Which of the following is not a valid probability

A. 1

B. 1.1

C. 0

D. 0.001

The partial sum for the power series which represents the function 1/(1-x³) consisting of the first 5 nonzero terms is: 1 + x³ + x⁶ + x⁹ + x¹² and the radius of convergence is 1.

The formula for the partial sum of a power series is given by:

Sₙ(x) = a₀ + a₁x + a₂x² + ... + aₙxⁿ

where a₀, a₁, a₂, ..., aₙ are the coefficients of the power series.

In this case, we can use the formula for the geometric series to find the coefficients:

1/(1-x³) = 1 + x³ + x⁶ + x⁹ + x¹² + ...

a₀ = 1

a₁ = 1

a₂ = 1

a₃ = 0

a₄ = 0

and so on.

Therefore, the first 5 nonzero terms of the power series are 1, x³, x⁶, x⁹, and x¹².

The radius of convergence for this power series can be found using the ratio test:

lim┬(n → ∞)⁡|aₙ₊₁/aₙ| = lim┬(n → ∞)⁡|x³/(1-x³)| = 1

Since the limit equals 1, the radius of convergence is 1.

To know more about  power series, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/16407904#
#SPJ11

The probability that a student studied for 5 hours is given as follows:

0.23.

A probability is calculated as the division of the desired number of outcomes by the total number of outcomes in the context of a problem/experiment.

The total number of students in this problem is given as follows:

1 + 3 + 2 + 5 + 9 + 7 + 3 = 30.

Out of those 30 students, 7 studied five hours, hence the probability is given as follows:

p = 7/30 = 0.23.

More can be learned about probability at https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The risk due to the hazard of exposure to radioactive chemicals is 6 cancer-deaths per year.  The probability of exposure is approximately 0.002. The event tree exposure with 1, 2, or 3 barriers failing, and no exposure if all 3 barriers work.

To calculate the probability of exposure and risk due to the hazard, we need to develop an event tree showing all the branches and outcomes.

The event tree for this scenario would look like this:

Barrier 1 fails (0.001 probability) -> Exposure -> 3000 cancer-deaths per year
Barrier 2 fails (0.001 probability) -> Barrier 1 works -> Exposure -> 3000 cancer-deaths per year
Barrier 3 fails (0.001 probability) -> Barrier 2 works -> Barrier 1 works -> Exposure -> 3000 cancer-deaths per year
All 3 barriers work -> No exposure -> No consequence

                               Start

                                |

                            Barrier 1

                           /     |     \

                    Fail (0.001)  |   Pass (0.999)

                      |            |

           Exposure    Barrier 2

(3000 cancer-deaths) /    |     \

                                    /     |     \

                      Barrier 2  |   Barrier 3

                     Fail (0.001)|   Pass (0.999)

                       |         |

                   Exposure  No exposure

            (3000 cancer-deaths)     |

                                   |

                              Barrier 3

                             Fail (0.001)

                               |

                            Exposure

                     (3000 cancer-deaths)

From this event tree, we can see that there are 4 possible outcomes: exposure with 1, 2, or 3 barriers failing, and no exposure if all 3 barriers work.

The probability of exposure can be calculated by adding up the probabilities of each branch that leads to exposure:
0.001 + (0.001 x 0.999) + (0.001 x 0.999 x 0.999) = 0.001997

Therefore, the probability of exposure is approximately 0.002 (or 0.2%).

To calculate the risk, we need to multiply the probability of exposure by the consequence:
0.002 x 3000 = 6

Therefore, the risk due to the hazard of exposure to radioactive chemicals is 6 cancer-deaths per year. However, it is important to continue to monitor and maintain these barriers to ensure their effectiveness and minimize the risk of exposure.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The population of Pennsylvania is: 1304503 people

Population density is calculated by taking the total area of a region in question and dividing it by the total number of people that live in that area. The result will give the average number of inhabitants per square kilometre, mile, acre, meter, etc.

The parameters given are:

Population of colorado = 5,770,000 people

Area of colorado = 280 * 380

= 106,400 mi²

Population density here = 5,770,000/106,400

54.23 people per mi²

Area of Pennsylvania = 283 * 170

= 48110 mi²

Thus:

Population of Pennsylvania/48110 mi² = 5 * 54.23 people per mi²

Population of Pennsylvania = 48110 * mi² * 5 * 54.23 people per mi²

= 1304503 people

Read more about Population Density at: https://brainly.com/question/13902749

#SPJ1

Answer:

The correct answer is the option 3

The value of the unknown angle is 68°

Trigonometric Ratios are defined as the values of all the trigonometric functions based on the value of the ratio of sides in a right-angled triangle.

Sin(tetha) = opp/hyp

cos(tetha) = adj/hyp

tan(tetha) = opp/adj

In the triangle, 51 is the opposite and 55 is the hypotenuse.

therefore;

sin(tetha) = 51/55

sin(tetha) = 0.927

tetha = sin^-1( 0.927)

tetha = 67.97

approximately to 68°

therefore the value of the unknown angle is 68°

learn more about trigonometric ratio from

https://brainly.com/question/24349828

#SPJ1

To determine the supremum and infimum of the given sets.

(a) The set {1/n: n ∈ N} consists of the reciprocals of positive integers. The smallest element in the set is 1, as it corresponds to n=1. The set has no largest element since it has an infinite number of elements getting smaller as n increases. Therefore, the infimum (greatest lower bound) of the set is 1, and there is no maximum. The supremum (least upper bound) of the set is not in the set itself, but it exists and equals 1.

(b) The set {z ∈ Q: 22 < 3} is an empty set since there is no rational number z that satisfies the condition 22 < 3. In this case, there is no supremum or infimum since the set has no elements. Consequently, there is no maximum or minimum value.

Learn more about supremum and infimum: https://brainly.com/question/24424398

#SPJ11

The answer of the compound inequality 3 < 3x + 9 < 24 is -2 < x < 5.

To solve the compound inequality 3 < 3x + 9 < 24, we need to isolate the variable x.

First, we will subtract 9 from all parts of the inequality:

3 - 9 < 3x + 9 - 9 < 24 - 9

-6 < 3x < 15

Next, we will divide all parts of the inequality by 3 (remembering to flip the direction of the inequality if we divide by a negative number):

-6/3 < 3x/3 < 15/3

-2 < x < 5

Therefore, the solution to the compound inequality 3 < 3x + 9 < 24 is -2 < x < 5.

To know more about inequality visit:

brainly.com/question/30228778

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for x.

4x - 9 = 2x + 5

4x - 2x = 5 + 9

2x = 14

x = 14 : 2

x = 7

-----------------

check   (replace "x" with "7")

4 * 7 - 9 = 2 * 7 + 5                  (remember PEMDAS)

28 - 9 = 14 + 5

19 = 19

the answer is good

Answer:

hence the required value of x is 7.

To solve this problem, we need to find the z-score corresponding to the 14th percentile of the normal distribution. We can then use this z-score to find the corresponding value of K.

First, we find the z-score corresponding to the 14th percentile using a standard normal distribution table or calculator. The 14th percentile is equivalent to a cumulative probability of 0.14, which corresponds to a z-score of approximately -1.08.

Next, we use the formula z = (x - μ) / σ to find the corresponding value of K. Rearranging this formula, we get x = μ + z * σ. Plugging in the values we know, we get:

K = 11 + (-1.08) * 0.25
K = 10.73 cm

Therefore, there is a 14% chance that a randomly selected cylindrical metal bar has a length longer than 10.73 cm.

Learn more about normal distribution: https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ11

The solution to the inequality is:

x ∈ (26/33, ∞)

i) We can simplify the left-hand side of the inequality as follows:

2|2x + 71| + 2 ≤ 24

2|2x + 71| ≤ 22

|2x + 71| ≤ 11

Next, we can split this into two separate inequalities, depending on the sign of (2x + 71):

2x + 71 ≤ 11

2x ≤ -60

x ≤ -30

or

2x + 71 ≥ -11

2x ≥ -82

x ≥ -41

Therefore, the solution to the inequality is:

x ∈ (-∞, -30] ∪ [-41, ∞)

ii) We can solve for x as follows:

33x - 2 > 24

33x > 26

x > 26/33

Therefore, the solution to the inequality is:

x ∈ (26/33, ∞)

To learn more about inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30231190

#SPJ11

Given:

[tex]\text{AOC}[/tex] and [tex]\text{BOD}[/tex] are diameters of a circle and has center [tex]\text{O}[/tex].

To Find:

[tex]\Delta\text{ABD}[/tex] and [tex]\Delta\text{DCA}[/tex] are congruent by [tex]\text{RHS}[/tex].

Solution:

It is given that [tex]\text{AOC}[/tex] and [tex]\text{BOD}[/tex] are diameters of a circle.

[tex]\rightarrow \text{BD} = \text{CA}[/tex] [diameters of the circle]

[tex]\rightarrow \angle\text{BAD} = \angle\text{CDA}[/tex] [angles in semicircle is 90°]

[tex]\rightarrow \text{AD} = \text{AD}[/tex] [common in both the triangles]

[tex]\rightarrow \Delta\text{ABD} \cong \Delta\text{DCA}[/tex] [using RHS congruence criteria]

Hence, proved [tex]\Delta\bold{ABD} \cong \Delta\bold{DCA}[/tex] by [tex]\bold{RHS}[/tex] congruency criteria.

Answer:

Part A:

Sunday newspaper: Start at $36 and add $4 for each paper delivered.

Saturday newspaper: Start at $12 and add $2.50 for each paper delivered.

Part B:

To calculate Stevic's total earnings after delivering 15 papers on each day:

Earnings from Sunday papers = $36 + ($4 x 15) = $96

Earnings from Saturday papers = $12 + ($2.50 x 15) = $49.50

Total earnings = Earnings from Sunday papers + Earnings from Saturday papers

Total earnings = $96 + $49.50

Total earnings = $145.50

Therefore, Stevic's total earnings after delivering 15 papers on each day is $145.50.

Step-by-step explanation:

The quadratic equation with zeros at -6 and 2 is y² + 4y - 12 = 0. This is in standard form, which is ax² + bx + c = 0, with a = 1, b = 4, and c = -12.

To find the quadratic equation with zeros at -6 and 2, we can start by using the fact that if a quadratic equation has roots x₁ and x₂, then it can be written in the form

(y - x₁)(y - x₂) = 0

where y is the variable in the quadratic equation.

Substituting the given values of the zeros, we get

(y - (-6))(y - 2) = 0

Simplifying this expression, we get

(y + 6)(y - 2) = 0

Expanding this expression, we get

y² - 2y + 6y - 12 = 0

Simplifying this expression further, we get

y² + 4y - 12 = 0

So the quadratic equation with zeros at -6 and 2 is

y² + 4y - 12 = 0

This is the standard form of a quadratic equation, which is

ax² + bx + c = 0

where a, b, and c are constants. In this case, a = 1, b = 4, and c = -12.

To know more about quadratic equation:

https://brainly.com/question/30098550

#SPJ1

Answer:9.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 8

Step-by-step explanation:

The median of this data set is 8. If you cross one number from both sides at the same time, you will eventually come to the middle of the data set, which is 8.

The probability of the offspring being brown with long fur is 25%.

To determine the probability of offspring being brown with long fur from a cross between a brown, long-furred rabbit (Bbhh) and a white, short-furred rabbit (bbHh), we will use the terms dominant, recessive, and independent assortment.

Step 1: Set up the Punnett squares for each trait separately.
For fur color (B and b alleles):
Bb (brown, long-furred rabbit)×bb (white, short-furred rabbit)
Resulting in offspring genotypes:
Bb (brown fur)
Bb (brown fur)
bb (white fur)
bb (white fur)

For fur length (H and h alleles):
hh (brown, long-furred rabbit)×Hh (white, short-furred rabbit)
Resulting in offspring genotypes:
Hh (short fur)
Hh (short fur)
hh (long fur)
hh (long fur)

Step 2: Calculate the probabilities for each trait.
For brown fur: 2 out of 4 (50%)
For long fur: 2 out of 4 (50%)

Step 3: Calculate the combined probability.
Since both the B and H traits assort independently, we can multiply the probabilities of each trait occurring:
0.5 (brown fur) x 0.5 (long fur) = 0.25 (25%).

To know more about the calculation of Punnett squares visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15473888

#SPJ11

When conducting a hypothesis test, a(an) **b. t-statistic** is more appropriate than a z-score when you don't know the population variance or the population standard deviation. The t-statistic takes into account the sample size and is better suited for situations where population parameters are unknown.

When conducting a hypothesis test, a t-statistic is more appropriate than a 2-score when you don't know the population variance or the population standard deviation. The t-statistic is used to test hypotheses about population means when the sample size is small or when the population standard deviation is unknown.

The t-statistic is calculated by dividing the difference between the sample mean and the hypothesized population mean by the standard error of the mean, which takes into account the variability of the sample.

The t-statistic is compared to a critical value from a t-distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom, where n is the sample size. The level of significance, or alpha value, is also used to determine the critical value. Sample variance and Cohen's d are other statistical measures used in hypothesis testing but are not specifically related to the use of t-statistics.

Learn more about t-statistic,

https://brainly.com/question/30466889

#SPJ11

Option C, "A study shows that the average student leaves a four-year college with a student loan debt of more than $30,000", involves descriptive statistics.

The area of statistics known as descriptive statistics deals with the gathering, organizing, organizing, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting of data. It summarizes and describes the main features of a dataset, including measures of central tendency (such as mean, median, and mode) and measures of variability (such as range, standard deviation, and variance). Option C presents a descriptive statistic (the average student loan debt) that summarizes a larger dataset, making it the correct answer.

Learn more about average

https://brainly.com/question/24057012

#SPJ4

The solution of the differential equation 4y'' − y = [tex] {e}^{x/2} [/tex] + 8 by variation of parameter method is y(x) = (15C - 16)[tex] {e}^{x/2} [/tex] + 15C' [tex] {ex}^{-x/2} [/tex]

To solve the differential equation by variation of parameters, we assume that the solution is of the form,

y(x) = u₁(x)y₁(x) + u₂(x)y₂(x), linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous equation are y₂(x) and y₂(x), and functions to be determined u₁(x) and u₂(x). The homogeneous equation associated with the given differential equation is,

4y'' - y = 0

The characteristic equation is,

4r² - 1 = 0 which has solutions r = ±1/2. Therefore, the general solution of the homogeneous equation is,

y(x) = C[tex] {e}^{x/2} [/tex] + C'[tex] {e}^{-x/2} [/tex]

C and C' are arbitrary constants.

Now, we need to find particular solutions of the non-homogeneous equation. We can guess that a particular solution has the form,

[tex] y_{p(x)} = A(x) {e}^{(x/2)} [/tex]

where A(x) is a function to be determined. We can find A(x) by substituting y_p(x) into the differential equation and solving for A(x). We have,

[tex] 4y_{p(x)} - y_{p(x)} = {e}^{(x/2)} +8 [/tex]

Differentiating twice and substituting these into the differential equation gives:

[tex]4( A"(x) + A'(x)) {e}^{2/y} 2 + \frac{A(x)}{4} - A(x) {e}^{(x/2)} = {e}^{(x/2)} + 8[/tex]

Simplifying and solving for A(x), we obtain,

A(x) = -16/15

Therefore, a particular solution of the differential equation is:

[tex]y_{p(x)} = \frac{ - 16}{15} {e}^{(x \div 2)} [/tex]

The general solution of the non-homogeneous equation is then,

y(x) = C[tex] {e}^{x/2} [/tex] + C'[tex] {e}^{-x/2} [/tex] [tex]\frac{ - 16}{15} {e}^{(x/2)} [/tex]

Simplifying and collecting terms, we get,

y(x) = (15C - 16)[tex] {e}^{x/2} [/tex] + 15C' [tex] {ex}^{-x/2} [/tex] ,where C and C' are arbitrary constants.

To know more about variation of parameters method, visit,

brainly.com/question/31585746

#SPJ4

Complete question - Solve the differential equation by variation of parameters. 4y'' − y = e^x/2 + 8.

a. The correlation matrix p =  [tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&1/3&2/5\\1/3&1&-3/5\\2/5&-3/5&1\end{array}\right][/tex]. b. The correlation between X1, and i/2X2 + 1/2X3 is 0.3.

a. The correlation matrix p can be calculated by dividing the covariance matrix by the product of the standard deviations of the variables:

p = [tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&1/3&2/5\\1/3&1&-3/5\\2/5&-3/5&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

b. To compute the correlation between X1 and i/2X2 + 1/2X3, we first need to calculate the standard deviations of the variables:

σ1 = sqrt(4) = 2

σ2 = sqrt(9) = 3

σ3 = sqrt(25) = 5

Then, we can calculate the covariance between X1 and i/2X2 + 1/2X3:

cov(X1, i/2X2 + 1/2X3) = cov(X1, i/2X2) + cov(X1, 1/2X3)

= i/2 * cov(X1, X2) + 1/2 * cov(X1, X3)

= i/2 * 1 + 1/2 * 2

= 1.5

Finally, we can compute the correlation using the formula:

corr(X1, i/2X2 + 1/2X3) = cov(X1, i/2X2 + 1/2X3) / (σ1 * σ2/2 + σ3/2)

= 1.5 / (2 * 3/2 + 5/2)

= 0.3

Therefore, the correlation between X1 and i/2X2 + 1/2X3 is 0.3.

Know more about correlation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13879362

#SPJ11

Also, minimum observations for both data sets are same, however there is a difference in the maximum for the both data sets.

From the given boxplots, it is observed that the boxplot for the species BARN has more variation than the boxplot for the species OYST. The boxplot for the species OYST indicates that there is are some outliers present in the data, however the boxplot for the BARN species indicates that there are no any outliers present in the data. It is observed that the median for the species OYST is less than the median for the species BARN. First quartiles (Q1) for both data sets are approximately same, but medians and third quartiles are not same. Also, minimum observations for both data sets are same, however there is a difference in the maximum for the both data sets.

To learn more about  maximum visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29499469

#SPJ11

the dimensions of the rectangle are L = 15 inches and W = 15 inches, and the minimum perimeter is:    P = 2L + 2W = 60 inches.

Let the length and width of the rectangle be L and W, respectively, so that the area of the rectangle is A = LW = 225. We want to find the dimensions of the rectangle with minimum perimeter P = 2L + 2W, and then find the minimum perimeter.

Using the given area, we can solve for one of the variables in terms of the other:

L = 225/W

Substituting this expression for L into the expression for the perimeter, we get:

P = 2(225/W) + 2W

Taking the derivative of P with respect to W and setting it equal to zero to find the minimum, we get:

[tex]dP/dW = -450/W^2 + 2 = 0[/tex]

Solving for W, we get:

W^2 = 225

Since W must be positive (it is a length), we take the positive square root:

W = 15

Substituting this value of W back into the expression for L, we get:

L = 225/W = 15

To know more about Dimensions,refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28688567

#SPJ11

The probability that at least one WST111 student is in time for the 7h30 lecture on a Tuesday morning is 0.9961.

1. First, let's find the probability that a randomly selected student is on time for the lecture. Since the probability that a student is late is 0.25, the probability that a student is on time is 1 - 0.25 = 0.75.

2. Now, we need to calculate the probability that all five randomly selected students are late for the lecture. Since punctuality is independent, we can simply multiply each student's probability of being late: 0.25×0.25×0.25×0.25× 0.25 = 0.0009765625.

3. Finally, we want to find the probability that at least one student is on time. To do this, we'll subtract the probability that all students are late from 1:

1 - 0.0009765625 = 0.9961.

So, the probability that at least one WST111 student is in time for the 7h30 lecture on a Tuesday morning is 0.9961.

To know more about the calculation of probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23704607

#SPJ11

I)

[tex]~~~~~~~~~~~~\textit{middle point of 2 points } \\\\ A(\stackrel{x_1}{1}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{5})\qquad B(\stackrel{x_2}{3}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{9}) \qquad \left(\cfrac{ x_2 + x_1}{2}~~~ ,~~~ \cfrac{ y_2 + y_1}{2} \right) \\\\\\ \left(\cfrac{ 3 +1}{2}~~~ ,~~~ \cfrac{ 9 +5}{2} \right) \implies \left(\cfrac{ 4 }{2}~~~ ,~~~ \cfrac{ 14 }{2} \right)\implies (2~~,~~7)[/tex]

II)

keeping in mind that perpendicular lines have negative reciprocal slopes, let's check for the slope of the line AB

[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{1}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{5})\qquad (\stackrel{x_2}{3}~,~\stackrel{y_2}{9}) ~\hfill \stackrel{slope}{m}\implies \cfrac{\stackrel{\textit{\large rise}} {\stackrel{y_2}{9}-\stackrel{y1}{5}}}{\underset{\textit{\large run}} {\underset{x_2}{3}-\underset{x_1}{1}}} \implies \cfrac{ 4 }{ 2 } \implies 2 \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill[/tex]

[tex]\stackrel{~\hspace{5em}\textit{perpendicular lines have \underline{negative reciprocal} slopes}~\hspace{5em}} {\stackrel{slope}{ 2 \implies \cfrac{2}{1}} ~\hfill \stackrel{reciprocal}{\cfrac{1}{2}} ~\hfill \stackrel{negative~reciprocal}{-\cfrac{1}{2} }}[/tex]

so we're really looking for the equation of a line whose slope is -1/2 and it passes through (2 , 7)

[tex](\stackrel{x_1}{2}~,~\stackrel{y_1}{7})\hspace{10em} \stackrel{slope}{m} ~=~ - \cfrac{1}{2} \\\\\\ \begin{array}{|c|ll} \cline{1-1} \textit{point-slope form}\\ \cline{1-1} \\ y-y_1=m(x-x_1) \\\\ \cline{1-1} \end{array}\implies y-\stackrel{y_1}{7}=\stackrel{m}{- \cfrac{1}{2}}(x-\stackrel{x_1}{2}) \\\\\\ y-7=- \cfrac{1}{2}x+1\implies {\Large \begin{array}{llll} y=- \cfrac{1}{2}x+8 \end{array}}[/tex]

Part A - The pH of the buffer solution is 6.37.

Net ionic equation is [tex]H_2CO_3[/tex] + [tex]OH^-[/tex] → [tex]HCO^{3-}[/tex] + [tex]H_2O[/tex]

Part B - The pH of the buffer solution is 6.38.

Net ionic equation is [tex]H_2CO_3[/tex] + [tex]I^-[/tex] → [tex]HCO^{3-}[/tex] + [tex]H_3O^+[/tex]

Part A: To find the pH of the buffer solution, we first need to calculate the pKa of the weak acid. The pKa is -log(Ka1), so pKa1 = -log(4.20 x [tex]10^{-7}[/tex]) = 6.38.

Next, we can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to find the pH: pH = pKa1 + log([[tex]A^-[/tex]]/[HA]).

Plugging in the values for the buffer solution, we get pH = 6.38 + log(0.304/0.304) = 6.38. Therefore, the pH of the buffer solution is 6.38.

The net ionic equation for the reaction when 0.088 mol KOH is added to 1.00 L of the buffer solution is:

[tex]H^+[/tex] + [tex]OH^-[/tex] → [tex]H_2O[/tex]

Part B: Similar to Part A, we first need to calculate the pKa of the weak acid. pKa1 = -log(4.20 x [tex]10^{-7}[/tex]) = 6.38.

Then, we can use the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation to find the pH: pH = pKa1 + log([A-]/[HA]).

Plugging in the values for the buffer solution, we get pH = 6.38 + log(0.311/0.311) = 6.38. Therefore, the pH of the buffer solution is 6.38.

The net ionic equation for the reaction when 0.089 mol HI is added to 1.00 L of the buffer solution is:

[tex]H_3O^+[/tex] + [tex]I^-[/tex] → HI + H2O

Learn more about the buffer solution at

https://brainly.com/question/24262133

#SPJ4

The table which contains only values that satisfy the equation of line defined as y = 0. 5x + 14, ( linear equation) is present in option(c). So, option(c) is right one.

We have a equation of line, y = 0.5x + 14, --(1) which is a equation of line . We have to recognise the table which satisfy the above line equation. The values are called roots of the equation. A value that is a solution of an equation is said to satisfy the equation, and the solutions of an equation create its solution set. The above table consists values of x and y, so we check which set of values form solution set of equation (1). Let x = 0 => y = 14 so, ( 0, 14) is solution of equation (1). Similarly, when x = 5

=> y = 5× 0.5 + 14 = 16.5

Similarly, we can check other point values. The table present in option (c) is correct answer.

For more information about eqution of line, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/18831322

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The above figure complete the question.

The three options with dimensions resulting in a surface area greater than 140 square feet are:

To determine whether the dimensions of a rectangular prism result in a surface area greater than 140 square feet, we can use the formula for the surface area of a rectangular prism:

Surface Area = 2lw + 2lh + 2wh

    where l, w, and h are the length, width, and height of the rectangular prism, respectively.

Option 1: 6 feet by 2 feet by 3 feet

Surface Area = 2(6)(2) + 2(6)(3) + 2(2)(3) = 24 + 36 + 12 = 72 square feet

This option does not have a surface area greater than 140 square feet.

Option 2: 6 feet by 5 feet by 4 feet

Surface Area = 2(6)(5) + 2(6)(4) + 2(5)(4) = 60 + 48 + 40 = 148 square feet

This option has a surface area greater than 140 square feet.

Option 3: 7 feet by 6 feet by 4 feet

Surface Area = 2(7)(6) + 2(7)(4) + 2(6)(4) = 84 + 56 + 48 = 188 square feet

This option has a surface area greater than 140 square feet.

Option 4: 8 feet by 3 feet by 7 feet

Surface Area = 2(8)(3) + 2(8)(7) + 2(3)(7) = 48 + 112 + 42 = 202 square feet

This option has a surface area greater than 140 square feet.

Option 5: 8 feet by 4 feet by 3 feet

Surface Area = 2(8)(4) + 2(8)(3) + 2(4)(3) = 64 + 48 + 24 = 136 square feet

This option does not have a surface area greater than 140 square feet.

Therefore, the three options with dimensions resulting in a surface area greater than 140 square feet are:

To learn more about Dimensions of Rectangular Prism,

brainly.com/question/30344019

The condition that is one of the assumptions of a valid multiple linear regression model is: the relationship between the dependent and independent variables is linear.

Condition that is one of the assumptions of a valid multiple linear regression model is that the relationship between the dependent and independent variables is linear. This means that the change in the dependent variable is proportional to the change in each independent variable, and there is no curved or nonlinear relationship between them. The assumption of linear independence of the independent variables is also important, meaning that they are not highly correlated with each other.

The assumption of constant residuals means that the errors in the model are consistent across all values of the independent variables. The assumption of a quadratic relationship between the dependent and independent variables is not appropriate for a multiple linear regression model.

Learn more about regression:

brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ11