The given statements 'More people left the United States than entered it during the Great Depression' and 'The Mexican-born population living in Texas more than doubled in the Great Depression' are true regarding immigration during the great depression.
A. The Great Depression was a period of economic hardship in the 1930s that affected the entire world. The resulting recession meant that fewer people were willing and able to immigrate to the United States. From 1930-1940, only about 200,000 people moved to the United States, whereas in the previous decade, over 4 million had done so. Additionally, many who were already living in the US were returning home.
B. Hoover did not create a federal program to attract Mexican laborers willing to work in low paying agricultural jobs. Although there were some Mexican immigrants during this time, Hoover’s policies did not encourage immigration.
C. The Mexican-born population living in Texas more than doubled in the Great Depression. The actual number of Mexican-born people living in Texas only increased by 8%, not more than doubling.
Know more about Great Depression here:
https://brainly.com/question/29771180
#SPJ11
in the time period of 1860 - 1900, lumber entrepreneurs could purchase land in michigan from the government land office for:
In the time period of 1860 - 1900, lumber entrepreneurs could purchase land in Michigan from the government land office for $1.25 per acre.
Why was land purchased so cheaply in Michigan in the late 1800s?This was the standard price set by the Homestead Act of 1862, which allowed individuals to claim up to 160 acres of public land for a small fee. The act was designed to encourage settlement and development of the western United States, but it also applied to Michigan and other states with public lands available for sale.
The low price of land made it easier for lumber entrepreneurs to acquire large tracts of forested land for logging and other commercial activities, which contributed to the growth of the timber industry in Michigan and other parts of the country.
Find out more Michigan at https://brainly.com/question/8482739
#SPJ1
why was american expansion of the 1890s different from earlier expansionist moves? * 1 point it was primarily for agricultural objectives. it was intended for settlement. it was the result of war. it would create economic and military colonies overseas. it would venture into uninhabited areas.
American expansion of the 1890s was different from earlier expansionist moves because it was primarily for agricultural objectives, intended for settlement, and was the result of war.
This expansion sought to create economic and military colonies overseas and venture into uninhabited areas.
The idea of expansion for agricultural objectives stemmed from the idea of "Manifest Destiny" and was the main goal of the American expansion in the 1890s. This idea was to expand American boundaries and claim new land in order to increase the economic stability of the nation.
The idea of settlement was also important, as many Americans moved west in order to create their own settlements on the newly claimed land. The idea of war was also important, as some of the expansion in the 1890s was a result of the Mexican-American War, where the United States won new territories in the southwest.
The creation of economic and military colonies overseas was also an important part of the expansion in the 1890s, as it allowed the United States to increase its influence and power in foreign markets and regions.
Finally, the idea of venturing into uninhabited areas was important, as this allowed the United States to explore and expand its territory even further.
To know more about Manifest Destiny click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/11669373#
#SPJ11
According to Will Rogers, how did people buy
in the "old days?" What changed?
Answer: It features this “trickle up” economics quote from Will Rogers: ... In the old days, they could get away with it, but of late years, ..
Explanation:
State level governments are based on the organization of:
The Federalist Papers
The Declaration of Independence
the national government outlined in the Constitution
O monarchies in Europe
ext incorrect question
BRE
State level governments are based on the organization of C . the national government outlined in the Constitution .
How are state level governments organized in the United States ?The Constitution outlines the powers and responsibilities of both the federal government and the state governments, and establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful.
State level governments have their own constitutions, which outline the structure and powers of their respective state governments within the framework of the federal system .
Find out more on state level governments at https://brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ1
the great serpent mound differs from most hopewell mounds in its group of answer choices absence of burial sites. alignment with the sun at the equinoxes. mysterious abandonment. spiral shape and raised embankments.
The Great Serpent Mound differs from most Hopewell mounds in its spiral shape and raised embankments. Therefore the correct option is option D.
The Great Serpent Mound is an ancient earthwork in the shape of a serpent, located in Adams County, Ohio, USA. It is the most extensive serpent earthwork in the world, and it is still regarded as a sacred site by many Native Americans. The Great Serpent Mound is a mound that was built by the Hopewell people.
Hopewell culture, named after its first find site, is a Middle Woodland Period archaeological culture in eastern North America that is characterized by the construction of substantial burial mounds and various kinds of artistic expression.
The Great Serpent Mound is different from most other Hopewell mounds in that it is in the form of a serpent and has raised embankments. The spiral shape of the Great Serpent Mound is also unique.
For such more question on embankments:
https://brainly.com/question/4072602
#SPJ11
The following question may be like this:
The great serpent mound differs from most Hopewell mounds in its group of answer choices
absence of burial sites.
alignment with the sun at the equinoxes.
mysterious abandonment.
spiral shape and raised embankments.
which statement best describes the reason for the use of trench warfare in world war i? responses soldiers dug into the ground to protect themselves from machine gun and mortar fire. soldiers dug into the ground to protect themselves from machine gun and mortar fire. soldiers dug into the ground to protect themselves from the weather. soldiers dug into the ground to protect themselves from the weather. the soldiers needed a large enough space in which to bury all of their dead comrades. the soldiers needed a large enough space in which to bury all of their dead comrades. the soldiers wanted a clear line from which to launch their offensives. the soldiers wanted a clear line from which to launch their offensives.
Answer: Soldiers dug into the group to protect themselves from machine gun and mortar fire.
Explanation:
how could spaniards obtain encomiendas?group of answer choicesby inheriting themby buying them from native chiefsby serving the spanish crownby buying them from other spaniards
Encomiendas were a type of labor and tribute system in the Spanish colonies. The Spaniards could obtain encomiendas by serving the Spanish Crown. The correct option is C.
Spaniards could obtain encomienda by serving the Spanish Crown.
Encomienda was a system of rewarding conquistadors with land grants and the labor of the conquered peoples. In exchange, the encomenderos, or recipients of the encomienda, were responsible for the well-being and religious instruction of the natives under their control.
The Spanish monarchy was responsible for granting encomiendas to conquistadors who assisted in the colonization and subjugation of new territories, as well as for managing the encomienda system in the colonies. To gain encomiendas, individuals had to serve the Spanish crown, either through military service or other means.
The Spanish crown would then reward these individuals with encomiendas, giving them the authority to collect tributes and labor from the natives of the area. The idea of buying or inheriting encomiendas was unlikely since they were granted by the Spanish crown and were based on loyalty and service to the crown rather than personal wealth or inheritance.
Thus, the correct answer is C. Spaniards could obtain encomiendas by serving the Spanish Crown.
To know more about Encomiendas here:
https://brainly.com/question/11873464#
#SPJ11
how and to what extent merchants were able to acquire influence with rulers in the ottoman empire, the various parts of what is now india, and china in the 15th and 16th centuries.
In the 15th and 16th centuries, merchants in the Ottoman Empire, various parts of India, and China were able to acquire influence with rulers through the payment of bribes, and by forming relationships and alliances with the powerful.
Merchants would often provide goods, services, and other forms of wealth to the rulers in exchange for protection and other privileges. They would also form relationships with powerful people in the court, which would give them a better chance to influence the ruler.
Merchants would also form alliances with other merchants and traders, and together they could have more power in the court.
1. Merchants in the Ottoman Empire, various parts of India, and China were able to acquire influence with rulers through bribes, forming relationships and alliances, and providing goods and services.
2. Forming relationships with powerful people in the court and forming alliances with other merchants and traders could help them have more influence.
3. These strategies helped merchants to acquire influence in the 15th and 16th centuries.
To know more about ottoman empire refer to-
brainly.com/question/17850038#
#SPJ11
I’ll put the pictures in can y’all do the paragraph ?
Answer: Here's a CER paragraph with 4 claims about Andrew Jackson as a villain, with supporting evidence and explanations:
Andrew Jackson is often seen as a villain in American history due to his controversial policies and actions. Firstly, his treatment of Native Americans is a clear indication of his villainous nature. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forcibly relocated tens of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, resulting in the infamous Trail of Tears. This caused immense suffering and loss of life for Native American communities, as documented by the National Park Service.
Secondly, Jackson's disregard for the Constitution is another indication of his villainous nature. He vetoed the re-chartering of the Second Bank of the United States in 1832, despite the fact that it was a lawful institution established by Congress. This act of executive overreach undermined the separation of powers, according to the National Constitution Center, and set a dangerous precedent for future presidents.
Thirdly, Jackson's expansion of executive power is another clear indication of his villainous nature. He famously declared, "I am the government," according to the Miller Center, and made it clear that he would use his presidential powers to push through his agenda. This disregard for checks and balances contributed to a concentration of power in the executive branch that many see as undemocratic.
Finally, Jackson's violent temperament and tendency to engage in duels are also evidence of his villainous nature. According to History.com, he engaged in several duels throughout his life, including one in which he killed a man. This shows a willingness to use violence to settle disputes, which is certainly not a trait of a hero.
In conclusion, Jackson's treatment of Native Americans, disregard for the Constitution, expansion of executive power, and violent tendencies are all clear indications of his villainous nature. While he is celebrated by some for his military leadership and populist rhetoric, a closer examination of his actions reveals a darker side to his legacy.
Explanation:
Madagascar plan was ultimately abandoned by the Nazi party when it became apparent that Britain would not easily be conquered. how was the plan triumphed over Britain related to resettling Jews on an island off the coast of Africa?
A) the Britain where allies of the malagasy people and promised fight against resettlement.
B) Brian had colonized madagascar, so Germany hoped to take control of it.
C) the Nazis plan to use British warships to transport Jewish prisoners.
D) if Britain were conquered, the United States would be too powerless to object the Madagascar plan
Option (c), The Nazis intend to transport Jewish detainees using British warships.
The Madagascar Plan was what?The Nazi German government suggested the "Madagascar Plan," which advocated for expelling Jews from Europe and forced them to relocate on the island of Madagascar. In June 1940, just before France was toppled, Franz Rademacher, the head of the German Foreign Office's Jewish Division, put up the notion. The plan proposed giving Germany dominion over Madagascar, which at the time was a French colony, in exchange for final peace conditions.
The possibility of resettling Polish Jews in Madagascar was investigated by the Polish government in 1937, but the task team that was sent to evaluate the potential of the island discovered that only 5,000 to 7,000 households, or possibly as few as 500 families, according to some estimates, could be accommodated.
Due to the Nazis' unsuccessful attempts to encourage the emigration of Germany's Jewish population before to World War Two, the idea of sending Jews to Madagascar was revived by the Nazi leadership in 1940.
The Madagascar Plan, a Nazi German plot that called for moving European Jews to the island of Madagascar, was conceived during World War II. This was meant to occur following the invasion of Madagascar, which was then a part of France.
The plan was never put into action for two main reasons. The strategy needed Germany to be able to control Great Britain's naval forces, but this never happened. The scheme was also replaced with the "Final Solution," which called for the extermination of all Jews in Europe.
Learn more about "Madagascar Plan,": https://brainly.com/question/3067634
#SPJ1
What is the definition of a parable? Describe some of the main themes taught in the parables of Christianity.
A parable is a short, simple story that teaches a moral or spiritual lesson. It is often used as a teaching tool to convey a deeper meaning or truth in a way that is easy to understand. Parables are commonly found in religious texts such as the Bible, where they are used to teach important lessons about God and the nature of humanity.
In the Christian tradition, parables are a significant part of Jesus' teachings, and they serve to illustrate key concepts and themes such as faith, forgiveness, love, and the kingdom of God. Some of the most famous parables in Christianity include the Good Samaritan, the Prodigal Son, the Lost Sheep, and the Mustard Seed.
One of the main themes of Jesus' parables is the kingdom of God, which refers to the spiritual realm of God's rule and reign. Through his parables, Jesus teaches that the kingdom of God is not a physical place, but rather a state of being that is accessible to all who have faith and trust in God. He also emphasizes the importance of humility, compassion, and service to others, as these qualities are essential for living a righteous and meaningful life.
Another common theme in Jesus' parables is the idea of forgiveness and reconciliation. He teaches that we should forgive those who wrong us and that God's love and mercy are freely available to all who seek them. This theme is illustrated in the Parable of the Prodigal Son, where the father forgives his wayward son and welcomes him back with open arms.
Overall, Jesus' parables serve as powerful tools for spiritual growth and transformation, as they challenge us to examine our beliefs and values and to live in a way that reflects God's love and grace.
Learn more about parables:
https://brainly.com/question/29055094?referrer=searchResults
scholarship indicates that there have been how many waves of democratization in the world since 1825?
There have been four main waves of democratization in the world since 1825. The first wave of democratization began in the early 19th century, with countries like the United States, France, and the United Kingdom democratizing.
The second wave of democratization began in the late 19th century and was concentrated in Latin America. The third wave of democratization occurred in the mid-20th century and saw a spread of democratic rule to countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. The fourth and most recent wave of democratization began in the late 20th century and has been largely concentrated in post-Communist countries in Europe and Eurasia.
Since 1825, there have been four distinct waves of democratization across the world. The first wave of democratization began in the early 19th century and focused primarily on Europe and the Americas. The second wave of democratization occurred in the late 19th century and was mainly concentrated in Latin America.
The third wave of democratization occurred in the mid-20th century and saw a spread of democratic rule to countries in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. The fourth and most recent wave of democratization began in the late 20th century and has been largely concentrated in post-Communist countries in Europe and Eurasia.
To know more about democratization refer to-
brainly.com/question/14320124#
#SPJ11
What were two government structures in France from 1919 to 1939
From 1919 to 1939, France had two different forms of government structures:
Parliamentary SystemPresidential SystemWhat is the government structures in France?Parliamentary System: France had a parliamentary system of government in which the executive power was held by the Prime Minister and his cabinet. The Prime Minister was appointed by the President and had to have the support of the National Assembly to remain in power. The National Assembly was elected by the people of France and was responsible for creating and passing laws.
Lastly, Presidential System: In 1934, France moved to a presidential system of government, which gave more power to the President. The President was directly elected by the people and had the power to appoint and dismiss the Prime Minister and his cabinet. However, the President still had to work with the National Assembly to pass laws and make decisions.
Read more about government structure here:
https://brainly.com/question/1658251
#SPJ1
what is in the edict of milan shows that christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the edict
In the Edict of Milan, it is shown that Christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the Edict. The text of the Edict of Milan was a series of letters signed by the Roman Emperor Constantine and Licinius to treat Christians benevolently and stop persecuting them.
The Edict of Milan marked the beginning of the period of toleration for Christians throughout the empire. This period of toleration allowed Christianity to flourish, and it is considered one of the most critical moments in the history of Christianity.
In conclusion, the Edict of Milan demonstrated that Christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the Edict. The Edict of Milan allowed Christianity to flourish, which is why it is regarded as one of the most important moments in Christian history.
For such more question on Christians:
https://brainly.com/question/369465
#SPJ11
The following question may be like this:
What is in the edict of Milan shows that Christians had legal recourse if anyone refused to comply fully with the edict?
over the course of the nineteenth century, differences in what things were evidence of divisions in the united states? luoa
In the nineteenth century, differences in economics, politics, and culture were evidence of divisions in the United States. For example, many regions of the country had very different economic conditions and political ideologies, while also exhibiting distinct cultural norms and customs. Additionally, racial divisions were very prominent in the nineteenth century, with African Americans facing various forms of discrimination in much of the country.
The 19th century is a period in history that occurred between 1801 and 1900, as well as the last century of the modern period. The 19th century was a century of innovation and revolution, with new political and social ideologies and industrial technology giving rise to capitalism, communism, and the creation of factories.
The United States was no exception, and throughout the century, there were several divisions that resulted from disagreements on issues such as slavery, sectionalism, politics, and economics. The divisions in the United States over the course of the nineteenth century were evidenced by:
1. Slavery: Slavery was one of the most divisive topics in America in the 19th century, leading to the Civil War. Abolitionists advocated for the abolition of slavery, while others were in favor of it.
2. Sectionalism: Sectionalism refers to the political, social, and economic differences between the North and South. The South was agricultural and supported slavery, while the North was industrial and opposed it.
3. Politics: Politics was a major point of division in the 19th century. Political divisions were seen between the two major parties, the Democrats and the Whigs, as well as the Republican party, which was formed in 1854.
4. Economics: Economic differences also led to divisions in America. The North's economy was based on manufacturing, while the South's economy was based on agriculture. In conclusion, over the course of the nineteenth century, differences in slavery, sectionalism, politics, and economics were evidence of divisions in the United States.
To know more about nineteenth century, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30048262#
#SPJ11
what do etruscan tombs tell us about the etruscan's' lives? be sure to cite specific examples to illustrate your discussion. how does it demonstrate contact with other cultures?
Etruscan tombs tell us about Etruscan art and crafts, their wealth, religion, society, and their everyday life. The tombs offer much insight into the Etruscan people’s rituals, society, and everyday life, including their religious beliefs and their perspective on death.
The decorations on the walls and ceilings of the tombs show several scenes and figures from the Etruscan lifestyle that represented how the Etruscan people lived. The Etruscan tombs’ walls and ceilings are decorated with images of humans, animals, and mythical creatures.
The Etruscan people believed in the afterlife, and, to this end, they preserved the dead in decorated tombs along with their most valuable belongings. These tombs were sealed after the burial, so that the items inside the tomb could never be taken out. It was believed that the deceased could utilize their possessions and continue their life in the afterlife.
The Etruscans had long-established trade routes with Greece and other nations in the Mediterranean area, as revealed by the objects found in the tombs. These objects were likely acquired through trade or given as gifts to Etruscan aristocrats.
Know more about Etruscan here:
https://brainly.com/question/28232442
#SPJ11
Fill in the blank: _____ was the first president since fdr to be reelected with the unemployment rate higher than when he was first elected.
Ronald Reagan was the first president since FDR to be reelected with an unemployment rate higher than when he was first elected.
Ronald Reagan was the first president since FDR to be reelected with an unemployment rate higher than when he was first elected. His reelection in 1984 made history in America as it was the first time since FDR that a president had been re-elected with an unemployment rate higher than when he was first elected. The unemployment rate was 7.2% when he was elected in 1980 and 7.4% when he was reelected in 1984.
You can learn more about unemployment rate at: brainly.com/question/30115084
#SPJ11
the third intermediate period in egypt was part of what larger mediterranean and near eastern phenomen? question 1 options:
The third intermediate period in Egypt was part of the larger Near Eastern Late Bronze Age (ca. 1550–1175 BCE).
This period saw the emergence of powerful regional states and empires throughout the Near East, including the Neo-Assyrian Empire and the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
1. The third intermediate period in Egypt was part of the larger Near Eastern Late Bronze Age.
2. This period was in the timeframe of 1550–1175 BCE.
3. During this period, powerful regional states and empires emerged in the Near East, such as the Neo-Assyrian Empire and the Neo-Babylonian Empire.
To know more about Egypt refer to-
brainly.com/question/9626101#
#SPJ11
Complete question
The third intermediate period in egypt was part of what larger mediterranean and near eastern phenomen?
According to the passage, what makes the doer of good glad?
the tyrannical spanish system by which natives were turned into servile laborers and forced to convert to catholicism and to adopt the spanish language was called group of answer choices metropole haciendas conquistadors mestizos
The tyrannical Spanish framework by which locals were transformed into subservient workers and compelled to switch over completely to Catholicism and embrace the Spanish language was called haciendas. option (B) is correct.
Communications with Local Americans: Spanish colonizers endeavored to coordinate Local Americans into Spanish culture by wedding them and changing them over completely to Catholicism. Albeit a few Local Americans embraced parts of Spanish culture, others chose to rebel.
Much of the time, the Spanish teachers drove the settlement and early administration of these distant stations. Spanish preachers were individuals who were sent by the Roman Catholic Church. Therefore, option (B) is correct.
Learn more about Spanish:
https://brainly.com/question/18520956
#SPJ4
This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question:
The tyrannical Spanish system by which natives were turned into servile laborers and forced to convert to catholicism and to adopt the spanish language was called group of answer choices
(A) metropole
(B) haciendas
(C) conquistadors
(D) mestizos
what was not a reason that the industrial revolution began in england? responses many available laborers many available laborers strong banking system strong banking system large population of landowners large population of landowners numerous rivers
None of the options provided is a valid response as they all were contributing factors to the Industrial Revolution in England.
The Industrial Revolution in England was a complex and multifaceted event that was caused by a combination of economic, social, and technological factors. The availability of many laborers, a strong banking system, a large population of landowners, and numerous rivers were all key factors that contributed to the growth of the industry in England. Other factors that also played a role in the Industrial Revolution include technological innovations, the availability of natural resources, and the growth of trade and commerce.
For more information on The Industrial Revolution in England:
https://brainly.com/question/14528824?referrer=searchResults
The Atlantic Charter was an agreement made by US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in August 1941 (before the US entered into WW2), which outlined the objectives of the war and what they agreed the world should be like when the war concluded.
You can read the full text at the bottom of this assignment.
Directions: Find and quote evidence from the primary source text in The Atlantic Charter that supports the claims made below:
CLAIM: The US and UK don’t seek to grow or gain new territory.
1. EVIDENCE:
CLAIM: Colonies should be able to create their own governments.
2. EVIDENCE:
CLAIM: Countries won’t be excluded from global trade.
3. EVIDENCE:
CLAIM: World peace means that people have what they need to live.
4. EVIDENCE:
CLAIM: Let’s finally make a move to get rid of pirates.
5. EVIDENCE:
CLAIM: Disarming countries’ weapons will benefit global security.
6. EVIDENCE:
THE ATLANTIC CHARTER- AUGUST 14, 1941
The President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister, Mr. Churchill, representing His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom, being met together, deem it right to make known certain common principles in the national policies of their respective countries on which they base their hopes for a better future for the world.
First, their countries seek no aggrandizement, territorial or other;
Second, they desire to see no territorial changes that do not accord with the freely expressed wishes of the people concerned;
Third, they respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them;
Fourth, they will endeavor, with due respect for their existing obligations, to further the enjoyment by all States, great or small, victor or vanquished, of access, on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their economic prosperity;
Fifth, they desire to bring about the fullest collaboration between all nations in the economic field with the object of securing, for all, improved labor standards, economic advancement and social security;
Sixth, after the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny, they hope to see established a peace which will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety within their own boundaries, and which will afford assurance that all the men in all lands may live out their lives in freedom from fear and want;
Seventh, such a peace should enable all men to traverse the high seas and oceans without hindrance;
Eighth, they believe that all of the nations of the world, for realistic as well as spiritual reasons must come to the abandonment of the use of force. Since no future peace can be maintained if land, sea, or air armaments continue to be employed by nations that threaten, or may threaten, aggression outside of their frontiers, they believe, pending the establishment of a wider and permanent system of general security, that the disarmament of such nations is essential. They will likewise aid and encourage all other practicable measures that will lighten for peace-loving peoples the crushing burden of armaments.
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Winston S. Churchill
Answer:
Please look in the explanation!
Explanation:
CLAIM: The US and UK don’t seek to grow or gain new territory.
EVIDENCE: "First, their countries seek no aggrandizement, territorial or other;"
The Atlantic Charter explicitly states that the US and UK have no intention of seeking any territorial gains or aggrandizement. They only hope to establish a better future for the world through common principles.
CLAIM: Colonies should be able to create their own governments.
2. EVIDENCE: "Third, they respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them;"
The Atlantic Charter acknowledges the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live. The document explicitly states that they wish to see sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have been deprived of them. This is especially true for colonies that were under the rule of imperial powers.
CLAIM: Countries won’t be excluded from global trade.
3. EVIDENCE: "Fourth, they will endeavor, with due respect for their existing obligations, to further the enjoyment by all States, great or small, victor or vanquished, of access, on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their economic prosperity;"
The Atlantic Charter recognizes the need for all countries to have access to global trade on equal terms. The document states that the US and UK will strive to promote equal access to trade and raw materials for all countries, regardless of their size or status.
CLAIM: World peace means that people have what they need to live.
4. EVIDENCE: "Sixth, after the final destruction of the Nazi tyranny, they hope to see established a peace which will afford to all nations the means of dwelling in safety within their own boundaries, and which will afford assurance that all the men in all lands may live out their lives in freedom from fear and want;"
The Atlantic Charter envisions a world where all nations can live in safety and freedom from fear and want. The document highlights that world peace requires the assurance that people have the means to live without fear or want.
CLAIM: Let’s finally make a move to get rid of pirates.
5. EVIDENCE: None found in The Atlantic Charter.
There is no explicit mention of pirates in The Atlantic Charter. The document focuses on establishing common principles for national policies of the US and UK in their hopes for a better future for the world.
CLAIM: Disarming countries’ weapons will benefit global security.
6. EVIDENCE: "Eighth, they believe that all of the nations of the world, for realistic as well as spiritual reasons, must come to the abandonment of the use of force. [...] they believe, pending the establishment of a wider and permanent system of general security, that the disarmament of such nations is essential."
The Atlantic Charter asserts that the abandonment of the use of force by nations is essential for global peace and security. The document emphasizes that nations must disarm their weapons, which is an important step towards achieving this goal.
marriage patterns within upper-class muslim society around the year 1000 differed from classical greek and roman patterns because:
Marriage patterns within upper-class Muslim society around the year 1000 differed from classical Greek and Roman patterns because they allowed polygamy and permitted concubinage.
Polygamy is the practice of having more than one wife at the same time. Concubinage, on the other hand, refers to having a mistress or concubine who is not legally recognized as a wife.
Unlike the classical Greeks and Romans who preferred monogamy (having one wife), the upper-class Muslim society was more inclined towards polygamy and concubinage. In addition, in Islam, a man is permitted to marry four wives under certain conditions such as the ability to support all of them equally.
Marriage was an essential aspect of life in Muslim society. It was viewed as a holy and legal contract, which formed the basis of society. The Quran regards marriage as the foundation for creating an orderly and peaceful society. Muslim society's view of marriage is rooted in their faith, which promotes family values and unity.
Polygamy was an essential aspect of the upper-class Muslim society, where men would take multiple wives, and it was a way to extend their lineage. Concubinage was also an essential aspect of upper-class Muslim society, where women would live with wealthy men, and the men would provide for them but not marry them.
Upper-class Muslim society in the early years was based on tribal kinship, and the taking of wives from other tribes was an important means of forming alliances. Thus, the practice of polygamy and concubinage was encouraged as a means of extending tribal relationships.
To know more about tribal kinship refer here : https://brainly.com/question/8707167#
#SPJ11
what nationality was the first scientist who used the pi symbol?
Leonhard Euler was the first mathematician, physicist, and astronomer in 1737 who adopted the pi symbol ( [tex]\pi[/tex] ). He was born in Basel, Switzerland on 15 April 1707. He studied with diligence and showed an affinity for cognitive thinking and higher senses of logical reasoning.
He was bright in the field of mathematics and engineering hence he enrolled in the University of Basel, in 1720. Furthermore, his drive and curiosity to learn led to many epitomes of success such as his model for topology while viewing a map changed the common views of people across the globe.
Hence, Leonhard Euler opened the gates to the future of cognitive thinking and formed the stepping stone for future generation.
To learn more about Leonhard Euler,
https://brainly.com/question/30883806
HELPP the test is due at the end of class
Answer:
c
Explanation:
can someone help me with this
Option (a), North Korea's efforts to unite the peninsula posed a threat to the U.S. containment strategy.
What relationship exists between US involvement in Korea and the containment approach?The Korean War saw phases of confinement, freedom, and containment. NSC 68 was adopted as a result of the Korean War, which also led to substantial expenditures on weapons in Asia and Europe and an expansion of American dominance. Up to that point, American involvement in Korea had served as the most major containment test.
What occurred in 1950 that precipitated American involvement in the Korean War?When North Korea attacked South Korea in June 1950, the United States backed a "police action"—a war without a name—under the auspices of the UN. The Department of State worked with the other 16 countries that were sending troops to the conflict to coordinate American military decisions.
Learn more about The Korean War: https://brainly.com/question/11375126
#SPJ1
what was life like for enslaved children? what does the film reveal about family life, work, community, and religion during slavery? what role did music play? 3 points your answer
Enslaved children lived a difficult and often dangerous life.
The film reveals that family life during slavery was often separated due to the sale of family members. Work was assigned by the plantation owners, often including hard labor and long hours.
Enslaved communities provided support and protection to one another. Religion was often practiced in secret, as it was forbidden by the plantation owners. Music was a form of communication and was used to express emotions and to pass stories on to the next generations.
Slavery in the United States continued legally until the 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted in 1865. Slavery had its beginnings with the British colonization of Virginia in 1607, although African slaves had been brought to Spanish Florida in the 1560s.
Learn more about Slavery : https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ11
how do the oral histories in source 5 add to your understanding of home front involvement in the war effort? does their testimony force you to question the other documents in any way, and if so, how?
Answer:
The oral histories in source 5 add to our understanding of home front involvement in the war effort by providing a more personal and detailed account of the experiences of those who lived through the war. Through the oral histories, we can gain a better understanding of the impact of the war on individuals, their families, and their communities. The testimonies also provide insight into the ways in which people adapted to the changing circumstances of the war and how they contributed to the war effort.
The oral histories do force us to question the other documents in a few ways. For example, the oral histories provide a more detailed and nuanced account of the experiences of individuals, which may differ from the more general accounts provided in other documents. Additionally, the oral histories provide
true or false: today there are more young children in child care in the united states than at any other time in history.
True. According to the United States Census Bureau, in 2018 there were 8.3 million young children in the United States receiving care in center-based and non-center-based settings, the highest number ever recorded. This is a 6% increase from the 2017 total.
In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in the number of children in childcare in the United States, particularly as more parents have entered the workforce. According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2011, approximately 32% of children under age 5 were regularly cared for by someone other than a parent, such as a child care center or family child care provider. This represents a significant increase from previous decades.
Learn more about child care:
https://brainly.com/question/14969791
#SPJ11
8. what were essential elements of the arab spring and what happened in the arab fall? what country evolved as the most successful after its arab spring uprising?
The Arab Spring began in late 2010 and early 2011 as a wave of uprisings across the Middle East and North Africa. Essential elements of the Arab Spring included demonstrations, protests, civil wars, and regime changes.
In many of the countries affected by the Arab Spring, a shift away from autocratic government to a more democratic system occurred.
The Arab Fall was a continuation of the Arab Spring but characterized by political instability, civil war, and the rise of extremist groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).
The country that evolved as the most successful after its Arab Spring uprising is Tunisia. Tunisia experienced a peaceful revolution that overthrew its authoritarian government and elected a new government, implementing democratic reforms and a new constitution.
The country also experienced an economic recovery and is now considered the most successful Arab Spring state.
To know more about Arab Spring, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9535949#
#SPJ11