The best explanation for other people's failure to intervene when witnessing the attack is the bystander effect.
What is the bystander effect?The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to the tendency for individuals to be less likely to provide assistance during an emergency situation when other people are present.
The presence of other people around makes it less likely for an individual to step forward and help, which is known as the bystander effect. The main answer for the question above is: "The best explanation for other people's failure to intervene when witnessing the attack is the bystander effect."
In the given scenario, the bystander effect is the most evident reason why other people around the subway platform did not intervene when Jay intervened and stopped the violent man from attacking the woman.
Learn more about bystander effect: https://brainly.com/question/3164279
#SPJ11
provide an exposition of the main philosophical framework of Mill’s Utilitarianism; b) Elaborate two arguments of your own against any two aspects of Mill’s account c) Mill argues that it is better to be Socrates unhappy than swine pleased. What does he mean by this claim?
Mill's Utilitarianism is the philosophical framework that stresses the maximization of happiness for the greatest number of people. It is a consequentialist philosophy that judges the morality of an action by its results.
However, the philosophical framework of Mill’s Utilitarianism has two central themes. Firstly, it suggests that individuals have the right to their liberty and autonomy, which must be respected by society and the state. Secondly, Utilitarianism proposes that actions are only right or wrong based on their consequences and the extent to which they promote the overall happiness of all individuals within a society.
Two arguments against any two aspects of Mill’s account are: Utilitarianism is a moral theory that values the consequences of our actions over the intentions behind them. This implies that an action that creates happiness for the majority of individuals in society can be considered morally right, regardless of how many individuals are adversely affected. It is, therefore, possible for Utilitarianism to justify acts of cruelty.
The second argument is that Utilitarianism may be challenging to apply practically. The primary objective of Utilitarianism is to create the maximum happiness for the greatest number of individuals.
Learn more about Mill's Utilitarianism:
https://brainly.com/question/30484900
#SPJ11
What specific topic would you use for your informative speech?
Who would be your audience? Where, specifically, would you
research?
To determine the specific topic for an informative speech, several factors need consideration, including the interests of the audience, the purpose of the speech, and the audience's previous knowledge of the subject matter. The informative speech aims to inform the audience about a particular topic in an engaging and informative way.
The following is a sample informative speech topic, audience, and research area:Topic: Artificial Intelligence Audience: University StudentsResearch Area: Library and Online databases. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a popular topic among university students. The audience already has basic knowledge of the subject matter, and they are willing to learn more about it.
Furthermore, AI is an exciting topic with vast research possibilities. Additionally, the audience can relate to the subject matter, which will make the speech more engaging.Research: To research for the informative speech, the library and online databases can be used. The library has various books, journals, and magazines with relevant information about artificial intelligence.
Online databases like JSTOR, Science Direct, and Scholar are also great research areas for gathering relevant and reliable information about AI. In summary, selecting a specific topic for an informative speech is crucial.
Learn more about Artificial intelligence
https://brainly.com/question/32692650
#SPJ11
Write a long introduction about sexual harassment by religious
preacher in Malaysia?
Sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia is a widespread problem that affects women from all walks of life.In recent years, there have been numerous reports of religious preachers using their position of power to sexually harass women.
Sexual harassment refers to any unwanted behavior of a sexual nature that is both uninvited and offensive. Such behavior may include physical advances, sexual propositions, groping, and other forms of verbal or physical abuse.
These reports have been met with outrage and calls for action from members of the public and advocacy groups alike. There have been instances of women being coerced into sexual relationships with religious leaders, while others have been subjected to lewd and obscene behavior.
There are many reasons why sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia continues to be a problem. One of the main reasons is the fact that religious figures are often held in high regard by members of the public.
This means that victims of sexual harassment may be reluctant to come forward and speak out about their experiences, for fear of being disbelieved or ostracized from their communities.
The process of addressing sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia involves a number of different steps. The first step is for victims to come forward and report their experiences to the relevant authorities.
This may involve filing a police report or reaching out to advocacy groups for support and guidance. Once a report has been made, it is then up to law enforcement officials to investigate the allegations and bring charges against the perpetrator if necessary.
This process can be lengthy and difficult, particularly if the victim does not have the support of their community or is facing other obstacles such as poverty or discrimination.
In conclusion, sexual harassment by religious preachers in Malaysia is a serious problem that requires urgent action.
While there have been some efforts to address this issue in recent years, more needs to be done to raise awareness and provide support to victims of sexual harassment. By working together, we can create a safer and more equitable society for all Malaysians.
Learn more about Malaysia: https://brainly.com/question/30975910
#SPJ11
Question 19 In "Moving toward an inclusive model of allyship for racial justice," we learned that in order to be allys, particularly aware of and allow for other identities and ideas to be brought into the conversation. Points out of 1.00 P Flag question O a. folks in privileged positions; their physical attributes O b. everyone; their physical attributes O c. folks in privileged position; space O d. everyone; power
The answer is option b. In order to be allies, everyone should be aware of and allow other identities and ideas to be brought into the conversation.
To be allies, it is important for everyone to be aware of and allow other identities and ideas to be brought into the conversation. Allyship for racial justice must not be about folks in privileged positions or their physical attributes, but it should be for everyone and their power. This implies that the concept of allyship must be inclusive, as racial justice involves all races. It should be a space where everybody's voices are heard and all ideas are acknowledged, irrespective of their racial background.
This approach is crucial in facilitating the exchange of different thoughts, perspectives, and experiences on race and racism to bring about change. Therefore, the article highlights the importance of the concept of allyship in racial justice, particularly its role in creating a conducive environment where people can address the issues of racial discrimination and bias.
To know more about racial justice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28780655
#SPJ11
PART A
Rearrange the information about the Heimlich manoeuvre procedures in the text into its correct sequence by numbering it from 1 - 10. The first step (0) has been done for you.
The Heimlich manoeuvre, also known as abdominal thrusts, is a rapid first-aid procedure to treat the conscious adult or child whohis choking. Choking occurs due to a foreign object obstructing the upper airway, typically food or toys. Alternative methods, however, should be performed for obese patients and women in late pregnancy. To begin performing the Heimlich manoeuvre, stand directly behind the adult or kneel behind a child who is choking, and encirde the person's midsection with your arms.
Continue compressions until emergency help arrives if the foreign object cannot be removed. Do not attempt the blind finger sweep manoeuvre that could be harmful for the person.
However, if the person can speak and breathe, encourage themto cough. Do not initiate theairway clearance manoeuvre, instead, arrange for a medical assessment.
Repeat the thrust until the obstruction is expelled or until medical aid arrives.
0 Before starting the rapid first-aid procedure, the severity of the airway obstruction must be determined.
After each set of chest compressions, look inside the patient's mouth before giving rescuebreaths and remove any visible obstruction that can be reached safely.
Once noticing the signs of serious airway blockade, call for emergency help and administer the first aid treatment at once
The following is the Heimlich manoeuvre procedures listed in the correct order:
Before starting the rapid first-aid procedure, the severity of the airway obstruction must be determined. (0)Once noticing the signs of serious airway blockade, call for emergency help and administer the first aid treatment at once. (1)Stand directly behind the adult or kneel behind a child who is choking and encircle the person's midsection with your arms. (2)Deliver upward and inward pressure to the person's abdomen with your fist to expel the obstruction. (3)Repeat the thrust until the obstruction is expelled or until medical aid arrives. (4)After each set of chest compressions, look inside the patient's mouth before giving rescue breaths and remove any visible obstruction that can be reached safely. (5)If the foreign object cannot be removed, continue compressions until emergency help arrives. (6)However, if the person can speak and breathe, encourage them to cough. Do not initiate the airway clearance manoeuvre; instead, arrange for a medical assessment. (7)Do not attempt the blind finger sweep manoeuvre that could be harmful to the person. (8)Alternative methods, however, should be performed for obese patients and women in late pregnancy. (9)The Heimlich manoeuvre, also known as abdominal thrusts, is a rapid first-aid procedure to treat the conscious adult or child who is choking. Choking occurs due to a foreign object obstructing the upper airway, typically food or toys. (10)
To know about Heimlich maneuver:
https://brainly.com/question/1328264
#SPJ11
It is well established that deep – level diversity
characteristics often form the basis for stereotypes.
True or false?
The statement "It is well established that deep-level diversity characteristics often form the basis for stereotypes" is true.
Deep-level diversity characteristics are attributes that are difficult to observe in others. They are often the most fundamental dimensions of diversity, such as personality, attitudes, and beliefs, among others.
Stereotypes are based on deep-level diversity traits such as race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and other characteristics. When these characteristics are used to make generalizations or assumptions about individuals, they become stereotypes.
These include attitudes, values, and religious beliefs. They are similar to hidden diversity in that they aren't distinguishable visually.
These can lead to discriminatory attitudes and actions, which can have harmful consequences for individuals and society as a whole.
To learn more about deep-level diversity, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32374628
#SPJ11
The antidepressant drugs Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are all examples of which of the following? O tricyclics OSSRIs O MAO inhibitors O benzodiazepines
The antidepressant drugs Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are all examples of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed type of antidepressant medication. They are used to treat depression, anxiety disorders, and other conditions. Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil are all examples of SSRIs.SSRIs work by increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain. Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that is responsible for regulating mood, appetite, and sleep. By increasing the levels of serotonin in the brain, SSRIs can help to improve mood and reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety.
There are several other types of antidepressant medications, including tricyclics, MAO inhibitors, and benzodiazepines. Each of these medications works in a different way and may be more or less effective for different people depending on their specific symptoms and needs.
Learn more about Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) here: https://brainly.com/question/9400805
#SPJ11
Mary is the mother of 3-year-old Hailey. Hailey tends to have a varied appetite, eating more on some days than others. She is also about eight pounds overweight. Mary frequently worries about Hailey's eating habits and urges her to clean her plate at every meal, offering snacks as rewards for eating. Explain why Mary's approach is problematic.
Mary's approach to managing Hailey's eating habits is problematic for several reasons: Pressure to clean the plate, using food as a reward, ignoring appetite variability, Focusing on weight rather than health.
Pressure to clean the plate: Mary's insistence on Hailey cleaning her plate at every meal can lead to a negative relationship with food. It teaches Hailey to ignore her natural hunger and fullness cues and overrides her ability to self-regulate her eating. This can contribute to overeating and the development of unhealthy eating patterns.
Using food as a reward: Offering snacks as rewards for eating can create an unhealthy association between food and emotional rewards. It can lead Hailey to develop an emotional dependence on food and may contribute to unhealthy eating habits in the long run.
Ignoring appetite variability: Children naturally have varying appetites, with some days eating more and others eating less. It is normal for their intake to fluctuate, and trying to force consistent portion sizes disregards their individual needs. By pressuring Hailey to eat a specific amount, Mary may disrupt her innate ability to self-regulate her food intake.
Focusing on weight rather than health: Mary's concern about Hailey being overweight may inadvertently promote an unhealthy focus on body weight rather than overall health and well-being. Placing emphasis solely on weight can contribute to negative body image, disordered eating patterns, and an unhealthy relationship with food.
A more balanced approach would involve fostering a positive food environment, providing a variety of nutritious foods, and allowing Hailey to follow her own internal hunger and fullness cues. Encouraging a healthy relationship with food, promoting enjoyable physical activities, and focusing on overall well-being rather than weight would be more beneficial for Hailey's long-term health and development.
To know more about variability, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15078630
#SPJ11
Devaluation of the testimony by cross-examination is referred to as ________ in the field of evidence.
Devaluation of the testimony by cross-examination is referred to as impeachment in the field of evidence.
Impeachment of a witness refers to the process of discrediting or undermining the credibility of a witness during a trial, by presenting evidence or asking questions that contradict their testimony or reveal a bias, inconsistency, or falsehood in their statements. It is a common strategy used by attorneys to challenge the veracity of a witness and to cast doubt on the reliability of their testimony.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court has ruled that a party may impeach a witness by cross-examining them regarding specific instances of behavior that demonstrate their lack of credibility, provided that the questions are relevant to the witness's character for truthfulness.
Thus, impeachment of an evidence is the devaluation of testimony by cross-examination.
Learn about impeachment here:
https://brainly.com/question/1411922
#SPJ12
When choosing weights for a weighted moving average, the general rule states that the most recent periods should get the ________________ weighting.
As a general rule, when choosing weights for a weighted moving average, the most recent periods should get the highest weighting.
How to Choose Weights for a weighted moving average?When choosing weights for a weighted moving average, according to the general rule, it states that the most recent periods should get the highest weighting. This means that the weight assigned to the most recent data points will be greater compared to older data points.
The rationale behind this rule is to give more importance to recent information as it may be more indicative of current trends or market conditions.
Learn more about choosing weights for a weighted moving average on:
https://brainly.com/question/31657322
#SPJ4
Choose a current event and or personal experience that
you can relate to the readings:
Write an APA formatted paper
Journal on Human Genetics.
Minimum 1300 words.
Human genetics refers to the study of inherited genes, genetic variation, and the manner in which these genetic components relate to different physiological and pathological conditions in human beings (The Human Genome Project, 2017).
The paper focuses on a current event related to human genetics, namely the rise of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. The objective of the paper is to discuss the history, benefits, ethical concerns, and potential future developments of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. History of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is a new concept that was introduced in the 1990s when the Human Genome Project was launched. The first company to offer this service was Gene Tree, which started operating in 1997 (Carroll, 2019).
Benefits of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingDirect-to-consumer genetic testing has several benefits, including the following:
Personalized medicine: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing enables individuals to understand their genetic makeup and identify the potential risk factors for different medical conditions.
Genealogy research: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing enables individuals to trace their ancestry and learn more about their ethnic background.
Reproductive health: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing enables individuals to identify genetic mutations that may be passed down to their children.
Ethical Concerns of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingDirect-to-consumer genetic testing has also raised several ethical concerns, including the following:
Accuracy of results: Some genetic testing companies have been criticized for providing inaccurate or misleading results to their clients.
Informed consent: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing may not always obtain informed consent from their clients, particularly when the test results have implications on other family members.
Data privacy: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies may share their clients' genetic information with third-party companies without their clients' consent.
Future Developments of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic TestingThe future developments of direct-to-consumer genetic testing are likely to focus on the following areas:
Wider range of tests: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies are likely to offer a wider range of tests that can identify more genetic markers associated with different medical conditions.
Integration with electronic health records: Direct-to-consumer genetic testing is likely to be integrated with electronic health records to enable healthcare providers to offer more personalized medical care.
Conclusion, direct-to-consumer genetic testing has several benefits, including personalized medicine, genealogy research, and reproductive health. However, it also raises several ethical concerns, such as accuracy of results, informed consent, and data privacy. Future developments of direct-to-consumer genetic testing are likely to focus on a wider range of tests and integration with electronic health records. The regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing is, therefore, essential to protect consumers' interests and ensure that the results are accurate and reliable.
Learn more about Human genetics visit : brainly.com/question/29548100
#SPJ11
Holland described interests as realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional. He arranged these interests in a ________ to show the relationship of the interests to one another.
Holland arranged these interests in a RIASEC or hexagonal model to show the relationship of the interests to one another.
What is the RIASEC or hexagonal model?Holland arranged these interests in a "hexagonal model" to show the relationship of the interests to one another. The hexagonal model, also known as the Holland Codes or RIASEC model, places the six interests (realistic, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, and conventional) on the vertices of a hexagon.
The model suggests that individuals possess varying degrees of each interest and that the proximity of interests on the hexagon represents their relatedness. It helps individuals understand their own interests and preferences, as well as explore career options that align with their dominant interest types.
Learn more about RIASEC or hexagonal model on:
https://brainly.com/question/10724349
#SPJ1