Answer:
Explanation:
The limited jurisdiction of the federal court means that only certain types of cases will satisfy the criteria of a federal case. State courts are considered courts of general jurisdiction because state courts have the power to hear almost any type of case.
ty
A court of general jurisdiction is a court with authority to hear cases of all kinds - criminal, civil, family, probate, and so forth. All federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Many U.S. states have divided their courts between criminal and civil, with some making further divisions, assigning probate, family law, and juvenile cases, for example, to specialized courts.
Limited jurisdiction, or special jurisdiction, is the court's jurisdiction only on certain types of cases such as bankruptcy, and family matters. Courts of limited jurisdiction, as opposed to general jurisdiction, derive power from an issuing authority, such as a constitution or a statue.
A Little Help pls? (again) (if you help me I will friend you and mark you BRAINLIEST)
A, D, & C don't worry progress learning doesn't affect your grades
Answer:
Explanation:
points AHHH
PLS HELP ASAP!
Part A
Based on the information in "Mami and Papi," which statement accurately describes Negi's family?
Responses
They share work equally.
They share work equally.
Negi's father makes the major decisions.
Negi's father makes the major decisions.
They have little money to pay for shelter.
They have little money to pay for shelter.
Negi's mother is not close with her children.
Negi's mother is not close with her children.
Question 2
Part B
Which evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A?
Responses
"I walked a broad circle around Mami, who looked up from her vegetable chopping whenever I went by."
"I walked a broad circle around Mami, who looked up from her vegetable chopping whenever I went by."
"I pretended not to hear but felt her eyes bore holes in the back of my head. Papi stepped between us."
"I pretended not to hear but felt her eyes bore holes in the back of my head. Papi stepped between us."
"Our home was a giant version of the lard cans used to haul water from the public fountain."
"Our home was a giant version of the lard cans used to haul water from the public fountain."
"'You girls keep away from the house while your father is working,' she warned as we walked by my sisters having fun."
"'You girls keep away from the house while your father is working,' she warned as we walked by my sisters having fun."
Part A: Based on the information in "Mami and Papi," the statement that accurately describes Negi's family is:
c. They have little money to pay for shelter.
Part B: The evidence from the text that best supports the answer to Part A is:
c. "Our home was a giant version of the lard cans used to haul water from the public fountain."
What does passage suggests about Negi's family?Part A:
The statement "They have little money to pay for shelter" accurately describes Negi's family based on the information in "Mami and Papi." Throughout the text, the family's living conditions are described as poor and cramped.
They live in a small house made of sheet metal, and their living space is compared to a giant version of lard cans used to haul water from a public fountain. Additionally, the text mentions that Negi's father often works long hours and has to take on multiple jobs to support the family. These details suggest that the family may struggle financially and have limited resources for housing.
Part B:
This evidence from the text best supports the answer to Part A because it directly describes the family's living conditions and implies that they do not have much money to invest in a proper home. The comparison of their living space to a giant version of lard cans suggests that their house is small and cramped, and may not provide adequate shelter from the elements.
The use of the word "public" in the phrase "public fountain" also implies that the family may not have access to private resources or amenities, further reinforcing the idea that they may be struggling financially.
Learn more about "Mami and Papi," here:https://brainly.com/question/30961229
#SPJ1
How did Chemical Weapons affect World War 1? Was it successful?
Answer:The weapons caused immense carnage and suffering but had little impact on the outcome of the war. They helped the Germans more than the Allies, but they ‘did not win them a battle, let alone give them victory’, wrote Haber’s son, Lutz. 1 He concluded that chemical warfare was ‘largely a waste of effort’
Explanation:
DEFINITIONS PLSSSS HURRY
Sponge
Porifera
Cnidaria
Spicules
Symbiotic Relationship
Platyhelminthes
Nematoda
Annelida
Mollusk
Mantle
Foot
Radula
Arthropod
Exoskeleton
Endoskeleton
Chitin
Arachnids
Crustaceans
Echinoderms
5 part symmetry
Answer: just go to the dictionary or search them up
Explanation:
Why is there something rather than nothing?
Answer:
Why is there anything at all?" (or "why is there something rather than nothing?") is a question about the reason for basic existence which has been raised or commented on by a range of philosophers and physicists, including Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Explanation:
hope it helps
Explanation:
Because there is literally no such thing as nothing (at all), and there possibly never was.
(Pls give me brainliest)
points so you can ask questions just put a joke in the answers this is for an essay about people in one of my classes
Answer:
I have no clue what you're saying but I have a joke :)
Explanation:
1. Why did the Cookie go to the doctor?
Because it was feeling crumby
2. Where do you learn to make ice cream?
Sundae School
3. Why do celebrities stay cool?
Because They have a lot of Fans
What is the similarty between Dubois and Washington?
Answer: While there were many points of contention between Washington and DuBois, there were similarities in their philosophies as well. Both worked adamantly against lynching and opposed racially motivated violence. While Washington may have stressed industrial education over liberal arts, he did believe that liberal arts were beneficial (Washington 203). Furthermore, DuBois greatly appreciated and acknowledged many of Washington's noteworthy accomplishments (DuBois 68). Though both men can be criticized on various aspects of their approaches, both DuBois and Washington were key figures in the advancement of African Americans.
Explanation: I hope this helps :D
Answer: They both had common goals to end slavery.
Explanation: W.E.B. Dubois and Booker T. Washington even though coming from different backgrounds had a common goal to work to end slavery.