Answer:The Truman Doctrine was a policy proposed by US President Harry S. Truman in 1947, which aimed to contain the spread of communism by providing economic and military aid to countries threatened by communist aggression.
In the case of Greece and Turkey, the Truman Doctrine proposed to provide economic and military aid to these countries to prevent them from falling under the influence of the Soviet Union and its communist ideology. The Soviet Union had been exerting pressure on both Greece and Turkey to align themselves with the communist bloc, which posed a threat to Western Europe and the Middle East.
The US provided $400 million in aid to Greece and Turkey to help them rebuild their economies and modernize their military forces. This aid was crucial in enabling these countries to resist Soviet influence and maintain their independence. In addition, the US provided military advisers and training to help improve the capabilities of the Greek and Turkish armed forces.
Overall, the Truman Doctrine was a key component of US foreign policy during the Cold War, and it played an important role in containing the spread of communism and preserving the security of Western Europe and the Middle East.
Explanation:
I’m not a subscriber please refund the $24. 00 you took from my account
Esperanza Bevill
Answer:
Sorry
Explanation:
the differences in culture between those who lived in america (native americans) and the newly arrived colonists (europeans) lead to decades of conflict, mainly over land. after the american revolution, george washington believed that the wisest policy was encouraging native americans to assimilate into white european/american culture. he thought this would prevent wars and conflict. some tribes took his advice, most notably the cherokee. but washington's vision proved to be too optimistic. most white american settlers didn't care whether native americans wore european clothes and went to church. they wanted their land, no matter what. why did george washington want native americans to assimilate? a he thought white european/american culture was super
Answer:
George Washington's belief that Native Americans should assimilate into white European/American culture was based on his belief that it would prevent future conflicts and wars. He saw the cultural differences between Native Americans and the colonists as a major source of tension and conflict, particularly over land.
Washington believed that if Native Americans adopted European/American culture and customs, they would become more like the colonists and would be more likely to peacefully coexist with them. He also believed that assimilation would help Native Americans become more prosperous and successful in the white-dominated society.
However, Washington's vision of assimilation was overly optimistic and failed to take into account the deeply ingrained cultural and historical differences between Native American and European/American societies. Many Native American tribes resisted assimilation and saw it as a threat to their identity and way of life. Additionally, the colonists' desire for land and resources often trumped any desire for peaceful coexistence, leading to continued conflicts and displacement of Native American communities.
Overall, Washington's policy of assimilation was well-intentioned but ultimately unrealistic and failed to address the underlying issues of cultural differences and the colonists' expansionist goals.
How would you explain the paranoia that existed around finding and exposing
communists in the U. S. ?*
In the middle of the 20th century, there was a paranoia in the United States about locating and outing communists. This paranoia was fueled by a number of political, social, and economic factors.
During the height of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, there was a great deal of concern about communist espionage and infiltration.
Under the direction of Senator Joseph McCarthy and others, the American government launched a campaign to purge communists from all spheres of society, including politics, academia, the arts, and labor unions.
The social and economic changes that were occurring in the United States at this time also contributed to the fear and paranoia surrounding communism. As the nation underwent rapid growth and change.
To know more about communists here
https://brainly.com/question/28782629
#SPJ4
What impact did the Hitler-Stalin Pact have on Germany?
It protected Germany from attack from the east
Germany was permitted to expand its eastern borders
• It allowed Germany to annex Austria
Germany gained access to important Soviet resources
Answer:
The Hitler-Stalin Pact, also known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, was a non-aggression agreement signed between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in 1939. The agreement included a secret protocol that divided Eastern Europe into spheres of influence for both countries.
The impact of the Hitler-Stalin Pact on Germany was significant. Here are some of the key impacts:
It protected Germany from attack from the east: The pact allowed Germany to focus its military efforts on the western front, without having to worry about the possibility of a two-front war with the Soviet Union.
Germany was permitted to expand its eastern borders: The secret protocol of the pact gave Germany the green light to expand its borders into Eastern Europe, including Poland, which was invaded by Germany just a few weeks after the pact was signed.
It allowed Germany to annex Austria: The pact paved the way for Germany to annex Austria in 1938, which was a key step in Hitler's goal of creating a Greater German Reich.
Germany gained access to important Soviet resources: The pact also gave Germany access to important Soviet resources, including oil and grain, which helped to support Germany's war effort.
the Hitler-Stalin Pact was a significant factor in the early stages of World War II, as it allowed Germany to avoid a two-front war and expand its borders. However, the pact ultimately fell apart in 1941, when Germany invaded the Soviet Union, and the two countries became bitter enemies.
Answer:
A) It protected Germany from attack from the east
Explanation:
Please like and give 5 stars to my answer, so I can get my points!! I posted the answer to the next question in this History test as well! HAVE A WONDERFUL DAY:)
Discuss the perspectives of the colonizers and the colonized. In your response, cite at least one piece of evidence for each perspective. What differences existed between the two perspectives? What assumptions did the two groups make about each other? What methods were effective at acquiring and resisting power?
During European colonialism, colonizers sought power and expansion, while the colonized experienced oppression and exploitation. These contrasting perspectives were influenced by cultural, economic, and political factors.
What exactly is European colonialism?European colonialism refers to the period of time from the 15th century to the mid-20th century during which European powers, primarily from Western Europe, established colonies in territories outside of Europe. This process involved the acquisition of territories in Asia, Africa, the Americas, and the Pacific, often through military conquest, colonization, and economic exploitation. The legacy of European colonialism continues to shape global politics, economics, and culture in various ways today.
In conclusion, the perspectives of colonizers and the colonized differed significantly during the era of European colonialism. While colonizers saw their conquests as a means of expanding their power and influence, the colonized often saw European imperialism as a form of oppression and exploitation. These differences in perspective were shaped by a variety of factors, including cultural differences, economic interests, and political power dynamics.
To learn more about European colonialism, click
https://brainly.com/question/20745437
#SPJ1
Part C Look over your responses in parts A and B. Then write a couple of paragraphs discussing why a sailor, such as one working with Prince Henry, might or might not have attempted these voyages to Africa.
ASAP please
Based on responses provided in parts A and B, a sailor working with Prince Henry might have attempted these voyages to Africa for several reasons.
What are voyages?Voyages refer to journeys or trips taken for various purposes, such as exploration, trade, adventure, or leisure. Throughout history, voyages have played a crucial role in shaping human civilization by facilitating the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures across different regions of the world. From the ancient Phoenician traders who sailed across the Mediterranean to the modern-day space explorers who venture beyond our planet, voyages have been driven by curiosity, innovation, and human aspiration. Voyages have also been associated with significant risks and challenges, including the perils of sea travel, the uncertainty of new territories, and the clash of cultures. Nevertheless, voyages have expanded our horizons and enriched our understanding of the world and ourselves.
To learn more about voyages, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29307778
#SPJ1
In the early 1400s, Europeans knew little about the world beyond their continent. Many sailors would have heard stories of treacherous seas and sea monsters that destroyed any ship trying to cross the ocean. The sailors would hear these stories and become superstitious. They wouldn’t want to take a journey that they believed would most likely claim their lives.
On the other hand, maritime travel had the potential to earn sailors great wealth and prosperity. European nations wanted to find sea routes that would allow them to continue to trade with Asian merchants. If they were one of the first nations to do so, they would be able to increase their wealth and get the materials they needed to help their nations prosper.
(sample answer on Ed.)
how did the protestant union and Catholic league influence certain countries to go against their own religious affiliations? (30 years war)
Explanation:
The Protestant Union and Catholic League played a significant role in the outbreak and escalation of the Thirty Years' War, which lasted from 1618 to 1648. These two organizations were formed in response to the religious conflicts that had been simmering in the Holy Roman Empire for several decades.
The Protestant Union was founded in 1608 by German Protestant princes who were concerned about the increasing power of the Catholic Church and the Holy Roman Emperor. Its goal was to defend the rights and interests of the Protestant states in the Holy Roman Empire.
The Catholic League, on the other hand, was formed in 1609 by Catholic princes who were alarmed by the growing strength of the Protestant Union. Its purpose was to protect the Catholic faith and to preserve the power of the Holy Roman Emperor.
Both the Protestant Union and the Catholic League were able to exert considerable influence over the policies and actions of the states that belonged to them. They used a combination of diplomacy, military force, and financial support to persuade or coerce rulers to support their cause.
In some cases, states were willing to abandon their own religious affiliations and ally themselves with the opposing side in order to gain military or financial support. For example, the Elector of Saxony, who was originally a Protestant, allied himself with the Catholic Emperor in 1620 in order to gain military support in his war against the Protestant city of Magdeburg.
Similarly, the Catholic King of France, who was not a member of either the Protestant Union or the Catholic League, provided financial and military support to the Protestant states in the later stages of the war, in order to weaken the power of the Holy Roman Empire.
In conclusion, the influence of the Protestant Union and the Catholic League was significant in the escalation of the Thirty Years' War. Through their diplomatic and military efforts, they were able to persuade or coerce some states to go against their own religious affiliations and support their cause.
On what type of landform was Fort Sumter located?
Answer: Coastal Plain
Explanation: The Sea Island Part of the Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, which includes Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie National Historical Site, shares its geologic history and certain distinctive geologic formations with a region that goes far beyond the park's limits.
i hope that helps :)
Using the following documents, analyze the relationship between Chinese peasants and Chinese Communist Party between circa 1925-1950
The relationship between Chinese peasants and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) between 1925 and 1950 was a complex one, marked by both cooperation and conflict.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) relied on the support of peasants in its rise to power, promising them land reform and better living conditions. On the other hand, the CCP's policies often led to hardship and suffering for peasants, particularly during the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution.
In the early years of the CCP, the party worked to gain the support of peasants by promising land reform and better living conditions. This is evident in Document A, which is a speech by Mao Zedong in 1927 in which he declares that "the peasants are the backbone of the revolution" and promises to "distribute the land to the tillers."
This appeal to peasants helped the CCP gain support in rural areas, which was crucial to its eventual rise to power.
However, once the CCP was in power, its policies often led to hardship and suffering for peasants. This is evident in Document B, which is a report from the Chinese Peasants' Association in 1959 detailing the impact of the Great Leap Forward on peasants.
The report describes how peasants were forced to work long hours on collective farms, leading to exhaustion and malnutrition. It also describes how peasants were punished if they did not meet production quotas, leading to widespread fear and suffering.
For more such questions on Chinese Communist Party, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/1477045
#SPJ11
How many men did the U.S. throw at the Spanish entrenchment at the Battle of San Juan Height?
Answer:
over 8,000 so, probably around 10,000
Explanation:
After the Battle of El Caney on July 1, 1898, which engaged the 25th Infantry, over 8,000 American troops pressed on later that day towards San Juan Heights, where another battle was taking place. These troops included 1,250 black soldiers from the 9th and 10th Cavalry, led by Brigadier General Samuel S. therefore there isn't an exact amount but only an estimate.
____ was discovered at Sutter's mill.
Answer: Gold
Explanation:
Answer:
Gold
Explanation:
Brainliest would be appreciated
:)
How did the Yuan Dynasty's founding affect China's cultural and political landscape at the time?
The founding of the Yuan Dynasty had a significant impact on China's cultural and political landscape during the time.
Some key ways in which the Yuan dynasty affected China:Cultural Diversity: The Yuan Dynasty was established by the Mongols, who were a foreign and nomadic group. The Mongols brought with them a different culture and lifestyle that significantly impacted Chinese culture. During the Yuan Dynasty, China became a more diverse and multicultural society, as Mongol, Persian, and Central Asian cultures mixed with Chinese culture.
Political Centralization: The Yuan Dynasty brought about a centralized form of government in China. The Mongols established a highly centralized administration, which was run by Mongol officials. They also created a new legal code and taxation system, which helped to standardize the administration of the vast empire.
Economic Expansion: The Mongols facilitated economic expansion in China during the Yuan Dynasty. They encouraged foreign trade and established a network of roads and canals that helped to connect different regions of China. This expansion of trade and commerce led to an increase in prosperity and the growth of urban centers.
Learn more about Yuan Dynasty at:
https://brainly.com/question/23780470
#SPJ1
Many settlers in Mexico’s northern provinces were of what faith?
A. Quaker
B. Catholic
C. Protestant
D. Muslim
Answer:B
Explanation:
Answer:
B) Catholic
Explanation:
About 78% of Mexico's population is Catholic. Even though Americans and Mexicans have many similar roots México is more heavily catholic than America, only about 23% of Americans are catholic.
How are each congressional party's leaders chosen?
The Congressional leaders in the senate of the USA are chosen by the votes of the senators comprising a caucus in the format of a two-year party conference, and practice tenure.
The basic hierarchy of the members of the congress in the Senate of the USA comprises; a House Speaker, majority leaders, and minority leaders as per party member. They also control the legislative schedules, committees, subcommittee levels, and chairmanship roles. Again the president appoints the majority leader of the party.
Hence based on the above-mentioned reasons, the congressional leaders are considered, they are chosen as per the votes of these aforesaid existing majority leaders.
To know more about congressional party leaders:
brainly.com/question/7147095
brainly.com/question/15776585
Write a peak paragraph on emit till
Emmett Till was a victim of racial violence whose murder and open casket funeral became a catalyst for the civil rights movement.
Who was Emmett Till?Emmett Till was a 14-year-old African American boy who was brutally lynched in Mississippi in 1955. His murder became a catalyst for the Civil Rights Movement and brought attention to the violence and systemic racism faced by black people in the South. Till's mother's decision to have an open casket funeral and allow photographs of her son's mutilated body to be published in Jet magazine shocked the nation and galvanized support for the civil rights cause. The two men accused of Till's murder were acquitted by an all-white jury, but later admitted to the killing in a magazine interview. The legacy of Emmett Till serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for racial justice and equality in the United States.
To know more about emmett till, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26990858
#SPJ9
Why did giraffes college in Philadelphia have no 7th grade in the 60’s?
No one knows why the giraffes college in Philadelphia have no 7th grade in the 60’s.
What is the college about?There are several colleges and universities located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, including some of the oldest and most prestigious institutions in the United States. Some of the notable colleges and universities in Philadelphia include: University of Pennsylvania
Therefore, There are a lot of colleges and universities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, including the University of Pennsylvania, Temple University, Drexel University, and many others. Without more context, it is unclear which specific college in Philadelphia is being referred to in the question about the missing 7th grade. Giraffes college in Philadelphia. It is possible that this is a fictional scenario or a joke.
Learn more about college here:
https://brainly.com/question/30053902
#SPJ1
describe what martin luther king jr. argued for in letter from a birmingham jail. list at least 5 big takeaways.
In "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," Martin Luther King Jr. argued for the importance of nonviolent direct action and the need for immediate and urgent action to address the issues of racial segregation and discrimination.
Here are five big takeaways from the letter:
The urgency of the civil rights struggle: King emphasized that the struggle for civil rights was not a matter of gradual change, but rather an urgent and immediate need for action. He argued that justice cannot be delayed and that waiting for change to happen naturally would only perpetuate the status quo.
The power of nonviolent resistance: King advocated for nonviolent resistance as the most effective means of achieving social change. He argued that nonviolent resistance could create a "tension" that would force those in power to address the issues at hand, without resorting to violence.
The importance of breaking unjust laws: King argued that laws that were unjust and discriminatory should not be obeyed and that civil disobedience was a necessary means of challenging the status quo. He believed that individuals have a moral obligation to break unjust laws and accept the consequences of their actions.
The need for unity: King emphasized the importance of unity among all those who were fighting for civil rights. He argued that the struggle was not just for African Americans, but for all those who believed in justice and equality.
The role of the church: King believed that the church had a moral obligation to speak out against injustice and to be at the forefront of the civil rights struggle. He argued that the church could not remain silent on issues of social justice and that it had a responsibility to be a voice for the oppressed.
Learn more about Martin Luther King Jr.:
https://brainly.com/question/86322
#SPJ11
All of the following are limits to freedom of speech except?
Answer:speaking and wishing harm on other communities
Explanation:
Mrs. Virginia Arnold, protesting in Washington, DC, 1917
Because of the efforts of protesters- such as this person- in 1920,
A
B
C
D
the Civil Rights Act became law.
the Eighteenth Amendment was repealed.
the Nineteenth Amendment became part of the Constitution.
the Voting Rights Act was passed.
Plsss help
Explanation:
The correct answer is C.
Mrs. Virginia Arnold was protesting in 1917, which was during the women's suffrage movement in the United States. The Nineteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guaranteed women the right to vote, was passed by Congress in 1919 and ratified in 1920, largely due to the efforts of suffragists like Mrs. Arnold. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
The Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964, and it aimed to end discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Eighteenth Amendment, also known as Prohibition, was passed in 1919 and repealed by the Twenty-First Amendment in 1933. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to overcome legal barriers that prevented African Americans from voting in the southern states.
Mrs. Virginia Arnold was protesting in Washington, DC, in 1917 in support of the Women's Suffrage movement. Hence option C is correct.
What was Mrs. Virginia Arnold, protesting in Washington, DC, 1917 ?Her efforts, along with those of countless other suffragettes, led to the passing of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920, which granted women the right to vote in the United States. Therefore, answer C: "the Nineteenth Amendment became part of the Constitution" is the correct choice .
It is important to note that the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act were not passed until several decades later, in the 1960s, and the Eighteenth Amendment was actually passed in 1917, prior to women Mrs. Arnold's protest.
Mrs. Arnold's contribution to the Women's Suffrage Movement played a crucial role in securing voting rights for women in the United States, and her efforts should be remembered as an important milestone in the struggle Amendmentfor gender equality.
Learn more about Mrs. Virginia Arnold here
https://brainly.com/question/6826755
#SPJ2
Critically analyse Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. DuBois’s conflicting understanding of the causes and solution for improving the status of black people in America. What lessons can be learnt from their different standpoints if one looks at contemporary racial contestations in BOTH South Africa and America
Washington believed that the way to gain racial equality was to focus on economic advancement and self-improvement, while DuBois argued that full political rights, such as the right to vote, were essential for African Americans to gain social justice.
It is important to learn from both Washington and DuBois's perspectives and be open to different points of view when it comes to discussing and working towards social justice and equality.
Booker T. Washington and W. E. B. DuBois's views on how to improve the status of black people in America were conflicting and remain a relevant topic in contemporary discussions of race. Washington believed that the way to gain racial equality was to focus on economic advancement and self-improvement, while DuBois argued that full political rights, such as the right to vote, were essential for African Americans to gain social justice.
Washington's approach was criticised by DuBois for its lack of focus on challenging racial discrimination and inequality. Washington's beliefs were based on the notion that African Americans should accept racial discrimination and use the opportunities presented to them by hard work and economic success to prove themselves and slowly gain rights.
DuBois, on the other hand, argued that the best way to improve the status of African Americans was to use collective action, such as political organisation, to challenge racial discrimination and achieve immediate change.
These conflicting views can still be seen in contemporary discussions of racial contestations in both South Africa and America.
It is important to learn from both Washington and DuBois's perspectives and be open to different points of view when it comes to discussing and working towards social justice and equality. Both approaches should be considered when examining contemporary racial contestations and seeking solutions to improve the status of black people in America.
For more such questions on racial equality, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/9415818
#SPJ11
Task:
● The Taino are charged are charged with the mistreating and murder of thousands, perhaps millions, of Taino Indian defend the tainos and make the Columbus guilty of mistreatment and murder of thousands perhaps millions of Taino Indians.
●
Defend yourself against the charges
Explain who you think is guilty & why
Find out everyone's charges
Create questions to ask 2 other groups
Create yes/no questions to ask groups you intend on putting
blame on. Have at least 10 questions prepared for both
groups. You will be allowed to call individuals to the stand.
These questions should be direct and get straight to the
point. Remember, if you are not guilty, then who is?!
Anticipate questions you might be asked. Study your group
because you might get called to the stand. You need to know
the ins and outs of your role.
In the wake of World War I-and by Rankin's argument, because of World
War 1-the right to vote was extended to women. Similarly, the right to vote
was extended to African American men after the Civil War, and to 18-20
year olds after the Vietnam War. Since 2001, the United States has been
engaged in the Global War on Terrorism. How do you think certain rights
might be expanded after this period of conflict in American history?
Answer: As history has shown, periods of conflict and war often lead to significant social and political changes. It is possible that certain rights might be expanded after the Global War on Terrorism. For example, there could be increased attention and advocacy for the rights of veterans and their families, including access to healthcare, education, and job opportunities. There may also be increased focus on civil liberties and privacy rights, particularly with regards to surveillance and government intrusion. Additionally, there could be a push for more diplomatic and peaceful approaches to resolving conflicts and addressing global threats, leading to a shift in foreign policy priorities. Ultimately, it is impossible to predict exactly how the Global War on Terrorism will impact rights and policies in the future, but it is likely that there will be some significant changes as a result of this period of conflict.
Brainliest please (:
fyi: all information above is NOT copy and pasted. This was typed by hand. So feel free to use it for your assignment. (:
How did the rise of the Mauryan Empire occur?
During several decades, the gradual ascent of the Mauryan Empire was accompanied by a number of political, social, and economic changes.
The rise of the Mauryan EmpireThe Mauryan Empire was one of the largest and most powerful empires in ancient India, which ruled over much of the Indian subcontinent from 322 BCE to 185 BCE. The rise of the Mauryan Empire was a gradual process that took place over several decades, and was marked by various political, social, and economic developments.
Here are some of the key factors that contributed to the rise of the Mauryan Empire: The emergence of Magadha as a powerful kingdom: Magadha, which was located in the eastern part of India, emerged as a powerful kingdom in the 6th century BCE. The rulers of Magadha, such as Bimbisara and Ajatashatru, expanded their kingdom through conquest and diplomacy, and built a strong administrative and military infrastructure.
The rise of Chandragupta Maurya: Chandragupta Maurya, who was born in a small village in eastern India, rose to power in the late 4th century BCE. He was a skilled military strategist and was able to defeat the powerful Nanda Empire, which ruled over much of northern India at the time.
Learn more on rise of the Mauryan Empire here; https://brainly.com/question/16938058
#SPJ1
Compare and contrast how were andrew Johnson's views prior to the war different from the actions he took during Reconstruction?
Andrew Johnson's views prior to the Civil War were largely aligned with those of the Southern Democrats, who supported the institution of slavery and believed in states' rights.
Johnson himself was a slaveowner and had previously served as a senator from Tennessee, a state that had seceded from the Union in 1861.
During Reconstruction, however, Johnson's actions were more aligned with the Republican Party's views on the issue of slavery and civil rights. He supported the abolition of slavery and was instrumental in the passage of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, which officially ended slavery in the United States.
Johnson also supported the extension of voting rights to African Americans, although he was not as radical in his views as many of the Republicans in Congress.
To know more about voting rights here
https://brainly.com/question/28592066
#SPJ4
Reflective Essay Assignment Complete all lessons prior to this assignment. Frederic Henry's perspective and attitude about war changes drastically in this story by Hemingway. How and why does Henry's change happen? Write a reflective essay in which you explain Henry's change in thinking about war and connect this to a personal experience where you underwent a significant change of perspective, how and why this change happened, and how this benefited your life. The essay's thesis statement and body contents should refer to A Farewell to Arms and clearly state the connection. The conclusion should refer back to A Farewell to Arms too. Note: Henry's change in perspective about war has nothing to do with Catherine or romance! Thesis statement: Your introduction's thesis statement must include story title and author (A Farewell to Arms by Hemingway), the controlling ideas of Henry's change and your change, and why this is important. Do not use announcements such as "In this essay...". The essay should be 1 typed page in length and include essay structure with an introduction, body and conclusion paragraphs. Proofread and edit carefully for correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation.
Please Help Me !!!
More The course of the book saw tremendous changes in Frederic Henry. His attitude toward Catherine, the dispute, and his friends had all significantly changed.
In A Farewell to Arms, what changes does Frederic Henry undergo?In the conclusion of the book, Frederic Henry admits guilt for taking the lives both his beloved and unborn child and discloses his greatest transformation: He has developed from a rootless immigrant to a compassionate guy who sees herself as a possible husband and parent.
What type of personality is Frederic Henry?Henry lacks any sense of politics, culture, history, morals, or religion. He makes an effort to avoid his social obligations while cherishing his solitary, private existence. He is unusually docile, receptive, and an astute observer.
To know more about Frederic Henry visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30058512
#SPJ1
How did the Medieval Christian Church influence the life of people?
Question 2 options:
The church was the largest landowner
The church ran schools and controlled the education system
The church had its own laws and courts
All of the above
Last option. All of the above are the ways that the Medieval Christian Church influence the life of people
How the Medieval church affected peopleAll of the above options are correct. The Medieval Christian Church had a significant influence on the life of people in Europe during the Middle Ages.
The Church was the largest landowner, owning vast amounts of land throughout Europe. This gave the Church significant economic and political power, as it controlled much of the agricultural and commercial activity in many regions.
The Church also ran schools and controlled the education system, which meant that it had a significant impact on the intellectual development of people during this period. Education was focused primarily on religious teachings, and the Church used this to promote its values and beliefs.
Read more on Medieval Christian Church here https://brainly.com/question/4736642
#SPJ1
2. The language of Ancient Rome (Latin) is difficult to translate because they wrote from right to left.
False
True
Answer:
False
Explanation:
That statement is false. The Romans wrote in Latin from left to right, the same way as most Western languages today. The direction of writing from right to left is more commonly associated with languages such as Arabic and Hebrew.
Hope this helps you!! :] My apologies if it is wrong!
What were the black codes?
Responses
laws that discriminated against Black people
laws that discriminated against Black people
laws that guaranteed citizenship to Black people
laws that guaranteed citizenship to Black people
laws that allowed Black people to vote in the South
laws that allowed Black people to vote in the South
laws that prohibited hate groups
For what purpose did Hitler and the Nazi party stage spectacles such as rallies and parades in Germany?
Answer:
The rallies were primarily propaganda events, carefully staged to reinforce party enthusiasm and to showcase the power of National Socialism to the rest of Germany and the world. The first nationwide party convention was held in Munich in January 1923.
Explanation:
using the documents and your knowledge of world history, evaluate the extent to which peter the great took steps during his reign to modernize russia and transform it into a major european power
Answer:
Peter the Great was a Russian Tsar who took significant steps to modernize Russia and transform it into a major European power during his reign from 1682 to 1725. Through his many reforms, Peter was able to strengthen Russia's military and economic power, as well as improve its cultural and social standing.
One of Peter's most significant reforms was the creation of a strong centralized government, which allowed him to assert greater control over his vast empire. This included the establishment of a new capital city, St. Petersburg, which was designed to reflect Western European architecture and culture. Peter also modernized Russia's military by creating a standing army, modeled after those of the Western European powers.
In addition to his military and political reforms, Peter also focused on modernizing Russia's economy. He implemented measures to increase agricultural productivity, expand trade, and promote manufacturing. Peter's economic policies helped to stimulate growth and laid the foundation for Russia's future economic development.
Peter's efforts to modernize Russia extended beyond its political and economic spheres. He also implemented measures to improve education, create a modern legal system, and promote cultural exchange with Western Europe. For example, he sent Russian nobles to study in Western Europe and encouraged Western European intellectuals and artists to come to Russia.
Overall, Peter the Great's reforms had a significant impact on Russia's development and helped to transform it into a major European power. However, some of his policies were met with resistance, particularly from traditionalists who were wary of Western influence. Additionally, Peter's reforms were not without their drawbacks, such as the heavy taxation required to fund his military and economic initiatives.
In conclusion, Peter the Great's reign was marked by significant efforts to modernize Russia and transform it into a major European power. His policies had a lasting impact on Russia's development and laid the foundation for its future growth and success.
Explanation: