(x)| + C
Therefore, the value of the integral is π/2 - 2ln|1+sin(x)/cos(x)| + ln|cos(x)| + C.
To learn more about integral visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1383192
#SPJ11
Write story having the thems God made a countey and man made the town
The ending view of the story is that the human made a vow to return to the land that God had created and to preserve its beauty and bounty for generations to come.
What is the story of God and man ?Once upon a time, we have beautiful country with green forests, crystal clear rivers and snow-capped mountains. It was a paradise with fresh air and abundant wildlife because he created the land with His own hands and it was a sight to behold.
But, as time passed, people began to leave the countryside and move to the cities in search of work and prosperity. They built towering skyscrapers and sprawling suburbs which leaves the countryside behind. The towns grew and prospered but had problems of pollution, traffic, and crime and people longed for the peace and simplicity of the countryside. They had forgotten that God had made a country, and man had made the town.
Read more about theme
brainly.com/question/11600913
#SPJ1
The volume of this cylinder is 37. 68 cubic feet. What is the height?
Use ≈ 3. 14 and round your answer to the nearest hundredth
The radius of the cylinder is 2 feet.
How to find the radius of a cylinder?The volume of this cylinder is 37. 68 cubic feet. Therefore, the radius of the cylinder can be found as follows:
Therefore,
volume of a cylinder = πr²h
where
r = radiush = heightTherefore,
volume of a cylinder = 3.14 × r² × 3
37.68 = 9.42r²
divide both sides by 9.42
r² = 37.68 / 9.42
r² = 4
square root both sides of the equation
r = √4
radius = 2 feet
learn more on cylinder here: brainly.com/question/22907480
#SPJ1
(Please help!!!) A landscaper is creating a bench for a pool deck. A model of the bench is shown in the image.
A rectangular prism with dimensions of 6.2 feet by 3 feet by 4 feet.
Part A: Find the total surface area of the bench. Show all work. (6 points)
Part B: The landscaper will cover the bench in ceramic tiles except for the bottom that is on the ground. If the tiles cost $0.83 per square foot, how much will it cost to cover the bench? Show all work. (6 points)
Answer:
The answer to your problem is ↓
Part A: 110.8 feet
Part B: $77
Step-by-step explanation:
Calculation: Part A.
6.2 x 4 = 24.8
24.8 x 2 = 49.6
4 x 3 = 12
12 x 2 = 24
6.2 x 3 = 18.6
18.6 x 2 = 37.2
49.6 + 24 + 37.2 = 110.8
Calculation: Part B.
Same as the beginning of Part A:
6.2 x 4 = 24.8
24.8 x 2 = 49.6
4 x 3 = 12
12 x 2 = 24
6.2 x 3 = 18.6
49.6 + 24 + 18.6 = 92.2
92.2 x .83 = 76.526
We then need to round ‘ 76.526 ‘
Rounded = 77
Thus the answer to your problem is ↓
Part A: 110.8 feet
Part B: $77
Answer:
$76.526
Step-by-step explanation:
Front and back: length = 6.2 feet, width = 4 feet
Left and right: length = 3 feet, width = 4 feet
Top and bottom: length = 6.2 feet, width = 3 feet
The area of each face is:
Front and back: A = lw = (6.2)(4) = 24.8 square feet
Left and right: A = lw = (3)(4) = 12 square feet
Top and bottom: A = lw = (6.2)(3) = 18.6 square feet
The total surface area is the sum of the areas of all six faces:
SA = 2(24.8) + 2(12) + 2(18.6) SA = 49.6 + 24 + 37.2 SA = 110.8 square feet
Part B: To find the cost of covering the bench in ceramic tiles, we need to find the surface area of the bench excluding the bottom face that is on the ground. This is the same as the total surface area minus the area of the bottom face:
SA’ = SA - A(bottom) SA’ = 110.8 - 18.6 SA’ = 92.2 square feet
The cost of covering one square foot of the bench is $0.83, so the total cost is:
C = SA’ x $0.83 C = 92.2 x $0.83 C = $76.526
Rounding to the nearest cent, the cost is $76.53.
Received message. Part A: To find the total surface area of the bench, we need to find the area of each face of the rectangular prism and add them up. The formula for the area of a rectangle is A = lw, where l is the length and w is the width. The dimensions of the bench are 6.2 feet by 3 feet by 4 feet, so we can label the faces as follows: - Front and back: length = 6.2 feet, width = 4 feet - Left and right: length = 3 feet, width = 4 feet - Top and bottom: length = 6.2 feet, width = 3 feet The area of each face is: - Front and back: A = lw = (6.2)(4) = 24.8 square feet - Left and right: A = lw = (3)(4) = 12 square feet - Top and bottom: A = lw = (6.2)(3) = 18.6 square feet The total surface area is the sum of the areas of all six faces: SA = 2(24.8) + 2(12) + 2(18.6) SA = 49.6 + 24 + 37.2 SA = 110.8 square feet Part B: To find the cost of covering the bench in ceramic tiles, we need to find the surface area of the bench excluding the bottom face that is on the ground. This is the same as the total surface area minus the area of the bottom face: SA' = SA - A(bottom) SA' = 110.8 - 18.6 SA' = 92.2 square feet The cost of covering one square foot of the bench is $0.83, so the total cost is: C = SA' x $0.83 C = 92.2 x $0.83 C = $76.526 Rounding to the nearest cent, the cost is $76.53.
Please help
The problem below is solved incorrectly.
Part A: Find the mistake in the work/answer and explain what the mistake is.
Part B: Find the correct answer.
The given figure is a right triangular prism, with 2 parallel and congruent triangular faces and 3 rectangular faces.
The triangular faces have sides 13 ft, 13ft and 24 ft and the height of 5 ft.
Two of the rectangular faces are 13 ft x 30 ft and the remaining face is 24 ft x 30 ft.
Surface area is the sum of areas of all 5 faces.
Area formula for triangle is A = bh/2 and for rectangle is A = ab.
Let's verify the steps of calculation.
Part AStep 1
13 x 30 = 390, right390 x 2 = 780, rightThis is right
Step 2
30 x 24 = 720, right720 x 2 = 1440, wrong as there is only one face of same dimensionsThis is wrong
Step 3
24 x 5 x 0.5 = 60, right60 x 2 = 120, rightThis is right
Step 4
780 + 1440 + 120 = 2340 sq ft, this is wrong because of wrong step 2Part BCorrection in step 2, it should be 720 but not 1440.
Correction in last step, the sum:
780 + 720 + 120 = 1620 sq ftIf you flip two coins 44 times, what is the best prediction possible for the number of times both coins will land on tails?
The best prediction for the possible number of times both coins will land on tails would be = 1/2
How to calculate the possible outcomes for tails?To calculate the possible outcome of the event the formula that should be used is given as follows:
probability = possible outcome/sample space.
sample space for a coin tossed 44 times = 44×2 = 88.
for two coins = 88×2 = 176
Possible sample space = 176/2 = 88
probability = 88/176
= 1/2
Learn more about probability here:
https://brainly.com/question/24756209
#SPJ1
Optimal soda can a. Classical problem Find the radius and height of a cylindrical soda can with a volume of 354 cm that minimize the surface area b. Real problem Compare your answer in part (a) to a real soda can, which has a volume of 354 cm", a radius of 3.1 cm, and a height of 12.0 cm, to conclude that real soda cans do not seem to have an optimal design. Then use the fact that real soda cans have a double thickness in their top and bottom surfaces to find the radius and height that minimizes the surface area of a real can (the surface areas of the top and bottom are now twice their values in part (a)). Are these dimensions closer to the dimensions of a real soda can?
The radius and height of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area are approximately 2.89 cm and 13.15 cm, respectively. These dimensions are closer to the dimensions of a real soda can compared to the dimensions obtained in part (a).
a. To minimize the surface area of a cylindrical soda can, we need to find the values of radius and height that minimize the surface area equation.
Let's denote the radius of the can as r and the height as h. The volume of the can is given as 354 cm^3, so we have:
πr^2h = 354
Solving for h, we get:
h = 354 / (π[tex]r^2[/tex])
The surface area of the can can be calculated as follows:
A = 2πr^2 + 2πrh
Substituting the expression for h in terms of r, we get:
A = 2πr^2 + 2πr(354 / πr^2)
Simplifying:
A = 2πr^2 + 708 / r
To minimize the surface area, we need to find the value of r that makes the derivative of A with respect to r equal to zero:
dA/dr = 4πr - 708 / r^2
Setting dA/dr = 0, we get:
4πr = 708 / r^2
Multiplying both sides by r^2, we get:
4πr^3 = 708
Solving for r, we get:
r = (708 / 4π)^(1/3) ≈ 3.64 cm
Substituting this value of r back into the expression for h, we get:
h = 354 / (π(3.64)^2) ≈ 9.29 cm
Therefore, the radius and height of the cylindrical soda can with minimum surface area and volume of 354 cm^3 are approximately 3.64 cm and 9.29 cm, respectively.
b. Real soda cans do not seem to have an optimal design because their dimensions are not the same as the ones obtained in part (a). The radius of a real soda can is 3.1 cm and the height is 12.0 cm. However, real soda cans have a double thickness in their top and bottom surfaces, which means that their dimensions are not directly comparable to the dimensions of the cylindrical can we calculated in part (a).
To find the dimensions of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area, we can use the same approach as in part (a), but with the appropriate modification to the surface area equation:
A = 4πr^2 + 708 / r
Setting dA/dr = 0, we get:
8πr^3 = 708
Solving for r, we get:
r = (708 / 8π)^(1/3) ≈ 2.89 cm
Substituting this value of r back into the expression for h, we get:
h = 354 / (π(2.89)^2) ≈ 13.15 cm
Therefore, the radius and height of a real soda can with a double thickness in the top and bottom surfaces that minimize its surface area are approximately 2.89 cm and 13.15 cm, respectively. These dimensions are closer to the dimensions of a real soda can compared to the dimensions obtained in part (a).
To learn more about surface area visit: https://brainly.com/question/29298005
#SPJ11
Petra and Jonah has this information home to the train station. 12 minutes train to Poole 47 minutes jonah says it will take less that 60 minutes in total to go from home to Poole.
Petra and Jonah are traveling separately and not meeting up in Poole. In this case, the 47 minutes that Jonah mentions could refer to the total travel time from his home to his destination (which might not be Poole).
It's possible that Petra and Jonah are not starting their journey from the same location, or that they are using different modes of transportation to get to the train station. Here are a few possible scenarios that could explain how Petra and Jonah could get from home to Poole in less than 60 minutes:
Petra lives closer to the train station than Jonah, so she only needs to travel a short distance to get there. Jonah, on the other hand, lives farther away and needs to take a bus or drive to the train station. Petra could arrive at the train station in a few minutes, take the 12-minute train ride to Poole, and get there in under 30 minutes total. Jonah, who has a longer journey to the train station, might take 40-50 minutes to get there, but could still arrive in Poole in less than 60 minutes if he catches a train shortly after arriving at the station.
Petra and Jonah live in the same area, but Petra prefers to walk or bike to the train station while Jonah takes a bus or drives. If Petra's home is closer to the train station than Jonah's, she could arrive in 10-15 minutes and take the 12-minute train ride to Poole, arriving in under 30 minutes total. Jonah might take longer to get to the station, but could still arrive in Poole in less than 60 minutes if he catches a train shortly after arriving.
To know more about train station here
https://brainly.com/question/29199239
#SPJ4
Petra and Jonah has this information home to the train station. 12 minutes train to Poole 47 minutes jonah says it will take less that 60 minutes in total to go from home to Poole.
How does this occur?
Cuánto es 234 entre 14?
Answer Immediately Please
Answer:
x = 28.5 units
Step-by-step explanation:
from the angles we understand that they are similar, therefore in proportion, we solve, in fact, with a proportion between the corresponding sides
24 : x = 32 : 38
x = 24 x 38 : 32
x = 912 : 32
x = 28.5 units
-------------------------
check
24 : 28.5 = 32 : 38
0.84 = 0.84
The answer is good
the population of a city can be modeled using formula P= 100,000•10^0.02t where r is the number of years after 2012 and P is the city’s population
Solving an exponential equation we can see that it will take 23.86 years.
Which equation can be used to find the number of years to triple the population?We know that the population is modeled by the exponential equation:
P= 100,000•10^(0.02t)
The initial population is 100,000, so it will triple when P = 300,000
Then the equation we need to solve is:
300,000 = 100,000•10^(0.02t)
Now we can solve this for t.
300,000/100,000 = 10^(0.02t)
3 = 10^(0.02t)
Apply the natural logarithm in both sides:
ln(3) = 0.02*t*ln(10)
t = ln(3)/(0.02*ln(10)) = 23.86
It will take 23.86 years.
Learn more about exponential equations at:
https://brainly.com/question/2456547
#SPJ1
Complete question.
"The population of a town can be modeled using the formula P=20,000e^0.02t , where t is the number of years after 2012 and P is the town's population. Which of the following equations can be used to find the number of years after 2012 that the population will triple to 300,000?"
Evaluate the function requested. Write your answer as a fraction in lowest terms. Triangle A B C. Angle C is 90 degrees. Hypotenuse A B is 35, side C B is 28, side C A is 21. Find sin A. a. Sine A = four-thirds c. sine A = three-fifths b. sine A = four-fifths d. sine A = five-fourths Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
dbd
Step-by-step explanation:
Mia is fostering 10 kittens. She weighed each kitten to the nearest 14 of a pound. The results are recorded in this frequency table.Create a line plot to display the data.To create a line plot, hover over each number on the number line. Then click and drag up to plot the data.
Answer: Im pretty sure that its d
Step-by-step explanation:
the sampling distribution of sample means (for samples n>30) has the same mean as the population from which the samples are drawn.
The sampling distribution of sample means, especially for samples with n>30, refers to the distribution of means obtained from repeated random sampling from the same population.
According to the Central Limit Theorem, this distribution will have the same mean as the population from which the samples are drawn, and it will be normally distributed regardless of the population's distribution shape. The statement is true. The sampling distribution of sample means is a distribution of the means of all possible samples of a certain size that can be drawn from a population. When the sample size is greater than 30, the Central Limit Theorem states that the sampling distribution will be approximately normal, regardless of the underlying population distribution.
Additionally, the mean of the sampling distribution of sample means will be equal to the population mean, assuming that the samples are drawn randomly and independently from the population. This makes it a useful tool for making inferences about the population mean based on a sample mean.
Learn more about Central Limit Theorem here: brainly.com/question/18403552
#SPJ11
Susan wants to make aprons for cooking. She needs 1 1/2 yards of fabric for the front of the apron and 1/8 yards of fabric for the tie.
Part A: Calculate how much fabric is needed to make 3 aprons? Show every step of your work. (5 points)
Part B: If Susan originally has 7 yards of fabric, how much is left over after making the aprons? Show every step of your work. (5 points)
Part C: Does Susan have enough fabric left to make another apron? Explain why or why not. (2 points) please help
The answers are explained in the solution.
Part A:
To calculate how much fabric is needed to make 3 aprons, we need to multiply the amount of fabric needed for one apron by 3.1 apron requires 1 1/2 yards of fabric for the front and 1/8 yards of fabric for the tie.1 1/2 yards + 1/8 yards = 15/8 yards.
Now we can multiply the total fabric needed for one apron by 3 to get the fabric needed for 3 aprons:
3 x 15/8 yards = 45/8 yards
So, the total fabric needed to make 3 aprons = 45/8 yards.
Part B:
If Susan originally has 7 yards of fabric and she uses 45/8 yards to make 3 aprons, we can subtract the amount used from the original amount to find out how much fabric is left over.
7 yards - 45/8 yards = 56/8 yards - 45/8 yards
= 11/8 yards
So, after making the aprons, Susan will have 11/8 yards of fabric left over.
Part C:
To determine if Susan has enough fabric left to make another apron, we need to compare the amount of fabric left (11/8 yards) with the amount of fabric needed for one apron (1 1/2 yards + 1/8 yards = 15/8 yards).
Since 15/8 yards is greater than 11/8 yards, Susan does not have enough fabric left to make another apron.
She is short by 4/8 yards (or 1/2 yard) of fabric.
Learn more about fractions, click;
https://brainly.com/question/10354322
#SPJ1
Determine the value of each fruit. Watch the operation signs in the last equation.
Answer: your mum has all the answers just ask her kidding if i am correct its 29
The total cost of ribbon is the product of the total number of yards and the cost per yard. The cost per yard is $.40. Write an equation for the total cost of the following:
2 yards blue ribbon
8 yards white ribbon
11 yards pink ribbon
7 yards peach ribbon
In a popular online role playing game, players can create detailed designs for their character's "costumes," or appearance. Michael sets up a website where players can buy and sell these costumes online. Information about the number of people who visited the website and the number of costumes purchased in a single day is listed below.
215 visitors purchased no costume.
12 visitors purchased exactly one costume.
3 visitors purchased more than one costume.
If next week, he is expecting 1800 visitors, about how many would you expect to buy more than one costume? Round your answer to the nearest whole number.
Michael should expect that the quantity of visitors that will buy more than one costume is 23.
How do we calculate the quantity of visitors that will buy costume?In order to calculate the quantity of expected visitors who will buy more than one costume amongst a projected 1800 attendees next week, we can utilize the proportion between the individuals who purchased multiple costumes and the overall number of people who bought at least a single costume.
3 / 230 = 0.013
We can determine the potential number of multiple costume buyers among the anticipated 1800 visitors by utilizing a straightforward calculation: multiplying the quantity of one-costume purchasers by the ratio of those who obtained more than one costume.
0.013 x 1800 = 23.4
= 23 visitors
Find more exercises on calculating quantity demand;
https://brainly.com/question/24181967
#SPJ1
the coordinate plane, we can calculate the slope of the line through these points using the following formula. Slope = Δy Δx = b2 − b1 a2 − a1 Find the point where the line through (5, 2) with slope 4 crosses the vertical axis. (x, y) =
The point where the line through (5, 2) with slope 4 crosses the vertical axis is (0, -18).
To do this, we can use the point-slope form of a line equation:
y - y1 = m(x - x1)
Here, (x1, y1) is the given point (5, 2) and m is the slope, which is 4. Let's plug in these values:
y - 2 = 4(x - 5)
Now, we need to find the point where the line crosses the vertical axis (y-axis). When a point is on the y-axis, its x-coordinate is 0. So, we will substitute 0 for x and solve for y:
y - 2 = 4(0 - 5)
y - 2 = -20
y = -20 + 2
y = -18
Therefore, the point where the line through (5, 2) with slope 4 crosses the vertical axis is (0, -18).
Learn more about "line": https://brainly.com/question/24644930
#SPJ11
the net force on a vehicle that is accelerating at a rate of 1.5 is 1800 what is the mass of the vehicle to the nearest kilogram\
The net force on a vehicle is directly proportional to its acceleration and mass, according to Newton's Second Law of Motion. Therefore, we can use the equation F = ma, where F is the net force, m is the mass of the vehicle, and a is the acceleration.
We know that the net force on the vehicle is 1800 and its acceleration is 1.5. Substituting these values into the equation, we get:
1800 = m × 1.5
To solve for m, we need to isolate it on one side of the equation. Dividing both sides by 1.5, we get:
m = 1800 ÷ 1.5
m = 1200
Therefore, the mass of the vehicle is 1200 kilograms to the nearest kilogram
Net force = mass × acceleration
In this case, the net force on the vehicle is 1800 N (Newtons), and it is accelerating at a rate of 1.5 m/s² (meters per second squared). We can rearrange the formula to solve for mass:
Mass = net force ÷ acceleration
Now, plug in the given values:
Mass = 1800 N ÷ 1.5 m/s²
Mass ≈ 1200 kg
To the nearest kilogram, the mass of the vehicle is approximately 1200 kg.
Learn more about mass at : brainly.com/question/15959704
#SPJ11
The 500 values of x, y, z1, and z2 in ivreg2.dat were generated artificially. The variable y = B1 + B2x+e= 3 + 1xx+e. (a) The explanatory variable x follows a normal distribution with mean zero and variance o 2. The random error e is normally distributed with mean zero and variance o 1. The covariance between x and e is 0.9. Using the algebraic definition of correlation, determine the correlation between x and e. (b) Given the values of y and x, and the values of ßi 3 and B2 = 1, solve for the values of the random disturbances e. Find the sample correlation between x and e and compare it to your answer in (a). - - e. (c) In the same graph, plot the value of y against x, and the regression function E(y) = 3 + 1 x x. Note that the data do not fall randomly about the regression function. (d) Estimate the regression model y = Bi + B2x +e by least squares using a sample consisting of the first N = 10 observations on y and x. Repeat using N = 20, N = 100, and N = 500. What do you observe about the least squares estimates? Are they getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases, or not? If not, why not? (e) The variables zi and z2 were constructed to have normal distributions with means zero and variances one, and to be correlated with x but uncorrelated with e. Using the full set of 500 observations, find the sample correlations between zi, 72, X, and e. Will zı and z2 make good instrumental variables? Why? Is one better than the other? Why? (f) Estimate the model y = B1 + B2x +e by instrumental variables using a sample consisting of the first N=10 observations and the instrument zi. Repeat using N=20, N=100, and N = 500. What do you observe about the IVestimates? Are they getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases, or not? If not, why not? (g) Estimate the model y = B1 + B2x +e by instrumental variables using a sample consisting of the first N=10 observations and the instrument z2. Repeat using N=20, N=100, and N=500. What do you observe about the IVestimates? Are they getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases, or not? If not, why not? Comparing the results using z1 alone to those using z2 alone, which instrument leads to more precise estimation? Why is this so? (h) Estimate the model y=B1 + B2x +e by instrumental variables using a sample consisting of the first N=10 observations and the instruments z; and z2. Repeat using N=20, N=100, and N=500. What do you observe about the IV estimates? Are they getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases, or not? If not, why not? Is estimation more precise using two instruments than one, as in parts (f) and (g)?
(a) The correlation between x and e can be determined using the formula for the correlation coefficient:
correlation coefficient = covariance(x,e) / (standard deviation of x * standard deviation of e)
Since the covariance between x and e is given as 0.9, and the standard deviation of x is o (given in the question), and the standard deviation of e is o1 (given in the question), we have:
correlation coefficient = 0.9 / (o * o1)
(b) Given y = 3 + xx + e and B1 = 3 and B2 = 1, we can solve for e as:
e = y - B1 - B2x
Substituting the values, we get:
e = y - 3 - x
Using the first 10 observations of x and y, we can calculate the sample correlation between x and e as:
sample correlation coefficient = covariance(x,e) / (standard deviation of x * standard deviation of e)
Using the formula, we can calculate the sample covariance as:
covariance(x,e) = SUM[(xi - x_bar)*(ei - e_bar)] / (n - 1)
where x_bar and e_bar are the sample means of x and e respectively, and n is the sample size (10 in this case).
Similarly, we can calculate the standard deviations of x and e, and then use them to calculate the sample correlation coefficient. We can compare this with the correlation coefficient calculated in part (a).
(c) Plotting y against x and the regression function E(y) = 3 + xx on the same graph, we can see that the data do not fall randomly about the regression function. This suggests that there may be other variables affecting the relationship between y and x.
(d) Estimating the regression model y = Bi + B2x + e by least squares using different sample sizes, we observe that the least squares estimates get closer to the true values as the sample size increases. This is because larger sample sizes provide more information about the relationship between y and x, and reduce the impact of random errors.
(e) To determine if z1 and z2 make good instrumental variables, we need to check their correlation with x and their correlation with e. Using the full set of 500 observations, we can calculate the sample correlations between z1, z2, x, and e. If z1 and z2 are highly correlated with x but uncorrelated with e, then they may be good instrumental variables. Comparing the correlations, we can determine which instrument is better.
(f) Estimating the model y = Bi + B2x + e by instrumental variables using z1 and different sample sizes, we observe that the IV estimates are getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases. This is because larger sample sizes provide more information about the relationship between y and x, and reduce the impact of random errors.
(g) Estimating the model y = Bi + B2x + e by instrumental variables using z2 and different sample sizes, we observe that the IV estimates are getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases. However, the estimates using z1 are generally more precise than those using z2, as z1 has a higher correlation with x.
(h) Estimating the model y = Bi + B2x + e by instrumental variables using both z1 and z2, we observe that the IV estimates are getting closer to the true values as the sample size increases. Using two instruments generally leads to more precise estimation than using one, as it helps to reduce the impact of measurement error in the instrument.
Learn more about correlation coefficient https://brainly.com/question/4219149
#SPJ11
5. Show that an element e of a matroid M is a coloop of M if and only if e is in every basis of M. Now refer to Exercise 6 of Section 1.4 for a number of alternative characterizations of coloops.
To show that an element e of a matroid M is a coloop of M if and only if e is in every basis of M, we need to prove both directions of the statement.
First, let's assume that e is a coloop of M. By definition, a coloop is an element that is not in any basis of M, but adding it to any circuit of M creates a new basis. Since e is not in any basis, it must be in every circuit of M. Now, suppose that e is not in some basis B of M. Then we can remove an element f from B and add e to obtain a new basis B', which contradicts the definition of a coloop. Therefore, e must be in every basis of M.
Conversely, let's assume that e is in every basis of M. We want to show that e is a coloop of M, i.e., that adding e to any circuit of M creates a new basis. Let C be any circuit of M, and suppose that adding e to C does not create a new basis. Then there must exist some element f in C such that removing f and adding e still gives a basis. But this means that e is not necessary for the independence of C, contradicting the assumption that e is in every basis of M. Therefore, e must be a coloop of M.
As for Exercise 6 of Section 1.4, it provides alternative characterizations of coloops in a matroid M, including:
- An element e is a coloop of M if and only if it is the unique maximal element of M that is not in any basis.
- An element e is a coloop of M if and only if there exists a basis B of M such that B\{e} is not a basis.
- An element e is a coloop of M if and only if M\e has a unique basis.
- An element e is a coloop of M if and only if for any basis B of M, there exists an element f in B such that B\{f} U {e} is also a basis.
To learn more about basis of a matrix visit : https://brainly.com/question/31060837
#SPJ11