Parts 91 and 121 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations would be the "law" that would apply when one boards a plane, and is reminded to not remove their life jacket unless necessary as this may violate a law.
They essentially say that no one is allowed to fly an aircraft over water past power-off gliding distance for an emergency landing unless they have given each passenger a flotation device and a signaling device. With the help of this rule, the airline, crew, and pilots will be held responsible for giving their customers a certain level of safety. Since the passengers do not own or operate the aircraft, it does not apply to them.
Part 91.11, however, forbids interference with an aircrew member while they are performing their duty. Interference can be considered to occur when a piece of equipment needed for flight is removed from the aircraft without authorization.
Additionally, you are only permitted to use the flotation device while you are a passenger on the airplane. It belongs to the airline before, during, and after the trip. As a result, you would be stealing someone else's property. And breaking non-aviation laws is prohibited.
You may be responsible for much more in civil damage since this is a necessary equipment cost. It has cost a lot of money to get this piece of aviation gear a Technical Standard Order, Type Certificate from the FAA or another CAA, Inspection, and Packaging. It would be comparable to using a cockpit radio, a seat cushion, or a seatbelt.
You might owe the airline:
the price of a replacement unit, the time and labor of the technician,and the price of paying back the airline for an FAA fine.the financial loss incurred because the aircraft was unable to fly.To know about Airline Passenger List: https://brainly.com/question/16925468
#SPJ4
Which of the following is a reason that a person could not serve on a jury?
a.They have a bias towards the accuser.
b.They don't know how to interpret law.
c.They are a citizen of the United States.
d.They are not a judge.
How do you think a legal positivist would justify compulsory schooling?
I think a legal positivist would defend mandatory education as a way for children to properly grow their brains and understand the fundamentals of right and wrong. Additionally, it would instil in them the discipline needed to manage their time well, which will be crucial for their careers.
What do legal positivists believe in?Legal positivism is a legal philosophy that places an emphasis on how socially produced law is and how conventional it is. Legal positivism holds that law is synonymous with positive norms, i.e., norms created by legislators or regarded as common law or case law.
What is the legal principles of positivist school of thought?One of the most influential philosophical theories of the nature of law, legal positivism is characterised by two central tenets: (1) social facts—such as information about human behaviour and intentions—solely determine the existence and content of law; and (2) there is no inescapable link between morality and the law.
To learn more about legal positivist visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3521592
#SPJ13
What type of evidence can be pulled from both a computer and a portable device?
O images
O Text history
O GPS coordinates
O Phone call data
Answer:
images
Explanation:
greg is arrested at a warehouse in brady bunch corporate park. a government prosecutor provides evidence before a grand jury against greg for receiving stolen property. the grand jury formally charges greg. this charge is a(n)
An administration examiner gives proof before a stupendous jury against Greg for getting taken property. The stupendous jury officially charges Greg. This charge is abuses Greg's considerable fair treatment privileges data.
What is a meaningful fair treatment right?
Meaningful fair treatment is a rule in US sacred regulation that permits courts to lay out and shield specific major freedoms from government impedance, regardless of whether procedural securities are available or the privileges are unenumerated (not explicitly referenced) somewhere else in the U.S. Constitution.
What central freedoms are safeguarded by considerable fair treatment?
The High Court has decided that the freedoms to "Individual independence, substantial uprightness, self-pride, and self-assurance" are safeguarded by the Fair treatment Proviso. Together, these interests are conjured to legitimize an intrinsically safeguarded right to protection.
Learn more about Greg here:
https://brainly.com/question/28654863
#SPJ4
What personal story does Lou share to illustrate the broken judicial system at work? Explain and
analyze why this story speaks to her point?
Lou tells the story of her son, Jamal, who was wrongfully convicted of a crime he did not commit. She explains how the judicial system failed him at every turn, from the police officers who beat him during interrogation to the prosecutor who withheld evidence that would have exonerated him. This story speaks to Lou's point because it illustrates how the judicial system can fail even when there is overwhelming evidence of innocence. In Jamal's case, the police officers who beat him during interrogation likely caused him to confess to a crime he did not commit. The prosecutor then withheld evidence that would have exonerated him, which led to his wrongful conviction. This story highlights the need for reform in the judicial system, as innocent people like Jamal should not be punished for crimes they did not commit.
What is wrong with the legal system in the United States?
Drug usage and mental health problems are a couple of the problems causing the high incarceration rate. Spending on community preventive and treatment initiatives would be preferable to funding for policing and detentions. If inmates were once again eligible for federal Pell Grants, recidivism might also be decreased.To learn more about the judicial system, follow the link https://brainly.com/question/1145536
#SPJ13
bp violated the clean air act by discharging pollutants from one of its refineries and was unable to reach a settlement with the epa regarding a violation of the law. the epa plans to go forward with a trial on this matter, which will be heard by:
Administrative law judge (ALJ). The EPA intends to proceed with this case's trial, which will be presided over by an administrative law judge (ALJ).
- About the Clean air act :
- In order to correct violations of the Clean Air Act at its petroleum storage facility in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, TotalEnergies Marketing Puerto Rico Corp. will put in place compliance measures estimated to cost $1.3 million, according to a recent announcement from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As part of the settlement, the company's oil storage facility in Guaynabo must take steps to address major issues and poor maintenance. A civil fine of $500,000 will also be paid by the business.
- When the company was alerted by EPA that its gasoline storage operation resulted in vapor concentrations high enough to pose unacceptable fire and explosion hazards, it failed to act appropriately and EPA issued a Clean Air Act emergency order to the company in 2019. The corporation has already addressed the immediate risks that its site presents.
- Before continuing to use some tanks, the corporation is required under the settlement to repair any problematic parts and enhance monitoring. Tank vapor concentrations increase to a certain point. This involves performing safety tests, repairing or operating alterations to the tanks, or taking the tanks out of service. The settlement calls for reporting to EPA as well as additional improvement measures.
To know more about the Clean Air Act, kindly click on the link below :
https://brainly.com/question/2375762?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
There are four main juvenile justice systems at the state level.
Question 4 options:
1) True
2) False
A private agency that hears consumer complaints but does not have the power to enforce laws.
Consumer Protection safety commission
Ucc
Better business bureau
Federal trade commission
A private agency that hears consumer complaints but does not have the power to enforce laws Federal trade commission. The FTC has the authority to enact trade regulations that specifically define conduct or practices that are unfair or misleading. Additionally, the Commission has the authority to publish reports and suggest legislation to Congress regarding matters that have an impact on the economy.
What is the name of the FTC division responsible for gathering consumer complaints?
The FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection combats unfair, dishonest, and fraudulent business practices by gathering consumer complaints, conducting investigations, bringing legal action against offenders, creating rules to uphold a fair marketplace, and informing both consumers and businesses of their rights and obligations.
To know more about Federal trade commission, refer:
brainly.com/question/2214818
#SPJ13
Question 1 of 20
What is statue of limitations?
A. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime within a certain state
B. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime involving a certain type of person
OC. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime within a certain amount of time
D. A procedural law which requires that the state file charges for
certain types of crime involving a specific amount of money
Answer: B
Explanation:
Answer:a
Explanation:
tonya is an attorney. she is preparing evidence to be presented in a court trial. her exhibits include several photographs, printouts of email messages, and printouts of text messages. what type of evidence is tonya preparing?
Since Tonya is preparing evidence to be presented in a court trial and her exhibits include several photographs, printouts of email messages, and printouts of text messages, the type of evidence she is preparing is: Documentary evidence.
What is an evidence?In English literature, an evidence can be defined as a collection of factual information that comprises empirical statistics and analysis, which are typically used to show or prove that an action, event, message, etc., is credible, reliable, truthful, and verified.
The type of evidence.In Law, there are different type of evidence and these include the following:
Demonstrative evidenceTestimonial evidenceReal evidenceDocumentary evidenceGenerally speaking, a documentary evidence simply refers to a type of evidence that is tendered or presented through documents such as books, maps, printouts of email messages, photographs, printed text-based document, etc.
Read more on documentary evidence here: https://brainly.com/question/28848551
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Tonya is an attorney. She is preparing evidence to be presented in a court trial. Her exhibits include several photographs, printouts of email messages, and printouts of text messages. What type of evidence is Tonya preparing?
Demonstrative evidence
Documentary evidence
Testimonial evidence
Real evidence
When an officer makes a vehicle stop what four things should he/she transmit to dispatch
When an officer makes a vehicle stop the four things should he/she transmit to dispatch include -
That they stopped a vehicleThe CYMBALS informationThe occupant informationThe location of the stopSo, when an officer stops a vehicle, above mentioned are the four things which should he/she should transmit in order to dispatch. Thus, there are certain procedures which they have to abide by and one of these include transmitting certain information back to dispatch.
They also need to tell dispatch that they have made a vehicular stop, and also then they should send the CYMBALS (Color, Year, Make, Body Type...).
Hence, they should also transmit the location of the stop.
To learn more about the CYMBALS here:
https://brainly.com/question/14711592
#SPJ1
what two statements accurately characterize civil law? multiple select question. a jury typically issues the decision. judges often actively question the prosecution and defense. civil law tends to be less adversarial than common law. the role of the judge is to interpret the law.
Civil law is concerned with interpersonal conflicts. Although secularized over time and emphasizing individual freedom more, the civil law tradition encourages human cooperation.
What is the civil law?Civil law is concerned with interpersonal conflicts. -When a civil law is broken, the plaintiff, or the party claiming harm, files charges against the defendant, or the accused offender. The punishment for civil infractions is a monetary payment to the plaintiff. - Torts and contracts are two categories of civil law. Personnel perform their duties and exercise their management. Civil law is concerned with interpersonal conflicts. - When a civil law is breached, the victim, also known as the plaintiff, files a lawsuit against the alleged perpetrator, also known as the defendant. The punishment for civil infractions is a monetary payment to the plaintiff. - Torts and contracts are two categories of civil law.Although secularized over time and emphasizing individual freedom more, the civil law tradition encourages human cooperation.To learn more about civil law refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ4
the fbi has estimated that over a five-year period, alf and elf have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the united states, which have resulted in damages that exceeded:
The FBI has estimated that over a five-year period, ALF and ELF have committed more than 600 criminal acts in the united states, which have resulted in damages that exceeded: 110 MILLION DOLLARS.
The FBI categorizes the terrorist threat the United States faces into two main groups: domestic and foreign. In order to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, for the advancement of political or social goals, may use unlawful force or threaten to use unlawful force against persons or property.
The terrorist threat has undergone significant modifications during the previous ten years. Right-wing extremism replaced left-wing terrorism as the most serious domestic terrorist threat to the nation. Special interest extremism, as typified by the Animal Liberation Front- ALF and the Earth Liberation Front- ELF, has become a significant terrorist danger over the past few years. According to the FBI, the ALF/ELF have committed 600 or more crimes in the US since 1996, causing losses of more than 110 million dollars.
To learn more about terrorist click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15203676
#SPJ4
ASAP!!!! Do you think service should always happen in person or is dropping off the paperwork okay? What should happen to those who refuse to receive a summons? Defend your answer
In some states, a process server may send legal papers by certified mail rather than personally delivering them. If the server can locate the defendant's last known address or forwarding address, the complaint and court summons may be delivered by certified mail to that address. This would be accepted in law as they have received the summon.
What is a summons?A summons is a legal document issued by a court or a government administrative body for a variety of reasons.
When you are called to court, it is your formal notification that a criminal case has been brought against you. A summons is normally served by a Constable, however, it may also arrive in the mail, certified mail. You'll go to—you'll be sent to the court.
Learn more about summons:
https://brainly.com/question/28267011
#SPJ1
Nowadays there is electronic system is utilized in order to send summons to people through the mail rather than personally delivering them due to the time consumed by it.If the location is at a distant place where the address is unidentified then service can be in person.
What is a summons?A summon is refer to a legal document that instructs an individual present in the judiciary court for any offense or unethical action performed by them. This document is issued by the Court which is a higher authority.
These summon are sent via official mail to indicate that on a particular date an individual has to make their presence available at a particular location is given in the document.
If these summon get ignored by any individual there might be chances that strict action is filed against them. These summons are sent via a constable who will inform you about the action taking place.
So it can possible that a summon can be sent through email due to lack of time and speedy delivery depending on the circumstances.
Learn more about summons, here:
brainly.com/question/28267011
#SPJ1
which approach to law relies on decisions made by judges in previous cases along with statutes and regulations made by legislatures? multiple choice question. religious law
Answer: Common Law
Explanation: In this system, much of the law is made by judges' decisions, called precedent. This means that if a similar case has been resolved by a court in the past, a court is bound to follow the reasoning used in the prior decision.
I hope this helped
alex has been sued by jamie for failure to pay rent for their apartment, which kind of law will govern this lawsuit? group of answer choices civil law constitutional law administrative law criminal law g
The lawsuit will be governed by Civil Law.
Give an account on Civil Law.All continents and nearly 60% of the world are home to civil law systems, sometimes known as continental or Romano-Germanic legal systems. They are based on ideas, classifications, and regulations taken from Roman law, with some canon law influence, and occasionally greatly expanded or modified by regional custom or culture. Although secularized over time and emphasizing individual freedom more, the civil law tradition encourages human cooperation.
The terms "civil law" refer to the law that governs people, things, and the connections that arise between them in their technical, narrow sense, eliminating not just criminal law but also commercial law, labor law, etc.
To know more about, civil law, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/14788507
#SPJ4
Answer:
it's Civil Law
Explanation:
help me with this please
It is safe to assume that slavery would have persisted or taken a longer time to end if the court had declined to overturn the ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson during its decision in the brown v board of education.
What was the outcome of the case between Brown v. Board of Education?In the aforementioned case, the Supreme Court declared that racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Constitution.
The "separate but equal" rule established in the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling in 1896 was subsequently overturned.
With this decision, racial segregation in American schools came to an end.
What if the court in Gideon v. Wainwright had maintained Florida's law?If the court had upheld Florida's statute in the Gideon v. Wainwright case, it would have set a precedent for other cases, and many people would have ended up in jail because they would not have been able to afford an attorney to defend them in court.
Why didn't Florida assign Gideon a counsel?Because counsel could only be provided for a poor person accused with a deadly offense under Florida law, the trial judge rejected Gideon's request for a court-appointed attorney.
Why was Gideon's petition denied by the Florida Supreme Court?The trial judge denied Gideon's motion because Florida law only allowed the appointment of counsel for poor people facing capital charges.
Gideon, however, actually sent that letter; the court looked into his case; he was retried with the aid of an accomplished defense attorney; he was found not guilty; and after serving a two-year term for a crime he didn't commit, he was released from prison.
Due to the majority ruling in favor of Gideon by the Supreme Court in 1963, criminal defendants in federal and state courts now have the right to legal representation. following the decision.
Learn more about brown v board of education: https://brainly.com/question/14637388
#SPJ13
the doctrine that requires a litigant to have a legal interest in the subject being litigated before being able to participate in a lawsuit is called what?
The doctrine that requires a litigant to have a legal interest in the subject being litigated before being able to participate in a lawsuit is called a standing.
A person requesting a legal solution must establish to the court that they have a sufficient relationship to and injury from the law or action being challenged in order to sustain their participation in the case. This is known as having standing or locus standi.
According to the current legal doctrine in the United States, a person cannot file a lawsuit contesting the constitutionality of a statute unless they can show that the legislation is causing them injury or that they would "imminently" suffer harm as a result of the law. If not, the court will decide that the petitioner "lacks standing" to file the lawsuit and will dismiss it without examining the legitimacy of the claim.
To know more about lawsuit refer:
https://brainly.com/question/1443057
#SPJ4