Which has more kinetic energy:
a. A compact car going 70 MPH or a tractor trailer going 15 MPH?
b. An SUV going 30 MPH or a pickup truck going 30 MPH?
c. A school bus going 15 MPH, an SUV going 35 MPH, or a
compact car going 45 MPH?

Therefore, the potential difference of the circuit is 30 volts.

The external effort required to move a charge from one position to another in an electric field is known as an electric potential difference, or voltage. A test charge that has an electric potential differential of +1 will experience a shift in potential energy.

To calculate the potential difference (V) of the circuit, we can use Ohm's Law, which states that V = IR, where I is the current flowing through the circuit and R is the resistance of the circuit.

In this case, the current (I) is given as 0.5 A and the resistance (R) is given as 60 Ω. Therefore, we can substitute these values into Ohm's Law to find the potential difference:

V = IR

V = 0.5 A × 60 Ω

V = 30 volts

To know more about potential difference visit:-

brainly.com/question/12198573

#SPJ9

Answer:

3.84 m/s^2.

Explanation:

To solve this problem, we can use the following kinematic equation:

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

where:

v is the final velocity (31 m/s)

u is the initial velocity (13 m/s)

a is the acceleration (which is assumed to be constant)

s is the distance traveled (220 m)

We want to solve for the acceleration, so we can rearrange the equation as follows:

a = (v^2 - u^2) / 2s

Substituting the given values:

a = (31^2 - 13^2) / (2 x 220)

a = 3.84 m/s^2

Therefore, the acceleration of the car is 3.84 m/s^2.

please rate

Answer:

Explanation:

A. The gravitational pull from the Moon would correct the satellite and bring it back to the Lagrangian point.

At the Earth-Moon L1 Lagrangian point, the gravitational pulls from the Earth and the Moon are balanced, and the satellite is in a stable equilibrium. If the satellite drifted slightly closer to Earth, the gravitational pull from the Earth would become stronger, but the gravitational pull from the Moon would also increase due to its closer distance, and this would correct the satellite's motion and bring it back to the Lagrangian point.

Answer:

Astronomers use computer models to simulate the process of galactic evolution through mergers and collisions. These models are based on our current understanding of the physical laws that govern the behavior of matter and energy in the universe. By running simulations of galactic mergers and collisions, astronomers can test their understanding of how these physical processes work in practice and how they contribute to the formation and evolution of galaxies.

One way that astronomers might test their understanding of the physical processes of the universe is by comparing the predictions of their models to observations of real galaxies. For example, if a model predicts that a particular type of galaxy should have a certain shape, size, or distribution of stars, astronomers can compare these predictions to observations of actual galaxies to see if they match up. If there is a discrepancy between the model's predictions and the observations, this can indicate that there are some physical processes that are not well understood or included in the model.

Another way that astronomers might test their understanding is by looking for patterns or trends in the properties of galaxies that are consistent with the predictions of their models. For example, if a model predicts that galaxies that have undergone a recent merger should have a particular distribution of gas and dust, astronomers can look for evidence of this pattern in observations of real galaxies. If they find that the predicted pattern is consistently observed in a large sample of galaxies, this can provide support for the model's predictions and the physical processes that it includes.

Overall, computer models of galactic evolution through mergers and collisions provide a powerful tool for astronomers to test their understanding of the physical processes of the universe. By comparing the predictions of their models to observations of real galaxies and looking for consistent patterns and trends, astronomers can refine their understanding of how galaxies form and evolve over time.

They are specifically made tο be ideal fοr cοnducting live electrical lines because οf their electrical insulatiοn and mechanical tοughness. A structure called an electric pylοn οf hοt-rοlled steel bevels οr gusset plates.

Other materials, such as cοncrete and wοοd, may alsο be utilised in additiοn tο steel. Transmissiοn tοwers can be divided intο fοur main categοries: suspensiοn, terminal, tensiοn, οr transpοsitiοn.

This Central Electricity Bοard held a cοmpetitiοn in 1927, and the winning entry was chοsen by the classical designer Sir Reginald Blοοmfield. He settled οn an A-frame structure with latticewοrk that was οffered by the American cοmpany Milliken Brοthers and is still in use tοday.

To know more about mechanical visit:

brainly.com/question/20885658

#SPJ1

Complete question:

It takes 0.1311 seconds to hear the echo of the stone.

First we need to determine the time it takes for the sound wave to travel from the stone to the bottom of the mine shaft and back up to our ears.

Let's start by finding the time it takes for the sound wave to reach the bottom of the mine shaft. We can use the formula:

time = distance / speed

The distance is the depth of the mine shaft, which is 15 meters. The speed of sound is 343 m/s, as given in the problem. Therefore, the time it takes for the sound wave to reach the bottom of the mine shaft is:

time = 15 m / 343 m/s

time = 0.0437 s

Now, we need to find the time it takes for the sound wave to travel back up to our ears. Since the sound wave travels at the same speed, 343 m/s, the distance it needs to cover is twice the depth of the mine shaft, or 30 meters. Therefore, the time it takes for the sound wave to travel back up to our ears is:

time = 30 m / 343 m/s

time = 0.0874 s

Finally, to find the total time it takes to hear the echo, we add the time it takes for the sound wave to reach the bottom of the mine shaft to the time it takes to travel back up to our ears:

total time = 0.0437 s + 0.0874 s

total time = 0.1311 s

Therefore, it takes 0.1311 seconds to hear the echo of the stone.

Learn more about sound wave here : brainly.com/question/13105733

#SPJ1

Answer:

15 hours

Explanation:

formula: f(a) = a(0.5)^(T/t)

fill in known values: 13=208(0.5)^(60/t)

use natural log to isolate t:    ln(13/208)=ln(0.5)(60/t)

solve for t: t=15

The truck's acceleration is 3.0m/s² and the momentum of the truck is  144000 kg m/s.

It is the rate at which the speed and direction of a moving object vary over time.

We can use the following equation to calculate the acceleration of the truck:

a = (v - u) / t

where

a = acceleration

v = final velocity = 18.0 m/s

u = initial velocity = 0 m/s (the truck starts from rest)

t = time taken = 6.00 s

Substituting the values, we get:

a = (18.0 m/s - 0 m/s) / 6.00 s

a = 3.00 m/s²

Therefore, the acceleration of the truck is 3.00 m/s².

We can use the following equation to calculate the momentum of the truck:

p = m * v

where

p = momentum

m = mass of the truck = 8000.0 kg

v = final velocity = 18.0 m/s

Substituting the values, we get:

p = 8000.0 kg * 18.0 m/s

p = 144000 kg m/s

Therefore, the momentum of the truck after it has reached its final velocity is 144000 kg m/s.

Learn more about velocity here:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ9

Answer:

The student used 24000 Joules of energy.

Explanation:

We can use the Energy Power equation to solve this example.

[tex]\sf E=Pt[/tex]

Where

[tex]\sf E[/tex] is the energy in Joules (J)

[tex]\sf P[/tex] is the power in Watts (W)

[tex]\sf t[/tex] is the time in seconds (s)

Numerical Evaluation

In this example we are given

[tex]\sf P=800\\t=30[/tex]

Substituting our given values into the equation yields

[tex]\sf E=800 \cdot 30[/tex]

[tex]\sf E=24000[/tex]

24000 Joules  

[tex]\Large\bold{SOLUTION}[/tex]

To calculate the energy used by the student in this scenario, we can use the formula:

[tex]\sf{Energy\: (in\: Joules) = Power\: (in\: Watts) \times Time\: (in\: seconds)}[/tex]

Given that the student uses an 800 W microwave for 30 seconds, we can plug in these values to the formula:

[tex]\sf Energy = 800\: W \times 30\: s = 24,000\: J[/tex]

Therefore, the student uses 24,000 Joules of energy in this scenario.

[tex]\rule{200pt}{5pt}[/tex]

Answer:

Pulse transfers a single disturbance, while wave is a continuous disturbance that transfers energy.

If you found this response helpful, please consider marking it as brainliest.

The voltage of the battery would be 20 volts. Option I.

According to Ohm's law, the voltage (V) across a resistor is equal to the current (I) flowing through it multiplied by its resistance (R). Mathematically,

V = I × R

In this case, the current (I) flowing through the resistor is given as 10 A and the resistance (R) of the resistor is given as 2 ohms. Substituting these values into the above formula, we get:

V = 10 A × 2 ohms = 20 volts

Therefore, the voltage of the battery is 20 volts.

More on voltage can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/13521443

#SPJ1

Answer:

- 0.33 m/s

Explanation:

An illustration is shown above,

In this case, since the two objects move in opposite directions before collision, then move together, the formula to be used is,

m1u1 - m2u2 = (m1 + m2)v

Where,

m1 = mass of the first object

u1 = initial velocity of the first object

v1 = final velocity of the first object

m2 = mass of the second object

u2 = initial velocity of the second object

v2 = final velocity of the second object

Therefore,

(4.0 • 3.0) - (8.0 • 2.0) = (4.0 + 8.0)v

12 - 16 = 12v

-4 = 12v

Divide both sides by 12,

-4 / 12 = 12v / 12

-1 / 3 = v

v = -0.33 m/s

Please mark brainliest.

Thanks

Answer:

The period of a ticker-timer is the time interval between two consecutive dots made by the ticker.

If the frequency of the ticker-timer is 25 Hz, then it makes 25 dots in one second. Therefore, the period of the ticker-timer can be calculated as:

Period = 1/frequency = 1/25 Hz = 0.04 seconds

If the frequency of the ticker-timer is 50 Hz, then it makes 50 dots in one second. Therefore, the period of the ticker-timer can be calculated as:

Period = 1/frequency = 1/50 Hz = 0.02 seconds

So, the period of the ticker-timer is 0.04 seconds for a frequency of 25 Hz and 0.02 seconds for a frequency of 50 Hz

Explanation:

please Mark Me As Brainlist.

Answer:

Explanation:

The formula relating the speed of sound, frequency, and wavelength is:

speed = frequency x wavelength

Rearranging this formula to solve for frequency:

frequency = speed / wavelength

Substituting the given values:

frequency = 342 m/s / 1.8 m

frequency = 190 Hz

Therefore, the frequency of the sound wave is 190 Hz.

Answer:

Explanation:

Assuming that air resistance is negligible, we can use the following kinematic equations to solve for the peak height:

v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2ad

where v_f = 0 m/s (at the peak height) and a = -9.8 m/s^2 (acceleration due to gravity)

and

d = v_i t + (1/2)at^2

where d is the displacement or the peak height we want to find, v_i is the initial velocity, t is the time it takes to reach the peak height.

First, we need to resolve the initial velocity into its vertical and horizontal components:

v_i_x = v_i cos(30°) = 121.1 m/s

v_i_y = v_i sin(30°) = 70.0 m/s

Next, we can use the vertical component of the initial velocity to find the time it takes to reach the peak height:

v_f = v_i_y + at

0 m/s = 70.0 m/s + (-9.8 m/s^2)t

t = 7.14 s

Finally, we can use the time we found and the kinematic equation for displacement to find the peak height:

d = v_i_y t + (1/2)at^2

d = (70.0 m/s)(7.14 s) + (1/2)(-9.8 m/s^2)(7.14 s)^2

d = 247.5 m

Therefore, the peak height of the football is 247.5 meters.

Answer:

Number of coils of conducting wire and whether or not domains are present in iron core are the two properties of the electromagnet that the researcher will need to take into account.

Explanation:

The number of coils of conducting wire affects the strength of the magnetic field produced by the electromagnet. More coils will produce a stronger magnetic field, while fewer coils will produce a weaker magnetic field. The researcher will need to determine the appropriate number of coils to produce the desired strength of the magnetic field for the medical application.

The presence of domains in the iron core is also an important consideration. The iron core of the electromagnet helps to concentrate the magnetic field and increase its strength. The domains in the iron core align with the magnetic field produced by the current flowing through the wire, and this alignment reinforces the magnetic field. If the iron core does not have domains, the magnetic field produced by the electromagnet will be weaker. Therefore, the researcher will need to ensure that the iron core has domains to maximize the strength of the magnetic field for the medical application.

Answer:The current in a lightbulb with a voltage of 35.0 V and a resistance of 175 ohm is 0.2 A.

Find the current in a lightbulb?

Given:

The voltage in a lightbulb is given by the equation V=IR

V is the voltage, I is current, and R is the resistance.

The voltage of the lightbulb is given as 35.0 V.

The resistance of the lightbulb is given as 175 Ohm.

As the equation is given,

V= IR

where I is current, R is resistance and V is the voltage.

Now, I = V/R

As the value of Voltage and resistance of the lightbulb is given, we will put in the above equation, we get;

I = 35.0/ 175 A

I = 0.2 A.

Hence, the current of the lightbulb is 0.2 A.

Therefore, Option C is the correct answer.

To learn more about Current, refer to:

Explanation:

Because it is less than the required minimum energy difference of 1.51 eV, the energy of 0.66 eV is not feasible. Hence, 0.66 eV is the correct answer.

The electron is first assumed to be in the ground state (n=1) in a hydrogen atom. Hence, the electron's energy in its ground state is 13.6 eV. This means that 12.75eV is needed to transfer electrons from the ground state to the third excited state.

The following equation provides the energy levels:

En = -13.6/n² eV

where n is the main quantum number.

An electron can move from the n=4 level to the n=3, n=2, or n=1 level after initialization. For each of these transitions, the relevant photon energies and energy differences are as follows:

n=4 to n=3: ΔE = En=3 - En=4 = (-13.6/3²) - (-13.6/4²) = 1.51 eV

n=4 to n=2: ΔE = En=2 - En=4 = (-13.6/2²) - (-13.6/4²) = 3.40 eV

n=4 to n=1: ΔE = En=1 - En=4 = (-13.6/1²) - (-13.6/4²) = 10.2 eV

As a result, the released photons could have energies of 1.51 eV, 3.40 eV, or 10.2 eV.

To know more about energy visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11399976

#SPJ9

Answer:

625

Explanation:

To solve this problem, we can use the following kinematic equation:

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

Where:

v = final velocity (0 m/s since the body comes to rest)

u = initial velocity (50 m/s)

a = acceleration (-2 m/s^2 since the body is decelerating)

s = distance

We want to find the distance (s) that the body covers from the time it starts to decelerate to the time it comes to rest. We can rearrange the equation to solve for s:

s = (v^2 - u^2) / (2a)

Substituting the values we have:

s = (0^2 - 50^2) / (2 x (-2)) = 625 meters

Therefore, the body covers a distance of 625 meters from the time it starts to decelerate until it comes to rest.

The bigger the spring constant, the more stiff or rigid the spring is.

The exact amount of force needed to bend a spring depends on the spring constant. Although pounds/inch is a common measurement in North America, the standard international (SI) unit for spring constants is Newtons/meter. A stiffer spring has a greater spring constant, and vice versa.

The exact amount of force needed to bend a spring depends on the spring constant. Although pounds/inch is a common measurement in North America, the standard international (SI) unit for spring constants is Newtons/meter. A stiffer spring has a greater spring constant, and vice versa.

To know more about spring constant visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14159361

#SPJ9

The two gases that could be components of water are indeed hydrogen and oxygen.

Evidence to support this claim:

1. The chemical formula for water is H2O, which means that it is composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.

2. The table of elements shows that hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) are both elements that exist in nature.

3. The atomic mass of hydrogen (1.008) and oxygen (15.999) matches the molecular mass of water (18.015).

4. Water is produced when hydrogen gas (H2) is burned in the presence of oxygen gas (O2), according to the following equation: 2H2 + O2 → 2H2O.

Overall, the evidence supports the conclusion that hydrogen and oxygen are the two gases that could be components of water.

To know more about water please refer: https://brainly.com/question/31037355

#SPJ1

The hammer's centripetal acceleration is therefore 100.59 m/s².

An object has positive acceleration when it is going faster than it was previously. Positive acceleration was demonstrated by the moving car in the first scenario. Positive forward motion is being made by the car.

Hammer mass, m, is 6.55 kg. chain length, including the length of the arms, r = 1.3 m, Hammer's angular velocity is given by the formula: = 1.4 rev/s = 8.79646 rad/s (1 rev = 6.28 rad).

The formula a = V2/r, where V is the transverse velocity of the hammer, yields the centripetal acceleration.

V = r, hence

As a result, a = r²

A = 1.3 x 8.796462, or 100.59 m/s², is obtained by substituting the supplied numbers in the equation above.

The hammer's centripetal acceleration is therefore 100.59 m/s².

To know more about Acceleration visit:

brainly.com/question/30499732

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

To use Gauss's Law, we need to choose a Gaussian surface that encloses the point of interest and has symmetry such that the electric field is constant over the surface. For all points in this problem, we can choose a cylinder as our Gaussian surface with its axis perpendicular to the sheets.

Let's assume that the cylinders are tall enough such that the electric field at the top and bottom faces of the cylinder is negligible. The electric flux through the curved part of the cylinder is constant and equal to Φ_E = E*A, where A is the surface area of the curved part of the cylinder.

Using Gauss's Law, Φ_E = Q_in / ε0, where Q_in is the net charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface and ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

A: The Gaussian surface is a cylinder with radius r = 5.00 cm and height h = the distance between the sheets (20.0 cm). The net charge enclosed is Q_in = σ1 * A_top + σ2 * A_bottom, where A_top and A_bottom are the areas of the top and bottom faces of the cylinder, respectively. Since the electric field is perpendicular to the faces, the flux through them is zero. So, Q_in = (σ1 - σ2) * A, where A is the surface area of the curved part of the cylinder. Thus,

Φ_E = E * A = Q_in / ε0

E = (σ1 - σ2) / (ε0 * r) = (-7.30 μC/m^2 - 5.00 μC/m^2) / (8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2 * 0.0500 m) = -2.31 x 10^5 N/C

The magnitude of the electric field at point A is 2.31 x 10^5 N/C.

B: The electric field points from higher potential to lower potential. Since the left-hand sheet has a negative charge density and the right-hand sheet has a positive charge density, the potential decreases from left to right. Thus, the electric field at point A points from left to right.

The direction of the electric field at point A is RIGHT.

C: The Gaussian surface is a cylinder with radius r = 1.25 cm and height h = the thickness of the right-hand sheet (10.0 cm). The net charge enclosed is Q_in = σ4 * A, where A is the surface area of the curved part of the cylinder. Thus,

Φ_E = E * A = Q_in / ε0

E = σ4 / (ε0 * r) = 4.00 μC/m^2 / (8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2 * 0.0125 m) = 3.77 x 10^7 N/C

The magnitude of the electric field at point B is 3.77 x 10^7 N/C.

D: The electric field points from higher potential to lower potential. Since the right-hand sheet has a positive charge density, the potential decreases from the right-hand sheet to the left. Thus, the electric field at point B points from right to left.

The direction of the electric field at point B is LEFT.

E:

Since point C is in the middle of the right-hand sheet, the electric field due to this sheet alone cancels out due to symmetry. Thus, the only electric field present is due to the left-hand sheet. The Gaussian surface is a cylinder with radius r = the radius of the sheet (10.0 cm) and height h = the thickness of the sheet (10.0 cm). The net charge enclosed is Q

The net charge enclosed within this Gaussian surface is:

Q = σ1 × (2πrh)

where h is the thickness of the left-hand sheet, r is the distance from the left-hand sheet to point C, and σ1 is the surface charge density of the left-hand sheet. Plugging in the given values, we get:

Q = (-7.30 × 10^-6 C/m^2) × (2π × 0.1 m × 0.1 m) = -4.60 × 10^-8 C

Using Gauss's law, we can find the electric field at point C:

E × (2πrh) = Q/ε0

where ε0 is the permittivity of free space. Solving for E, we get:

E = Q / (2πε0rh)

Plugging in the values, we get:

E = (-4.60 × 10^-8 C) / (2π × 8.85 × 10^-12 C^2/(N·m^2) × 0.1 m × 0.1 m) = -1.64 × 10^5 N/C

Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at point C is 1.64 × 10^5 N/C.

To find the electric field at point C, we need to consider both sheets since point C is equidistant from both sheets. Thus, we can use Gauss's law to find the total electric field due to both sheets.

The net charge enclosed by a cylindrical Gaussian surface of radius r = 1.25 cm and height h = 20.0 cm is given by:

qenc = σ2 * (2πrh) + σ4 * (2πrh) = (σ2 + σ4) * (2πrh)

where σ2 is the charge density on the inner surface of the right-hand sheet, σ4 is the charge density on the outer surface of the left-hand sheet, and h is the distance between the two sheets.

Substituting the given values, we get:

qenc = (5.00 μC/m^2 + 4.00 μC/m^2) * (2π * 1.25 cm * 20.0 cm) = 628.32 nC

Using Gauss's law, we have:

E * 2πrh = qenc/ε0

where ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

Solving for E, we get:

E = qenc / (2πrhε0) = 2.22 × 10^4 N/C

Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at point C is 2.22 × 10^4 N/C.

F:

The direction of the electric field at point C is perpendicular to the surface of the sheet, pointing away from the positive charge density and towards the negative charge density. Since the positive charge density is on the outer surface of the left-hand sheet and the negative charge density is on the inner surface of the right-hand sheet, the direction of the electric field at point C is from left to right. Therefore, the direction of the electric field at point C is RIGHT.

The net flux of an electric field in a closed surface is directly proportionate to the charge contained, according to Gauss' equation.

To use Gauss's Law, we need to choose a Gaussian surface that encloses the point of interest and has symmetry such that the electric field is constant over the surface. For all points in this problem, we can choose a cylinder as our Gaussian surface with its axis perpendicular to the sheets.

Let's assume that the cylinders are tall enough such that the electric field at the top and bottom faces of the cylinder is negligible. The electric flux through the curved part of the cylinder is constant and equal to Φ_E = E*A, where A is the surface area of the curved part of the cylinder.

Using Gauss's Law, Φ_E = Q_in / ε0, where Q_in is the net charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface and ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

A: The Gaussian surface is a cylinder with radius r = 5.00 cm and height h = the distance between the sheets (20.0 cm). The net charge enclosed is Q_in = σ1 * A_top + σ2 * A_bottom, where A_top and A_bottom are the areas of the top and bottom faces of the cylinder, respectively.

Φ_E = E * A = Q_in / ε0

E = (σ1 - σ2) / (ε0 * r) = (-7.30 μC/m^2 - 5.00 μC/m^2) / (8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2 * 0.0500 m) = -2.31 x 10^5 N/C

The magnitude of the electric field at point A is 2.31 x 10^5 N/C.

B: The electric field points from higher potential to lower potential. Since the left-hand sheet has a negative charge density and the right-hand sheet has a positive charge density, the potential decreases from left to right. Thus, the electric field at point A points from left to right.

The direction of the electric field at point A is RIGHT.

C: The Gaussian surface is a cylinder with radius r = 1.25 cm and height h = the thickness of the right-hand sheet (10.0 cm). The net charge enclosed is Q_in = σ4 * A, where A is the surface area of the curved part of the cylinder. Thus,

Φ_E = E * A = Q_in / ε0

E = σ4 / (ε0 * r) = 4.00 μC/m^2 / (8.85 x 10^-12 C^2/Nm^2 * 0.0125 m) = 3.77 x 10^7 N/C

The magnitude of the electric field at point B is 3.77 x 10^7 N/C.

D: The electric field points from higher potential to lower potential. Since the right-hand sheet has a positive charge density, the potential decreases from the right-hand sheet to the left. Thus, the electric field at point B points from right to left.

The direction of the electric field at point B is LEFT.

E:Since point C is in the middle of the right-hand sheet, the electric field due to this sheet alone cancels out due to symmetry. Thus, the only electric field present is due to the left-hand sheet. The Gaussian surface is a cylinder with radius r = the radius of the sheet (10.0 cm) and height h = the thickness of the sheet (10.0 cm). The net charge enclosed is Q

The net charge enclosed within this Gaussian surface is:

Q = σ1 × (2πrh)

where h is the thickness of the left-hand sheet, r is the distance from the left-hand sheet to point C, and σ1 is the surface charge density of the left-hand sheet. Plugging in the given values, we get:

Q = (-7.30 × 10^-6 C/m^2) × (2π × 0.1 m × 0.1 m) = -4.60 × 10^-8 C

Using Gauss's law, we can find the electric field at point C:

E × (2πrh) = Q/ε0

where ε0 is the permittivity of free space. Solving for E, we get:

E = Q / (2πε0rh)

Plugging in the values, we get:

E = (-4.60 × 10^-8 C) / (2π × 8.85 × 10^-12 C^2/(N·m^2) × 0.1 m × 0.1 m) = -1.64 × 10^5 N/C

Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at point C is 1.64 × 10^5 N/C.

To find the electric field at point C, we need to consider both sheets since point C is equidistant from both sheets. Thus, we can use Gauss's law to find the total electric field due to both sheets.

The net charge enclosed by a cylindrical Gaussian surface of radius r = 1.25 cm and height h = 20.0 cm is given by:

qenc = σ2 * (2πrh) + σ4 * (2πrh) = (σ2 + σ4) * (2πrh)

where σ2 is the charge density on the inner surface of the right-hand sheet, σ4 is the charge density on the outer surface of the left-hand sheet, and h is the distance between the two sheets.

Substituting the given values, we get:

qenc = (5.00 μC/m^2 + 4.00 μC/m^2) * (2π * 1.25 cm * 20.0 cm) = 628.32 nC

Using Gauss's law, we have:

E * 2πrh = qenc/ε0

where ε0 is the permittivity of free space.

Solving for E, we get:

E = qenc / (2πrhε0) = 2.22 × 10^4 N/C

Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at point C is 2.22 × 10^4 N/C.

F:The direction of the electric field at point C is perpendicular to the surface of the sheet, pointing away from the positive charge density and towards the negative charge density. Since the positive charge density is on the outer surface of the left-hand sheet and the negative charge density is on the inner surface of the right-hand sheet, the direction of the electric field at point C is from left to right. Therefore, the direction of the electric field at point C is RIGHT.

Learn more about  Gauss's law

https://brainly.com/question/14767569

#SPJ1

There are two forces acting on the rock: the force of gravity pulling it downward and the force of the boulder supporting it from underneath.

The force of gravity is the gravitational attraction between the rock and the Earth. It pulls the rock downward with a force equal to its weight, which is given by the equation Fg = mg, where Fg is the force of gravity, m is the mass of the rock, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s^2).

The concept of forces explains why the rock stays on top of the boulder because the forces are balanced. The force of gravity pulling the rock downward is equal and opposite to the force of the boulder supporting it from underneath. As a result, the rock remains in equilibrium, or a state of balance, on top of the boulder. If either force were to change, the equilibrium would be disrupted, and the rock would either fall to the ground or be pushed off the boulder.

To know more about forces visit:-

brainly.com/question/13191643

#SPJ1

Answer:

To solve this problem, we can use the formula:

d = (v^2)/(2μg)

d = distance traveled

v = speed of the car

μ = coefficient of kinetic friction

g = acceleration due to gravity

First, let's calculate the distance traveled when the car is traveling at 23 m/s:

d = (23^2)/(2*0.7*9.81) ≈ 67.97 meters

Now, let's calculate the distance traveled when the car is going twice as fast (46 m/s):

d = (46^2)/(2*0.7*9.81) ≈ 271.88 meters

Therefore, the car would travel approximately 271.88 meters if it were going twice as fast.

Real, inverted, and same size are the features of the image. when A concave mirror with a curvature of 8 is displayed on a ruler with a range of 0 to 14 cm.

The mirror formula may be used to calculate the image distance for an item located 4 cm from a 1.5 cm focal length mirror.

1/f = 1/u+1/v

f is the focal length

u is the object distance

v is the image distance

Keep in mind that the concave mirror's image distance and focal length are both positive.

Given:

u = 4cm

f = 1.5cm

1/v = 1/1.5-1/4

1/v = 0.67-0.25

1/v = 0.42

v = 1/0.42

v = 2.38cm

The picture is Genuine and INVERTED since the image distance value is positive.

We shall find its magnification and see if it is magnified or lessened. It is amplified if the magnification is larger than 1, and it is decreased if it is less.

Magnification = v/u

Magnification = 2.38/4

Magnification = 0.595 or. 0.6

The picture is reduced in size since the magnification is less than one (SMALLER).

Learn more about Inverted here:

https://brainly.com/question/16150120

#SPJ1

Answer:

power plant

collision

Battery

Burning wood

speaker

Beating drum

Answer:

Explanation:

We can solve this problem using kinematic equations. We know that the initial velocity of the ball is 55 m/s at an angle of 30° to the horizontal. We can break this velocity into its horizontal and vertical components:

vx = v0 cos θ = 55 cos 30° = 47.6 m/s

vy = v0 sin θ = 55 sin 30° = 27.5 m/s

We can now use the vertical motion equation to find the time it takes for the ball to reach its maximum height:

Δy = vy t + 0.5 a t^2

At the maximum height, the vertical velocity of the ball is 0, so we have:

0 = vy + a t_max

Solving for t_max, we get:

t_max = -vy / a = -27.5 / (-9.8) = 2.81 s

The ball will take twice this time to reach the fence, since it needs to come back down to the ground:

t_total = 2 t_max = 5.62 s

The horizontal distance the ball travels during this time is:

Δx = vx t_total = 47.6 × 5.62 = 267.7 m

Since this distance is greater than the distance to the fence (120 m), the ball will reach the fence if it leaves the bat traveling upward at an angle of 30° to the horizontal.

Mechanical energy to heat energy is collision,force x distance is work done,rubbing energy friction, stewardship is using energy wisely and nuclear energy can cause heat pollution.

For more information on energy kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/10770247

#SPJ1