The most likely reason why loyalism to the British Crown was more concentrated around New York City than Boston is due to the city's financial importance and deep trade links to Great Britain. New York City was a major hub for the slave trade, as well as for a thriving merchant class,
Boston, on the other hand, was a smaller port city that was largely dependent on the agricultural and fishing industries, which were not as closely linked to the British Crown. Additionally, Boston was a stronghold of the Patriot cause and there were fewer Loyalists in the city.
New York City's financial importance to Great Britain meant that the Crown had a vested interest in its loyalty. Trade links between the two were long-standing, and the city had become an important hub for the slave trade. In addition, the city was home to a large merchant class, many of whom relied on the Crown for their livelihood. This provided a powerful incentive for New Yorkers to remain loyal to the British Crown.
Boston, on the other hand, was a much smaller port city than New York and its reliance on the British Crown was much less. The city was largely dependent on the agricultural and fishing industries, both of which had few ties to the British. Furthermore, Boston was a hotbed of Patriot sentiment and there were far fewer Loyalists in the city than in New York. This further contributed to a lack of loyalty to the Crown.
In conclusion, the most likely reason why loyalism to the British Crown was more concentrated around New York City than Boston was due to the city's financial importance and deep trade links to Great Britain. The city was a major hub for the slave trade, as well as for a thriving merchant class, both of which had strong ties to the British Crown.
To learn more about New York City here:
https://brainly.com/question/1206585#
#SPJ4
what was the lasting impact of preventing the large hearst and pulitzer syndicates from gaining a lasting foothold in texas journalism?
The lasting impact of preventing the large Hearst and Pulitzer syndicates from gaining a lasting foothold in Texas journalism was the promotion of diversity in the state's media landscape.
How did preventing Hearst and Pulitzer allow for Texan diversity ?In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer were two of the most powerful newspaper publishers in the United States, and their media empires dominated many local and regional markets. However, in Texas, smaller, independent newspapers were able to resist their attempts to gain a foothold, and a more diverse media landscape emerged as a result.
This diversity had several lasting impacts. First, it allowed for a greater range of perspectives and viewpoints to be represented in Texas journalism, which promoted greater civic engagement and informed public debate.
Find out more on Hearst and Pulitzer at https://brainly.com/question/944878
#SPJ1
who was the controversial french ambassador to the united states who openly recruited american volunteers to commit acts of war against england and spain?
The French ambassador to the United States who openly recruited American volunteers to commit acts of war against England and Spain was Pierre Augustin Caron de Beaumarchais.
He was a French playwright, watchmaker, entrepreneur, spy, and diplomat. He served as the French ambassador to the United States from 1777 to 1780 and worked to enlist volunteers in the American Revolution. Beaumarchais was a controversial figure as his efforts to recruit volunteers often involved smuggling weapons and munitions into the United States.
He was also accused of using the volunteers he recruited to carry out acts of piracy against English and Spanish ships. He faced several accusations and legal challenges throughout his mission, but he was ultimately exonerated of any wrongdoing.
Beaumarchais was an important figure in the American Revolution, as he helped to secure support for the rebel cause and recruit volunteers who were essential in helping to win the war. He was a controversial figure, but his efforts to recruit volunteers for the American Revolution and his willingness to take risks for the cause of freedom and democracy were invaluable to the success of the Revolutionary War.
To know more Beaumarchais French playwright about refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/30713308
#SPJ11
HELPP! Why was this case important?
After the War of 1812, the U.S. government needed to borrow money to pay off war debts. At this time in history, each state had its own bank. This meant that the U.S. government had to work with multiple state banks to borrow money. To solve this problem, in 1816 Congress decided to set up the Second Bank of the United States with branches in multiple states. Many of the states opposed the national bank because it meant that their state banks had to compete with the national bank for business.
Many states were unhappy with the Second Bank of the United States. One of those states was Maryland. To show its unhappiness, Maryland passed a law that required the national bank to pay a heavy tax to the state of Maryland. This was a move to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States. James McCulloch, cashier of the Baltimore branch, had to pay a $15,000 annual tax. When McCulloch refused to pay the tax, a Maryland court convicted him and fined him $2,500. He appealed the decision to the Maryland Court of Appeals and lost again. The dispute then ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States, with Chief Justice John Marshall presiding.
Did Congress have the power to establish a national bank?
McCulloch Argument:
Congress debated the creation of the national bank a few years ago. Members of Congress believed they had the right to create the Second Bank of the United States, citing the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18). The members believed that the bank was a "necessary and proper" way for Congress to conduct the financial operations of the nation. Congress referred to these as "implied powers," stating that the Constitution only provides a framework and cannot specifically outline every detail of national operations.
Maryland Argument:
The Constitution does not directly grant the power to charter a national bank. It is also not an implied power. Therefore, Congress did not have the right to establish a national bank. The states should determine the right to establish a bank.
Was the Maryland law that taxed nationally chartered banks unconstitutional, interfering with federal powers?
McCulloch Argument:
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) states that federal law takes priority over state law. The bank is a federal function which no state may interfere. If Maryland can tax the national bank, it could interfere enough to cause the bank to close.
Maryland:
Maryland is a sovereign state; it has the right to tax individuals and businesses in its state borders.
The Judgement
The Supreme Court unanimously (7–0) ruled in favor of McCulloch and the federal government. The case was important because it established a precedent for the relationships between the federal government and the state governments. It stated that the federal government had powers the Constitution did not list, known as implied powers. These implied powers granted Congress the constitutional right to establish a national bank. They said that states had the power to tax within their borders. However, the state of Maryland did not have the power to tax a federal establishment. Maryland's decision to tax the national bank was an attempt to destroy the bank. The state challenged the supremacy of federal power.
briefly explain how one specific event or historical development was used by opponents of going to war against britain in 1812
The opponents of going to war against Britain in 1812 used several events and developments to support their stance. One such event was the issue of impressment. Impressment was the practice of forcing American sailors to serve in the British Navy and had been a contentious issue since the end of the War of 1812.
This practice had led to the United States government enacting the Embargo Act of 1807, which was meant to hurt Britain economically, but also caused great hardship for American merchants. This was seen as a violation of American sovereignty and as a result, many people began to oppose the war.
The Second Great Awakening also had a role in the anti-war sentiment of 1812. This religious revival, which spread across the United States and peaked between 1820-1840, changed the spiritual and political landscape of the nation.
Finally, the anti-war sentiment in 1812 was also bolstered by a number of political developments. This included the election of James Madison to the Presidency in 1808, which signaled a new era of Democratic-Republican rule in the United States. This party was largely opposed to war, and as a result, Madison and his cabinet refused to declare war against Britain in 1812. This sentiment was further reinforced by the victory of the Federalists in the Congressional elections of 1810, which increased the power of the anti-war forces in the government.
In conclusion, the opponents of war against Britain in 1812 used a variety of events and developments to support their stance. These included the issue of impressment, the Second Great Awakening, and the rise of the Democratic-Republican Party. All of these factors contributed to the strong anti-war sentiment that eventually led to the United States avoiding war with Britain.
To know more about Second Great Awakening refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/3631198
#SPJ11
During the late-1940s and early-1950s, the term McCarthyism was used to mean what? (4 points)investigation of financial transactions to avoid taxesinvestigation of subversion at the highest levels of governmentlegislation that focused on domestic rather than foreign policyaccusation of disloyalty with little or no evidence
During the late-1940s and early-1950s, the term McCarthyism was used to mean "the accusation of disloyalty with little or no evidence."
McCarthyism is a term used to refer to the practice of accusing people of treason or subversion without sufficient evidence. The term originated in the United States during the late 1940s and early 1950s.McCarthyism was a dark period in US history in which many individuals, mostly government officials and intellectuals, were investigated and charged with being communist sympathizers or traitors to their country.
Joseph McCarthy, a US senator from Wisconsin, is often associated with this period of witch hunts and fear-mongering. The accusations were made without proper evidence and often ruined people's careers and reputations. This led to a culture of fear and suspicion in American society, with people being afraid to speak out for fear of being labeled a communist or a traitor.
While McCarthyism eventually fell out of favor, it left a lasting impact on American society. It highlighted the importance of protecting civil liberties and the rule of law, even in times of national security crises. It also demonstrated the danger of political extremism and the need for rational and evidence-based policies.
For more about McCarthyism:
https://brainly.com/question/3283958
#SPJ11
why is having white allies in a fight for racial justice so important?
White Allies dispels the myth that racial justice is exclusively the concern of people of color by demonstrating that white men and women have taken up this fight in the past, often at considerable personal danger.
What factors most exacerbate injustice?Despite the fact that racism, economic inequality, and class prejudice are some of its main causes, social injustice can damage anyone. Social injustice exists when one group is treated more favorably than another due to its wealth, power, or position.
White Allies dispels the myth that only people of color are concerned about racial justice by demonstrating how white people have historically taken up this fight, frequently at considerable personal danger. Their experiences are intended to be an inspiration, a wake-up call, and a motivator for action to act in support of equality and human dignity at a time when racial injustice is receiving more attention.
Learn more about Social injustice: https://brainly.com/question/28220571
#SPJ1
President Lincoln called for volunteers to join the U.S. military in 1861 in order
to:
A. force Southern states to rejoin the Union.
B. destroy all major cities throughout the South.
C. free enslaved African Americans being held in the South.
D. protect Northern cities from Confederate attacks.
Answer I THINK ITS C
Explanation:
President Lincoln called for volunteers to join the U.S. military in 1861 in order to force Southern states to rejoin the Union. Therefore, option A is correct.
Union refers to the United States as a single nation, encompassing all the states that are part of the federal government. During the American Civil War, the Union referred to the Northern states that remained loyal to the federal government and opposed the secession of the Southern states.
President Lincoln's call for volunteers was aimed at preserving the Union, ensuring the unity and sovereignty of the United States.
The conflict between the Union and the Confederate States was a pivotal moment in American history, testing the strength and resilience of the nation as a unified entity.
Learn more about President Lincoln here:
https://brainly.com/question/25971195
#SPJ4
Why did the Sons of Liberty dress up as Native Americans and dump tea in the Boston Harbor?
Answer:
The Sons of Liberty dressed up as Native Americans and dumped tea in the Boston Harbor as a protest against the Tea Act of 1773. The Tea Act was a law passed by the British government that imposed a tax on tea imported to the American colonies. The Sons of Liberty viewed the Tea Act as an unjust taxation without representation and a violation of their rights as British citizens. The Boston Tea Party was a symbolic act of defiance against the British government and a rallying cry for the American Revolution.
Which list includes events that all occurred during Reconstruction?A• Annexation of California• Signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe• HidalgoB • American occupation of Mexico City• Establishment of the Freedmen's Bureau• Impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson• Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment.C.• Battle of Gettysburg• Assassination of Abraham Lincoln• Bombardment of Fort SumterD .• Enforcement of the Tariff of Abominations• Passage of the Missouri Compromise• Raid at Harpers Ferry
The events that all occurred during Reconstruction are: American occupation of Mexico City• Establishment of the Freedmen's Bureau• Impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson• Ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment. So, option B is correct.
The formation of the Freedmen's Bureau, Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial, and the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment all took place in the United States during the Reconstruction era. The Mexican-American War, which took place before Reconstruction, saw the American conquest of Mexico City. There were further events connected to the Mexican-American War, such as the annexation of California and the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Before Reconstruction, there was the Civil War, which included the Battle of Gettysburg and Lincoln's assassination. The Missouri Compromise's adoption, the Harpers Ferry Raid, and the Tariff of Abominations' enforcement all took place before the Civil War.
To know more about Reconstruction era
brainly.com/question/14423201
#SPJ4
What was the name of the government established after World War 1 in Germany?
Answer:
The Weimar Republic was Germany's government from 1919 to 1933, the period after World War I until the rise of Nazi Germany. It was named after the town of Weimar where Germany's new government was formed by a national assembly after Kaiser Wilhelm II abdicated
Which of the following individuals and groups most directly supported the perspective of this cartoon?
Herbert Hoover and East Coast leaders of the Republican Party.
Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters.
American men who were eligible for the military draft.
Wendell Willkie and the progressive wing of the Republican Party.
The individuals and groups most directly supported the perspective of this cartoon is charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters. The correct option is B. charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters.
This was a popular sentiment that spread throughout the country. The given cartoon was drawn in 1940 and the cartoonist's message is that the proposed peacetime draft was a conspiracy by American industry and Great Britain to trick the United States into joining World War II.
Lindbergh said that the United States had no business being involved in the war and that it should remain neutral. He went on to say that the war was being promoted by Jews and that they were using it to enrich themselves at the expense of the United States. Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters were against the draft.
They saw it as an infringement on personal liberties and thought that it would lead to more war. They were also against the idea of fighting for other countries, as they felt that the United States should focus on its own problems. Overall, Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters were against the draft, and they most directly supported the perspective of the cartoon.
For more about perspective:
https://brainly.com/question/28272722
#SPJ11
questionwhich border state's loyalty to the union was critical to keeping washington, d.c. from being surrounded by the confederacy?responsesdelawaredelawarekentuckykentuckywest virginiawest virginiamaryland
The border states loyalty to the union that was critical to keeping Washington, D.C. from being surrounded by the confederacy was West Virginia and Maryland, the correct option is (d).
During the American Civil War, the Confederacy sought to surround and isolate Washington, D.C., which was the capital of the Union. The border state loyalty of West Virginia and Maryland was critical in preventing this from happening. In the case of West Virginia, it was formed during the Civil War when a portion of Virginia split off from the Confederacy to stay with the Union. Maryland’s strategic location between Washington, D.C., and the Confederacy made it a key state in the Union's efforts to maintain control over the capital, the correct option is (d).
To learn more about Virginia follow the link:
brainly.com/question/25232557
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
Which border state's loyalty to the union was critical to keeping Washington, d.c. from being surrounded by the confederacy? responses
a. Delaware
b. Delaware and Kentucky
c. Kentucky west and Virginia
d. West Virginia and Maryland
Americans are fond of saying, "It's a free country," yet freedom has responsibilities that go along with it. This notion of freedom is referenced in the Declaration of Independence itself. How does freedom bring both gains and losses? Explain this idea, providing an example from the Declaration of Independence to validate your opinion.
The concept of liberty is central to American culture and identity and is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence as an inalienable right. However, freedom also brings gains and losses, as it entails responsibilities and consequences.
What are the impacts of freedom for the US?On the one hand, freedom allows individuals to pursue their own goals, interests and aspirations without undue interference from outside forces. This can lead to personal growth, creativity and innovation, as well as social and economic prosperity.
Therefore, in the Declaration of Independence, the authors affirm that people have the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". This ideal of individual freedom has inspired generations of Americans to strive for their own success and fulfillment.
Find out more about Declaration of Independence on:
https://brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
In 3-4 sentences, write a brief description of the public response that followed 9/11.
How did other countries react?
Answer:
Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States, there was a widespread public response of shock, horror, and grief. The attacks led to a surge of patriotism and a sense of unity among Americans, as well as increased government surveillance and security measures. The event also triggered military action and international relations changes.
what is valhalla made of? question 7 options: the skulls of dragons the bones of conquered warriors spears and shields the wood from sunken viking ships
Valhalla is made up of the bones of conquered warriors. It is a place of strength, honor, and glory, where the bravest warriors go after their death. The Einherjar who reach this paradise will feast, drink mead with Odin, and hone their skills for the final battle.
Valhalla is a term from Norse mythology that refers to a warrior's paradise where the bravest and mightiest warriors would go after their death. According to the mythology, the Viking warriors who die in battle are carried to Valhalla by the Valkyries, where they are welcomed with a feast.
The warriors who reach this afterlife paradise are known as Einherjar. The Einherjar are not mere spirits but actual physical beings who will fight for Odin in the final battle against the giants. The Great Hall of Valhalla was the center of the afterlife, where Odin presides over the warriors with his Valkyries.
According to the mythology, Valhalla is made up of the bones of conquered warriors, and its walls are lined with shields. These shields were used by the Einherjar in their mock battles.
Know more about Valhalla here:
https://brainly.com/question/9233703
#SPJ11
in what ways did the columbian exchange affect the lives of the inhabitants of both the old and the new worlds?
The Columbian Exchange resulted in the exchange of crops, animals, diseases, culture, and ideas between the Old World and the New World.
Significant impacts of the Columbian Exchange.Exchange of crops and livestock: Crops like corn, potatoes, and tomatoes were introduced to the Old World, while crops like wheat, rice, and sugar were introduced to the New World. Spread of diseases: The Old World diseases such as smallpox, influenza, and measles were introduced to the New World, which had a devastating impact on the native populations who had no immunity to these diseases.Cultural exchange: The introduction of horses to the New World revolutionized transportation and warfare for many indigenous groups, while the introduction of gunpowder from the Old World had a significant impact on the way wars were fought in the New World.Environmental changes: The introduction of new crops and livestock had an impact on the ecosystems of both worlds, while the introduction of new plants like tobacco led to changes in the landscape and the way people used the land.Learn more about Columbian Exchange here:
https://brainly.com/question/14088518
#SPJ11
why is ponyboy surpised that the man in the ambulance doesnt realze that he johnny and dally are greasers?
Answer:
It's likely that Ponyboy is surprised because in their community, the distinction between greasers and socs (the wealthier, more privileged group) is very clear and strong. Ponyboy and his friends, Johnny and Dally, all belong to the greaser subculture that emphasizes a sense of identity and belonging through dress, hairstyle, music preferences, and social norms. For them, being a greaser is an integral part of their self-identity.
Therefore, Ponyboy assumes that the man in the ambulance would be able to identify them as greasers simply based on their appearance and attire. However, the man's lack of recognition shows that their world is not as divided as Ponyboy had believed and that socioeconomic status or subcultural affiliations are not always immediately noticeable or relevant.
______in the North depended on cotton in order to produce textiles. A. Farmers B. Merchants C. Factories D. Plantations
Answer:
C: Factories
Explanation:
The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution led to what feature of English government that was distinct from other European nations at the time?
Absolutism
Constitutional monarchy
Protestant leadership
State religion
The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution led to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy in England, which was a feature of English government that was distinct from other European nations at the time. A constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch serves as head of state within the parameters of a constitution, which limits the powers of the monarch and establishes the rights of the people. The English Bill of Rights, which was enacted after the Glorious Revolution in 1689, established limits on the power of the monarch and established the rights of English citizens. This laid the foundation for a system of government that was based on the rule of law and the rights of the people, rather than the absolute power of the monarch. This was a departure from the system of absolute monarchy that existed in many other European nations at the time, and it helped to establish England as a leader in democratic governance.
Answer: Constitutional monarchy
Explanation:
In a couple of sentences, use the graph and your knowledge of World War Il at home to compare the status of women before and after World War II.
Type your response in the box below.
Before World War II, women's participation in workforce was limited and their roles were often restricted to traditional domestic duties.
What is workforce?The workforce refers to the group of people who are available for employment and who are either currently working or seeking employment. This includes both full-time and part-time employees, as well as those who are self-employed or working on a freelance basis. The workforce is often classified into different categories, such as skilled and unskilled labor, manual and white-collar workers, and temporary and permanent employees. Workforce demographics may also be analyzed, including age, gender, ethnicity, and education level. The size and composition of the workforce can have a significant impact on the economy and businesses, as well as on social issues such as income inequality and access to employment opportunities.
To learn more about workforce, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17148967
#SPJ1
________used_______, a horribly addictive drug to create favorable trade for themselves in China unfortunately it ruined the weaker nation's ______
The British Empire used opium, a horribly addictive drug, to create favorable trade for themselves in China.
What impact does it had on the society ?Unfortunately, it ruined the weaker nation's economy and society. In the 19th century, Britain was exporting large quantities of opium to China, causing widespread addiction and social problems. The Chinese government tried to ban the drug, but the British refused to stop trading. This led to the Opium Wars, where the British military defeated China and forced them to sign unfavorable treaties, including the ceding of Hong Kong to Britain. This example highlights the unethical and exploitative practices of imperial powers, as well as the devastating consequences of addiction on individuals and society.
To know more about Opium Wars, visit :
brainly.com/question/15072997
#SPJ1
The English government became a military dictatorship under what leader?
Oliver Cromwell
Charles I
James I
William Cecil
to justify american intervention in the venezuela boundary dispute with britain, secretary of state olney invoked the a monroe doctrine. b clayton-bulwer treaty. c gentlemen's agreement. d open door policy. e platt amendment.
To justify American intervention in the Venezuela boundary dispute with Britain, Secretary of State Olney invoked the Monroe Doctrine. (option a)
The Monroe Doctrine was a foreign policy doctrine introduced by President James Monroe in 1823. It asserted that the United States would not tolerate any further colonization or intervention in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere by European powers.
Olney's application of the Monroe Doctrine to the Venezuela boundary dispute with Britain was based on the belief that the British were violating the doctrine by pursuing territorial claims in South America.
Olney argued that the United States had a duty to protect the sovereignty of the nations in the Western Hemisphere and that British actions in Venezuela threatened the security of the region.
The Monroe Doctrine has been a foundational principle of American foreign policy for nearly two centuries, and it continues to influence U.S. relations with other nations in the Western Hemisphere and beyond.
Learn more about American intervention here:
https://brainly.com/question/1621821
#SPJ11
which development in the 1950s made the ideal of the nuclear family attainable for a large fraction of the u.s. population?
Answer: a sharp rise in inflation-adjusted wages
Which if the following did not Contribute to American hysteria during the
Cold War?
A. The Rosenberg espionage case and their execution.
B. Joseph McCarthy and his speeches about communists in America.
C. Americans being encouraged to build fallout shelters.
D. The excessive growth of sub
The last option D is fully correct that is excessive growth of sub.
What is American Hysteria in cold war?Due to rising communist tensions between the US and the Soviet Union after World War II, the Cold War eventually broke out. There was growing hysteria across the country as Americans started to fear the spread of communism. Through legislation, the Eisenhower administration tried to calm American hysteria. However, American hysteria remained constant due to both their fear of communism and their failing economy.
Nash's schizophrenia would have a strangely parallel context in a world of genuine danger and occasionally paranoia. Nash referred to himself as "the communist" in a world that was divided into communist and capitalist camps.
To know about cold war visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ1
briefly describe the differences between native american cultures in different regions of north america. explain how native americans were affected by the different phases of us policy in the east between the 1780s and the 1840s, with examples mentioning specific nations or tribes. then describe something about the historical experience of native americans in the west at this time, both those living independently and those living under spanish and mexican rule.
Native American cultures varied greatly across the different regions of North America. In the east, the Iroquois Confederacy and Algonquian-speaking tribes were the most prominent. In the southeast,
there were a number of Muskogean-speaking tribes, such as the Cherokee, Creek, and Choctaw.
In the Great Plains, many tribes followed a nomadic lifestyle, including the Sioux, Cheyenne, Arapaho, and Comanche. In the southwest, the Puebloan tribes were the most prominent.
U.S. policy towards Native Americans changed drastically over time. In the 1780s, treaties were negotiated between the federal government and Indian tribes, recognizing their sovereignty over their lands. In the 1820s,
the federal government shifted its stance, attempting to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream American culture. In the 1830s, President Andrew Jackson issued the Indian Removal Act,
forcing many tribes to relocate west of the Mississippi River. This caused immense disruption and suffering, particularly among the Five Civilized Tribes in the southeast, such as the Cherokee, Seminole, and Choctaw.
Native Americans in the West experienced a complex set of historical conditions at this time. Some, such as the Apache and Ute, remained independent, while others,
such as the Navajo, Hopi, and Puebloan tribes, lived under Spanish and Mexican rule. In the late 1840s, the U.S. government established a policy of Indian reservations,
with Native Americans living on federally-designated land. This caused considerable disruption and led to the relocation of many tribes from their traditional homelands.
To know more about Native American Cultures refer this :
https://brainly.com/question/13232482?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ11
Benito Mussolini made himself dictator of ______ by promoting an aggressive brand of nationalism called fascism.
Benito Mussolini established fascism as the dominant nationalist ideology in Italy and used it to his advantage.
Fascism is a far-right political philosophy that supports militarization, radical nationalism, and a powerful centralised government run by a dictator. It fosters the concept that some people and groups are better than others and emphasises the state's priority over the individual. Fascist governments frequently repress dissent and resistance, and they may resort to violence and intimidation to further their objectives. Early in the 20th century, fascism developed in Europe, especially in Italy, and was characterised by totalitarianism, racism, and authoritarianism. The history of the world has been significantly impacted by fascism's legacy, especially during World War II.
Learn more about fascism here:
https://brainly.com/question/15080505
#SPJ4
The British governor of each colony solved colonial problems quickly. True False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Executive Branch can "check" the Legislative Branch by:
A.) Declare laws unconstitutional
B.) Nominate judges
C.) Confirm the president's nominations
D.) President can veto (say no) to congressional legislation
Chests of tea were tossed into the Boston Harbor. True False
Answer:
True. It self-explanatory, BOSTON TEA PARTY.
Why did the colonists dump the tea into the Boston Harbor?
It’s complicated, but basically the British government gave a tax concession to the British East India (BEI) company, letting it sell tea to the American colonies at a reduced price. The same concession was not given to American tea importers, who now couldn’t compete with the BEI’s prices.
That was grating enough (imagine if the government passed a law that put you out of business in order to give a big ‘foreign’ company an advantage), but the one tax that remained on BEI tea was the Townsend tax. The purpose of this tax was to pay the salaries of British officials in the colonies. Previously these officials had been paid directly by the colonies, but the British government wanted to make those officials dependent on them for their wages to insure their loyalty.
And all of this was done without the colonists having any say in the matter. Thus ‘no taxation without representation.’ They were furious that the British government was passing such laws on them without giving them any say in the matter.