Problem 4 [8 points]
For each one of the following statements write whether it is mathematically true or false. Prove or
disprove your decision accordingly.
Assume A = {u, v, w} c R over R with regular operations. The vectors u, v, and w are distinct and
none of them is the zero vector.
(a) If A is linearly dependent, then Sp{u, v} = Sp{u, w}.
(2 points)
(b) The set A is linearly independent if and only if {u+v,v-w, w+ 2u} is linearly independent.
(4 points)
(c) Assume that A is linearly dependent. We define u₁ = 2u, v₁ = -3u + 4v, and W₁ = u + 2v - tw for some t E R. Then, there exists t E R such that {u₁, v₁, w₁} is linearly
independent
(2 points)

a. John Underpar's possible monetary outcomes are either winning, which is worth -$5 (the cost of the ticket).

b. the driver (worth $300) or having a worthless ticket (worth $0).

c) Probability of getting nothing = 79/80 = 0.9875
Probability of winning the driver = 1/80 = 0.0125
d. the expected value of buying a ticket is -$1.19, which means on average, a person can expect to lose $1.19 by buying a ticket.
e.the expected return to the club is $100 if all 80 tickets are sold.

a. John Underpar's possible monetary outcomes are either winning the Taylormade R9 10.5 regular flex driver, which is worth $300, or having a worthless ticket, which is worth -$5 (the cost of the ticket).

b. Actually, winning the driver is worth $300, not $295. So, Mr. Underpar's possible monetary outcomes are either winning the driver (worth $300) or having a worthless ticket (worth $0).

c. Mr. Underpar's "experiment" can be summarized as a probability distribution with the following probabilities:

Probability of getting nothing = 79/80 = 0.9875
Probability of winning the driver = 1/80 = 0.0125

d. The mean or expected value of the probability distribution can be calculated as:

Expected value = (Probability of winning the driver x Value of winning) + (Probability of getting nothing x Value of nothing)
Expected value = (0.0125 x $300) + (0.9875 x -$5)
Expected value = $3.75 - $4.94
Expected value = -$1.19

Therefore, the expected value of buying a ticket is -$1.19, which means on average, a person can expect to lose $1.19 by buying a ticket.

e. If all 80 tickets are sold, the expected return to the club can be calculated as:

Expected return = (Number of tickets sold x Price of a ticket) - Value of the prize
Expected return = (80 x $5) - $300
Expected return = $400 - $300
Expected return = $100

Therefore, the expected return to the club is $100 if all 80 tickets are sold.

learn more about Probability

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The value of x is 48⁰ if EF is tangent to the circle at E.

In geometry, a tangent to a circle is a straight line or line segment that touches the circle at exactly one point. This point of contact is called the point of tangency.

To find the center angle we need to join OD and OC as shown in Figure.

∠ODC = ∠OCD = 90⁰ - 70⁰ = 20⁰

∠DOC = 180⁰ - 20⁰ - 20⁰ = 140⁰

Hence,

(5x-20)⁰ = 360⁰ - 140⁰

5x - 20 = 220⁰

5x = 240⁰

x = 48⁰

Hence, the value of x is 48⁰

To know more about circle here

https://brainly.com/question/23265136

#SPJ1

"The given question is incomplete, the complete question figure is attached below as Question Figure"

"EF is tangent to the circle at E. Find the value of x"

The optimal solution to this linear programming problem will give us the ideal weight for each compound that satisfies all the constraints and minimizes the total cost of the compounds used.

What is linear equation?

A linear equation is a mathematical equation that describes a straight line in a two-dimensional plane.

To build a linear programming model for this problem, we need to define decision variables, objective function, and constraints.

Let:

x1 be the weight of the first compound in grams

x2 be the weight of the second compound in grams

Objective function:

The objective is to minimize the total cost of the compounds used, which can be expressed as:

minimize 3x1 + 8x2

Constraints:

The total weight of the product should be 200 grams. This can be expressed as:

x1 + x2 = 200

The first compound should not exceed 80 grams. This can be expressed as:

x1 ≤ 80

The second compound should not be less than 60 grams. This can be expressed as:

x2 ≥ 60

The weights of both compounds should be non-negative. This can be expressed as:

x1 ≥ 0, x2 ≥ 0

Therefore, the complete linear programming model can be formulated as follows:

minimize 3x1 + 8x2

subject to:

x1 + x2 = 200

x1 ≤ 80

x2 ≥ 60

x1 ≥ 0

x2 ≥ 0

The optimal solution to this linear programming problem will give us the ideal weight for each compound that satisfies all the constraints and minimizes the total cost of the compounds used.

To learn more about linear equation from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ4

Answer:

D.) 42

Step-by-step explanation:

7 multiplied by 6 is 42, and since the function rule is to multiply by 6, we multiply the input, 7, by 6, to get the output, 42.

Answer:

the answer is D.42

Step-by-step explanation:

have a nice day.

The z-score for a patient who takes ten days to recover is 2.24, which is closest to option c. 2.2.

To find the z-score for a patient who takes ten days to recover from a surgical procedure with a mean recovery time of 5.3 days and a standard deviation of 2.1 days, you can use the following formula:

Z-score = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the patient's recovery time (10 days), μ is the mean recovery time (5.3 days), and σ is the standard deviation (2.1 days).

1. Subtract the mean from the patient's recovery time: 10 - 5.3 = 4.7
2. Divide the result by the standard deviation: [tex]\frac{4.7}{2.1} = 2.24[/tex]

The z-score for a patient who takes ten days to recover is approximately 2.24. None of the given options match this value, so the correct answer is not listed.

To know more about the z-score visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31613365

#SPJ11

The coordinates of the critical point is none and the coordinates of endpoints for the function f(t) = 5t^3 + 5t on the given interval (-2, 2) are (-2, -70) and (2, 70) and the function is increasing in interval (-2,2).

To use the first derivative test to locate the relative extrema of the function f(t) = 5t^3 + 5t with domain (-2, 2), we first need to find the derivative of the function:

f'(t) = 15t^2 + 5

Next, we need to find the critical points by setting the derivative equal to zero and solving for t:

15t^2 + 5 = 0
t^2 = -1/3
t = ± sqrt(-1/3)

Since the square root of a negative number is not a real number, there are no critical points in the given domain (-2, 2).

Therefore, we need to check the endpoints of the domain to determine if they are relative extrema. Plugging in t = -2 and t = 2 into the original function, we get:

f(-2) = -70
f(2) = 70

So the endpoint at t = -2 is a relative minimum and the endpoint at t = 2 is a relative maximum.

To determine the intervals of increase and decrease, we can use the first derivative test. Since the derivative f'(t) = 15t^2 + 5 is positive for all values of t in the domain, the function is increasing on the entire interval (-2, 2).

Therefore, the coordinates of the critical points and endpoints for the function f(t) = 5t^3 + 5t on the given interval (-2, 2) are:

- No critical points in the given domain
- Endpoint at t = -2 is a relative minimum, coordinates: (-2, -70)
- Endpoint at t = 2 is a relative maximum, coordinates: (2, 70)
- The function is increasing on the entire interval (-2, 2)

To learn more about critical point and endpoints go to:

https://brainly.com/question/15436460#

#SPJ11

The end behavior of f(x)=(2+x2)(x2−36) is determined by the highest degree terms in the numerator and denominator. In this case, the highest degree terms are both x^4.

The numerator (2+x^2) will approach positive infinity as x approaches positive or negative  infinity because the x^2 term dominates.

The denominator (x^2-36) will approach positive infinity as x approaches positive or negative infinity because the x^2 term dominates.

Therefore, as x approaches positive or negative infinity, f(x) will approach positive infinity.

This is because the highest degree term in the function is x^4, which will dominate the function as x approaches infinity or negative infinity. Since the coefficient of x^4 is positive, the function will approach 0 from both sides as x becomes large or very negative.

To learn more about highest degree term : brainly.com/question/28989244

#SPJ11

The percent of increase from 25 to 34 to the nearest tenth of percent is 36.

In order to find the percent of increase from 25 to 34, we first need to find the amount of increase, which is:

34 - 25 = 9

Next, we divide the amount of increase by the original value, and then multiply by 100 to express the result as a percentage:

(9 / 25) x 100 ≈ 36

Therefore, the percent of increase from 25 to 34 is approximately 36%.

More on percent calculation can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/14697226

#SPJ1

a) The quadratic equation x² + 7x + 10 = 0 has two distinct real roots
b) The quadratic equation 4x² - 3x + 4 = 0 has two complex (non-real) roots.

The discriminant of a quadratic equation of the form ax² + bx + c = 0 is given by the expression b² - 4ac. The value of the discriminant can help us determine the nature of the roots of the quadratic equation.

Specifically:

If the discriminant is positive, then the quadratic equation has two distinct real roots.

If the discriminant is zero, then the quadratic equation has one real root (also known as a double root or a repeated root).

If the discriminant is negative, then the quadratic equation has two complex (non-real) roots.

Using this information, we can determine the number of real solutions for each of the given quadratic equations without actually solving them:\

a) x² + 7x + 10 = 0

Here, a = 1, b = 7, and c = 10.

Therefore, the discriminant is:

b² - 4ac = 7² - 4(1)(10) = 49 - 40 = 9

Since the discriminant is positive, this quadratic equation has two distinct real roots.

b) 4x² - 3x + 4 = 0

Here, a = 4, b = -3, and c = 4.

Therefore, the discriminant is:

b² - 4ac = (-3)² - 4(4)(4) = 9 - 64 = -55

Since the discriminant is negative, this quadratic equation has two complex (non-real) roots.

To learn more about solution click on,

https://brainly.com/question/28974181

#SPJ1

The area of a rectangle is given by multiplying its length by its width. So, we have: Therefore, the area of the rectangle is 256x²m¹⁰.

When calculating a rectangle's area, we multiply the length by the width of the rectangle. The perimeter of a shape is the space surrounding it. Space inside a form is measured by area.  A closed figure's area is the portion of the plane that it occupys, whereas its perimeter is the space around it. The size of a plane or the area it encloses is expressed in square metres.

An example of a quadrilateral with equal and parallel opposite sides is a rectangle. It is a polygon with four sides and four angles that are each 90 degrees. A rectangle is a form with only two dimensions.

Area = length x width

Area = (8m³)² x (4x²m⁴)

Area = 64m⁶ x 4x²m⁴

Area = 256x²m¹⁰

Learn more about rectangle visit: brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ4

The statements and reasons for the proof of the triangle angle bisector theorem is shown below.

Since Lines EA and BD are parallel,

<1 = <4 (Corresponding angles)

<2 = <3 (Alternate angles)

<1 = <3 ( BD bisects ∠ABC )

So, by the above three equations, we get

<2 = <4

Then, BE=AB (Opposite sides equal to opposite angles are equal)

Now, In triangle ACE as AE is parallel to BD.

By Basic Proportionality theorem, which states

AD/ DC = BE/ CB

AD  DC = AS/ CB

Learn more about Basic Proportionality theorem here:

https://brainly.com/question/10726681

#SPJ1

False. Cross-sectional designs do not show how causal processes occur over time, as they only provide a snapshot of a particular moment in time. Longitudinal designs are better suited for studying causal processes over time

Longitudinal designs are better suited for studying causal processes over time. However, cross-sectional designs can still have a high degree of internal validity, which refers to the extent to which a study accurately measures what it intends to measure.

False. Cross-sectional designs do not show how causal processes occur over time, as they only provide a snapshot of a particular moment in time.

learn more about Cross-sectional designs

https://brainly.com/question/14676018

#SPJ11

The value of the book after three years is  $18661.

Given that the depreciation can be obtained from the use of;

An = P(1 - r)^t

An = value at the given time

P = initial value

r = rate of depreciation

t = time

Thus;

19200 = 24200 (1 - r)^6

19200/24200 =  (1 - r)^6

0.79 =  (1 - r)^6

ln 0.79 = 6ln(1 - r)

-0.23 = 6ln(1 - r)

ln(1 - r) = -0.23/6

ln(1 - r) = -0.038

1 - r = e^-0.038

r = 0.083

r = 8.3%

After three years;

An = 24200(1 - 0.083)^3

An = $18661

Learn more about depreciation:https://brainly.com/question/30531944

#SPJ1

Answer

R is reflexive

R is not symmetric.

R is transitive

Explanation

(i) R is Reflexive: Yes, R is reflexive because for any (x, y) in RxR, (x, y) R (x, y) is true since x + x ≤ y + y.

(ii) R is Symmetric: No, R is not symmetric. Counterexample: (1, 2) R (0, 1) is true since 1 + 0 ≤ 2 + 1, but (0, 1) R (1, 2) is false since 0 + 1 > 1 + 2.

(iii) R is Transitive: Yes, R is transitive. If (x, y) R (z, t) and (z, t) R (u, v), then x + z ≤ y + t and z + u ≤ t + v. Adding these inequalities, we get x + z + z + u ≤ y + t + t + v. Simplifying, we have x + u ≤ y + v, which means (x, y) R (u, v).

To Know more about Relation the visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31111483

#SPJ11

It appears that the quality control of the repair process has worked, but we cannot say this with complete certainty.

To determine if the quality control of the repair process has worked, we need to check if the machine has gone longer than expected without repairs.

The expected time between two repairs is given by the formula:

Expected time = α x β

So, in this case, the expected time between two repairs is:

Expected time = 3 x 4 = 12 days

Since it has been 30 days since the last repair, it appears that the quality control has worked and the machine has gone longer than expected without repairs. However, we cannot say this with certainty as there is still a probability of such a long time gap occurring even without any improvement in the repair process.

To make a more precise statement, we can calculate the probability of the machine going 30 days or longer without repairs, assuming the repair process has not improved.

Using the gamma distribution with α= 3 and β= 4, we can calculate this probability as:

P(X > 30) = 1 - P(X ≤ 30)

where X is the time between two repairs.

Using a gamma distribution calculator or software, we can find that:

P(X > 30) ≈ 0.028

This means that there is only a 2.8% chance of the machine going 30 days or longer without repairs if the repair process has not improved.

Therefore, based on this probability, it appears that the quality control of the repair process has worked, but we cannot say this with complete certainty.

To learn more about improvement visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28105610

#SPJ11

The amount quoted by the contractor , given the discount rate and the amounts to be paid, is N 29, 397.19

The amount quoted by the contractor is the total present value of the different future payments by the client.

The present value ( and amount quoted ) is therefore :

= 8, 000 / 1. 10 + 9, 000 / 1. 10 ² + 10, 000 / 1. 10 ³ + 10, 500 / 1. 10 ⁴

= 7, 272.73  + 7, 438.02  + 7, 513.14 + 7, 173.30

= N 29, 397.19

In conclusion, the total quoted was Contractor is $ 29, 397.19 and the amount to be paid every year is N 9, 269.79.

Find out more on amount quoted at https://brainly.com/question/14483805

#SPJ1

The probability that a randomly selected bolt will have a diameter greater than 0.60 cm is approximately 0.6915.

We know that the diameters of bolts produced on a certain machine are normally distributed with a mean (μ) of 0.62 cm and a standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 cm.

Let X be the diameter of a bolt. Then, X ~ N(μ, σ) = N(0.62, 0.04).

We need to find the probability that a randomly selected bolt will have a diameter greater than 0.60 cm.

P(X > 0.60) = P((X - μ)/σ > (0.60 - 0.62)/0.04) (standardizing X)

= P(Z > -0.5) (where Z ~ N(0,1) is the standard normal distribution)

Using the standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that P(Z > -0.5) is approximately 0.6915.

Therefore, the probability that a randomly selected bolt will have a diameter greater than 0.60 cm is approximately 0.6915.

To learn more about diameter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5501950

#SPJ11

The leading term of the equation can be used to predict how many roots a polynomial will have.

To find the number of roots in a polynomial, look at the equation's leading phrase. A word with the most power is said to be leading.

Think about the linear formula x – 4 = 0.

The equation's highest power, 1, will only have one root.

We can check it by simplification

x = 4

The equation has only one root x = 4.

Consider the quadratic equation

10t² - t - 3 = 0

The equation's highest power, 2, will have two roots.

By simplifying and applying the middle term splitting approach, we can verify it.

10t² + 5t - 6t - 3 = 0

Taking out the common terms

5t (2t + 1) - 3 (2t + 1) = 0

(2t + 1) (5t - 3) = 0

t = -1/2 and t = 3/5

So the equation has two roots.

To know about polynomial

https://brainly.com/question/26227783

#SPJ4

Therefore, the slope of the line passing through the points (2,7) and (-1,6) is 1/3.

We must first subtract the y-coordinates from the x-coordinates in order to get the gradient or slope of a line, and then divide our two results. The ordered pairings two, negative two and four, eight serve as our x- and y-values in the calculation y two minus y one divided by x two minus x one.

The slope of a line passing through two points (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) can be found using the formula:

slope = [tex](y_2 - y_1) / (x_2 - x_1)[/tex]

Substituting the given points:

slope = (6 - 7) / (-1 - 2) = -1 / (-3) = 1/3

Learn more about slope visit: brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ4

Answer:

1/2 or 50%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find probability, put the number of biographies (chances the event will happen) over the number of books (sample space).

5/10 reduces to 1/2 or 50%.

Hope this helps!

Based on the survey conducted by the alumni association, a sample of 100 alumni was taken from the population of all living alumni. Out of this sample, 64 alumni were in favor of firing the coach. To calculate the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all living alumni who favor firing the coach, we can use the formula: CI = p ± z*(sqrt(p*(1-p)/n))

 To find the 95% confidence interval for the proportion p of all living alumni who favor firing the coach, follow these steps:

1. Identify the sample proportion (p-hat), which is the proportion of alumni in favor of firing the coach in the sample. In this case, p-hat = 64/100 = 0.64.

2. Determine the sample size (n), which is 100 in this case.

3. Find the standard error (SE) of the proportion using the formula SE = sqrt(p-hat * (1 - p-hat) / n). In this case, SE = sqrt(0.64 * (1 - 0.64) / 100) ≈ 0.048.

4. Find the critical value (z) for the 95% confidence interval. For a 95% confidence interval, the z-score is approximately 1.96.

5. Calculate the margin of error (ME) using the formula ME = z * SE. In this case, ME = 1.96 * 0.048 ≈ 0.094.

6. Finally, calculate the 95% confidence interval for p using the formula p-hat ± ME. In this case, the interval is 0.64 ± 0.094, which is approximately (0.546, 0.734).

So, the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all living alumni who favor firing the coach is approximately (0.546, 0.734).

Learn more about :

Population : brainly.com/question/25630111

#SPJ11

If Abby deposited $3000 and has $3600 at the end of 8 years, then the interest-rate is 2.5%.

The "Simple-Interest" is the interest which is calculated based only on principle amount of a loan or investment, without taking into account any additional interest earned on previous periods.

We can use the simple interest formula to find the annual interest rate:

⇒ Simple Interest = Principle × Rate × Time,

Where: Principle is = initial deposit of $3000,

Rate = annual interest rate (what we need to find)

Time = number of years the money was invested = 8,

The Simple Interest earned over 8 years : $3600 - $3000 = $600,

Substituting the values,

We get,

⇒ $600 = $3000 × Rate × 8,

⇒ Rate = 600/(3000 × 8),

⇒ Rate = 0.025, or 2.5%.

Therefore, the annual interest rate on the account is 2.5%.

Learn more about Simple Interest here

https://brainly.com/question/30964674

#SPJ1

y(x) = y_c(x) + y_p(x)

To find the general solution of the given differential equations using the variation of parameters method:

(i) y" - 4y' + 3y = e^x

The complementary solution of the homogeneous equation is found by solving the characteristic equation:

r^2 - 4r + 3 = 0

(r - 1)(r - 3) = 0

The roots are r = 1 and r = 3, so the complementary solution is:

y_c(x) = C1e^x + C2e^(3x)

Now, we need to find the particular solution using the variation of parameters method. Assume the particular solution has the form:

y_p(x) = u1(x)e^x + u2(x)e^(3x)

where u1(x) and u2(x) are functions to be determined.

Differentiating y_p(x), we have:

y_p'(x) = u1'(x)e^x + u1(x)e^x + u2'(x)e^(3x) + 3u2(x)e^(3x)

y_p''(x) = u1''(x)e^x + 2u1'(x)e^x + u1(x)e^x + u2''(x)e^(3x) + 6u2'(x)e^(3x) + 9u2(x)e^(3x)

Substituting y_p(x), y_p'(x), and y_p''(x) back into the original equation, we get:

(u1''(x)e^x + 2u1'(x)e^x + u1(x)e^x + u2''(x)e^(3x) + 6u2'(x)e^(3x) + 9u2(x)e^(3x))

4(u1'(x)e^x + u1(x)e^x + u2'(x)e^(3x) + 3u2(x)e^(3x))

3(u1(x)e^x + u2(x)e^(3x)) = e^x

Now, we equate the coefficients of like terms on both sides of the equation:

e^x terms:

u1''(x) - 2u1'(x) + u1(x) = 1

e^(3x) terms:

u2''(x) + 6u2'(x) + 9u2(x) = 0

Solve these two differential equations to find u1(x) and u2(x). Once you have u1(x) and u2(x), substitute them back into the particular solution:

y_p(x) = u1(x)e^x + u2(x)e^(3x)

Finally, the general solution is given by:

y(x) = y_c(x) + y_p(x)

(ii) y" - 2y' + y = e^x / (x^2 + 1)

The process is similar to the first equation, but with a slight difference in the particular solution. Assume the particular solution has the form:

y_p(x) = u1(x)e^x + u2(x)e^xln(x^2 + 1)

Differentiate y_p(x) and substitute it back into the original equation to find u1(x) and u2(x). Then the general solution is given by:

y(x) = y_c(x) + y_p(x)

Note: Solving the differential equations for u1(x) and u2(x) in both cases can be quite involved, and the exact form of the particular solution may vary depending on the specific calculations.

To learn more about differential visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29573028

#SPJ11

Perimeter of the polygon ABCDEF is 24 units .

Given, vertices of polygons: A(1, –3), B(–1, –3), C(–1, –1), D(–4, –1), E(–4, 5) and F(1, 5).

Perimeter of the polygon is calculated by adding all the side lengths of the polygon .

According to distance formula,

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (x_2 - x_1)^2 + (y_2 - y_1)^2}[/tex]

Side AB :

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (-1 - 1)^2 + (-3 - (-3))^2}\\d = \sqrt{4 + 0}\\d = 2 units[/tex]

Side BC :

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (-1 - (-1))^2 + (-1 - (-3))^2}\\d = \sqrt{0 + 4}\\d = 2 units[/tex]

Side CD :

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (-4 - (-1))^2 + (-1 - (-1))^2}\\d = \sqrt{9 + 0}\\d = 3 units[/tex]

Side DE :

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (-4 - (-4))^2 + (5 - (1))^2}\\d = \sqrt{0 + 16}\\d = 4 units[/tex]

Side EF :

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (1 - (-4))^2 + (5 - (5))^2}\\d = \sqrt{25 + 0}\\d = 5 units[/tex]

Side FA:

[tex]d = \sqrt{ (1 - (1))^2 + (5 - (-3))^2}\\d = \sqrt{0 + 64}\\d = 8 units[/tex]

Perimeter of the polygon = AB + BC + CD + DE + EF + FA

Perimeter of the polygon = 2 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 8

Perimeter of the polygon = 24 units

Know more polygons,

https://brainly.com/question/17756657

#SPJ4

Let’s look at the function f: ZZ. f(z) = 22-32+2.

a) The domain of function f is ZZ (all integers). The codomain of function f is also ZZ. The image (range) of the function f is { -8, -6, 6, 8 }.

b) f(Z+) = { 6, 8 }, f(Z-) = { -8, -6 }.

c) f({2,6}) = { 6 }, f-1({-4}) = {}, f-1({0,-1,-2}) = { 2 } and f¹({2,3,4}) = {}.

Let f(x)=√r+4 and g(x) = 2x − 1.

a) The maximal range for function f such that it is a subset of R is [4, ∞). The maximal range for function g such that it is a subset of R is (-∞, ∞).

b) (fog)(x) = f(g(x)) = √(2x-1+4) = √(2x+3). The maximal range for (fog)(x) such that it is a subset of R is [√3, ∞).

c) (go f)(x) = g(f(x)) = 2√(r+4)-1. The maximal range for (go f)(x) such that it is a subset of R is [1, ∞).

#SPJ11

Learn more about function f question: https://brainly.com/question/20365883.

Answer:

[tex]\frac{1}{20}[/tex]

Step-By-Step Explanation:

Min divides one piece of paper into 2 equal parts. This shows the dividend of the equation, or [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]. If she cuts one of those 2 equal parts into 10 pieces, then she is dividing half of the paper by 10. If we set the equation up...

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\div 10[/tex]

And we flip the divisor...

[tex]\frac{1}{2}\cdot \frac{1}{10}[/tex]

We get [tex]\frac{1}{20}[/tex] of the paper as our final answer. Try this solution for a similar problem!

Here are some examples of formulas that contain a rational number that is not an integer is A = (1/2)bh and m = [tex](y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)[/tex].

The formula for the circumference of a circle: C = 2πr, where π is a rational number approximately equal to 3.14159.

The formula for the area of a triangle: A = (1/2)bh, where b and h are the base and height of the triangle, respectively.

The formula for the Pythagorean theorem: [tex]a^2 + b^2 = c^2,[/tex] where a, b, and c are the sides of a right triangle and c is the length of the hypotenuse. The square root of a rational number may not be an integer.

The formula for the slope of a line: m = [tex](y_2 - y_1)/(x_2 - x_1)[/tex], where m is the slope and (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are two points on the line.

The formula for compound interest: A = [tex]P(1 + r/n)^{nt[/tex], where A is the final amount, P is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate (as a decimal), n is the number of times interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

Learn more about rational number visit: brainly.com/question/20400557

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

Mention all the formulas contain a rational number that is not an integer.

The price that Maura sell each scarf would be =$33. Maura sells each scarf for $33. That is option A.

To calculate the amount of money that Maura spends on each scarf the following is carried out.

The amount of money that she spends on the scarf material = $5.50

The percentage selling price of each scarf = 600% of $5.50

That is ;

= 600/100 × 5.50/1

= 3300/100

= $33.

Therefore, each price that is sold by Maura would probably cost a total of $33.

Learn more about cost price here:

https://brainly.com/question/26008313

#SPJ1

To address the girl's allergies and alleviate her problems, it may be best to relocate to a less polluted area with cleaner air.

The sentence is talking about a girl who is facing allergy problems while living in a big city. The word "relocate" means to move from one place to another, which is a suitable option for the girl to avoid the allergy problems caused by living in the big city. Therefore, "relocate" is the correct word that fits in the sentence

Relocating may involve allocating resources and funds to find a suitable new home, and possibly even recreating a new lifestyle in a different environment. Ultimately, the goal is to collocate the girl in a location that is better suited to her health needs.

To learn more about allergies visit : https://brainly.com/question/7290086

#SPJ11