Part A: Based on the information in "Mami and Papi," the statement that accurately describes Negi's family is:
c. They have little money to pay for shelter.
Part B: The evidence from the text that best supports the answer to Part A is:
c. "Our home was a giant version of the lard cans used to haul water from the public fountain."
What does passage suggests about Negi's family?Part A:
The statement "They have little money to pay for shelter" accurately describes Negi's family based on the information in "Mami and Papi." Throughout the text, the family's living conditions are described as poor and cramped.
They live in a small house made of sheet metal, and their living space is compared to a giant version of lard cans used to haul water from a public fountain. Additionally, the text mentions that Negi's father often works long hours and has to take on multiple jobs to support the family. These details suggest that the family may struggle financially and have limited resources for housing.
Part B:
This evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A because it directly describes the family's living conditions and implies that they do not have much money to invest in a proper home. The comparison of their living space to a giant version of lard cans suggests that their house is small and cramped, and may not provide adequate shelter from the elements.
The use of the word "public" in the phrase "public fountain" also implies that the family may not have access to private resources or amenities, further reinforcing the idea that they may be struggling financially.
Learn more about "Mami and Papi," here:https://brainly.com/question/30961229
#SPJ1
points so you can ask questions just put a joke in the answers this is for an essay about people in one of my classes
Answer:
I have no clue what you're saying but I have a joke :)
Explanation:
1. Why did the Cookie go to the doctor?
Because it was feeling crumby
2. Where do you learn to make ice cream?
Sundae School
3. Why do celebrities stay cool?
Because They have a lot of Fans
Why is there something rather than nothing?
Answer:
Why is there anything at all?" (or "why is there something rather than nothing?") is a question about the reason for basic existence which has been raised or commented on by a range of philosophers and physicists, including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Explanation:
hope it helps
Explanation:
Because there is literally no such thing as nothing (at all), and there possibly never was.
(Pls give me brainliest)