The driver of a car with a total of 1800 kg mass is traveling at 23 m/s when he slams on the brakes, locking the wheels on the dry pavement. The coefficient of kinetic friction between rubber and dry concrete is typically 0.7. How far would the car travel if were going twice as fast

The hammer's centripetal acceleration is therefore 100.59 m/s².

An object has positive acceleration when it is going faster than it was previously. Positive acceleration was demonstrated by the moving car in the first scenario. Positive forward motion is being made by the car.

Hammer mass, m, is 6.55 kg. chain length, including the length of the arms, r = 1.3 m, Hammer's angular velocity is given by the formula: = 1.4 rev/s = 8.79646 rad/s (1 rev = 6.28 rad).

The formula a = V2/r, where V is the transverse velocity of the hammer, yields the centripetal acceleration.

V = r, hence

As a result, a = r²

A = 1.3 x 8.796462, or 100.59 m/s², is obtained by substituting the supplied numbers in the equation above.

The hammer's centripetal acceleration is therefore 100.59 m/s².

To know more about Acceleration visit:

brainly.com/question/30499732

#SPJ1

Real, inverted, and same size are the features of the image. when A concave mirror with a curvature of 8 is displayed on a ruler with a range of 0 to 14 cm.

The mirror formula may be used to calculate the image distance for an item located 4 cm from a 1.5 cm focal length mirror.

1/f = 1/u+1/v

f is the focal length

u is the object distance

v is the image distance

Keep in mind that the concave mirror's image distance and focal length are both positive.

Given:

u = 4cm

f = 1.5cm

1/v = 1/1.5-1/4

1/v = 0.67-0.25

1/v = 0.42

v = 1/0.42

v = 2.38cm

The picture is Genuine and INVERTED since the image distance value is positive.

We shall find its magnification and see if it is magnified or lessened. It is amplified if the magnification is larger than 1, and it is decreased if it is less.

Magnification = v/u

Magnification = 2.38/4

Magnification = 0.595 or. 0.6

The picture is reduced in size since the magnification is less than one (SMALLER).

Learn more about Inverted here:

https://brainly.com/question/16150120

#SPJ1

They are specifically made tο be ideal fοr cοnducting live electrical lines because οf their electrical insulatiοn and mechanical tοughness. A structure called an electric pylοn οf hοt-rοlled steel bevels οr gusset plates.

Other materials, such as cοncrete and wοοd, may alsο be utilised in additiοn tο steel. Transmissiοn tοwers can be divided intο fοur main categοries: suspensiοn, terminal, tensiοn, οr transpοsitiοn.

This Central Electricity Bοard held a cοmpetitiοn in 1927, and the winning entry was chοsen by the classical designer Sir Reginald Blοοmfield. He settled οn an A-frame structure with latticewοrk that was οffered by the American cοmpany Milliken Brοthers and is still in use tοday.

To know more about mechanical visit:

brainly.com/question/20885658

#SPJ1

Complete question:

Answer:

Explanation:

The formula relating the speed of sound, frequency, and wavelength is:

speed = frequency x wavelength

Rearranging this formula to solve for frequency:

frequency = speed / wavelength

Substituting the given values:

frequency = 342 m/s / 1.8 m

frequency = 190 Hz

Therefore, the frequency of the sound wave is 190 Hz.

Answer:The current in a lightbulb with a voltage of 35.0 V and a resistance of 175 ohm is 0.2 A.

Find the current in a lightbulb?

Given:

The voltage in a lightbulb is given by the equation V=IR

V is the voltage, I is current, and R is the resistance.

The voltage of the lightbulb is given as 35.0 V.

The resistance of the lightbulb is given as 175 Ohm.

As the equation is given,

V= IR

where I is current, R is resistance and V is the voltage.

Now, I = V/R

As the value of Voltage and resistance of the lightbulb is given, we will put in the above equation, we get;

I = 35.0/ 175 A

I = 0.2 A.

Hence, the current of the lightbulb is 0.2 A.

Therefore, Option C is the correct answer.

To learn more about Current, refer to:

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

What is the gravitational force between them?

To calculate the gravitational force between two objects, we can use the formula:

F = G * (m1 * m2) / r^2

where F is the gravitational force, G is the gravitational constant (6.6743 x 10^-11 N * m^2 / kg^2), m1 and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them.

Plugging in the given values, we get:

F = (6.6743 x 10^-11 N * m^2 / kg^2) * (2000000 kg) * (3000000 kg) / (50 m)^2

F = 0.8046 N

Therefore, the gravitational force between the two asteroids is approximately 0.8046 N.

The force of gravity between the 80 kg person and the 100 kg person, who are 5 meters apart, is approximately 1.07269 × 10^-6 Newtons.

The force of gravity between two objects is given by the formula:

F = G(m1*m2)/r^2

Where

Plugging in the given values, we get:

F = 6.67430 × 10^-11 N·(m/kg)^2 * (80 kg) * (100 kg) / (5 m)^2

Simplifying this expression, we get:

F = 1.07269 × 10^-6 N

Therefore, the force of gravity between the 80 kg person and the 100 kg person, who are 5 meters apart, is approximately 1.07269 × 10^-6 Newtons.

Learn more about force of gravity here : brainly.com/question/20548149

#SPJ1

Answer:

Isaac Newton, the English physicist, mathematician, and astronomer, discovered the concept of gravity in the late 17th century. The story of his discovery of gravity is one of the most famous in scientific history.

The most well-known anecdote is that Newton was sitting under an apple tree when an apple fell from the tree and hit him on the head. This event, however, is likely to be a myth created to make the story more memorable. Nonetheless, it is true that Newton began to wonder why objects fall to the ground instead of flying off into space.

Newton's curiosity led him to conduct experiments to understand the behavior of falling objects. He reasoned that the same force that caused an apple to fall to the ground was responsible for holding the moon in orbit around the Earth.

Newton's breakthrough came when he realized that the force that causes objects to fall to the ground is the same force that governs the motion of the planets in the solar system. He described this force as "gravity" and formulated his famous law of universal gravitation, which states that every object in the universe attracts every other object with a force that is proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Newton's discovery of gravity was a major scientific achievement that revolutionized our understanding of the physical world. It laid the foundation for the development of classical mechanics, and the law of gravitation has since been used to explain a wide range of phenomena in physics, from the motion of planets to the behavior of subatomic particles.

In summary, Newton discovered gravity through a process of curiosity, experimentation, and mathematical reasoning. Although the apple falling on his head is unlikely to be true, his discovery has had a profound impact on our understanding of the universe.

Answer:

Isaac Newton did not "discover" gravity, as it was already known that objects were attracted to each other. However, he did discover the law of universal gravitation, which states that every particle in the universe attracts every other particle with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of their separation distance.

The bigger the spring constant, the more stiff or rigid the spring is.

The exact amount of force needed to bend a spring depends on the spring constant. Although pounds/inch is a common measurement in North America, the standard international (SI) unit for spring constants is Newtons/meter. A stiffer spring has a greater spring constant, and vice versa.

The exact amount of force needed to bend a spring depends on the spring constant. Although pounds/inch is a common measurement in North America, the standard international (SI) unit for spring constants is Newtons/meter. A stiffer spring has a greater spring constant, and vice versa.

To know more about spring constant visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14159361

#SPJ9

There are two forces acting on the rock: the force of gravity pulling it downward and the force of the boulder supporting it from underneath.

The force of gravity is the gravitational attraction between the rock and the Earth. It pulls the rock downward with a force equal to its weight, which is given by the equation Fg = mg, where Fg is the force of gravity, m is the mass of the rock, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s^2).

The concept of forces explains why the rock stays on top of the boulder because the forces are balanced. The force of gravity pulling the rock downward is equal and opposite to the force of the boulder supporting it from underneath. As a result, the rock remains in equilibrium, or a state of balance, on top of the boulder. If either force were to change, the equilibrium would be disrupted, and the rock would either fall to the ground or be pushed off the boulder.

To know more about forces visit:-

brainly.com/question/13191643

#SPJ1

Answer:

Pulse transfers a single disturbance, while wave is a continuous disturbance that transfers energy.

If you found this response helpful, please consider marking it as brainliest.

Answer:

Explanation:

We can solve this problem using kinematic equations. We know that the initial velocity of the ball is 55 m/s at an angle of 30° to the horizontal. We can break this velocity into its horizontal and vertical components:

vx = v0 cos θ = 55 cos 30° = 47.6 m/s

vy = v0 sin θ = 55 sin 30° = 27.5 m/s

We can now use the vertical motion equation to find the time it takes for the ball to reach its maximum height:

Δy = vy t + 0.5 a t^2

At the maximum height, the vertical velocity of the ball is 0, so we have:

0 = vy + a t_max

Solving for t_max, we get:

t_max = -vy / a = -27.5 / (-9.8) = 2.81 s

The ball will take twice this time to reach the fence, since it needs to come back down to the ground:

t_total = 2 t_max = 5.62 s

The horizontal distance the ball travels during this time is:

Δx = vx t_total = 47.6 × 5.62 = 267.7 m

Since this distance is greater than the distance to the fence (120 m), the ball will reach the fence if it leaves the bat traveling upward at an angle of 30° to the horizontal.

Therefore, the power of the porter is 441,450 J/s, or approximately 441.5 watts.

The work done by the porter in lifting the 50 kg bag up the stairs can be calculated as the product of the force applied and the distance moved.

The force applied is the weight of the bag, which is given by:

F = m * g

where m is the mass of the bag and g is the acceleration due to gravity, which is approximately 9.81 m/s². Substituting the given values, we get:

F = 50 kg * 9.81 m/s²

F = 490.5 N

The distance moved by the porter in lifting the bag up one staircase is 30 cm, and the porter climbs 10 staircases in 10 seconds, which gives a speed of:

v = (10 * 30 cm) / 10 s

v = 30 cm/s

The power of the porter is the rate at which work is done, which can be calculated as:

P = W / t

where W is the work done and t is the time taken. Substituting the values, we get:

P = F * d * v / t

P = 490.5 N * 10 * 30 cm * 30 cm/s / 10 s

P = 441,450 J/s

To know more about power visit:-

brainly.com/question/4160783

#SPJ9

Answer:

Number of coils of conducting wire and whether or not domains are present in iron core are the two properties of the electromagnet that the researcher will need to take into account.

Explanation:

The number of coils of conducting wire affects the strength of the magnetic field produced by the electromagnet. More coils will produce a stronger magnetic field, while fewer coils will produce a weaker magnetic field. The researcher will need to determine the appropriate number of coils to produce the desired strength of the magnetic field for the medical application.

The presence of domains in the iron core is also an important consideration. The iron core of the electromagnet helps to concentrate the magnetic field and increase its strength. The domains in the iron core align with the magnetic field produced by the current flowing through the wire, and this alignment reinforces the magnetic field. If the iron core does not have domains, the magnetic field produced by the electromagnet will be weaker. Therefore, the researcher will need to ensure that the iron core has domains to maximize the strength of the magnetic field for the medical application.

Answer:

15 hours

Explanation:

formula: f(a) = a(0.5)^(T/t)

fill in known values: 13=208(0.5)^(60/t)

use natural log to isolate t:    ln(13/208)=ln(0.5)(60/t)

solve for t: t=15

Answer:

Astronomers use computer models to simulate the process of galactic evolution through mergers and collisions. These models are based on our current understanding of the physical laws that govern the behavior of matter and energy in the universe. By running simulations of galactic mergers and collisions, astronomers can test their understanding of how these physical processes work in practice and how they contribute to the formation and evolution of galaxies.

One way that astronomers might test their understanding of the physical processes of the universe is by comparing the predictions of their models to observations of real galaxies. For example, if a model predicts that a particular type of galaxy should have a certain shape, size, or distribution of stars, astronomers can compare these predictions to observations of actual galaxies to see if they match up. If there is a discrepancy between the model's predictions and the observations, this can indicate that there are some physical processes that are not well understood or included in the model.

Another way that astronomers might test their understanding is by looking for patterns or trends in the properties of galaxies that are consistent with the predictions of their models. For example, if a model predicts that galaxies that have undergone a recent merger should have a particular distribution of gas and dust, astronomers can look for evidence of this pattern in observations of real galaxies. If they find that the predicted pattern is consistently observed in a large sample of galaxies, this can provide support for the model's predictions and the physical processes that it includes.

Overall, computer models of galactic evolution through mergers and collisions provide a powerful tool for astronomers to test their understanding of the physical processes of the universe. By comparing the predictions of their models to observations of real galaxies and looking for consistent patterns and trends, astronomers can refine their understanding of how galaxies form and evolve over time.

The statement that correctly defines an evolutionary stage of a star like the sun is that after leaving the main sequence, its core is stable due to electron degeneracy. That is option C.

The stages of the life cycle of a star include the following:

The evolutionary stage is also called the main sequence stage of the life cycle of the star.

In this stage, the core temperature reaches the point for the fusion to occur whereby the protons of hydrogen are converted into atoms of helium. This leads to the stability of the core of the newly formed start due to electron degeneracy.

Learn more about star formation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29976256

#SPJ1

Because it is less than the required minimum energy difference of 1.51 eV, the energy of 0.66 eV is not feasible. Hence, 0.66 eV is the correct answer.

The electron is first assumed to be in the ground state (n=1) in a hydrogen atom. Hence, the electron's energy in its ground state is 13.6 eV. This means that 12.75eV is needed to transfer electrons from the ground state to the third excited state.

The following equation provides the energy levels:

En = -13.6/n² eV

where n is the main quantum number.

An electron can move from the n=4 level to the n=3, n=2, or n=1 level after initialization. For each of these transitions, the relevant photon energies and energy differences are as follows:

n=4 to n=3: ΔE = En=3 - En=4 = (-13.6/3²) - (-13.6/4²) = 1.51 eV

n=4 to n=2: ΔE = En=2 - En=4 = (-13.6/2²) - (-13.6/4²) = 3.40 eV

n=4 to n=1: ΔE = En=1 - En=4 = (-13.6/1²) - (-13.6/4²) = 10.2 eV

As a result, the released photons could have energies of 1.51 eV, 3.40 eV, or 10.2 eV.

To know more about energy visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/11399976

#SPJ9

It takes 0.1311 seconds to hear the echo of the stone.

First we need to determine the time it takes for the sound wave to travel from the stone to the bottom of the mine shaft and back up to our ears.

Let's start by finding the time it takes for the sound wave to reach the bottom of the mine shaft. We can use the formula:

time = distance / speed

The distance is the depth of the mine shaft, which is 15 meters. The speed of sound is 343 m/s, as given in the problem. Therefore, the time it takes for the sound wave to reach the bottom of the mine shaft is:

time = 15 m / 343 m/s

time = 0.0437 s

Now, we need to find the time it takes for the sound wave to travel back up to our ears. Since the sound wave travels at the same speed, 343 m/s, the distance it needs to cover is twice the depth of the mine shaft, or 30 meters. Therefore, the time it takes for the sound wave to travel back up to our ears is:

time = 30 m / 343 m/s

time = 0.0874 s

Finally, to find the total time it takes to hear the echo, we add the time it takes for the sound wave to reach the bottom of the mine shaft to the time it takes to travel back up to our ears:

total time = 0.0437 s + 0.0874 s

total time = 0.1311 s

Therefore, it takes 0.1311 seconds to hear the echo of the stone.

Learn more about sound wave here : brainly.com/question/13105733

#SPJ1

Mechanical energy to heat energy is collision,force x distance is work done,rubbing energy friction, stewardship is using energy wisely and nuclear energy can cause heat pollution.

For more information on energy kindly visit to

https://brainly.com/question/10770247

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

A. The gravitational pull from the Moon would correct the satellite and bring it back to the Lagrangian point.

At the Earth-Moon L1 Lagrangian point, the gravitational pulls from the Earth and the Moon are balanced, and the satellite is in a stable equilibrium. If the satellite drifted slightly closer to Earth, the gravitational pull from the Earth would become stronger, but the gravitational pull from the Moon would also increase due to its closer distance, and this would correct the satellite's motion and bring it back to the Lagrangian point.

The voltage of the battery would be 20 volts. Option I.

According to Ohm's law, the voltage (V) across a resistor is equal to the current (I) flowing through it multiplied by its resistance (R). Mathematically,

V = I × R

In this case, the current (I) flowing through the resistor is given as 10 A and the resistance (R) of the resistor is given as 2 ohms. Substituting these values into the above formula, we get:

V = 10 A × 2 ohms = 20 volts

Therefore, the voltage of the battery is 20 volts.

More on voltage can be found here: https://brainly.com/question/13521443

#SPJ1

Answer:

power plant

collision

Battery

Burning wood

speaker

Beating drum

The two gases that could be components of water are indeed hydrogen and oxygen.

Evidence to support this claim:

1. The chemical formula for water is H2O, which means that it is composed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom.

2. The table of elements shows that hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) are both elements that exist in nature.

3. The atomic mass of hydrogen (1.008) and oxygen (15.999) matches the molecular mass of water (18.015).

4. Water is produced when hydrogen gas (H2) is burned in the presence of oxygen gas (O2), according to the following equation: 2H2 + O2 → 2H2O.

Overall, the evidence supports the conclusion that hydrogen and oxygen are the two gases that could be components of water.

To know more about water please refer: https://brainly.com/question/31037355

#SPJ1

The truck's acceleration is 3.0m/s² and the momentum of the truck is  144000 kg m/s.

It is the rate at which the speed and direction of a moving object vary over time.

We can use the following equation to calculate the acceleration of the truck:

a = (v - u) / t

where

a = acceleration

v = final velocity = 18.0 m/s

u = initial velocity = 0 m/s (the truck starts from rest)

t = time taken = 6.00 s

Substituting the values, we get:

a = (18.0 m/s - 0 m/s) / 6.00 s

a = 3.00 m/s²

Therefore, the acceleration of the truck is 3.00 m/s².

We can use the following equation to calculate the momentum of the truck:

p = m * v

where

p = momentum

m = mass of the truck = 8000.0 kg

v = final velocity = 18.0 m/s

Substituting the values, we get:

p = 8000.0 kg * 18.0 m/s

p = 144000 kg m/s

Therefore, the momentum of the truck after it has reached its final velocity is 144000 kg m/s.

Learn more about velocity here:

https://brainly.com/question/17127206

#SPJ9

Answer:

The student used 24000 Joules of energy.

Explanation:

We can use the Energy Power equation to solve this example.

[tex]\sf E=Pt[/tex]

Where

[tex]\sf E[/tex] is the energy in Joules (J)

[tex]\sf P[/tex] is the power in Watts (W)

[tex]\sf t[/tex] is the time in seconds (s)

Numerical Evaluation

In this example we are given

[tex]\sf P=800\\t=30[/tex]

Substituting our given values into the equation yields

[tex]\sf E=800 \cdot 30[/tex]

[tex]\sf E=24000[/tex]

24000 Joules  

[tex]\Large\bold{SOLUTION}[/tex]

To calculate the energy used by the student in this scenario, we can use the formula:

[tex]\sf{Energy\: (in\: Joules) = Power\: (in\: Watts) \times Time\: (in\: seconds)}[/tex]

Given that the student uses an 800 W microwave for 30 seconds, we can plug in these values to the formula:

[tex]\sf Energy = 800\: W \times 30\: s = 24,000\: J[/tex]

Therefore, the student uses 24,000 Joules of energy in this scenario.

[tex]\rule{200pt}{5pt}[/tex]

Explanation:

I'm sorry, but the statement you provided is incorrect. There is no such thing as Newton's 4th law. Newton's laws of motion consist of three laws, which are:

An object at rest tends to stay at rest, and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the force applied to it and inversely proportional to its mass.

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

None of these laws state that action and reaction never start from the same point. However, it is true that the action and reaction forces act on different objects, not necessarily at the same point. This is because Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, which means that when one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite force back on the first object.

Answer:

625

Explanation:

To solve this problem, we can use the following kinematic equation:

v^2 = u^2 + 2as

Where:

v = final velocity (0 m/s since the body comes to rest)

u = initial velocity (50 m/s)

a = acceleration (-2 m/s^2 since the body is decelerating)

s = distance

We want to find the distance (s) that the body covers from the time it starts to decelerate to the time it comes to rest. We can rearrange the equation to solve for s:

s = (v^2 - u^2) / (2a)

Substituting the values we have:

s = (0^2 - 50^2) / (2 x (-2)) = 625 meters

Therefore, the body covers a distance of 625 meters from the time it starts to decelerate until it comes to rest.

Answer:

Explanation:

Assuming that air resistance is negligible, we can use the following kinematic equations to solve for the peak height:

v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2ad

where v_f = 0 m/s (at the peak height) and a = -9.8 m/s^2 (acceleration due to gravity)

and

d = v_i t + (1/2)at^2

where d is the displacement or the peak height we want to find, v_i is the initial velocity, t is the time it takes to reach the peak height.

First, we need to resolve the initial velocity into its vertical and horizontal components:

v_i_x = v_i cos(30°) = 121.1 m/s

v_i_y = v_i sin(30°) = 70.0 m/s

Next, we can use the vertical component of the initial velocity to find the time it takes to reach the peak height:

v_f = v_i_y + at

0 m/s = 70.0 m/s + (-9.8 m/s^2)t

t = 7.14 s

Finally, we can use the time we found and the kinematic equation for displacement to find the peak height:

d = v_i_y t + (1/2)at^2

d = (70.0 m/s)(7.14 s) + (1/2)(-9.8 m/s^2)(7.14 s)^2

d = 247.5 m

Therefore, the peak height of the football is 247.5 meters.