The process of "identity development" may start earlier and take longer to accomplish for multiracial youth.The process of "identity development" may start earlier and take longer to accomplish for multiracial youth.
According to research conducted on the experiences of multiracial adolescents, multiracial youth face unique identity development issues. This is particularly significant since multiracial youth may feel like they don't fit in or identify with any one race or ethnicity. They may feel excluded or different from both monoracial and multiracial peers, resulting in feelings of isolation and confusion regarding their identity.
Additionally, multiracial youth may be subjected to discrimination or microaggressions from both majority and minority populations, further complicating their development. Moreover, the development of a healthy and stable identity takes time, and multiracial youth may require a more extended period to explore their identities. They may need to navigate their complex identities and reconcile the varying cultural and racial norms that exist within each of their racial and ethnic communities. This process may require more profound self-reflection, introspection, and exploration than it does for their monoracial peers. As a result, the process of identity development may start earlier and take longer to accomplish for multiracial youth, as they deal with unique challenges associated with developing a sense of self.
to know more about identity development visit:
brainly.com/question/1563750
#SPJ11
The antidepressant drugs Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are all examples of which of the following? O tricyclics OSSRIs O MAO inhibitors O benzodiazepines
The antidepressant drugs Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are all examples of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed type of antidepressant medication. They are used to treat depression, anxiety disorders, and other conditions. Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are all examples of SSRIs.SSRIs work by increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is responsible for regulating mood, appetite, and sleep. By increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain, SSRIs can help to improve mood and reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety.
There are several other types of antidepressant medications, including tricyclics, MAO inhibitors, and benzodiazepines. Each of these medications works in a different way and may be more or less effective for different people depending on their specific symptoms and needs.
Learn more about Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) here: https://brainly.com/question/9400805
#SPJ11
According to your text, in some states in the US, over 20% of the black population cannot vote due to felon disenfranchisement. O True O False
The statement "According to your text, in some states in the US, over 20% of the black population cannot vote due to felon disenfranchisement." is true.
Felon disenfranchisement: Felon disenfranchisement refers to the restriction of the right to vote due to the commission of a felony by an individual. It is practiced in some countries, including the United States.
In some states in the United States, over 20% of the black population cannot vote due to felon disenfranchisement. This is due to the disproportionate number of Black Americans in the criminal justice system, as well as the disproportionately harsh sentencing guidelines for certain crimes that affect Black Americans in particular.
However, some states have passed legislation to restore voting rights to people with felony convictions, while others are actively debating such legislation.
To learn more about felon disenfranchisement, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28347485
#SPJ11
Instructions: With the different conceptualizations of nationalism in mind, research on a dispute that is currently happening between countries (you can choose a dispute between the Philippines and other countries or between other countries, not including the Philippines). Using a PowerPoint presentation or Prezi, present to class the following: 1. What the dispute is about 2. What led to the dispute 3. What the government officials from the disputing countries are doing to address the problem 4. How the concept and sense of nationalism is observed in the different measures to address the dispute
With different conceptualizations of nationalism in mind, research on a dispute that is currently happening between countries (you can choose a dispute between the Philippines and other countries or between other countries, not including the Philippines).
Using a PowerPoint presentation or Prezi, present to class the following:1. What the dispute is about:The dispute is about the sovereignty of the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea. The Spratly Islands, also known as the Kalayaan Island Group, are a group of islands and reefs that are claimed by China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei. The Spratly Islands are strategically important because they are believed to be rich in oil and gas reserves.2. What led to the dispute:China's claims to the Spratly Islands are based on a historical basis, citing the use of the islands by Chinese fishermen and traders for centuries.
Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei also claim the islands on historical grounds, with each country asserting that the islands have been used by their fishermen and traders for generations. The dispute has escalated in recent years as China has built artificial islands and military bases in the area.
Read more about conceptualizations here;https://brainly.com/question/9383377
#SPJ11
*Can the goal of providing quality and affordable health care to all Americans be reached?
please make it long and cite where you got the info from
Achieving the goal of providing quality and affordable healthcare to all Americans is challenging, evidence from studies and reports indicates that it is feasible.
The goal of providing quality and affordable healthcare to all Americans is an ambitious one, but with the right strategies and policies, it is possible to make significant progress. Several studies and reports have shed light on potential approaches.
A study published in The Lancet in 2020 explored various universal healthcare systems around the world and concluded that achieving quality and affordable healthcare for all is feasible. The study examined countries like Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom, which have achieved near-universal healthcare coverage while maintaining reasonable costs.
Furthermore, a report by the Commonwealth Fund in 2021 compared healthcare systems in 11 high-income countries, ranking the United States last in terms of overall performance, including access, efficiency, and equity. The report suggested that implementing policies such as expanding Medicaid, increasing primary care access, and promoting preventive care can enhance affordability and coverage.
To learn more about healthcare
https://brainly.com/question/27741709
#SPJ11
a plan so that people accpt lgbtq community in the world or a
particular region for a a paper proposal. a plan not a support
In order to create a plan for acceptance of LGBTQ+ community in the world or a particular region, we need to follow a few steps:
Conducting a survey: We need to conduct a survey in order to know what people think about the LGBTQ+ community and how much they are accepting them. Based on the survey result we can plan a strategy.
Awareness programs: In the plan, we must include various awareness programs which can be in the form of social media campaigns, posters or pamphlets distributed in public places, advertisements in newspapers, or public service announcements that promote acceptance and inclusivity of the LGBTQ+ community. The campaign should target all age groups and educational levels.
Enforcement of laws and regulations: The laws regarding the protection of the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals should be implemented and enforced strictly so that people are made aware that discrimination against them is illegal.
Providing counseling: To help individuals who may be struggling with accepting the LGBTQ+ community, it is important to provide them with counseling services. Counseling can be in the form of a helpline or individual counseling sessions.
The plan should be created after a survey has been conducted to know people's views regarding the LGBTQ+ community. The plan should include awareness programs, strict implementation of laws and regulations, and counseling services.
Learn more about LGBTQ+ community: https://brainly.com/question/19511344
#SPJ11
Abortion is one of the most difficult and controversial moral issues we will consider. Listen to both sides, even if it is difficult to do. Both sides have important moral insights, even if ultimately these insights are outweighed by the insights of the other side. The goal of this discussion is not to convince you to accept one position over the other, but to help you to understand both sides. As you consider this difficult issue, it is important to distinguish two questions:
Is abortion morally wrong?
Should abortion be illegal?
Choose one of the questions above and argue both sides with supporting evidence.
Abortion is one of the most controversial issues and moral dilemmas in the society. The discussion about the legalization of abortion started during the women's liberation movement in the 1960s. Since then, it has become a debatable topic and divided the world into two opinions. Abortion refers to the termination of pregnancy, and it is mostly done in the first trimester of the pregnancy. There are two sides of this issue, one is whether abortion is morally wrong, and the other is whether it should be illegal. The first question, "Is abortion morally wrong?" is the foundation of the entire discussion about abortion. Those who are pro-life consider abortion morally wrong because it violates the life and dignity of the fetus, which should be considered as a human being. They believe that life begins at conception, and it is not right to kill a baby that has started its life.
According to the pro-life side, abortion is equivalent to murder because it is the killing of an innocent human being that has the right to live. Moreover, there is an argument that says that a woman cannot choose to abort her fetus because she is not the one who created life. God created life, and no one can take it away.On the other hand, the pro-choice side argues that abortion is not morally wrong. They believe that women have the right to choose what they do with their bodies, and they should have the right to decide whether they want to have a baby or not. The pro-choice side argues that a woman has the right to her own body, and she should be able to choose what to do with it. In addition, the pro-choice side argues that some women cannot have children because of medical reasons, and they should have the option to terminate their pregnancy if they want to.
The second question, "Should abortion be illegal?" is the second part of the abortion debate. Those who are pro-life believe that abortion should be illegal because it is morally wrong. They believe that if abortion is legalized, it will lead to the death of more innocent babies. They also argue that there are other options available for women who are not ready to have a baby, such as adoption.On the other hand, the pro-choice side argues that abortion should be legal. They believe that if abortion is illegal, women will still try to terminate their pregnancy, but they will do it in an unsafe and unregulated way, which will lead to health problems or even death.
According to them, women should have the right to choose, and it is not up to the government to decide what they do with their bodies. In conclusion, abortion is a moral dilemma that is divided into two sides, pro-life and pro-choice. Both sides have their own arguments and beliefs that are backed up with strong evidence and reasoning. While it is difficult to choose one side over the other, it is important to listen to both sides and understand their opinions. Ultimately, the decision about whether abortion is morally wrong or should be illegal should be left to individuals, and it is up to them to decide what they believe is right.
Learn more about Abortion
https://brainly.com/question/30917522
#SPJ11
When considering the moral issue of abortion, it is important to distinguish between whether it is morally wrong and whether it should be illegal. Arguments for abortion being morally wrong involve the right to life and religious beliefs, while arguments for it being morally acceptable emphasize women's autonomy and considerations about the quality of life and health risks.
Explanation:When considering the moral issue of abortion, it is important to distinguish between whether abortion is morally wrong and whether it should be illegal.
Arguments for abortion being morally wrong:The right to life: Some argue that abortion is morally wrong because it violates the right to life of the unborn fetus.Religious beliefs: Many religious individuals believe that human life begins at conception and that aborting a fetus is morally equivalent to killing a human being.Consistency: Some argue that if we consider killing a born human being morally wrong, then it follows that killing an unborn fetus is also morally wrong.Arguments for abortion being morally acceptable:Women's autonomy: Proponents argue that a woman has the right to make decisions about her own body, including whether or not to continue a pregnancy.Quality of life: Some argue that it is morally acceptable to abort a fetus if it is likely to have a severely compromised quality of life, such as in cases of severe genetic abnormalities.Health risks: In cases where continuing a pregnancy poses significant health risks to the mother, proponents argue that abortion is morally acceptable to protect the woman's well-being.In conclusion, the moral question of abortion is complex and often elicits strong opinions. The arguments for abortion being morally wrong center around the right to life and religious beliefs, while the arguments for it being morally acceptable emphasize women's autonomy and considerations about the quality of life and health risks.
Learn more about the Morality of abortion here:https://brainly.com/question/33716042
#SPJ2
In educational settings, what types of decisions do specialists or administrators at higher levels (e.g., district, state, national) typically make from tests? a.Selecting and placing students into programs, counseling and guiding students in career options. b. Evaluating student performance, diagnosing student strengths and difficulties, and adjusting their instructional methods. c. Evaluating the effectiveness of an educational program, deciding whether to continue supporting and allocating money to such programs.
The following types of decisions are frequently made using examinations in educational contexts by specialists or administrators at higher levels (e.g., district, state, national).
determining whether to continue supporting and funding educational initiatives after evaluating their performance. assessing student performance, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, and modifying their teaching strategies. deciding which students to accept into programs. provide career advice and guidance to students. In educational environments, decisions are made through educational tests.
Administrators and specialists frequently make the following types of choices at higher levels, such as district, state, or national levels:
determining whether to continue funding and supporting educational initiatives after evaluating their efficacy: Examining the effectiveness of a curriculum is one of the key purposes of test results. Test results can be used by district and state authorities to assess a program's effectiveness and determine how much funding and resources to devote to it. assessing student performance, identifying student strengths and weaknesses, and modifying their teaching strategies The findings of the tests can be used by educators to assess students' academic performance, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and modify their lesson plans as necessary.
Teachers can create lesson plans that specifically target students' deficiencies and aid in their improvement by recognizing where the students are succeeding or struggling. choosing students and assigning them to programs: Educational assessments are also used to place students in advanced placement classes, gifted and talented programs, special education programs, and other specialized programs. Students that fit the requirements for a certain program are found using test results, and they are then assigned to the proper program. Career counseling and guidance for students: Test results can help students and their families make decisions about their futures in education and employment. Students frequently use tests to help them identify their talents, interests, and career prospects. Examples of these exams include aptitude tests and career interest inventories. In order to attain their career goals, students can use the exam results to guide them in selecting the appropriate courses and educational opportunities.
To read more about how education can help:
https://brainly.com/question/919597
#SPJ11
N13. The young people that fought for desegregation in the Freedom Rides and the Woolworth's Sit-Ins were willing to vandalize public property and attack law enforcement officers if they were attacked first.
True
False
The statement, "The young people that fought for desegregation in the Freedom Rides and the Woolworth's Sit-Ins were willing to vandalize public property and attack law enforcement officers if they were attacked first" is False.
The young people that fought for desegregation in the Freedom Rides and the Woolworth's Sit-Ins were the Civil Rights Activists who were mostly African Americans that had a peaceful approach towards the freedom movement. They fought for their rights by participating in the Freedom Rides which was a campaign aimed to integrate interstate buses and to protest against the segregation in public transportation.
They also participated in the Woolworth's Sit-Ins which was a series of nonviolent protests led by college students in the 1960s. These activists practiced non-violent resistance to fight against discrimination, segregation, and inequality. They were trained in non-violent tactics such as peaceful protests, sit-ins, and boycotts.
These activists were not willing to vandalize public property or attack law enforcement officers as they believed in peaceful protests and were guided by the principles of nonviolence. Hence, the given statement is False.
Learn more about law enforcement officers: https://brainly.com/question/12071867
#SPJ11
Write a long introduction about sexual harassment by religious
preacher in Malaysia?
Sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia is a widespread problem that affects women from all walks of life.In recent years, there have been numerous reports of religious preachers using their position of power to sexually harass women.
Sexual harassment refers to any unwanted behavior of a sexual nature that is both uninvited and offensive. Such behavior may include physical advances, sexual propositions, groping, and other forms of verbal or physical abuse.
These reports have been met with outrage and calls for action from members of the public and advocacy groups alike. There have been instances of women being coerced into sexual relationships with religious leaders, while others have been subjected to lewd and obscene behavior.
There are many reasons why sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia continues to be a problem. One of the main reasons is the fact that religious figures are often held in high regard by members of the public.
This means that victims of sexual harassment may be reluctant to come forward and speak out about their experiences, for fear of being disbelieved or ostracized from their communities.
The process of addressing sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia involves a number of different steps. The first step is for victims to come forward and report their experiences to the relevant authorities.
This may involve filing a police report or reaching out to advocacy groups for support and guidance. Once a report has been made, it is then up to law enforcement officials to investigate the allegations and bring charges against the perpetrator if necessary.
This process can be lengthy and difficult, particularly if the victim does not have the support of their community or is facing other obstacles such as poverty or discrimination.
In conclusion, sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia is a serious problem that requires urgent action.
While there have been some efforts to address this issue in recent years, more needs to be done to raise awareness and provide support to victims of sexual harassment. By working together, we can create a safer and more equitable society for all Malaysians.
Learn more about Malaysia: https://brainly.com/question/30975910
#SPJ11
Choose a current event and or personal experience that
you can relate to the readings:
Write an APA formatted paper
Journal on Human Genetics.
Minimum 1300 words.
Human genetics refers to the study of inherited genes, genetic variation, and the manner in which these genetic components relate to different physiological and pathological conditions in human beings (The Human Genome Project, 2017).
The paper focuses on a current event related to human genetics, namely the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. The objective of the paper is to discuss the history, benefits, ethical concerns, and potential future developments of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. History of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is a new concept that was introduced in the 1990s when the Human Genome Project was launched. The first company to offer this service was Gene Tree, which started operating in 1997 (Carroll, 2019).
Benefits of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingDirect-to-consumer genetic testing has several benefits, including the following:
Personalized medicine: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing enables individuals to understand their genetic makeup and identify the potential risk factors for different medical conditions.
Genealogy research: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing enables individuals to trace their ancestry and learn more about their ethnic background.
Reproductive health: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing enables individuals to identify genetic mutations that may be passed down to their children.
Ethical Concerns of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingDirect-to-consumer genetic testing has also raised several ethical concerns, including the following:
Accuracy of results: Some genetic testing companies have been criticized for providing inaccurate or misleading results to their clients.
Informed consent: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing may not always obtain informed consent from their clients, particularly when the test results have implications on other family members.
Data privacy: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies may share their clients' genetic information with third-party companies without their clients' consent.
Future Developments of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingThe future developments of direct-to-consumer genetic testing are likely to focus on the following areas:
Wider range of tests: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies are likely to offer a wider range of tests that can identify more genetic markers associated with different medical conditions.
Integration with electronic health records: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is likely to be integrated with electronic health records to enable healthcare providers to offer more personalized medical care.
Conclusion, direct-to-consumer genetic testing has several benefits, including personalized medicine, genealogy research, and reproductive health. However, it also raises several ethical concerns, such as accuracy of results, informed consent, and data privacy. Future developments of direct-to-consumer genetic testing are likely to focus on a wider range of tests and integration with electronic health records. The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing is, therefore, essential to protect consumers' interests and ensure that the results are accurate and reliable.
Learn more about Human genetics visit : brainly.com/question/29548100
#SPJ11
A local track coach was informed his student is in an ABA class. He asks the student for advice about how to teach new members of the team to correctly jump hurtles.
A) Briefly describe how a behavior analyst would approach this concern using Behavioral language
B) Teach your friend how to address this concern by writing what you would say/write to them (i.e pretend you are talking to them to help them address the concern). Be specific about what your friend should do and use language they would likely understand.
A) A behavior analyst would approach this concern by breaking down the task of correctly jumping hurdles into smaller, measurable components.
They would focus on identifying the specific behaviors that need to be targeted and defined, such as approach speed, stride length, takeoff technique, and landing position. The behavior analyst would then use systematic and data-driven strategies to teach and reinforce these behaviors, utilizing methods such as modeling, prompting, shaping, and positive reinforcement. They would monitor progress by collecting data on each athlete's performance and adjust the teaching strategies as necessary based on the data.
B) Hey Coach, to teach new members of the team to correctly jump hurdles, here's what you can do. Start by demonstrating the correct technique yourself, showing them how to approach the hurdle, take off, and land. Break down the whole process into smaller steps, like practicing approach speed first.
Give clear instructions and provide visual cues to guide them. Encourage them to practice repeatedly and give positive feedback when they make progress. Use small rewards or praise to motivate them. Keep track of each athlete's performance by taking notes or using a scoring system.
Learn more about Behavioral language here
https://brainly.com/question/32104541
#SPJ4
the smell in our office (incense, eucalyptus, floral sprays) also sends messages. what is your impression of a business executive when you walk into her office and it smells like
Incense
Floral spray
The smell in our office also sends messages. A business executive who uses incense and floral sprays is probably seeking to create a relaxing and calming environment. Such an executive is probably aiming to create a more homey feel to the office space.
Using such scents can also help to make the workspace more inviting for clients who visit the executive in their office. It could indicate that the executive is a person who takes care of their well-being, and by extension, those of their employees. The executive would be seen as a thoughtful and detail-oriented person who values their staff and clients' comfort and well-being.
This could create an impression that the executive cares about their workspace environment. Clients may be inclined to relax and feel more comfortable in the space. Overall, the use of incense and floral sprays sends the message that the executive has a keen sense of detail and is mindful of the space's ambiance.
To know more about business executive visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32175816
#SPJ11
After an afternoon of Christmas shopping in Toronto, Jay got off the subway and witnessed a violent man attack a woman on the subway platform. He quickly intervened and stopped the man. Other people clearly also noticed the attack, but did not do anything about it. What best explains other people's failure to intervene when witnessing this attack? O The chameleon effect O The bystander effect O The Robbers Cave Experiment O Misattribution of arousal
The best explanation for other people's failure to intervene when witnessing the attack is the bystander effect.
What is the bystander effect?The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to the tendency for individuals to be less likely to provide assistance during an emergency situation when other people are present.
The presence of other people around makes it less likely for an individual to step forward and help, which is known as the bystander effect. The main answer for the question above is: "The best explanation for other people's failure to intervene when witnessing the attack is the bystander effect."
In the given scenario, the bystander effect is the most evident reason why other people around the subway platform did not intervene when Jay intervened and stopped the violent man from attacking the woman.
Learn more about bystander effect: https://brainly.com/question/3164279
#SPJ11
This is a Multiple Choice Question. Select the ONE answer you think is correct.
Why did the Byzantines reject the western insistence on "the primacy of the pope," based on the text Matthew 16:18-19
("Thou Art Peter and upon this rock I will build my church")?
Because Byzantines regarded the text as a false addition
(interpolation) to scripture, deliberately contrived by an early pope to foster the claims of Rome.
Because Byzantines believed that westerners
were misreading this text — taking it out of context, and not understanding its importance in connection with other New Testament passages, where Christ confers the "power of binding and loosing" on all the apostles.
The conflict between Rome and Constantinople was essentially political, and debates over the meaning of this text played little role in episodes of tension and conflict.
The Byzantines rejected the Western insistence on "the primacy of the pope" because they believed that Westerners were misreading the text (Matthew 16:18-19) by taking it out of context and not understanding its importance in connection with other New Testament passages where Christ confers the "power of binding and loosing" on all the apostles. (2)
The Byzantines did not view the text as a false addition to scripture deliberately contrived by an early pope to foster the claims of Rome. Instead, they believed that the primacy of the pope was based on a misinterpretation of the text and that the power given to Peter in the passage was meant to be shared among all the apostles. The conflict between Rome and Constantinople was primarily political, and debates over the meaning of this text played a lesser role in episodes of tension and conflict.
Learn more about Byzantines
https://brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ11
This is a Multiple Choice Question. Select the ONE answer you think is correct.
Why did the Byzantines reject the western insistence on "the primacy of the pope," based on the text Matthew 16:18-19
("Thou Art Peter and upon this rock I will build my church")?
Because Byzantines regarded the text as a false addition (interpolation) to scripture, deliberately contrived by an early pope to foster the claims of Rome.Because Byzantines believed that Westerners were misreading this text — taking it out of context, and not understanding its importance in connection with other New Testament passages, where Christ confers the "power of binding and loosing" on all the apostles.The conflict between Rome and Constantinople was essentially political, and debates over the meaning of this text played little role in episodes of tension and conflictMuslims do not believe human beings are born with sin. Where Christians believe the human problem is sin, Muslims believe the human problem is pride. What do you think this distinction means? Can you point to specific beliefs and practices in Islam that suggest human pride is a problem? Response in 250 words or more.
The difference between Muslims and Christians concerning the human problem is sin and pride, respectively, lies in their fundamental religious beliefs.
Muslims do not believe that human beings are born with sin while Christians believe the human problem is sin. On the other hand, Muslims believe the human problem is pride.
Therefore, the distinction between the two beliefs is that Christians believe the solution to the human problem is accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior while Muslims believe that the solution is submission to God’s will or the Five Pillars of Islam. This distinction means that both Christians and Muslims have different solutions to human problems based on their fundamental beliefs.
Muslims believe that human pride is a problem. This belief is grounded in the Islamic doctrine of tawhid (oneness of God), which teaches that God is the only worthy of worship and that all human beings should submit to God's will. Muslims believe that human pride is the opposite of this submission to God, as it promotes self-centeredness, arrogance, and egotism. The Quran teaches that pride is one of the most severe sins and that those who exhibit it will be punished severely in the afterlife.
Some of the practices in Islam that suggest human pride is a problem include the requirement of humility in prayer, fasting, and the giving of zakat (charity). Muslims must perform these acts with sincerity and humility, acknowledging that their deeds are ultimately for the sake of Allah and not for their glory. This encourages humility and selflessness, which are essential in overcoming human pride.
Additionally, Muslims must perform hajj (pilgrimage) to Mecca at least once in their lifetime, which involves giving up their material possessions and demonstrating their submission to Allah.
Read more about beliefs and practices in Islam here:
https://brainly.com/question/29526278
#SPJ11
What is Papal Primacy? What affect did this have on
relationships between the church and Western secular governments?
Eastern secular governments?
Papal Primacy refers to the supreme authority of the Pope of Rome, who is regarded by Roman Catholics as the head of the entire Christian Church, according to Christian religious practices. Papal Primacy means that the Pope of Rome has the power to act as the ultimate authority in religious matters, especially in the West. This notion is based on the idea that the Pope of Rome was the direct successor of Saint Peter, the apostle of Jesus, who was regarded as the founder of the Christian Church by the Roman Catholic Church.
The Papal Primacy had significant effects on the relationships between the Church and Western secular governments, as well as Eastern secular governments. In the Western world, the Church's power was primarily centralized in the Pope of Rome, who was regarded as the supreme religious authority. He was the final authority on all religious matters and had the power to excommunicate any ruler who refused to obey the Church's dictates.
Thus, the Popes were able to exercise significant influence over the Western secular governments during the Middle Ages. For example, the Popes were able to secure the support of the Holy Roman Emperor, Charlemagne, and other European monarchs.
However, in the Eastern world, where the Byzantine Empire was the dominant power, the Papal Primacy was not recognized, and the Eastern Orthodox Church was the dominant religious institution. Thus, the relationship between the Church and the Eastern secular governments was more complex. The Byzantine Emperors and the Patriarchs of Constantinople (the spiritual leaders of the Eastern Orthodox Church) were often in conflict, with each claiming authority over the other.
Thus, the Papal Primacy had a significant effect on the relationship between the Church and Western secular governments, and its impact was less significant in the Eastern world.
Learn more about secular governments: https://brainly.com/question/32345640
#SPJ11
Can threats to people's social (i.e. group) identity lead to deviant attitudes and behaviors? Belmi et al. (2015) sought to answer this question. They had 188 self-identified Black American college students and 123 self-identified White American college students complete three sets of self-reported measures. The first set asked whether the student worried about being seen negatively in school because of their ethnicity. The second set asked whether the student felt and expected to be disrespected at school. The final set asked whether the student engaged in delinquent behaviors at school in the past year (e.g. cheating on a test, copying someone else's work, picking a fight, using drugs, etc.). As predicted, the authors found that the more students worried about being seen negatively in school because of their ethnicity, the more likely they were to engage in social deviance, though this relationship occurred only for Black American students. The same finding occurred for the disrespected variable. That is, the more students worried about being seen negatively in school because of their ethnicity, the more likely they felt disrespected. A. Did the study establish covariance (a change in one variable led to a change in the other)? Explain. B. Did the study establish temporal precedence (a change in one variable preceded a change in the other)? Explain. C. Did the study eliminate alternative explanations? Explain. D. Is the study design causal (experimental), correlational, or quasi-experimental?
The study found that worries about being seen negatively due to ethnicity were related to engagement in social deviance among Black American college students, but not among White American students, suggesting a potential influence of social identity on deviant attitudes and behaviors.
A. The study established covariance because there was a significant relationship between students' worries about being seen negatively in school due to their ethnicity and their engagement in social deviance. The more students worried, the more likely they were to engage in deviant behaviors.
B. The study did not establish temporal precedence. While the study found a relationship between worries about being seen negatively and engagement in deviant behaviors, it does not provide evidence of which variable preceded the other. It is possible that both variables are influenced by other underlying factors.
C. The study attempted to eliminate alternative explanations by focusing on self-identified Black American and White American college students. By examining the relationship specifically within these racial groups, the authors aimed to minimize alternative explanations related to other factors. However, other unmeasured variables could still potentially account for the observed relationship.
D. The study design is correlational. The researchers examined the relationship between variables but did not manipulate or control any variables. They observed and measured the variables as they naturally occurred.
To know more about study design, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/32235638#
#SPJ11
Describe the additional participants and procedure in a
pluralistic walkthrough
A pluralistic walkthrough includes additional participants such as business analysts, developers, and users. The procedure involves reviewing the system by an independent group.
The pluralistic walkthrough is a software testing technique that involves a group of participants or reviewers, who review the system independently. The reviewers include business analysts, developers, users, testers, and others. Pluralistic walkthroughs usually involve around six to ten participants. In this walkthrough, the focus is on the verification of each aspect of the system. For instance, testers and developers focus on whether the system meets the intended design and user requirements. In addition to the participants, the procedure of pluralistic walkthroughs involves several steps. Firstly, the moderator distributes a document to the participants, which contains information about the system under review.
The reviewers go through the document individually and make notes of any questions or issues they come across. Secondly, the participants discuss the issues and questions and reach a consensus on how to proceed with the review. The moderator records the consensus reached and makes note of any unresolved issues. Finally, the moderator and participants report their findings and recommendations, which are used to improve the system. Overall, pluralistic walkthroughs are useful because they provide a diverse set of perspectives, which can help identify more issues and improve the system.
To know more about the walkthrough visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32270932
#SPJ11
List these factors and explain why the absence of these would be a problem. Would the presence of them motivate you? What about satisfiers-what satisfiers do you think motivate you the most? Why? Hygiene factors of most concern to you Why would the absence of these factors be a problem? Would the presence of them motivate you? What satisfiers do you think motivate you the most? Why
Absence of hygiene factors causes dissatisfaction. Their presence doesn't motivate, but prevents dissatisfaction. Satisfiers motivate through achievement, recognition, and responsibility.
It seems like you are referring to Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, which categorizes factors that influence job satisfaction and motivation in the workplace. According to this theory, there are hygiene factors and satisfiers (also known as motivators). Let's break it down:
Hygiene Factors:
1. Job Security: The absence of job security can create anxiety and uncertainty, negatively impacting job satisfaction and motivation. The presence of job security provides stability and peace of mind.
2. Salary and Benefits: Inadequate compensation or lack of desired benefits can lead to dissatisfaction. Fair and competitive salaries, along with comprehensive benefits, contribute to overall job satisfaction.
3. Working Conditions: Unfavorable working conditions, such as poor physical environment or lack of necessary resources, can demotivate employees. A comfortable and well-equipped work environment enhances satisfaction and productivity.
4. Interpersonal Relationships: Negative workplace relationships, conflicts, or lack of support can negatively affect job satisfaction. Positive and healthy interpersonal connections foster a supportive and motivating work environment.
5. Organizational Policies: Unfair or unclear policies can create frustration and dissatisfaction. Well-defined and equitable policies contribute to a positive work atmosphere.
Satisfiers (Motivators):
1. Achievement: Feeling a sense of accomplishment and growth in one's work motivates individuals. Challenging tasks, opportunities for personal development, and recognition drive job satisfaction.
2. Recognition: Acknowledgment and appreciation for one's contributions and achievements enhance motivation and job satisfaction.
3. Responsibility: Granting autonomy, decision-making authority, and meaningful responsibilities provide individuals with a sense of ownership and motivation in their work.
4. Advancement: Opportunities for career growth, promotion, and professional advancement act as motivators for many employees.
5. Work itself: Engaging and fulfilling tasks that align with individual interests and skills promote motivation and job satisfaction.
The absence of hygiene factors can create dissatisfaction and demotivation, whereas their presence does not necessarily lead to high motivation but prevents dissatisfaction. Satisfiers, on the other hand, directly contribute to motivation and job satisfaction when present.
As an AI language model, I don't possess personal motivations or job satisfaction. However, individuals are motivated by different factors based on their unique needs, values, and preferences. Some people may be primarily motivated by achievement and recognition, while others may prioritize autonomy and personal growth.
It's important to note that everyone's motivators can vary, and individuals should identify their own key factors to enhance job satisfaction and motivation in their specific context.
Learn more about hygiene factors
brainly.com/question/28895947
#SPJ11
You have just conducted a functional assessment for Larry’s problem behaviors of hitting, screaming, and kicking. You hypothesize that when Larry’s dad tells him "no" and Larry throws a tantrum, his dad reinforces his problem behaviors by sitting down and talking with him. What two conditions (experimental and control condition) would you use in a functional analysis (where you are manipulating the consequence) to determine your hypothesis is correct?
In the experimental condition, the response class would be reinforced each time, while in the control condition, it would not be reinforced.
The two conditions that could be used in a functional analysis to determine the hypothesis are as follows:
Experimental condition: This condition would manipulate the consequences for the behavior of the person being observed. The response class that includes the behaviors of hitting, screaming, and kicking could be chosen for Larry. In the experimental condition, the consequence of the behavior would be to reinforce the behavior every time it occurs. Control condition: This condition would provide information about the role of different environmental events or contexts in the occurrence of the target behavior. In the control condition, Larry’s dad would not reinforce the behaviors of hitting, screaming, and kicking.
to know about experimental condition visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28480517
#SPJ11
Correctional boot camps are considered the most unpopular
sentencing alternative. Why? What do you believe is a better
alternative?
It is important to approach criminal justice with a focus on rehabilitation, treatment, and addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior to achieve long-term positive outcomes.
Correctional boot camps are often considered unpopular as a sentencing alternative due to several reasons:
Effectiveness: There is limited evidence to support the long-term effectiveness of correctional boot camps in reducing recidivism rates or promoting positive behavioral changes.
Some studies have found that the impact of boot camps on reducing criminal behavior is short-lived once participants return to their communities.
Harsh and Punitive Approach: Boot camps typically employ a military-style disciplinary approach, which can involve strict rules, physical exertion, and intense discipline.
This approach may not be suitable for all individuals and may be perceived as overly harsh or degrading by some.
Lack of Individualized Treatment: Boot camps typically follow a standardized program that may not adequately address the specific needs and underlying issues of each participant.
Personalized treatment and rehabilitation plans are often more effective in addressing the root causes of criminal behavior.
Limited Focus on Rehabilitation: Boot camps primarily focus on discipline, physical fitness, and military-style training, but they may lack sufficient emphasis on rehabilitation, therapy, and skill-building to help individuals reintegrate into society successfully.
A better alternative to correctional boot camps would be a comprehensive and individualized approach that prioritizes rehabilitation, treatment, and community reintegration.
Some alternatives that have shown promise in reducing recidivism rates include:
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT programs aim to address the cognitive distortions and patterns of thinking that contribute to criminal behavior. By helping individuals develop pro-social attitudes and skills, CBT can promote long-term behavioral change.
Substance Abuse Treatment: Many individuals involved in the criminal justice system struggle with substance abuse issues. Providing access to evidence-based substance abuse treatment programs can address the underlying causes of criminal behavior and reduce the likelihood of reoffending.
Vocational Training and Education: Equipping individuals with job skills, education, and vocational training can significantly improve their chances of finding stable employment upon release, reducing the likelihood of recidivism.
Community-Based Programs: Diverting non-violent offenders to community-based programs such as probation, restorative justice initiatives, and community service can promote accountability, provide necessary support, and encourage reintegration into the community.
to learn more about criminal behavior.
https://brainly.com/question/32241057
#SPJ11
A representative sample is one that resembles the population
from which it was drawn in all the ways that are important for the
research being conducted.
Group of answer choices
True
False
A representative sample is one that resembles the population from which it was drawn in all the ways that are important for the research being conducted. The statement is False.
A representative sample should not resemble the populace in all methods. It is chosen in a way that accurately displays the key characteristics and variety of the populace below take a look at.
The purpose is to seize the critical attributes and variability of the populace while not having to include each unmarried person. The vital element is to ensure that the pattern is consultant of the populace in terms of applicable variables and factors which might be crucial to the studies being carried out.
By obtaining a consultant sample, researchers can make legitimate inferences and draw conclusions about the bigger populace with an affordable stage of self-belief. However, it's miles important to note that a complete resemblance to the populace in all factors won't be possible or vital for powerful research.
To know more about the representative sample,
https://brainly.com/question/30490266
#SPJ4
8.667 points A study has high "reliability" if the questions accurately measure what the researcher intended to measure. True False
A study has high "reliability" if the questions accurately measure what the researcher intended to measure. This statement is True. Reliability refers to the degree to which a measure is consistent and stable over time. Reliability, in the context of research, refers to the consistency of a research study or measuring test.
A reliable research study or measuring tool is one that is constant over time and across different research scenarios. A study or measure is deemed to be reliable if the findings from that research study are consistent, reliable, and repeatable. For example, if a measure of anxiety produces the same results for the same subject each time it is administered, it is considered a reliable measure.To assess the reliability of a study, researchers utilize different techniques and procedures. The test-retest technique, the split-half technique, and the parallel forms technique are among the most popular techniques for assessing research reliability. In addition, the inter-rater technique is used to test inter-observer reliability.The internal consistency of a test or research study is measured using the split-half approach. The test or study is divided into two halves, and the outcomes of the two halves are compared to assess the study's consistency. The parallel forms technique compares two different versions of the same test to see whether they produce comparable results.Lastly, it can be concluded that a study is considered reliable when the findings obtained from the study are consistent, stable, and reproducible. It is beneficial since a reliable study aids in replicating the findings, making them generalizable and applicable to the population being studied.For such more question on reliability
https://brainly.com/question/28343205
#SPJ8
The fact that experienced smartphone users can transmit more messages than new
smartphone users refers to what?
Communication proficiency
Communication property
Communication proprietary
Communication performance
Communication priority
What is Communication Proficiency?Communication proficiency refers to the ability to communicate with others efficiently and effectively.
It involves being able to express oneself and understand others in various contexts. Communication proficiency includes speaking, listening, reading, and writing skills as well as the ability to convey messages using nonverbal cues such as facial expressions, tone of voice, and body language.In the context of smartphones, communication proficiency refers to the ability to transmit messages using the device.
Experienced smartphone users have likely developed communication proficiency through practice and familiarity with the device, enabling them to transmit more messages than new smartphone users.
Read more about Communication here;https://brainly.com/question/28153246
#SPJ11
Devaluation of the testimony by cross-examination is referred to as ________ in the field of evidence.
Devaluation of the testimony by cross-examination is referred to as impeachment in the field of evidence.
Impeachment of a witness refers to the process of discrediting or undermining the credibility of a witness during a trial, by presenting evidence or asking questions that contradict their testimony or reveal a bias, inconsistency, or falsehood in their statements. It is a common strategy used by attorneys to challenge the veracity of a witness and to cast doubt on the reliability of their testimony.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has ruled that a party may impeach a witness by cross-examining them regarding specific instances of behavior that demonstrate their lack of credibility, provided that the questions are relevant to the witness's character for truthfulness.
Thus, impeachment of an evidence is the devaluation of testimony by cross-examination.
Learn about impeachment here:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ12
Describe the structure of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. B. Identify FOUR (4) functions of the U.K Parliament. C. Examine THREE (3) differences between the U.S Presidential System and the U.K
Parliamentary System of Government.
A. The structure of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is bicameral, consisting of the House of Commons and the House of Lords.
B. The functions of the U.K. Parliament include legislation, scrutiny and oversight, representation, and debate and decision-making.
C. The U.S. Presidential System differs from the U.K. Parliamentary System in terms of executive structure, separation of powers, and fixed terms and flexibility.
A. The Parliament of the United Kingdom is a bicameral legislative body consisting of two houses: the House of Commons and the House of Lords. It serves as the supreme legislative authority in the country, responsible for making and passing laws.
The House of Commons is composed of Members of Parliament (MPs) who are elected by the public through general elections. It is the more powerful and influential house, as it holds the majority of legislative authority. The House of Lords, on the other hand, is composed of appointed members, including life peers, hereditary peers, and bishops. While it can propose amendments and delay legislation, it has limited legislative power compared to the House of Commons.
B. The functions of the U.K. Parliament are as follows:
1. Legislation: The Parliament is responsible for creating, amending, and repealing laws. Members of Parliament introduce bills, which are discussed, debated, and voted upon in both houses before becoming law.
2. Scrutiny and Oversight: Parliament plays a vital role in holding the government accountable. MPs scrutinize government policies, actions, and expenditures through debates, committee inquiries, and question times. This ensures transparency and helps prevent misuse of power.
3. Representation: Members of Parliament act as representatives of their constituents. They voice their concerns, advocate for their interests, and raise important issues on their behalf. This allows citizens to participate in the democratic process and have their voices heard.
4. Debate and Decision-making: Parliament serves as a forum for robust debates on national issues. MPs from different political parties discuss and deliberate on matters of public importance, enabling informed decision-making and shaping government policies.
C. The U.S. Presidential System and the U.K. Parliamentary System of Government differ in several key aspects:
1. Executive Structure: In the U.S., the President is the head of state and government, elected separately from the legislature. The President holds significant executive powers, including the ability to veto legislation. In the U.K., the Prime Minister, who is the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons, serves as the head of government, while the monarch acts as the symbolic head of state.
2. Separation of Powers: The U.S. system employs a strict separation of powers between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, with each having independent powers and checks on the others. In contrast, the U.K. system has a fusion of powers, where the executive (Prime Minister and Cabinet) is drawn from and remains accountable to the legislature (Parliament).
3. Fixed Terms and Flexibility: In the U.S., both the President and members of Congress serve fixed terms, with specific election cycles. This ensures stability and predictability in governance. In the U.K., the Prime Minister can call for a general election at any time, allowing for more flexibility and potentially leading to changes in government more frequently.
Learn more about Parliament
brainly.com/question/1146179
#SPJ11
Mary is the mother of 3-year-old Hailey. Hailey tends to have a varied appetite, eating more on some days than others. She is also about eight pounds overweight. Mary frequently worries about Hailey's eating habits and urges her to clean her plate at every meal, offering snacks as rewards for eating. Explain why Mary's approach is problematic.
Mary's approach to managing Hailey's eating habits is problematic for several reasons: Pressure to clean the plate, using food as a reward, ignoring appetite variability, Focusing on weight rather than health.
Pressure to clean the plate: Mary's insistence on Hailey cleaning her plate at every meal can lead to a negative relationship with food. It teaches Hailey to ignore her natural hunger and fullness cues and overrides her ability to self-regulate her eating. This can contribute to overeating and the development of unhealthy eating patterns.
Using food as a reward: Offering snacks as rewards for eating can create an unhealthy association between food and emotional rewards. It can lead Hailey to develop an emotional dependence on food and may contribute to unhealthy eating habits in the long run.
Ignoring appetite variability: Children naturally have varying appetites, with some days eating more and others eating less. It is normal for their intake to fluctuate, and trying to force consistent portion sizes disregards their individual needs. By pressuring Hailey to eat a specific amount, Mary may disrupt her innate ability to self-regulate her food intake.
Focusing on weight rather than health: Mary's concern about Hailey being overweight may inadvertently promote an unhealthy focus on body weight rather than overall health and well-being. Placing emphasis solely on weight can contribute to negative body image, disordered eating patterns, and an unhealthy relationship with food.
A more balanced approach would involve fostering a positive food environment, providing a variety of nutritious foods, and allowing Hailey to follow her own internal hunger and fullness cues. Encouraging a healthy relationship with food, promoting enjoyable physical activities, and focusing on overall well-being rather than weight would be more beneficial for Hailey's long-term health and development.
To know more about variability, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15078630
#SPJ11
Correct the italicized sentence fragment shown below. Rewrite it into a complete sentence.
Because they were so tired of war.
6. Write a sentence that you make up using the word there.
7. Write a sentence that you make up using the word their.
8. Write a sentence that you make up using the word they're.
9. Write a sentence that you make up using the word it's.
10. Write a sentence that you make up using the word its.
The sentence fragment "Because they were so tired of war" can be revised into a complete sentence: "Because they were so tired of war, they decided to pursue a peaceful life ahead." Additionally, here are sentences using the words "there," "their," "they're," "it's," and "its": "There is a cat sitting on the window sill," "They donated their clothes to the charity," "They're planning to celebrate their anniversary next month," "It's raining heavily today," and "The company is well-known for its customer service."
The italicized sentence fragment given, "Because they were so tired of war" is a dependent clause and requires an independent clause to form a complete sentence. Thus, the sentence can be revised as follows:
Because they were so tired of war, they decided to pursue a peaceful life ahead.
Here are a few sentences for the given words:
There: There is a cat sitting on the window sill.
Their: They donated their clothes to the charity.
They're: They're planning to celebrate their anniversary next month.
It's: It's raining heavily today.
Its: The company is well-known for its customer service.
To know more about sentence fragment, refer to the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/11974889#
#SPJ11
Instructions: First, read the correlational study scenarios below. Then identify the variables that correlate with one another, noting which terms need to be operationally defined. Finally, provide operational definitions for those terms. You can be creative with your operational definitions—just make them clear and specific.
Scenario F: People who are involved in an intimate relationship may experience distinct, although related, feelings of liking for each other and love for each other. It is possible to like someone and not love them, of course, but it is also possible to love someone but not like them all that much (think of a couple that fights a great deal but can’t think of life without the other person, or siblings who don’t get along but feel a sense of familial love). A group of researchers wanted to examine the degree to which one’s liking for his or her partner was correlated with his or her love for that partner.
1. What is Variable #1 and how would you operationally define it?
2. What is Variable #2 and how would you operationally define it?
Scenario G: A researcher believes that the number of "daily hassles" that people experience affects the number of physical and psychological symptoms they have.
1. What is Variable #1 and how would you operationally define it?
2. What is Variable #2 and how would you operationally define it?
Scenario H: A researcher believes that there is a relationship between minority women’s experience of racism and the women’s psychological distress.
1. What is Variable #1 and how would you operationally define it?
2. What is Variable #2 and how would you operationally define it?
Scenario I: A researcher is interested in looking at the correlation between skin disease severity (psoriasis) and the fear of negative evaluation that psoriasis patients experience.
1. What is Variable #1 and how would you operationally define it?
2. What is Variable #2 and how would you operationally define it?
Scenario J: A researcher believes that a manager’s sense of humor impacts the productivity of the employees he supervises.
1. What is Variable #1 and how would you operationally define it?
2. What is Variable #2 and how would you operationally define it?
In this question, we are required to identify the variables that correlate with each other and provide operational definitions for those terms.
1. The first variable is the level of liking for the partner. The operational definition of the level of liking for the partner is the extent to which the subject feels positively towards their partner. This will be measured by rating on a scale from 1-10 with 1 being no liking and 10 being a high degree of liking.
2. The second variable is the level of love for the partner. The operational definition of the level of love for the partner is the extent to which the subject feels affectionately or romantically towards their partner. This will be measured by rating on a scale from 1-10 with 1 being no love and 10 being a high degree of love.
1. The first variable is the number of "daily hassles" that people experience. The operational definition of the number of daily hassles is the extent to which the subject experiences minor everyday irritations that disrupt their daily life. This will be measured by recording the number of daily hassles encountered in a day.
2. The second variable is the number of physical and psychological symptoms experienced. The operational definition of the number of physical and psychological symptoms experienced is the number of physical and psychological symptoms the subject experiences during or after exposure to daily hassles. This will be measured using a symptom checklist.
1. The first variable is minority women's experience of racism. The operational definition of minority women's experience of racism is the extent to which the subject experiences racism due to their minority status. This will be measured using a racism survey.
2. The second variable is psychological distress. The operational definition of psychological distress is the extent to which the subject experiences negative emotions. This will be measured using a questionnaire that asks the subject to rate their feelings on a scale from 1-10 with 1 being no distress and 10 being extreme distress.
1. The first variable is skin disease severity (psoriasis). The operational definition of skin disease severity is the extent to which the subject's psoriasis is severe. This will be measured using a severity scale, ranging from 1 (no psoriasis) to 10 (extremely severe psoriasis).
2. The second variable is the fear of negative evaluation. The operational definition of the fear of negative evaluation is the extent to which the subject fears being judged negatively by others. This will be measured using a questionnaire that asks the subject to rate their feelings on a scale from 1-10 with 1 being no fear and 10 being extreme fear.
1. The first variable is the manager's sense of humor. The operational definition of the manager's sense of humor is the extent to which the manager is perceived to be humorous by the employees. This will be measured using a questionnaire that asks the employees to rate their manager's sense of humor on a scale from 1-10 with 1 being not at all humorous and 10 being extremely humorous.
2. The second variable is employee productivity. The operational definition of employee productivity is the extent to which the employees are productive in their work. This will be measured by recording the number of tasks completed by each employee during a specific period.
Learn more about psychological distress: https://brainly.com/question/32220420
#SPJ11
What specific topic would you use for your informative speech?
Who would be your audience? Where, specifically, would you
research?
To determine the specific topic for an informative speech, several factors need consideration, including the interests of the audience, the purpose of the speech, and the audience's previous knowledge of the subject matter. The informative speech aims to inform the audience about a particular topic in an engaging and informative way.
The following is a sample informative speech topic, audience, and research area:Topic: Artificial Intelligence Audience: University StudentsResearch Area: Library and Online databases. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a popular topic among university students. The audience already has basic knowledge of the subject matter, and they are willing to learn more about it.
Furthermore, AI is an exciting topic with vast research possibilities. Additionally, the audience can relate to the subject matter, which will make the speech more engaging.Research: To research for the informative speech, the library and online databases can be used. The library has various books, journals, and magazines with relevant information about artificial intelligence.
Online databases like JSTOR, Science Direct, and Scholar are also great research areas for gathering relevant and reliable information about AI. In summary, selecting a specific topic for an informative speech is crucial.
Learn more about Artificial intelligence
https://brainly.com/question/32692650
#SPJ11