state the meaning of the central limit theorem in your own words. how important is it to the development and use of statistical quality control techniques?

Answer:

16x + 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Simplify by combining like terms.  Add the terms with x, then add the integers.

8x + 8x + 4 - 1 = 16x + 3

Given:-

[tex] \: [/tex]

Solution:-

[tex] \: [/tex]

[tex] \: [/tex]

[tex] \: [/tex]

The value of x is 7 !

__________________

hope it helps ⸙

The composite function (f + g)(3) when evaluated from f(x) = −3x² + 3x and g(x) = 2x+5 is -7

Given that

f(x) = −3x² + 3x and

g(x) = 2x+5

To perform the operation (ƒ + g)(3), we need to add the functions ƒ(x) and g(x) first, and then evaluate the sum at x = 3.

ƒ(x) = −3x² + 3x

g(x) = 2x + 5

To add the functions, we simply add their corresponding terms:

(ƒ + g)(x) = ƒ(x) + g(x) = (−3x² + 3x) + (2x + 5)

When the like terms are evaluated, we have

(ƒ + g)(3) = −3x² + 5x + 5

Now, we can evaluate the sum at x = 3:

(ƒ + g)(3) = −3(3)² + 5(3) + 5

So, we have

(ƒ + g)(3) = −27 + 15 + 5

Lastly, we have

(ƒ + g)(3) = -7

Therefore, (ƒ + g)(3) = -7.

Read more about composite function at

https://brainly.com/question/10687170

#SPJ1

Answer:

Eighty biscuits.

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find the limiting factor. We can do that by comparing ratio of mass of ingredient given to mass of ingredient needed for 20 biscuits

[tex]Butter:\\800:150\\=16:3\\=5.33\\Sugar:\\700:75=28:3\\=9.33\\Flour:\\1000:180\\=50:9\\=5.56\\Chocolate Chips:200:50\\=4:1\\=4\\[/tex]

We can clearly see that the choco. chips are the limiting factor since it has the lowest ratio, basically meaning we will run out of choco chips before anything else.

[tex]Biscuits=4*20=80[/tex]

Since we only have 4 times the choco chips needed to make 20 biscuits, we can only make 80 biscuits. Now you can see, we have other ingredients left, but choco chips have ran out which is why it was the limiting factor.

[tex]Flour:\\1000-4(180) = 280g[/tex]

After making 4 servings we still have 280g of flour left.

As a result, we should not be concerned that the sample does not accurately reflect the population.

We can learn more about average, population, and sample.

What is the population?

The entire group of people, items, or objects that we want to draw a conclusion about is known as the population. For example, if we want to learn about the average age of people in the United States, then the entire population is every individual in the United States.

What is a sample?

A smaller group of individuals, objects, or items that are selected from the population is known as a sample. A random sample is a sample in which every individual in the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample.

What is an average?

A statistic that summarizes the central tendency of a group of numbers is known as an average.

The mean is the most commonly used average in statistics. The mean is calculated by adding up all the numbers in a group and then dividing by the number of numbers in the group. If we want to learn about the average salary of all teachers in the United States, we'd have to sample every teacher. That's not a feasible option. Instead, we take a smaller sample, which should be representative of the population, and then use the information gathered from that sample to make predictions about the population as a whole.

If we assume that the five teachers in the example are a random sample of all teachers in the United States, then we can conclude that the average salary of all teachers in the United States is around $49,000. As a result, we should not be concerned that the sample does not accurately reflect the population.

To know more about average: https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ11

The probability that 10 or more of 15 marketing personnel are extroverts is 0.719.

Since 80% of all marketing personnel are extroverts, the probability of any single marketing personnel being an extrovert is 0.8. The probability that 10 or more marketing personnel at the party of 15 are extroverts can be calculated using the Binomial Distribution formula:

P(X>=10) = 1 - [P(X=0) + P(X=1) + P(X=2) + P(X=3) + P(X=4) + P(X=5) + P(X=6) + P(X=7) + P(X=8) + P(X=9)]

P(X>=10) = 1 - [15C0*0.80*0.215 + 15C1*0.81*0.214 + 15C2*0.82*0.213 + 15C3*0.83*0.212 + 15C4*0.84*0.211 + 15C5*0.85*0.210 + 15C6*0.86*0.29 + 15C7*0.87*0.28 + 15C8*0.88*0.27 + 15C9*0.89*0.26]

P(X>=10) = 0.719

Therefore, 0.79 is the probability that 10 or more of the 15 marketing personnel at the party are extroverts.

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/1596693#

#SPJ11

Serena's overall grade in the course is 75.5%. It's important to note that in a weighted grading system like this, the final exam is often a major determinant of the final grade.

To calculate Serena's overall grade, we need to first determine the weight of the final exam. We know that the assignments are worth 45% and the quizzes are worth 40%, which leaves 100% - 45% - 40% = 15% for the final exam.

Next, we can calculate Serena's grade for each component of the course. Her grade for assignments is 78% and her grade for quizzes is 65%. We can calculate her grade for the final exam by multiplying her score of 96% by the weight of the final, which is 15%:

Final grade = (0.45 * 78%) + (0.4 * 65%) + (0.15 * 96%)

Final grade = 35.1% + 26% + 14.4%

Final grade = 75.5%

Therefore, Serena's overall grade in the course is 75.5%. It's important to note that in a weighted grading system like this, the final exam is often a major determinant of the final grade. In this case, Serena's strong performance on the final exam helped to boost her overall grade, even though her scores on the assignments and quizzes were not as high. It's also worth noting that this calculation assumes that all assignments, quizzes, and the final exam were weighted equally within their respective categories (i.e., each assignment was worth the same percentage of the assignment grade).

To know more about determinant click here:

brainly.com/question/15362698

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of x in the right triangle when calculated is approximately 13.8 units

Given the right-angled triangle

The side length x can be calculated using the following sine ratio

So, we have

sin(39) = x/22

To find x, we can use the fact that sin(39 degrees) = x/22 and solve for x.

First, we can use a calculator to find the value of sin(39 degrees), which is approximately 0.6293.

Then, we can set up the equation:

0.6293 = x/22

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides by 22:

0.6293 * 22 = x

13.8446 = x

Rewrite as

x = 13.8446

Approximate the value of x

x = 13.8

Therefore, x is approximately 13.8 in the triangle

Read about right triangle at

https://brainly.com/question/2437195

#SPJ1

The conditional probability that Eric is a high-risk driver, given that he has had no traffic accidents in the past three years, is very low. Generally, insurance companies use the number of traffic violations and/or the number of claims a driver has had within a certain time period as indicators of their riskiness.

As Eric has had no accidents or traffic violations, the probability that he is a high-risk driver is very low. However, this does not mean that the probability is zero. There are many other factors which can contribute to a driver's risk, such as age, gender, experience, and location.

If Eric is an experienced driver, who has been driving for many years with no traffic accidents, then the probability of him being a high-risk driver will be lower than the average driver. On the other hand, if Eric is a new driver, or is located in an area with a high rate of traffic accidents, then the probability of him being a high-risk driver may be higher than the average driver.

Overall, the conditional probability that Eric is a high-risk driver, given that he has had no traffic accidents in the past three years, is very low. However, this probability can change depending on other factors, such as his age, experience, and location.

See more about conditional probability at: https://brainly.com/question/23382435

#SPJ11

If we see the scatter plot we can conclude that the possible relation between x and y is linear and with a positive correlation since when the values of x increase the values for y increases as well.

[tex]Cov(x,y) =\frac{\sum_1^n(x_i-X')(y_i-Y')}{n-1}[/tex]

 [tex]\sum_1^5(6-16)(6-10)+(11-16)(9-10)....(27-16)(12-10)=106\\\\and\\Cov(x,y)=\frac{106}{4}=26.5\\\\r=0.693[/tex]

For this part we use excel in order to create the scatterplot and we got the result on the figure attached

If we see the scatter plot we can conclude that the possible relation between x and y is linear and with a positive correlation since when the values of x increase the values of y increase as well

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this

[tex]Cov(x,y) =\frac{\sum_1^n(x_i-X')(y_i-Y')}{n-1}[/tex]

:  

[tex]Cov(x,y) =\frac{\sum_1^n(x_i-X')(y_i-Y')}{n-1}[/tex]

 [tex]\sum_1^5(6-16)(6-10)+(11-16)(9-10)....(27-16)(12-10)=106\\\\and\\Cov(x,y)=\frac{106}{4}=26.5\\\\r=0.693[/tex]

learn more about  scatter plot

https://brainly.com/question/29231735

#SPJ4

If we repeated a hypothesis test 1000 times, the number of times we would expect to commit a Type I error, assuming the null hypothesis were true, would depend on the significance level (α) of the test.

A Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. The significance level of a test (α) is the probability of making a Type I error when the null hypothesis is true. In other words, if we set a significance level of α = 0.05, we are saying that we are willing to tolerate a 5% chance of making a Type I error.

Assuming a significance level of α = 0.05, if we repeated the test 1000 times, we would expect to make a Type I error in approximately 50 tests (0.05 x 1000 = 50). This means that in 50 out of the 1000 tests, we would reject the null hypothesis even though it is actually true.

However, it is important to note that the actual number of Type I errors we make in practice may differ from our expectation, as it depends on the specific characteristics of the population being tested and the sample sizes used in each test.

For more details about hypothesis click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29519577#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use algebra to solve this problem.

Let's start by assigning variables to the unknown quantities. Let G be the initial number of green beads and Y be the initial number of yellow beads.

We know that the number of green beads is 1/3 the number of yellow beads:

G = (1/3)Y

After giving away some beads, he had 42 green beads and 270 yellow beads left. So we can set up two equations using this information:

G - 2f = 42

Y - 3f = 270

where f is the number of friends he gave the beads to.

Now we can substitute G = (1/3)Y into the first equation:

(1/3)Y - 2f = 42

Multiplying both sides by 3, we get:

Y - 6f = 126

Now we have two equations that we can solve simultaneously:

Y - 3f = 270

Y - 6f = 126

Subtracting the first equation from the second, we get:

3f = 144

So f = 48. He gave the beads to 48 friends.

To find the total number of beads he had at first, we can use the equation G = (1/3)Y:

G + Y = (4/3)Y = (4/3)(270) = 360

So he had a total of 360 beads at first.

One advantage of best-guess experiments is that they are often faster and more cost-effective than factorial or design experiments.

Best-guess (trial and error) experiments involve making a hypothesis and testing it through a series of trials until a satisfactory result is achieved. On the other hand, factorial or design experiments involve manipulating multiple variables simultaneously to determine their individual and interactive effects on a response variable.

Both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages depending on the specific research question and goals. They may also be useful in situations where there is limited knowledge about the variables of interest or when the system is too complex to be modeled accurately.

However, best-guess experiments may suffer from issues such as biased or subjective interpretation of results, a lack of control over extraneous variables, and a potential for false positives or negatives.

In contrast, factorial or design experiments provide a more systematic approach to testing hypotheses and offer greater control over variables, leading to more reliable and generalizable results. They may, however, be more time-consuming and expensive to conduct.

Ultimately, the choice between best-guess and factorial or design experiments depends on the research question, available resources, and desired level of precision and control.

To learn more about experiment click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30455826

#SPJ4

Julie hourly rate of pay from the given different rates of the day with total earning of $612 is equal to $12per hour.

Total number of hours Julie works in a week is equal to,

On Sunday = 10 hours

On Monday = 10 hours

On Tuesday = 7 hours

On Wednesday = 10 hours

On Thursday = 7 hours

On Friday = 7 hours

On Saturday = 0 hours

Total hours worked in whole week is

= 10 + 10 + 7 + 10 + 7 + 7 + 0

= 51 hours

Total money earned by Julie in whole week = $612

Hourly rate of pay = Weekly earnings / Total hours worked

Substitute the value we have,

⇒ Hourly rate of pay = $612 / 51 hours

⇒ Hourly rate of pay = $12 per hour

Therefore, Julie's hourly rate of pay is $12 per hour.

Learn more about rate of pay here

brainly.com/question/14458921

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete , the complete question is:

Julie works Sunday, Monday, and Wednesday for 10 hours each day. On Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, she works 7 hours each day. She does not work on Saturday. Her weekly total earnings are $612. What is Julie's hourly rate of pay, in dollars?

To implement the distributing principle to the phrase 7(2x+5) - 4(2x+5), we must first divide the 7 and 4 within the parenthesis to their respective terms:

7(2x+5) - 4(2x+5) = (72x + 75) - (42x + 45)

Within the parenthesis, each term is simplified:

= (14x + 35) - (8x + 20)

We may now reduce the phrase by grouping similar terms:

= 14x - 8x + 35 - 20

= 6x + 15

As a consequence, using the distributive property on 7(2x+5) - 4(2x+5) yields 6x + 15.

By expansion or multiplying, the distribution principle is frequently employed to compress statements and solve problems. It enables us to translate complicated statements into shorter language and conversely. The distributive principle is commonly utilized in mathematics, mathematics, as well as other mathematical subjects.

To know more about multiplying click here

brainly.com/question/25114566

#SPJ9

If the population growth rate is 3.5 percent every year then the population of the town after 7 years would be 14940.

Given that population grows 3.5 percent every year.

So, the increase in population after one year

= 3.5% of 12000

= (3.5/100) × 12000

= 420

Thus the increase in population after 7 year would be,

= population increase in one year × 7

= 420×7 = 2940

Hence population of the town after 7 years = (present population + increase in population)

= 12000 + 2940

= 14940

So the population of the town after 7 years with 3.5 % growth every year would be 14490.

Visit here to learn more about the percent: https://brainly.com/question/28670903

#SPJ4

As the length of the side immediately across from the angle, choice (c) 6 units is the correct answer.

Three straight lines that cross at three different locations create the two-dimensional geometric outline of a triangle. A triangle's vertices, which are the three places at which those three lines intersect, are referred to as the triangle's sides. The dimensions of a triangle's edges and angles can be used to classify it. For instance, an isosceles triangle has two equal sides and two equal angles while an equilateral triangle has three equal sides and three equal angles of 60 degrees. An angle or side of a scalene triangle cannot be equivalent.

given

The right-angled triangle XYZ in the provided illustration has a side length of 6 units and an angle opposite to it that is labelled as 30°. The extent of the side YZ, denoted as x, must be determined.

To find x, we can use the trigonometric sine relation. The length of the side directly across from the angle divided by the length of the hypotenuse is known as the sine of an angle. The hypotenuse in this instance is designated as 2x.

As a result, we have:

sin 30° = (6/2x)

Adding two times to both sides:

2x * sin 30° = 6

Using sin 30°, which has a value of 0.5:

x = (6/(2 * 0.5)) = 6/1 = 6

Consequently, the side YZ is 6 units long.

As the length of the side immediately across from the angle, choice (c) 6 units is the correct answer.

To know more about triangle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

a) The sum of the given series is 7 / (1 + 2z)

b) The domain of convergence is (-∞, -1/2) U (1/2, ∞).

The given series can be expressed as

7 – 14z + 28z^2 - 56z^3 + ...

This is a geometric series with first term (a) = 7 and common ratio (r) = -2z. The formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series is

sum = a / (1 - r)

Substituting the values of a and r, we get

sum = 7 / (1 + 2z)

So, the sum of the given series is 7 / (1 + 2z).

For the series to converge, the absolute value of the common ratio must be less than 1. That is,

|r| = |−2z| < 1

Simplifying this inequality, we get

1/2 < |z|

So, the domain of convergence of the given series is (-∞, -1/2) U (1/2, ∞).

Learn more about infinite geometric series here

brainly.com/question/28585723

#SPJ4

The answer to subtracting the two polynomials is 2x2 - 10x - 7.  The process of subtracting polynomials is like that of subtracting any other type of numerical expression.

Polynomials are mathematical expressions consisting of variables, coefficients, and exponents. They are used to represent a variety of functions, such as polynomial equations, rational equations, and trigonometric functions.

In this case, our like terms are 2x2 and 4x2, and -6x and -4x, and -4 and +3. We begin by subtracting the coefficients of the like terms. We subtract the coefficient of the term with the highest power first. In this case, that is 2x2 and 4x2, we subtract 2 from 4 to get 2. Next, we subtract the coefficients of the terms with the second highest power. This is -6x and -4x, so we subtract -6 from -4 to get -2. Thus, our answer now reads 2x2 -2x.

Finally, we subtract the coefficients of the terms with the lowest power. This is -4 and +3, so we subtract -4 from 3 to get -7. Thus, our answer now reads 2x2 -2x -7.

This answer can then be placed in the proper position on the grid.

For more questions related to coefficients

https://brainly.com/question/28872453

#SPJ1

Answer:

No, q=15 is not a solution to the inequality.

Step-by-step explanation:

As given, q=15. So, substituting is the best way to solve this problem.

Step 1: Substitute

[tex]\frac{15}{5}=3[/tex]

[tex]15-20=-5[/tex]

Step 2: Substitute values into inequality

[tex]3 < -5[/tex]

Equation is false since 3 is a bigger value than -5.

Hope this helps ya!

Answer:

(5,2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's solve your system by substitution.

[tex]x+y=7{\text{ ; }}x=y+3[/tex]

Step 2: let Solve [tex]$x+y=7$[/tex] for[tex]$x$[/tex]

[tex]x+y=7[/tex]

[tex]x+y +(-x)=7+(-x)[/tex] (Add (-x) on both sides)

[tex]y=-x+7[/tex]

0+(x)=7-x-y+(x)   (Add (x) on both sides)

x = -y + 7

x/1 = -y+7/1  (divide through by 1)

x = -y + 7

Substitute -y+7 for x in x = y + 3, then solve for u

(-y + 7) = y + 3

-y + 7 = y + 3 (simplify)

-y+7+(-7) = y + 3 + (-7)    (Add (-7) on both sides)

-y=y-4

-y = y-4 (simplify)

-y+(-y)=y-4+(-y)  (Add (-y) on both sides)

-2y-=-4

-2y/-2 = -4/-2  (Divide through by -2)

y = 2

Substitute in 2 for y in x = -y + 7

x =  -y+7

x = -2+7

x = 5

Answer:

x = 5 and y = 2

⇒First take out the highest common factor 2 form the quadratic equation and divide each and every term of that equation by that common factor.

⇒Factorise the equation and equate the factors of the equation to 0 and solve for the unknown variable x.

⇒Below are the steps on solving for the unknown variable.

[tex]2(x^{2} -14x+49)=0 \\\frac{2(x^{2} -14x+49)}{2} =\frac{0}{2} \\x^{2} -14x+49=0\\(x-7)(x-7)=0\\x-7=0\\x=7[/tex]

Answer: (-3,-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

y²+2y+11 = 5-3y

y^2+2y+11-5+3y =0

y^2+5y+6=0

y^2+3y+2y+6=0

y(y+3)+2(y+3)=0

(y+3)(y+2)=0

y= -3, -2

All you do is plug in the x value to the equation

Hope it helps:)

The 12 of each type of the ring would give max profit for the company.

Let x = number of VIP rings: let y = number of SST rings

:

The total production inequality;

x + y =< 24

y = 24 - x; arranged to plot graph (purple)

:

The labor inequality;

3x + 2y =< 60

2y = 60 - 3x

y = 60/2 - (3/2)x

y = 30 - 1.5x; arranged to plot the graph (red).

From the graph, the 3 corners of the area of feasibility (at or below the lines whichever is lower):

: x/y;.....profit on each type;... total profit

0,24; 40(0) + 35(24) = 0 + 840 = $840

12,12; 40(12) + 35(12) = 480 + 420 = $900

20,0; 40(20) + 35(0) = 800 + 35(0) = $800.

Therefore, the 12 of each type of the ring would give max profit for the company.

Read more about max profit

brainly.com/question/30281964

#SPJ1

Answer:

Let's call the length of the hypotenuse SD as x.

Since the altitude from T to SD divides SD into two parts, let the length of the shorter part be y. Then the length of the longer part is x-y.

Using similar triangles, we have:

TU/TS = ST/TD

Substituting the values we have:

TU/(3√5) = √5/UD

TU = (3/5)UD

Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUS, we have:

TU² + (3√5)² = TS²

(3/5 UD)² + 45 = ST²

9/25 UD² + 45 = ST²

Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUD, we have:

TU² + UD² = TD²

(3/5 UD)² + UD² = x²

9/25 UD² + UD² = x²

34/25 UD² = x²

UD² = (25/34)x²

Substituting the value of UD² in the equation ST² = 9/25 UD² + 45, we get:

ST² = 9/25 (25/34)x² + 45

ST² = 45/34 x² + 45

Since y = x-y-1, we have y = (x-1)/2.

Using the Pythagorean theorem in triangle TUD, we have:

(1/4) (x-1)² + UD² = x²

(1/4) (x² - 2x + 1) + (25/34)x² = x²

(1/4)(x²) + (25/34)x² - (1/2)x + (1/4) = 0

(59/68)x² - (1/2)x + (1/4) = 0

Using the quadratic formula, we get:

x = [1/2 ± √(1/4 - 4(59/68)(1/4))]/(2(59/68))

x = [1/2 ± (3√34)/17]/(59/34)

x = 17/59 ± 6√34/59

Since x is the hypotenuse SD, we have:

UD² = (25/34) x²

UD² = (25/34) [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²]

UD² = 136/59 ± 204√34/295

Therefore, the exact lengths of the two parts of the hypotenuse are:

SD = x = 17/59 ± 6√34/59

SU = x-y = (x-1)/2 = 8/59 ± 3√34/59

UD = y = (x-1)/2 = 8/59 ± 3√34/59

TU = (3/5) UD = (3/5) [8/59 ± 3√34/59] = 24/295 ± 9√34/295

ST² = 45/34 x² + 45 = 45/34 [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²] + 45

ST = √[45/34 [(17/59 ± 6√34/59)²] + 45]

The write-off of the receivable from Madonna Inc. is a necessary adjustment to ensure the accuracy of Marin Co.'s financial statements. Without it, the company's accounts receivable would be overstated and their financial statements would not provide an accurate portrayal of the company's financial position.

At the end of 2024, Marin Co. had accounts receivable of $673,200 and an allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,010. On January 24th, 2025, it was determined that the company's receivable from Madonna Inc. was not collectible and management authorized a write-off of $4,147. This action reduces the accounts receivable balance by $4,147, and reduces the allowance for doubtful accounts by the same amount. The net effect on the balance sheet is a reduction of $4,147 in both accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts.

The impact of the write-off on the company's financial statements is a decrease in net income for the period. This is because a write-off is recognized as an expense, which reduces the amount of net income reported in the period. The amount of the write-off is recorded as an expense on the income statement. In this case, the amount of the write-off is $4,147.

The journal entry to record the write-off would be: Accounts Receivable 4,147; Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 4,147. This entry reduces the accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts by $4,147. The write-off of $4,147 is recorded as an expense on the income statement, and this reduces the net income reported for the period.

for such more questions on financial statements

https://brainly.com/question/26240841

#SPJ11

Looks like your question already has an answer! https://brainly.com/question/22200751

The answer based on debt to assets ratio for east and west company are,

East company debt to assets ratio is equal to 0.44.

West company debt to assets ratio is equal to 0.28.

After comparing both the company debt to assets ratio East company is at higher level of financial risk.

Assets = Liabilities + Equity

For East company,

206,000 =  91,000 + 115,000

Assets = 206,000

liabilities = 91,000

Equity = 115,000

For West company,

603,000 =  169,000 + 434,000

Assets = 603,000

liabilities = 169,000

Equity = 434,000

Debt-to-assets ratio = Total liabilities divided by the total assets.

Debt-to-assets ratio for East

= 91,000 / 206,000

= 0.44

Debt-to-assets ratio for West

= 169,000 / 603,000

= 0.28

Comparing the two ratios,

0.44 > 0.28

This implies,

Company East has a higher debt-to-assets ratio is greater than the compared to Company West.

This represents that Company East has a higher level of financial risk.

As larger proportion of their assets are financed through debt.

This shows it is difficult to repay if the company experiences financial difficulties.

Company West has a lower level of financial risk as smaller proportion of their assets are financed through debt.

Therefore, the answer of the following questions are,

Debt to asset ratio of east company = 0.44

Debt to asset ratio of west company = 0.28

Company east has a higher financial risk level .

learn more about debt to asset ratio here

https://brainly.com/question/18648883

#SPJ4