The author's belief that gun control measures are necessary to reduce deaths caused by firearms is best supported by the statement "Death from firearms must be reduced by taking common-sense measures to strengthen gun control" and further details in section 3.
The detail from the passage that best supports the author's perspective is "Death from firearms must be reduced by taking common-sense measures to strengthen gun control." This statement highlights the author's belief that gun control measures are necessary to reduce deaths caused by firearms.
The following sentences in section 3 further support this perspective by mentioning the need for addressing unsafe gun storage and implementing more extensive background checks for the purchase of assault weapons.
The author also emphasizes the importance of taking action at the state level in the absence of federal action, indicating a sense of urgency and a belief that waiting for federal action is not enough. Overall, the passage conveys a strong message in support of gun control measures to reduce deaths caused by firearms.
To learn more about author
https://brainly.com/question/9260046
#SPJ4
Readers can tell that authors are using sarcasm when they
state the opposite of what is true.
make ridiculous exaggerations.
state exactly what they think.
describe historical people
Readers can tell that authors are using sarcasm are "state the opposite of what is true" and "make ridiculous exaggerations".
Sarcasm is a form of irony that is used to convey the opposite meaning of what is being said, often for humorous or critical effect.
By stating the opposite of what is true or making exaggerated statements, authors can signal their use of sarcasm to readers.
For example, if an author writes, "Oh great, another rainy day in paradise," the reader can infer that the author is being sarcastic because rainy weather is not typically associated with paradise.
Similarly, if an author writes, "I just love sitting in traffic for hours," the reader can infer that the author is being sarcastic because no one enjoys being stuck in traffic. These types of statements, where the intended meaning is opposite to the literal meaning, are clear signals to readers that sarcasm is being used.
Learn more about sarcasm here:
https://brainly.com/question/9172346
#SPJ4
It's most likely A. state the opposite of what is true.
PLEASE I NEED HELP BRO THIS IS DUE TONIGHT!!
Read this paragraph from page 136.
Isabel hit the water and sank into the warm Gulf Stream. It was pitch-black all around her, and the ocean was alive. Not alive with fish—alive like the ocean was a living creature itself. It churned and roiled and roared with bubbles and foam. It beat at her, pushing her and pulling her like a cat playing with the mouse it was about to eat.
How does the personification of the ocean impact the meaning in the paragraph?
The personification in this paragraph is trying to tell you that the waves are crashing harshly and trying to pull the girl into the water. When it says, "It churned and roiled and roared with bubbles and foam." Its acting as if it was an animal instead of the ocean and when it says, "It beat at her, pushing her and pulling her like a cat playing with the mouse it was about to eat." In reality we know that is false however, since this is personification, it's trying to tell us that she was going to become eaten by the wave itself.
according to your textbook, when speaking to a diverse audience it is important to promote a supportive communication climate that welcomes differing perspectives on topics and issues.true false
True.
Creating a supportive communication climate is important when speaking to a diverse audience because it helps to promote mutual respect, open-mindedness, and inclusiveness. A supportive communication climate involves creating an atmosphere of safety and trust that encourages participants to share their opinions and ideas freely without fear of being judged or rejected.
It also involves active listening, acknowledging different perspectives, and validating the feelings and experiences of others. Such a climate helps to foster a sense of community and promotes a collaborative approach to problem-solving, which is essential for effective communication in diverse settings.
learn more about 'communication';https://brainly.com/question/31687886
#SPJ11
a can opener is a combination of which simple machines?
a. a lever and a wedge
b. a wedge and a screw
c. a lever and an inclined plane
d. an inclined plane and a wedge
In the book Cyrano De Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, Why does Christian dare to insult Cyrano's nose?
In the play Cyrano de Bergerac, Christian insults Cyrano's nose because he wants to win the affection of Roxane, who has expressed her admiration for Cyrano's wit and eloquence. Christian is a handsome but inarticulate young man who has fallen in love with Roxane, but he is unable to express his feelings to her in a way that would win her heart. Cyrano, on the other hand, is a brilliant poet and swordsman, but his physical appearance is marred by his large nose.
When Christian first meets Cyrano, he is taken aback by the size of his nose and makes a comment about it. Cyrano responds by using his quick wit and sharp tongue to turn the insult back on Christian, making him look foolish in front of Roxane. However, Christian realizes that he needs Cyrano's help to win Roxane's heart, so he apologizes and asks for his assistance.
Later, when Roxane tells Cyrano that she has fallen in love with Christian's "soul," but not his "words," Cyrano sees an opportunity to use his own talents to help Christian. He agrees to write love letters for Christian to give to Roxane, but he insists that Christian must memorize the letters and speak them to Roxane himself. This way, Cyrano can use his words to win Roxane's heart, while Christian can use his good looks to woo her.
In the end, Christian's insults to Cyrano's nose were just a momentary lapse in judgment. He realizes that he needs Cyrano's help and is willing to apologize and ask for it. And Cyrano, in turn, uses his talents to help Christian win Roxane's love, even though he himself is in love with her.
In the play Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, Christian insults Cyrano's nose because he wants to get back at him for mocking his lack of wit and ability to woo Roxane, the woman they both love.
Christian is frustrated that he cannot express his love for Roxane in the eloquent, romantic language that she desires, and Cyrano's taunts about his lack of poetic skill only add to his frustration.
In a fit of anger and desperation, Christian insults Cyrano's nose, which is famously large and has been the subject of ridicule from others throughout Cyrano's life.
This sets off a chain of events that leads to the climax of the play, where Cyrano helps Christian express his love for Roxane in his own words, while hiding his own love for her.
To know more about Cyrano visit:
brainly.com/question/30143593
Torvald tells Nora that she has a "sacred duty" as a wife to remain--what does he mean?
When Torvald tells Nora that she has a "sacred duty" as a wife to remain, he is referring to the traditional gender roles and expectations of marriage during the time period in which the play is set. In this society, women were expected to prioritize their roles as wives and mothers above all else and to maintain a perfect household for their husbands.
This duty was seen as sacred because it was believed to be a divine and necessary role for women to fulfill in order to maintain the stability of the family unit and society as a whole.
Torvald believes that Nora's duty as a wife is to remain by his side and continue to fulfill her domestic duties, regardless of any personal desires or ambitions she may have. He sees Nora's duty to him and their family as her ultimate responsibility and believes that it is her duty to prioritize their needs above her own. This highlights the inequality and restrictive nature of gender roles during the time period in which the play is set.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Nora that she has a "sacred duty" CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/30542870
#SPJ11
Practice 1: same or different? Look at these pairs of sentences. Do they mean the same thing or are they different? Sentence examples T England is a little colder than France. France isn't quite as cold as England. TI Ta same different
Answer: The same
Explanation:
Because England is colder than France and the second sentence it talks about France not being cold as England.
Read the passage.
When the Walkers decided to remodel their living room, they enlarged the existing windows and added a few more. The once-dark room is now suffused with light—a total transformation.
Based on the context of the passage, which term can be used as a synonym for suffused?
The term that can be used as a synonym for suffused in this context is "filled."
The short answer is that filing means “storing documents or information” or “submitting a document or application,” while filling means “causing to become full” or “material used to fill something.
Filled-out Sentence Examples
Tears flowed freely as she filled out each blank space. ...
She was gabbing and smiling as two men filled out raffle tickets. ...
Carmen filled out all the necessary paperwork and then settled down for a long wait.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Filled CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/182137
#SPJ11
NEED THIS DONE BY TMRW MORNING
an essay about the book Mexican gothic that meets the criteria in this photo
USE EITHER OF THE PROMPTS BUT TELL ME WHICH ONE YOU ANSWERED PLS
Silvia Moreno-Garcia's 2020 novel, Mexican Gothic, is a woven tale of terror that takes place in Mexico during the 1950s.
What is the story about?In the story, Noemí Taboada, a young socialite sent to check on her cousin Catalina who had married into a puzzling and malevolent family.
The book, classified as gothic horror, pays homage to classic literature such as Bram Stoker's Dracula and Daphne du Maurier's Rebecca. Moreno-Garcia skillfully creates an atmospheric and evocative writing style, which builds unease and suspense throughout the novel.
Learn more about story on
https://brainly.com/question/1234077
#SPJ1
Read the sentences.
Whenever I see motorcyclists who choose not to wear helmets, I question their decision. It seems imprudent to choose not to wear a helmet when wearing one could save your life.
What is the meaning of the word imprudent as it is used in the sentence
Answer: showing poor judgment
Explanation: showing poor judgment
Can somone do this for me please
A narrative poem of "A police officer named Karla"
A police officer named Karla, groping along the tunnel, step by step,
She winked her prying torch with patching glare
From side to side, and sniffed the unwholesome air.
Tins, boxes, bottles, shapes too vague to know,
A mirror smashed, the mattress from a bed;
And she, exploring fifty feet below
The rosy gloom of a mission overhead.
Tripping, she grapped the wall; saw someone lie
Humped at her feet, half-hidden by a rug,
And stooped to give the sleeper's arm a tug.
"I'm looking for headquarters." No reply.
"God blast your neck!" (For days he'd had no sleep.)
"Get up and guide me through this stinking place."
Savage, she kicked a soft, unanswering heap,
And flashed her beam across the livid face
Terribly glaring up, whose eyes yet wore
Agony dying hard ten days before;
And fists of fingers clutched a blackening wound.
Alone she staggered on until she found
Dawn's ghost that filtered down a shafted stair
To the dazed, muttering creatures underground
Who hear the boom of shells in muffled sound.
At last, with sweat of horror in her hair,
she climbed through darkness to the twilight air,
Unloading hell behind her step by step.
I hope this helps.
_____ fallacy is a fallacy that presents limited choices, or black and white choices, that removes the complexity and nuance of an argument. An example would be when someone says something like, "You are not a true feminist if you believe…" or "You can't be a Republican if you believe …"
a. Strawman
b. Black and White
c. Authority
d. Ad Hominem tu quoque
b. Black and White fallacy is a fallacy that presents limited choices, or black and white choices, that removes the complexity and nuance of an argument. An example would be when someone says something like, "You are not a true feminist if you believe…" or "You can't be a Republican if you believe …"
What is the fallacy?The paradox depicted within the explanation is the Black and White false idea, which is additionally known as the Wrong Problem paradox. This error presents as it were two choices and disregards other conceivable outcomes.
Therefore, It's a sort of paradox that limits the choices accessible and neglects the different conceivable outcomes and choices that may exist.
Learn more about fallacy from
https://brainly.com/question/20939336
#SPJ1
Write a couplet poem with 8 lines in total
Answer:
In the garden, a bee hums and hums,
As the flowers sway, she busily comes.
The sun shines bright in the clear blue sky,
As the birds chirp and flutter by.
The leaves rustle in the gentle breeze,
And the grass dances as it please.
In this moment, all is at peace,
Nature's symphony, a moment to seize.
Explanation:
"The programme starts at half past six (on)
The programme ___at half past six"
A. The programme comes out at half past six.
B. The programme comes on at half past six.
C. The programme comes at at half past six.
D. The programme comes through at half past six.
The correct answer is B. The programme comes on at half past six. This means that the programme will begin airing or broadcasting at 6:30 PM.
When we say that a programme comes on at a certain time, it means that it will begin at that exact time. In this case, the programme will start at 6:30 PM. It is important to note that the phrase "comes on" is often used when referring to television or radio programmes, but can also be used in other contexts such as plays or concerts.
Saying that the programme comes out at half past six (Option A) might imply that it is being released or made available at that time, rather than starting at that time. Option C, "comes at half past six", does not make sense grammatically. Option D, "comes through at half past six", could be interpreted as the programme being broadcasted or received clearly at that time, but it is not commonly used in this context.
Therefore, the correct phrase to use when talking about a programme that starts at 6:30 PM is "the programme comes on at half past six".
To learn more about the phrase, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/15806900
#SPJ11
We couldn't have built this new train without the ____(dedicate) and expertise of the the entire workforce
We couldn't have built this new train without the dedication and expertise of the entire workforce.
It's always inspiring to see a project come together thanks to a dedicated team's hard work and expertise. Building a train is no small feat; it takes a lot of skill and coordination to make it happen. It's important to acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of everyone involved in the project, from the engineers and designers to the construction workers and support staff. Celebrating the team's accomplishments can help foster a positive and collaborative work culture, and can also serve as a reminder of what can be achieved when people work together towards a common goal.
Learn more about dedication here:
https://brainly.com/question/30160224
#SPJ11
4. Support Inferences: Every culture has certain rituals and customs for treating the dead. Reread lines
36-54. What does Elpenor request Odysseus and his men do? Cite specific textual evidence. Use quotation marks and line numbers.
In the "Odyssey", Elpenor requests Odysseus and his men to return to Aeaea and give him a proper burial, as is revealed in lines 46 and 47 of the passage.
What happens in the storyIn the epic poem "Odyssey," Elpenor asks Odysseus to bury him in a proper manner, which emphasizes the importance of proper burial in Greek culture and the strong bonds among comrades.
In the attached picture, the text in lines 46 and 47 says:
O my lord, remember me, I pray, do not abandon me unwept, unburied.Therefore, Elpenor represents the importance of treating the dead with decency, giving them a proper burial and the chance to be mourned by those who love them.
Learn more about "Odyssey" here:
https://brainly.com/question/4161823
#SPJ1
There are 2 things in this act that Nora wants to rip up. What are they and what do they symbolize?
In Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House," Nora wants to rip up two things: the loan agreement she signed with Krogstad and the dress she wore to the costume party. These two things symbolize different aspects of Nora's life and character.
The loan agreement represents Nora's secret and illegal borrowing of money to save her husband's life. It symbolizes Nora's desperation to maintain appearances and uphold societal expectations of women as caretakers of their husbands and families. By ripping up the agreement, Nora is rejecting this societal pressure and asserting her independence and agency. The dress represents Nora's role as a "doll" or plaything in her husband's eyes and in society at large. She wears the dress to the party to please and entertain her husband and his friends, but it ultimately makes her feel uncomfortable and objectified. By ripping up the dress, Nora is rejecting this objectification and asserting her own identity and desires.
Overall, Nora's desire to rip up these two things symbolizes her rejection of societal norms and expectations and her quest for self-discovery and independence.
To know more about objectification:
https://brainly.com/question/12929782
#SPJ11
Match each type of figurative language with its correct definition.
Match Term Definition
Hyperbole A) An exaggerated statement or claim not meant to be taken literally
Metaphor B) The forming of a word in imitation of a natural sound
Onomatopoeia C) A comparison used to show or suggest two things are similar without using like or as.
Match Term Definition are:
Hyperbole A, Metaphor C and Onomatopoeia B.
Hyperbole: Hyperbole is an exaggerated statement that is used to emphasize a point or to create a dramatic effect. It is usually not meant to be taken literally. For example, "It's so cold I could freeze to death!" This is an example of hyperbole because it is not literally possible to freeze to death from the cold.
Metaphor: A metaphor is a figure of speech that describes one thing in terms of another to compare the two and make a comparison. For example, "My love is a rose." This is a metaphor because the speaker is comparing their love to a rose, but of course their love is not actually a rose.
Onomatopoeia: Onomatopoeia is a figure of speech that uses words that sound like the noise or action they are describing. For example, "The bee buzzed." This is an example of onomatopoeia because the word "buzz" describes the sound a bee makes.
To learn more about figurative language link is here
brainly.com/question/2569664
#SPJ1
In literature, unreliable narrators are narrators who are not credible or trustworthy.
True
False
True.
In literature, an unreliable narrator is a narrator whose credibility has been seriously compromised. The reader is given reasons to doubt the narrator's veracity, or to suspect that the narrator is mistaken, deluded, or deceptive. The use of an unreliable narrator can create ambiguity and uncertainty in the narrative, and challenge the reader's assumptions about what is happening in the story.
~~~Harsha~~~
Answer:
True
Explanation:
hope this helps
Write a poem on marginalized people, 10-15 lines
A poem on marginalized people:
Marginalized people, forgotten and unseen,Their struggles and stories, too often obscene.Who will give voice to the silenced and oppressed?Marginalized people face barriers and discrimination based on their race, gender, sexuality, ability etc but their experiences are often dismissed or ignored by those in power which leads to lack of resources and support for their communities.
Despite these challenges, the marginalized people continue to fight for their rights and dignity but it up to those with privilege and power to listen, learn, and amplify their voices and work towards a more just and equitable society for all.
Read more about marginalized people
brainly.com/question/30960749
#SPJ1
How does stargirl’ choice for a pet (a rat) tie in with her nonconformist ways?
What important plot events occur in the scene that makes up act two, part five, of the crucible by Arthur miller?
Please select all that apply.
A. John proctor reveals to the court that he had an affair with Abigail Williams.
B. Officers of the court arrive to ask Elizabeth witchcraft.
C. Characters arrive to say that Rebecca nurse and Giles Corey’s wife have been accused.
D. Mary Warren makes a poppet for Elizabeth and puts the needle in it.
1692 in Salem, Massachusetts. In an effort to hide their own occult activities, a small number of girls 'cry out' against other residents of the town, accusing them of practicing witchcraft. The girls' allegations, spearheaded by Abigail Williams, lead to the establishment of a court to look into the alleged crimes.
One of Arthur Miller's more intimate plays, After the Fall, is a thinly veiled personal critique focused on Miller's recent divorce from Marilyn Monroe. The story is centered on Quentin, a Jewish intellectual from New York City who decides to reevaluate his life in order to decide whether or not to get married.
Learn more about Arthur Miller here:
https://brainly.com/question/14522532
#SPJ1
Identify the problem with pronoun reference as ambiguous, remote, or broad. If a car accident happens and you leave the scene before the police arrive, it is a crime. _____ reference
The problem with the pronoun reference is ambiguous. The pronoun "it" could refer to either the car accident or leaving the scene before the police arrive, which causes confusion for the reader.
To avoid this ambiguity, one could rewrite the sentence to make the reference clearer. For example: "If you leave the scene of a car accident before the police arrive, it is a crime." Here, "it" clearly refers to leaving the scene before the police arrive, and there is no confusion about the meaning of the sentence.
Pronoun reference is an important aspect of effective communication, and it is essential to ensure that the pronoun used has a clear antecedent to avoid ambiguity, remote, or broad reference.
In academic or professional writing, unclear pronoun reference can lead to confusion or misunderstandings, which can affect the credibility of the author. It's important to proofread and revise writing to ensure that pronouns have a clear antecedent and the intended meaning is conveyed.
Learn more about ambiguity here:
https://brainly.com/question/31273453
#SPJ4
What important information did Henrietta's doctor fail to give her before starting her cancer treatment? How did she react when this information was eventually shared with her?
Henrietta Lacks was a patient at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, who was diagnosed with cervical cancer in 1951. Her doctor failed to inform her that a sample of her cancer cells would be taken and used for research purposes without her knowledge or consent. The cells, known as HeLa cells, became the first immortal cell line and were used in countless medical breakthroughs, including the development of the polio vaccine.
When Henrietta's family discovered that her cells were still being used in research decades after her death, they were shocked and confused. They had not been informed about the use of her cells and did not understand the implications of their use. Henrietta's daughter, Deborah, struggled to come to terms with the fact that her mother's cells had been used without her knowledge and consent.
Overall, the lack of informed consent and communication from Henrietta's doctor had far-reaching consequences for her family and the scientific community. It highlights the importance of ethical considerations in medical research and the need for transparency in the use of patient samples.
TO KNOW MORE ABOUT Henrietta's doctor CLICK THIS LINK -
brainly.com/question/21830661
#SPJ11
The blank searched for artifacts in a feild
Archaeologists search for artifacts in a field as part of their work to excavate and study past human cultures and societies.
They use a variety of techniques, including surveying and excavation, to uncover and analyze artifacts such as pottery, tools, and buildings. Archaeologists also study the context in which these artifacts were found, including the geographical and historical background, as well as the social and cultural significance of these objects.
The study of artifacts is crucial to understanding the history and culture of past societies excavation, and the work of archaeologists is instrumental in advancing our knowledge of human history and evolution.
Learn more about Archaeologists here
https://brainly.com/question/31276613
#SPJ1
Un hombre rico
La Luna y las estrellas
El Sol y el aire que respiro
Tus ojos y corazón sincero
Todos son de mi propiedad
-Anónimo
¿Qué tipo de texto leíste?
¿De qué trata el poema?
¿De qué propiedad habla el poema?
¿De quién es la propiedad?
The poem appears to be about the speaker's appreciation and attachment to the world around them. While they use ownership language, it's possible that the poem is meant to convey a sense of gratitude rather than a desire for control or possession.
The poem is about the things that the speaker considers as their own property. These include material possessions such as wealth and intangible things such as the air they breathe, the stars and moon in the sky, and the sincerity of someone's heart. The poem suggests that the speaker values both tangible and intangible aspects of life as their property, perhaps indicating a desire for control or possession over their surroundings and emotions.
The property that the poem is talking about is largely symbolic. The speaker uses ownership language to express their appreciation and attachment to the various things in their life, emphasizing their personal connection to the world around them. The poem suggests that the speaker takes ownership of their experiences and emotions, finding value in both the material and intangible aspects of life.
It's not entirely clear who owns the property in the poem. While the speaker claims possession over these things, it could be argued that they are simply expressing their appreciation and connection to the world around them. It's possible that the poem is meant to convey a sense of gratitude for the abundance of life and the beauty of the world, rather than a desire for ownership or control.
To learn more about the poem
https://brainly.com/question/12155529
#SPJ4
Complete question:
A rich man
The moon and the stars
The sun and the air I breathe
Your eyes and sincere heart
They are all my property
-Anonymous
What type of text did you read?
What is the poem about?
What property is the poem talking about?
Who owns it?
Select the correct text in the passage. Which sentence in the passage best reveals that Anne is creative? adapted from Anne of Green Gables by Lucy Maud Montgomery Anne started off irreproachable, wearing a stiff black-and-white sateen dress. Her hat was a little, flat, glossy, new sailor, the extreme plainness of it disappointed Anne, who had permitted herself secret visions of ribbon and flowers. The latter, however, were supplied before Anne reached the main road, for being confronted halfway down the lane with a golden frenzy of wind-stirred buttercups and a glory of wild roses. Anne promptly and liberally garlanded her hat with a heavy wreath of them. Whatever other people might have thought of the result it satisfied Anne. And she tripped gaily down the road, holding her ruddy head with its decoration of pink and yellow very proudly.
Answer:
Anne promptly and liberally garlanded her hat with a heavy wreath of them.
Explanation:
Why does the lamp go out in the hall once Torvald takes the letters from the box?
In Henrik Ibsen's play, A Doll's House, the lamp going out in the hall once Torvald takes the letters from the box serves as a symbolic representation of the loss of truth and illumination in the household. The lamp, which represents light and knowledge, is put out as Torvald removes the letters that reveal the truth about Nora's secret loan. This act signifies the suppression of the truth, as Torvald seeks to maintain the facade of a perfect family, and his own reputation.
Moreover, the lamp going out also represents the loss of power and agency for Nora. Throughout the play, Nora has been living in a state of ignorance and naivety, believing that her husband is the sole source of knowledge and authority in their household. However, as the truth is revealed through the letters, Nora begins to see the power dynamics at play and realizes that she has been living in a doll's house all along.
In conclusion, the lamp going out in the hall symbolizes the loss of truth, knowledge, and agency in the household. It serves as a pivotal moment in the play, highlighting the importance of transparency and honesty in relationships, and the consequences of suppressing the truth.
To know more about A Doll's House, click this link-
brainly.in/question/48046758
#SPJ11
Curriculum Compacting is a strategy that works best for
A) English Language Learners.
B) gifted students.
C) Cognitively challenged students
Curriculum Compacting is a strategy that works best for B) gifted students. This approach allows them to move through the material at a faster pace, focusing on mastering new concepts and skills, rather than spending time on content they have already mastered.
Curriculum Compacting is a strategy that works best for gifted students. It involves identifying and eliminating the content that students already know or have mastered, allowing them to move on to more challenging material or pursue areas of interest. This strategy is particularly effective for gifted students who may become bored or disengaged in traditional classroom settings that do not adequately challenge them.
To know more about Curriculum click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17112325
#SPJ11
Why does Mrs. Linde tell Krogstad to leave his letter in the mailbox for helmer to read?
Mrs. Linde tells Krogstad to leave his letter in the mailbox for Helmer to read because she knows that Helmer values appearances and reputation above all else.
She believes that if Helmer were to read the letter in private, he would be more likely to react harshly and potentially ruin his own reputation by taking extreme measures against Krogstad. By allowing him to read the letter in public, Helmer may be more inclined to save face and find a more reasonable solution. Mrs. Linde tells Krogstad to leave his letter in the mailbox for Helmer to read because she believes it is essential for Nora and Helmer's relationship to face the truth about Nora's forgery. She thinks that this confrontation will promote honesty and growth in their marriage, ultimately leading to a stronger bond between them.
To know more about honesty please visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18014157
#SPJ11