Como expresar

[tex]\frac{20*19*18}{4*3*2*1}[/tex]

:>

There are a few different reasons why certain categorical variables may not be allowed in a linear regression model:

Some software packages require categorical variables to be converted to numerical variables before they can be included in a linear regression model. This is typically done using one-hot encoding, where each category is represented by a binary variable indicating whether or not it is present.

If the number of categories for a given variable is very large, this can create a very large number of new variables, which may exceed the capacity of the software or the memory available on the computer running the analysis.

Some software packages may not allow categorical variables with a very large number of categories, again because of the potential computational demands of encoding these variables as binary variables.

If a categorical variable has a large number of categories relative to the sample size, it may not be possible to estimate the coefficients for each category with enough precision to be useful. Some software packages may not allow categorical variables with missing values, unless those missing values are explicitly coded as a category.

Overall, the decision to include or exclude categorical variables from a linear regression model will depend on a variety of factors, including the number of categories, the software being used, the size of the dataset, and the research question being addressed.

For more details about variables click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17344045#

#SPJ11

any number raised to a negative exponent is equal to the reciprocal of the base raised to the opposite exponent. Let's consider a number "a" raised to a negative exponent "-n". We can represent it as follows:

  [tex]a^(-n) = 1 / (a^n)[/tex] To prove this, we can use the definition of negative exponents. When we have a negative exponent, we are essentially taking the reciprocal of the number raised to the positive version of that exponent. In other words, [tex]a^{-n}[/tex] is the same as 1 / [tex](a^n).[/tex]

For example, let's take the number 2 raised to the exponent -3:

[tex]2^(-3) = 1 / (2^3) = 1 / 8[/tex] We can also represent this as the reciprocal of 2 raised to the opposite exponent:

[tex]1 / (2^{-3}) = 1 / (1 / (2^3)) = 1 / (1/8) = 8[/tex]

As we can see, both approaches yield the same result. This can be generalized to any number "a" and any negative exponent "-n".

In summary, any number raised to a negative exponent is equal to the reciprocal of the base raised to the opposite exponent. This can be proven by using the definition of negative exponents and applying it to a specific example. This property is essential in many areas of mathematics and science, including algebra, calculus, and physics.

To know more about negative exponent click here:

brainly.com/question/29009712

#SPJ4

Answer:

G (-3,-1)

H (-2,-3)

I (1,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

After a reflection across y=2, the y-coordinates of the vertices will change sign while the x-coordinates remain the same. Thus, the new coordinates of the vertices will be:

G (-3,-1)

H (-2,-3)

I (1,1)

Answer:

G (3,3) , H (2,5), I (-1,1)

Step-by-step explanation:

Since it’s flipped over the Y-Axis, the X-Axis numbers remain the same.

WRONG!!

didnt read the question correctly, so the vertices are incorrect lol.

The equation |a + 5| = −5 − a is not true for any value of a, while the equation |a + 5| = a + 5 is true for values of a greater than or equal to -5.

The absolute value of a number is defined as the distance of the number from zero on a number line. Thus, |a + 5| is equal to the distance of (a + 5) from zero on a number line. Since distance is always non-negative, |a + 5| is always non-negative.

On the other hand, the expression −5 − a is always negative, since the sum of a negative number (-5) and any number (a) is always negative.

Therefore, for the equation |a + 5| = −5 − a to be true, the absolute value of (a + 5) would have to be negative, which is impossible since absolute value is always non-negative.

For the equation |a + 5| = a + 5 to be true, a must be greater than or equal to -5, because when a is greater than or equal to -5, (a + 5) is already non-negative, so the absolute value of (a + 5) is equal to (a + 5).

To learn more about absolute value please click on below link        

https://brainly.com/question/29764645

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex]\frac{32}{15}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

afternoon=[tex]\frac{21}{3}[/tex] +[tex]\frac{11}{5}[/tex]

L.C.M=15

[tex]\frac{21+11}{15}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{32}{15}[/tex]

The probability of x being exactly 48 when it is uniformly distributed between 45 and 150 is 1/105

Since x is uniformly distributed between 45 and 150, the probability of x taking any particular value in this range is the same. Let this probability be denoted by P(x).

To find P(x = 48), we need to first check if 48 lies within the range of values that x can take. In this case, 48 lies within the range of 45 and 150, so it is a possible value for x.

Since the distribution is uniform, the probability of x taking any particular value between 45 and 150 is given by

P(x) = 1 / (150 - 45) = 1 / 105

Therefore, the probability of x being exactly 48 is

P(x = 48) = 1 / 105

Learn more about probability here

brainly.com/question/28348710

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

A random variable x is uniformly distributed between 45 and 150. what is the probability of x = 48?

The probability using the demand distribution of a stockout is given as 0.6293.

Out-of-stock situations, commonly referred to as stockouts, occur when a company runs out of a product that a client is prepared to purchase. Stockouts have a direct influence on customer satisfaction and are a major reason for bad reviews, additional expenses, and lost revenue or, worse, customers.

Let X = no of demand for the toy

μ =20,000

P(10000 < X < 30000) = 0.90

X follows  normal distribution

z=x−μ​/σ

P(10000 < X < 30000)=0.90

P((10000−20000​)/σ) < (x−20000​)/σ < (30000−20000​)/σ )=0.90

as probability is 0.90, the z-score =1.645.

(30000−20000)​/σ =1.645

10000​/σ=1.645

σ=10000​/1.645

σ=6079

1.P(X>15,000)

=P(Z> (15000−20000​)/6079)

=P(Z> −0.82)

=P(Z< 0.82)

=0.5+0.1293

=0.6293

2. P(X> 24000)

=P(Z> (24000−20000​)/6079)

=P(Z> 0.66)

=0.5−0.2454

=0.2546

3.Expected profit = (profit per unit )*(no of sold units) + (loss per unit )*(of units unsold)

profit = $8

loss = -$11

a. profit if 15000 units are sold =(8)(15000) + (-11)(0) = $120,000

b. if there is demand for 15,000 units but orders only 18000 units profit is (8)(15000) + (-11)(3000) = $87,000

c. if there is demand for 18,000 units but orders only 24000 units profit is (8)(18000)+(-11)(6000)= $78,000.

Learn more about Probability;

https://brainly.com/question/29360755

#SPJ4

Complete question:

(a) What is the expected profit if all 15,000 units are sold? type your answer...

(b) Suppose there is demand for 15,000 units, but Specialty Toys orders 18,000 units? What is the expected profit? type your answer...

(c) Suppose there is demand for 18,000 units, but Specialty Toys orders 24,000 units? What is the expected profit? type your answer... 15 3 points Based on what you know about the distribution of demand, the probability of stock-outs, and the expected profit, how many units of Weather Teddy do you recommend that Specialty Toys purchase?

Answer:

The equation 3^4 x 2^3 = 6^4+3 is incorrect.

To evaluate the left side of the equation, we first simplify each term using exponent rules:

3^4 = 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 = 81

2^3 = 2 x 2 x 2 = 8

So 3^4 x 2^3 = 81 x 8 = 648

To evaluate the right side of the equation, we simplify the exponent first:

6^4+3 = 6^4 x 6^3 = 1296 x 216 = 279936

Therefore, the corrected equation should be:

3^4 x 2^3 = 648 = 6^4 - 288

Notice that 6^4 - 288 is equal to the original value of 279936, but the equation has been written correctly by moving the 3 to the other side of the equation and changing the operation from addition to subtraction.

Three consecutive odd integers are -3, -1, and 1.

A detailed explanation of the answer.

To find 3 consecutive odd integers such that 3 times the sum of the first and second equals 13 less than the third, we can follow these steps:

Therefore, the three consecutive odd integers are -3, -1, and 1.

Learn more about consecutive odd integers.

brainly.com/question/4249096

#SPJ11

The number of participants that will not get two cups of water if Mr. Mohan is the only person that donated water, obtained using basic arithmetic operations are 40 participants

Basic arithmetic operations includes addition, subtraction, division and multiplication.

Mr. Mohan donated 8 five-litre bottles of water, which is equivalent to 40 litres of water;

8 × 5 litres = 40 litres

Each cup contains 125 ml of water which means that each liter can fill 8 cups. So the total number of cups that can be filled from the 8 five-litre bottles of water containing 40 litres of water is; 40 × 8 = 320 cups

Since each participant takes one cup at each stop and there are two stops in total, each participant will take a total of 2 cups during the walkation. This means that only 160 participants will get two cups of water if Mr Mohan is the only person who donated water.

So, 200 - 160 = '40 participants' will not get two cups of water if Mr. Mohan is the only person who donated water.

Learn more on arithmetic operations here: https://brainly.com/question/31007191

#SPJ1

Noah sold 10 small avocados and 20 large avocados.

Let's assume that Noah sold "x" small avocados and "y" large avocados.

From the given information, we can write two equations:

x + y = 30 (since Noah sold a total of 30 avocados)

0.35x + 0.50y = 13.50 (since Noah made $13.50)

Now, we can use any method to solve these equations, such as substitution or elimination. Here, we will use the substitution method:

From the first equation, we can write:

x = 30 - y

Substituting this value of x in the second equation, we get:

0.35(30 - y) + 0.50y = 13.50

Simplifying this equation, we get:

10.50 - 0.35y + 0.50y = 13.50

0.15y = 3

y = 20

Substituting this value of y in the equation x = 30 - y, we get:

x = 30 - 20 = 10

Therefore, Noah sold 10 small avocados and 20 large avocados.

Learn more about  algebraic equations:https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ11

The artifact was made about 3102.5 years ago.

An artifact from an ancient tomb contains 70% of the carbon-14 that is present in living trees, how long ago was the artifact made?

Carbon dating is used to estimate the age of organic materials, and it is used to determine the age of an artifact in this situation. The method used to estimate the age of an artifact based on its carbon-14 content is known as carbon dating. Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5,730 years. As a result, the amount of carbon-14 present in an object can be used to determine how long it has been since the object was last in contact with the atmosphere, and therefore how long it has been since it was alive.

Let C0 be the amount of carbon-14 present in living trees and C1 be the amount of carbon-14 present in the wooden artifact. After 5,730 years, C1 will have decayed to 1/2 of C0. After 2(5,730) = 11,460 years, C1 will have decayed to 1/4 of C0. After 3(5,730) = 17,190 years, C1 will have decayed to 1/8 of C0. After 4(5,730) = 22,920 years, C1 will have decayed to 1/16 of C0. After 5(5,730) = 28,650 years, C1 will have decayed to 1/32 of C0.

We'll have to solve the following equation to find the age of the artifact.

C1 = (70/100) * C0

Substitute the value of C0 into the equation and solve for t,

t = ln(0.7) / ln(1/2) = 3102.5 years

The artifact was made about 3102.5 years ago.

To learn more about carbon dating refer :

https://brainly.com/question/19264491

#SPJ11

Answer:

To solve the problem, we need to first determine the value of the quarters Anna has. Since there are 5 quarters, we have:

5 quarters = 5 x $0.25 = $1.25

Thus, Anna has $2.00 - $1.25 = $0.75 left. We can find the maximum number of dimes she can have by dividing this amount by the value of a dime, which is $0.10. Therefore:

$0.75 ÷ $0.10 = 7.5

Since Anna cannot have a fraction of a dime, we round down to the nearest whole number to get a maximum of 7 dimes. Therefore, the answer is option B, 5.

The expression represents the constraint that the amount of fat in the cookie should not deviate from the target fat content by more than 1.8 grams per cookie is |f - 5| ≤ 1.8

To express the difference between the fat in a cookie from the new recipe and the target fat content, we can use an expression. Let's represent the amount of fat in a cookie from the new recipe as f. Then, the difference between the fat in the cookie and the target fat content of 5 grams per cookie can be expressed as:

|f - 5|

The vertical bars around the expression indicate the absolute value, which means that we want the difference to be positive, regardless of whether f is greater or less than 5.

Now, we also know that the company will accept a difference of up to 1.8 grams per cookie. This means that the expression above should be less than or equal to 1.8:

|f - 5| ≤ 1.8

To know more about expression here

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

The Billing sly Cookie Company is experimenting with a new low-fat cookie recipe. The management wants the bakers to come up with a cookie that is low in fat but still has good taste. The company decides on a target fat content of 5 grams per cookie. In order to be labeled low-fat, a difference of 1.8 grams per cookie is acceptable. This means the amount of fat should be no more than 1.8 grams above 5 or no more than 1.8 grams below 5.

Write an expression that represents the difference between the fat in a cookie from the new recipe and the target fat content. Use f to represent the amount of fat in a cookie from the new recipe.

The best approximation of the volume of a cylinder with a radius of 10 mm, and a height of 5 mm using 3.14 for pi is 1,570 cubic millimeters.

The formula for calculating the volume of a cylinder is as follows:

V = πr²h

Where V is the volume, r is the radius of the cylinder, and h is the height of the cylinder.

Substituting the values given in the formula, we have :

V = πr²hV = 3.14 × (10 mm)² × (5 mm)V = 3.14 × 100 mm² × 5 mm

V = 1,570 cubic millimeters.

Therefore, the best approximation of the volume of a cylinder with a radius of 10 mm, and a height of 5 mm using 3.14 for pi is 1,570 cubic millimeters.

To learn more about volume of cylinder refer :

https://brainly.com/question/16134180

#SPJ11

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of angles comes out to be  the arc length of the given arc 6.96 inches.

The curved lines which make up the ends of a skew are divided by its highest and bottom walls using Cartesian measurements. There is a possibility who two poles will collide at an intersection. Another result of two objects interacting is an angle. They most closely mimic dihedral shapes. Two line beams can be arranged in different ways between their extremities to form a two-dimensional curve.

Here,

The following is the algorithm for an arc's length:

=> (Central angle in degrees / 360°) x (2r) equals Arc Length

where r denotes the circle's radius.

The radius and central angle in this problem are both specified as 18 inches and 22 degrees. To determine the curve length, we can use the following formula:

=> Arc Length = 2 * 18 * (2 *360)

=> (0.0611) × (36) in, where:

=>  6.96 in

To the nearest hundredth or left in terms of, the arc length of the given arc is therefore roughly 6.96 inches.

To know more about angles visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14569348

#SPJ1

If the explained sum of squares is 35 and the total sum of squares is 49, then the residual sum of squares is 14.

The total sum of squares is a measure of the total variability in a dataset. It is the sum of the squared differences between the mean of the dataset and each individual data point. The explained sum of squares is the sum of the squared differences between the predicted value of a regression line and the mean of the dataset.

The residual sum of squares is the sum of the squared differences between the predicted value of the regression line and the actual data points. It is the amount of variability in a dataset that is not explained by the regression line.To calculate the residual sum of squares for the given example, we start with the total sum of squares.

The total sum of squares is the sum of the squared differences between the mean of the dataset and each individual data point. The mean of the dataset is calculated by summing all the values and then dividing by the number of data points.

The total sum of squares is then the sum of the squared differences between the mean of the dataset and each individual data point. For the given example, the total sum of squares is 49.

The explained sum of squares is the sum of the squared differences between the predicted value of the regression line and the mean of the dataset. The predicted value of the regression line can be found using the regression equation. The explained sum of squares for the given example is 35.

The RSS is then the difference between the TSS and the explained sum of squares. For the given example, the RSS is 49 - 35 = 14.

Learn more about residual sum of squares here:

brainly.com/question/30641534

#SPJ11

Answer:

16

Step-by-step explanation:

First you figure out how many days are in 4 weeks which is 28. Then you do 448 divided by 28 which equals 16. There's your answer.

The standard deviation for a chi square distribution for given degree of freedom is 7.0711.

The chi-square distribution is parameterized by the number of degrees of freedom (df). As the number of degrees of freedom increases, the shape of the distribution becomes more symmetrical and approaches a normal distribution.

The standard deviation (σ) of a chi-square distribution with k degrees of freedom is given by the formula:

σ = sqrt(2k)

Therefore, for a chi-square distribution with 25 degrees of freedom:

σ = sqrt(2(25)) = sqrt(50) ≈ 7.0711

Rounding this to four decimal places gives a standard deviation of approximately 7.0711.

Learn more about Chi-square distribution at:

brainly.com/question/4543358

#SPJ4

An important advantage of experiments over observational studies is that experiments can control for lurking variables to have a stronger case for causation. Another advantage is that experiments can isolate the effects of a specific treatment.

What is an experiment?

An experiment is a scientific study that is designed to test a hypothesis or investigate a cause-and-effect relationship between variables. Experiments allow researchers to manipulate one variable (independent variable) and observe the effect on another variable (dependent variable) while controlling for other variables that may affect the outcome (lurking variables).

What are observational studies?

Observational studies are research designs that observe and collect data from participants without manipulating any variables. In observational studies, the researchers only observe and record what happens naturally without intervening in any way. Observational studies are used when experiments are not feasible or ethical.

What are the advantages of experiments over observational studies?

Experiments have several advantages over observational studies. Some of the advantages include:

Control over variables: Experiments allow researchers to control for variables that may affect the outcome by manipulating one variable (independent variable) and keeping all other variables constant. This helps researchers to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between variables.

Isolation of specific effects: Experiments can isolate the effects of a specific treatment by comparing outcomes between treatment groups and control groups. This helps researchers to determine the effectiveness of the treatment with a high degree of accuracy.

Similarity between treatment groups: Experiments can ensure that approximately the same number of subjects is assigned to each treatment group, thereby minimizing the effects of individual differences on the outcome. This increases the statistical power of the study and reduces the likelihood of obtaining spurious results.

Control of extraneous variables: Experiments can control for lurking variables (extraneous variables) that may affect the outcome by manipulating one variable (independent variable) and keeping all other variables constant. This helps researchers to establish a strong case for causation.

Learn more about "observational studies": https://brainly.com/question/6349766

#SPJ11

Answer: 60%

Step-by-step explanation:

As mentioned earlier, we need to know the number of senior nutrition majors and sophomore non-nutrition majors to calculate the exact probability. Without this information, we cannot provide a specific answer to the question.

However, we can provide a general formula for computing the probability, assuming that the selections are made without replacement and the population of students is large enough to assume independence:

Probability of selecting a senior nutrition major and then a sophomore non-nutrition major = (Number of senior nutrition majors / Total number of students) × (Number of sophomore non-nutrition majors / (Total number of students - 1))

Once we have the values for the number of senior nutrition majors and sophomore non-nutrition majors, we can substitute them into this formula to obtain the probability, which will be a decimal number rounded to four decimal places.

For more details about Probability click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

If your grade is 88 but you have a test that counts for 25 percent of your total grade and you get an 80, your grade will be 86.

Test scores are an essential aspect of an educational system. Teachers use them to evaluate how well students have grasped concepts or learned material from a class or course. They help in establishing the academic strength and weaknesses of the student.

The test score you got is 80, which makes 25% of the total grade you can have for this course. This means that 0.25*80 = 20 marks will be added to your final grade. Your previous grade was 88, which will not be counted with the test marks.

Hence the marks you will have for the final grade will be 88 + 20 = 108. Divide this number by 1.25 (as 25% is equivalent to 0.25), which results in 86.4. You can round it off to the nearest integer, which is 86.

Therefore, your final grade will be 86.

To know more about total grade refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/21017787#

#SPJ11

Answer:

................

Step-by-step explanation:

.................

The correct option is c: 46lb x (16 oz / 1lb). Thus, amount of medicine given for the weight of dog in ounce is 736 ounce.

The same attribute is expressed using a unit conversion, but in a different measurement unit. For example say, time can be mentioned in minutes rather than hours, and distance can be expressed in kilometres, feet, or any other measurement unit instead of miles.

Measurements are frequently offered in one set of measurements, like feet, but are required in another set, like chains. A conversion factor is a mathematical equation that facilitates an equal exchange of feet for chains.

Given data:

ratio of ounces to pounds = 16:1

16 ounce / 1 pound

Let the weight of dog in ounce be 'x'.

weight of dog in pounds = 46 pounds.

ratio : x ounce /  46 pounds

Equating both ratios:

16 ounce / 1 pound = x ounce /  46 pounds

Cross multiplying:

x = 16*46  ounce

x = 736 ounce

The correct option is c: 46lb x (16 oz / 1lb)

Thus, amount of medicine given for the weight of dog in ounce is 736 ounce.

Know more about the unit conversion

https://brainly.com/question/141163

#SPJ1

Complete question is-

The ratio of ounces to pounds is 16:1. A veterinarian is treating a dog that weighs 46 pounds. To calculate the correct amount of medicine, the vet must convert the dog's weight

ounces. Which ratio shows the conversion to ounces?

The full question is attached.

The solution for the inequality is obtained as: x =>-2

In mathematics, "inequality" refers to a relationship between equations or values that is not equal to each other. Hence, inequality emerges from a lack of balance.

The given  inequality

-5x + 2 <= 12`

Subtract each side by - 2

-5x + 2 - 2 <= 12 - 2

-5x <= 10

Dive each side by -5 (it will reverse the sign)

-5x / -5 => 10/-5

x  => -2

Thus, the solution for the inequality is obtained as: x =>-2

Know more about the inequality of the number

https://brainly.com/question/24372553

#SPJ1

The required length of y representing the length of the cut piece from each corner of triangle to form regular octagon is equal to 2√2cm.

Let us consider the length of the side of the square card be x

Cut the corners of the triangle of length y cm.

Then as triangles at the corner are right angled triangle.

Using Pythagoras theorem we have,

Each side of the regular octagon is same as hypotenuse .

Hypotenuse = √y² + y²

⇒Hypotenuse = y√2

Length of each of regular octagon = y√2

Perimeter of the octagon = 8y√2

⇒8y√2 = 32

⇒ y = 4/√2

⇒ y = 2√2cm.

Therefore, the length of y with the given perimeter of the regular octagon is equal to 2√2cm.

learn more about octagon here

brainly.com/question/28595274

#SPJ4

In San Antonio, Texas it rain more in a year, on average when compared to Austin, Texas according to the mean of both cities.

Data of Austin, Texas is as follows:

36.00, 21.41, 52.27, 22.33, 34.70, 46.95, 16.07, 31.38, 37.76 and 19.68.

Number of values ( n ) = 10

Sum of the values = 318.23

Average of the rainfall in Austin, Texas is equal to:

Mean = Total sum / No. of Values

Mean = 318.23 / 10

Mean = 31.82 in

Data of San Antonio, Texas is as follows:

46.27, 28.45, 45.32, 16.54, 21.34, 47.25, 13.76, 30.69, 37.39 and 17.59.

Number of values ( n ) = 10

Sum of the values = 304.6

Average of the rainfall in San Antonio, Texas is equal to:

Mean = Total sum / No. of Values

Mean = 304.6 / 10

Mean = 30.46 in

So, comparatively the average of San Antonio is higher.

Therefore in San Antonio, Texas it rain more in a year, on average when compared to Austin, Texas.

Learn more about Mean:

https://brainly.com/question/12513463

#SPJ1

Answer: The correct answer is "Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to oppose the company's claim."

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test

The probability of selecting a sample of 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs is then given by p^5, where p is the probability of not having a defective bulb.

In this situation, the probability of selecting a sample of 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs is calculated using the binomial distribution. The probability of success, p, is the probability that a single lightbulb is not defective, and the probability of failure, q, is the probability that a single lightbulb is defective. The probability of selecting 5 lightbulbs with no defective bulbs is then given by the equation:

P(x=0) = (p^5)*(q^0) = p^5

In this case, p is the probability of not having a defective bulb, and q is the probability of having a defective bulb. The probability of selecting 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs is then given by p^5.

For example, if the probability of not having a defective bulb is 0.95 and the probability of having a defective bulb is 0.05, then the probability of selecting a sample of 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs is 0.95^5 = 0.7737. This means that there is a 77.37% chance of selecting a sample of 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs.

To sum up, the probability of selecting a sample of 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs is calculated using the binomial distribution. The probability of success is the probability of not having a defective bulb, and the probability of failure is the probability of having a defective bulb. The probability of selecting a sample of 5 lightbulbs without any defective bulbs is then given by p^5, where p is the probability of not having a defective bulb.

The correct question is:

A box contains 100 bulbs, out of which 10 are defective. If a sample of 5 lightbulbs is selected, find the probability that none in the sample are defective

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

There are n x (n-1) number of ways for the speaker and vice speaker to be selected in the demonstrator's party, where n is the number of members in the party.

For the demonstrator's party, the first position of the speaker can be filled by any of the n members. After the speaker is chosen, there are n-1 members left to select from for the position of vice speaker. Therefore, the total number of ways the speaker and vice speaker can be selected is n x (n-1).

For example, if the demonstrator's party has 4 members, there are 4 choices for the speaker position. After the speaker is chosen, there are 3 choices left for the position of vice speaker. So, the total number of ways to select a speaker and vice speaker in the party is 4 x 3 = 12.

This formula can be applied to any size of the party to determine the total number of possible ways to select a speaker and vice speaker.

To know more about number of ways, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29110744#

#SPJ11