Nativists during the aftermath of World War I found the following characteristics of immigrants to be most alarming: their cultural and linguistic differences, their perceived lack of assimilation into American society, and their supposed threat to American jobs and wages.
Nativism is the practice of favoring native-born citizens over immigrants in the political, social, and economic arenas. Nativists oppose immigration and advocate for the restriction of citizenship rights to native-born citizens only.
During the aftermath of World War I, nativism gained a lot of traction in the United States as immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe flocked to American shores. They were usually poor, non-Protestant, and non-English-speaking, and they were seen as a threat to the nation's identity, security, and prosperity by many native-born Americans.
The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the National Origins Act, was the culmination of the nativist movement's efforts to limit immigration to the United States.
For such more question on Nativists:
https://brainly.com/question/4351039
#SPJ11
Although Hamilton was a federalist, and disagreed with Thomas Jefferson on almost everything, why did he tell electors to vote for him?
Please help
1. Jefferson paid Hamilton to support him
2. He thought Jefferson was more trustworthy
3. Aaron Burr shot him
4. He agreed with Jefferson all along
Answer:The answer is number two
Explanation:Hamilton saw Burr as one of the worst choices Burr incurred the enmity of Hamilton, who subsequently tried to thwart his political aspirations on numerous occasions.
the tyrannical spanish system by which natives were turned into servile laborers and forced to convert to catholicism and to adopt the spanish language was called group of answer choices metropole haciendas conquistadors mestizos
The tyrannical Spanish framework by which locals were transformed into subservient workers and compelled to switch over completely to Catholicism and embrace the Spanish language was called haciendas. option (B) is correct.
Communications with Local Americans: Spanish colonizers endeavored to coordinate Local Americans into Spanish culture by wedding them and changing them over completely to Catholicism. Albeit a few Local Americans embraced parts of Spanish culture, others chose to rebel.
Much of the time, the Spanish teachers drove the settlement and early administration of these distant stations. Spanish preachers were individuals who were sent by the Roman Catholic Church. Therefore, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about Spanish:
https://brainly.com/question/18520956
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
The tyrannical Spanish system by which natives were turned into servile laborers and forced to convert to catholicism and to adopt the spanish language was called group of answer choices
(A) metropole
(B) haciendas
(C) conquistadors
(D) mestizos
can someone help me with this
Option (a), North Korea's efforts to unite the peninsula posed a threat to the U.S. containment strategy.
What relationship exists between US involvement in Korea and the containment approach?The Korean War saw phases of confinement, freedom, and containment. NSC 68 was adopted as a result of the Korean War, which also led to substantial expenditures on weapons in Asia and Europe and an expansion of American dominance. Up to that point, American involvement in Korea had served as the most major containment test.
What occurred in 1950 that precipitated American involvement in the Korean War?When North Korea attacked South Korea in June 1950, the United States backed a "police action"—a war without a name—under the auspices of the UN. The Department of State worked with the other 16 countries that were sending troops to the conflict to coordinate American military decisions.
Learn more about The Korean War: https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ1
marriage patterns within upper-class muslim society around the year 1000 differed from classical greek and roman patterns because:
Marriage patterns within upper-class Muslim society around the year 1000 differed from classical Greek and Roman patterns because they allowed polygamy and permitted concubinage.
Polygamy is the practice of having more than one wife at the same time. Concubinage, on the other hand, refers to having a mistress or concubine who is not legally recognized as a wife.
Unlike the classical Greeks and Romans who preferred monogamy (having one wife), the upper-class Muslim society was more inclined towards polygamy and concubinage. In addition, in Islam, a man is permitted to marry four wives under certain conditions such as the ability to support all of them equally.
Marriage was an essential aspect of life in Muslim society. It was viewed as a holy and legal contract, which formed the basis of society. The Quran regards marriage as the foundation for creating an orderly and peaceful society. Muslim society's view of marriage is rooted in their faith, which promotes family values and unity.
Polygamy was an essential aspect of the upper-class Muslim society, where men would take multiple wives, and it was a way to extend their lineage. Concubinage was also an essential aspect of upper-class Muslim society, where women would live with wealthy men, and the men would provide for them but not marry them.
Upper-class Muslim society in the early years was based on tribal kinship, and the taking of wives from other tribes was an important means of forming alliances. Thus, the practice of polygamy and concubinage was encouraged as a means of extending tribal relationships.
To know more about tribal kinship refer here : https://brainly.com/question/8707167#
#SPJ11
eugene v. debs, a socialist party leader, was imprisoned for delivering an antiwar speech. group of answer choices true false
The given statement is "Eugene v. debs, a socialist party leader, was imprisoned for delivering an antiwar speech" is True. Eugene V. Debs was an American labor leader, a five-time candidate for President of the United States, and a prominent member of the Socialist Party.
He was also one of the most prominent opponents of World War I in the United States and was sentenced to prison for speaking out against the war.
In 1918, Debs gave a speech in Canton, Ohio in which he denounced the war and the draft. He said, "I am opposing a social order in which it is possible for one man who does absolutely nothing that is useful to amass a fortune of hundreds of millions of dollars, while millions of men and women who work all the days of their lives secure barely enough for a wretched existence."
The speech was seen as a direct violation of the newly-passed Espionage Act, which made it a crime to speak out against the war. Debs was arrested and eventually convicted, with the judge sentencing him to 10 years in prison.
Though his sentence was later commuted, Debs remained an influential advocate for the Socialist cause until his death in 1926. He is remembered as a pioneer of the labor movement and a proponent of free speech.
To learn more about Socialist Party here:
https://brainly.com/question/16644614#
#SPJ11
the rapid social changes in europe, particularly in great britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, were mainly due to:
The rapid social changes in Europe, particularly in Great Britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, were mainly due to the Industrial Revolution.
The industrial revolution was a period of major change in the way goods were produced, and it brought with it significant social changes.
How did the Industrial Revolution affect social changes in Europe?The Industrial Revolution in Europe caused several social changes. It led to an increase in the population, which put a strain on the resources, food, and housing. It also resulted in the growth of cities as people moved from rural areas to the towns in search of jobs.
The following are the ways in which the Industrial Revolution brought social changes in Europe:
It led to urbanization which caused an increase in population and led to the growth of cities.It led to a new system of labor and production, which brought changes in the social class system.It led to an increase in the standard of living for some, while others faced poor living and working conditions.There was a change in the social structure, and new industries brought new opportunities for some people while some others were left behind due to their lack of education and training.It led to the emergence of the middle class, which became an influential group in the society. This middle class emerged as a result of the new industries that sprouted up during the industrial revolution.These are some of the ways in which the Industrial Revolution brought about social changes in Europe, particularly in Great Britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
To know more about Industrial Revolution, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/855594#
#SPJ11
The nation's plan for dealing with other nations is called
Answer: Foreign Policy
Explanation:
Answer:
Foreign policy.
Explanation:
A nation's overall plan for dealing with other nations.
elie and his father decide to leave buna when the germans evacuate the camp. what would have happened if they had remained at buna?
If Elie and his father had remained at Buna, they likely would have been taken by the Germans to another concentration camp. This was a common practice during the Holocaust, as those in concentration camps were moved around as the German forces continued to take control of new areas.
1. The Germans began to evacuate the Buna concentration camp, as they were taking control of the area.
2. Elie and his father decided to leave Buna as well, instead of remaining.
3. If they had remained at Buna, they likely would have been taken to another concentration camp by the Germans.
During the Holocaust, many people in concentration camps were moved to other camps as the German forces continued to take control of new areas. Therefore, if Elie and his father had remained at Buna, they would have been taken by the Germans to another concentration camp.
To know more about holocaust refer to-
brainly.com/question/24051881#
#SPJ11
Which was NOT a helpful agricultural technique?
A) wind mills
B) seed drill
C) three-field system
D) iron plow
The photo shows a street scene in berlin after world war ii. a photo showing tanks driving down a city street. soldiers stand next to a barrier and civilians look at the tanks. the scene is best described as friendly and open. tense and aggressive. calm and peaceful. timid and indecisive.
The photo shows a street scene in berlin after World War II. A photo showing tanks driving down a city street. Soldiers stand next to a barrier and civilians look at the tanks. The scene is best described as tense and aggressive. Option B is correct.
The presence of tanks driving down a city street, soldiers standing next to a barrier, and civilians looking at the tanks all suggest a highly charged and potentially volatile situation. The fact that the scene is taking place in post-World War II Berlin, where tensions between the Allied powers and the Soviet Union were high, only adds to the sense of unease and tension.
The soldiers and tanks suggest a military presence, and the barrier may be intended to keep civilians at a distance. The civilians themselves appear curious or concerned, but also somewhat apprehensive or cautious. Overall, the scene suggests a moment of heightened tension and possible conflict, rather than one of calm or peacefulness.
In short, the photo captures a moment of tension and aggression in post-war Berlin, likely reflecting the larger geopolitical tensions of the time. Option B is correct.
To know more about the World War II, here
https://brainly.com/question/1273421
#SPJ4
in the seventeenth century, widespread political participation of males in new england town meetings led to
Answer:
a unique form of democratic governance. These town meetings, open to all male landowners, provided a space for citizens to discuss and vote on local issues, from road maintenance to taxes. This system allowed for a level of direct democracy that was rare at the time, and helped shape American political culture. However, it's important to note that this participation was limited to white males who owned property, and excluded women, people of color, and those without land ownership. Despite its limitations, the New England town meeting model continues to influence modern-day democracy in the United States.Explanation:
what historical lessons, if any, can we draw from the rise, expansion, and/or fall of the roman republic?
The Roman Republic teaches many lessons about the rise and fall of civilizations. It is a reminder that no state or government is immune to internal strife and external threats. The Roman Republic provides examples of the importance of a strong military, the necessity of sound fiscal policy, and the need for effective political leadership. It also shows how having a powerful and ambitious leader can lead to an empire's rapid expansion, yet also its eventual collapse. The historical lessons that can be drawn from the rise, expansion, and/or fall of the Roman Republic are as follows:The rise of the Roman Republic can teach us a lot about governance, power distribution, and social organization.
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BCE after the overthrow of the Etruscan dynasty. This marked the beginning of Roman domination in the Mediterranean world. The Romans established a system of government that was based on checks and balances, which helped them to maintain social stability and control.The expansion of the Roman Republic teaches us about the dangers of imperialism, the importance of diplomacy, and the consequences of overreaching. The Roman Republic expanded through a series of wars, conquests, and treaties. This expansion brought many benefits to the Roman people, including increased trade, wealth, and access to resources. However, it also brought many challenges, including cultural clashes, military overextension, and political corruption.The fall of the Roman Republic teaches us about the dangers of internal conflict, the importance of civic responsibility, and the consequences of authoritarianism. The Roman Republic was a republic in name only by the time of Julius Caesar, who was assassinated by his own senators. This assassination marked the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was marked by authoritarianism, political instability, and social unrest, which eventually led to the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 CE.
For more such questions on Roman Republic
https://brainly.com/question/14474446
#SPJ11
The Navigation Acts that controlled shipping were largely ineffective because of the efforts of ___. Pirates Indians smugglers Kings Spaniards
The Navigation Acts that controlled shipping were largely ineffective because of the efforts of colonial smugglers and the difficulty of enforcing the laws.
Smuggling was a common practice, which was one of the major reasons the Navigation Acts were ineffectual. By bribing officials, forging papers, and using tiny, swift ships that were challenging to capture, smugglers discovered methods to get around the laws.
The Navigation Acts' ineffectiveness was also a result of how challenging it was to enforce them. Because of limited resources and frequently dishonest or friendly colonial officers, the British government was unable to monitor the extensive coastline of its American colonies.
To know more about smugglers-
brainly.com/question/29496460
#SPJ4
What was an immediate result of Abraham Lincoln's election as president in November 1860?
Question 5 options:
several states seceded from the Union.
A constitutional amendment to end slavery was adopted.
Kansas and Nebraska joined the Union as free states.
Missouri was admitted to the Union as a slave state.
Answer: Several states seceded from the union.
Explanation:
Several states did not want Lincoln to become President because they feared he would abolish slave labor. Slave labor was essential to those states because it helped them get more profits and keep labor costs low. Therefore once Lincoln became President those states seceded.
what rather disturbing aspect of egyptian royalty do the ptolemy's adopt to portray themselves like traditional pharaohs?
The Ptolemy's, who were the ruling dynasty in Egypt from 305 BCE to 30 BCE, adopted the tradition of incest from the Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt. In order to portray themselves as legitimate rulers and preserve their power.
The Ptolemies intermarried between brothers and sisters, father and daughter, and mother and son in order to keep their line of succession secure.
This disturbing tradition was a reflection of the Pharaohs' belief that the gods had given them power and they had the right to use it as they saw fit.
The Ptolemies also adopted many of the practices of the traditional Pharaohs, such as building grand monuments and temples to honor the gods.
They also believed in the divine right of kings, which allowed them to control their people through taxation and military service.
The Ptolemy's adopted these practices in order to create a sense of continuity and legitimacy to their rule, even though the practice of incest was a very disturbing aspect of their reign.
To learn more about Ancient Egypt here:
https://brainly.com/question/20262049#
#SPJ11
how do we define classical societies and empires, such as ancient persia? why was the persian empire, in particular, so successful?
To define classical societies and empires, such as Ancient Persia, it is important to look at the historical context and political structure that made them successful. Ancient Persia was an empire that existed from 550 BCE to 330 BCE and was centered in what is now Iran.
The success of the Persian Empire was due to its strong political and military organization, with a central government that had a strong authority and well-developed bureaucracy. It also benefited from a network of road and communications systems, and its use of cavalry as its primary military force.
1. Ancient Persia was an empire that existed from 550 BCE to 330 BCE and was centered in what is now Iran.
2. The success of the Persian Empire was due to its strong political and military organization, with a central government that had a strong authority and well-developed bureaucracy.
3. It also benefited from a network of road and communications systems, and its use of cavalry as its primary military force.
Classical societies and empires, such as Ancient Persia, are defined by the historical context and political structure that made them successful.
The Persian Empire was successful because it had a strong authority with a well-developed bureaucracy, a network of road and communications systems, and its use of cavalry as its primary military force.
To know more about Persian Empire refer to-
brainly.com/question/30355165#
#SPJ11
Imagine that you are Christopher Columbus in 1492. In a well composed essay, develop a proposal which would convince Ferdinand and Isabella to fund your expedition to find a passage to Asia. Make sure to include at least 2 benefits for the country for backing your plan.
Europe has been trading with Asia along Silk Road, a dangerous and expensive journey that spans thousands of miles.
What is Silk Road?Silk Road was an ancient network of trade routes that connected the East and West from around the 2nd century BCE to the 18th century CE. It spanned over 7,000 miles and was used to transport a variety of goods, including silk, spices, tea, and precious metals. The route began in China and extended through Central Asia, the Middle East, and into Europe. The Silk Road played a significant role in the development of civilizations and cultural exchange, as well as the spread of religions such as Buddhism and Islam. It also facilitated the exchange of ideas and technologies, including papermaking, gunpowder, and the compass. The Silk Road was eventually replaced by sea trade routes in the 15th century.
To learn more about Silk Road, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29986786
#SPJ1
4. Parliament in England would finally pass legislation to abolish slavery primary
because of the leader
Answer: false
Explanation: they wouldn’t abolish slavery
discuss three developments that enabled great britain to achieve a dominant economic position between 1700 and 1830. 2000
In the period between 1700 and 1830, Great Britain achieved a dominant economic position through the implementation of several key developments. These included the transition from mercantilism to free trade, technological advancements in the Industrial Revolution, and the expansion of the British Empire.
1. Transition from Mercantilism to Free Trade: During the 18th century, Great Britain adopted a policy of free trade which allowed for an increase in foreign trade, decreased government regulation, and greater economic growth. This led to an influx of foreign imports and exports, increasing Britain's economic wealth.
2. Technological Advancements in the Industrial Revolution: The Industrial Revolution was a period of time in which new technologies and machines were developed, leading to a revolution in the production of goods and services. This revolution led to an increase in the efficiency and production capacity of many industries, allowing Britain to expand its wealth.
3. Expansion of the British Empire: The expansion of the British Empire throughout the 18th and 19th centuries allowed Britain to access resources and markets around the world. This in turn allowed them to increase their economic power and wealth, leading to the dominant position they enjoyed during this period.
In conclusion, the developments of the transition from mercantilism to free trade, technological advancements in the Industrial Revolution, and the expansion of the British Empire all played a role in allowing Great Britain to achieve a dominant economic position between 1700 and 1830.
To learn more about Industrial Revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/14240244#
#SPJ4
the great serpent mound differs from most hopewell mounds in its group of answer choices absence of burial sites. alignment with the sun at the equinoxes. mysterious abandonment. spiral shape and raised embankments.
The Great Serpent Mound differs from most Hopewell mounds in its spiral shape and raised embankments. Therefore the correct option is option D.
The Great Serpent Mound is an ancient earthwork in the shape of a serpent, located in Adams County, Ohio, USA. It is the most extensive serpent earthwork in the world, and it is still regarded as a sacred site by many Native Americans. The Great Serpent Mound is a mound that was built by the Hopewell people.
Hopewell culture, named after its first find site, is a Middle Woodland Period archaeological culture in eastern North America that is characterized by the construction of substantial burial mounds and various kinds of artistic expression.
The Great Serpent Mound is different from most other Hopewell mounds in that it is in the form of a serpent and has raised embankments. The spiral shape of the Great Serpent Mound is also unique.
For such more question on embankments:
https://brainly.com/question/4072602
#SPJ11
The following question may be like this:
The great serpent mound differs from most Hopewell mounds in its group of answer choices
absence of burial sites.
alignment with the sun at the equinoxes.
mysterious abandonment.
spiral shape and raised embankments.
what is in the edict of milan shows that christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the edict
In the Edict of Milan, it is shown that Christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the Edict. The text of the Edict of Milan was a series of letters signed by the Roman Emperor Constantine and Licinius to treat Christians benevolently and stop persecuting them.
The Edict of Milan marked the beginning of the period of toleration for Christians throughout the empire. This period of toleration allowed Christianity to flourish, and it is considered one of the most critical moments in the history of Christianity.
In conclusion, the Edict of Milan demonstrated that Christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the Edict. The Edict of Milan allowed Christianity to flourish, which is why it is regarded as one of the most important moments in Christian history.
For such more question on Christians:
https://brainly.com/question/369465
#SPJ11
The following question may be like this:
What is in the edict of Milan shows that Christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the edict?
, what did the
growth of industry in the New England
region lead to?
O an increase in urban population
O a decrease in enslaved persons
O an increase in farming
O a decrease in trade
Answer:
The growth of industry in the New England region led to an increase in urban population. The development of factories and mills attracted many people to cities in search of work, leading to the growth of urban areas.
Why does the Fifth Amendment matter today? (5 points)
A) It prevents people accused of crimes from being sent far away to plead their case alone in front of a single judge.
B) The amendment protects the rights of children and minors that are not covered by other language in the Constitution.
C) Without this amendment, it would not be possible to pass laws to protect our right to use new technologies and ideas.
D) If it didn't exist, an innocent person could be forced to speak at their trial and may say something bad out of nervousness.
WRONG ANSWERS WILL BE REPORTED!
Today's Fifth Amendment issue If it didn't exist, an innocent person could be forced to speak at their trial and may say something harmful out of nervousness.
Why is the Fifth Amendment important?In essence, it holds the government responsible for how it treats its citizens. The Fifth Amendment's "takings clause" is the last right granted. In essence, it demands that the government offer "fair recompense" for every citizen whose private property is stolen. This idea is known as "eminent domain."
Why is self-incrimination protected by the Fifth Amendment?A person is not allowed to be coerced to provide any information to the police, prosecutor, judge, or jury if doing so could result in criminal charges being brought against them.
To Know more about Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ1
What was the legacy of the Haymarket Riot among employers
A. Employers decided that police should not be used to restore order
B. Employers began to strongly support labor unions
C. Employers grew more suspicious of labor unions
D. Employers agreed not to use strikebreakers
Answer:
c) Employers grew more suspicious of labor unions
Explanation:
the hay market riots occurred during a labor demonstration in Chicago; after this, employers didn’t want to get involved with unions, which let to the creation of the American federation of labor
How did people respond to the large tax cuts for the wealthy in Reagan's supply-side economic policy?
O Most understood that tax cuts would help in the long run.
O Most opp
O Some supported the 's and some opposed them.
O
The majority had no opinion about it because they didn't think it was a key element of economic recove
the cuts because there weren't similar provisions to help the poor.
1
2
3
4 5 6 7
mm
earnx-svc/getindex/token/641d0ac70897c069e9c3d263_8c33c219-8553-401a-9c70-57a8adf33fcb/conceptld/HST303B_Summit US History_06_17_UT_CG/cond
People respond to the large tax cuts for the wealthy in Reagan's supply-side economic policy through Option 3 which is the most accurate response to this question.
How is it the response?There were both supporters and opponents of Reagan's supply-side economic policy, which included large tax cuts for the wealthy.
Supporters argued that the tax cuts would stimulate economic growth and job creation, while opponents argued that the policy would primarily benefit the rich and exacerbate income inequality.
However, it is worth noting that opinions on the policy were not necessarily divided along clear partisan lines and varied among different segments of society.
learn more about Reagan's supply-side economic policy: https://brainly.com/question/978072
#SPJ1
in what way was the treaty of fort stanwix typical of similar negotiations between the u.s. government and indian nations after 1781?
The Treaty of Fort Stanwix was typical of similar negotiations in its use of gifts and annuities, unequal power dynamics, and vague or difficult-to-enforce provisions. These factors contributed to a long history of conflict and displacement for Native American communities.
What is the Treaty of Fort Stanwix?The Treaty of Fort Stanwix, signed in 1784, was one of many negotiations between the U.S. government and Indian nations in the years following the American Revolution. Like other treaties, it was intended to establish peaceful relations and define the boundaries of Indian lands.
One way in which the Treaty of Fort Stanwix was typical of similar negotiations was in its use of gifts and annuities to persuade Indian leaders to sign. The U.S. government often offered goods, such as blankets, clothing, and tools, as well as annual payments in exchange for Indian lands.
Learn more about Treaty of For Stanwix here: https://brainly.com/question/27961742
#SPJ1
If Jews were the principal target during the Holocaust, why were books written by non-Jewish authors burned?
Although the Holocaust was largely focused at the Jewish people, there were books with other themes and writers that were also burned during this time as part of a greater effort to control and manipulate knowledge, ideas, and culture.
Books were burned during the Holocaust as part of a greater effort to control and shape knowledge, ideas, and culture rather than only books written by or about Jews. In order to advance their own ideology and stifle dissident views, the Nazi regime strove to regulate every part of German culture, including the arts, literature, and intellectual dialogue.
Publications published by non-Jewish authors that were thought to be "un-German" or otherwise in opposition to Nazi ideology were destroyed. Books that were considered to be "degenerate" or immoral, written by authors with Jewish ancestry or who had leftist political beliefs, or novels that were critical of the Nazi dictatorship were all included in this category. To spread its own propaganda and stifle dissident views, the Nazi regime tried to regulate how information and ideas reached the German people.
To know more about Holocaust
brainly.com/question/321509
#SPJ4
What was unique about samuel slaters design for textile mills in america?
Answer:
Samuel Slater's design for textile mills in America was unique because it was the first to use powered machinery to produce textiles. Slater was an Englishman who had worked in a British cotton mill and had memorized the design of the machines used there. He then came to America and replicated the design, introducing the concept of powered machinery to the American textile industry.
To His Royal Highness Prince Albert
This simple narrative is an honest attempt to enlist the sympathies
both of England & America in the sufferings of an oppressed race,
to whom in less enlightened days both England & America were
unjust.
The wrong on England's part has been atoned in a manner worthy
of herself, nor in all her strength & glory, is there any thing that
adds such luster to her name as the position she holds in relation
to human freedom (may America yet emulate her example!)?
The appeal is in greater part as it should be to the writer's own
country, but when fugitives by thousands are crowding British
shores she would enlist for them the sympathy of British hearts.
The author is encouraged by the thought that beneath the royal
insignia of England throbs that woman's & mother's heart. May
she ask that He who is nearest to her would present to her notice
this simple story. Should it win from her compassionate nature,
pitying thoughts for those multitudes of poor outcasts who have
fled for shelter to the shadow of her throne...
1.) What kind of source is this? How do you know?
Answer:
This appears to be a letter or a written appeal addressed to Prince Albert, possibly by an author or a writer who is seeking sympathy and support for an oppressed race. It is likely a primary source as it is written in first-person and reflects the personal views and opinions of the author.
Examine the picture above. What is the picture advertising or promoting? What are your feelings about this
image?
The picture is advertising the land and goods to show the profit that can be made from investing in African colonies and taking resources from them.
How did colonies in Africa make Europeans rich?Colonies in Africa made Europeans rich through the extraction of natural resources and the exploitation of labor. The extraction of these resources was often done at great cost to African people, who were forced to work in mines and on plantations under harsh conditions and low wages.
European colonial powers also imposed taxes and tariffs on African goods and commodities, further impoverishing local economies and contributing to the development of a system of unequal trade. The picture is showing one of the ways that Europeans exploited Africans by showing how profit could be made from selling goods from Africa.
Find out more on African colonies at https://brainly.com/question/12173631
#SPJ1